• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제21권3호
• /
• pp.198-205
• /
• 2021

For twenty years, in the EU there has been a trend of a lack of maritime infrastructure and a redundance of the road one, which has a negative impact on the economy. The intermodal transport market structure in the EU has not changed over the past ten years. The stability of transport systems due to the lack of changes in the transport market remains under threat, affecting supply chains and networks through the optimization of warehousing and transportation costs. The research methodology is based on a quantitative assessment of cause-and-effect relations between economic growth and transport and logistics in the EU. A statistical analysis of security indicators, intermodal and modal transport, international trade in goods within the EU and in the world trade in goods, the dynamics of GDP of the EU countries, the level of openness of the EU economy, investment and maintenance costs of different modes of transport and infrastructure has been carried out. The results show that in 2000- 2010 there were positive changes in the transport and logistics infrastructure of the EU, which had a positive effect on trade, openness of the economy of the EU, GDP growth. However, at that time, negative effects of environmental impact and the load on road and rail transport were accumulating. Investment in different modes of transport is limited, and technical maintenance and infrastructure maintenance costs form a significant part of GDP of the EU. A slowdown in economic growth leads to budget constraints and infrastructure financing gap. As a result, the freight and passenger intermodal and modal transport market structure remains virtually unchanged. The load on rail and road transport remains stable, despite the reduced level of transport hazards. Transport productivity has declined over the past ten years. Herewith, the intensification of trade and the openness of the EU economies require constant modernization and innovative renewal. The EU policy in this direction remains normative, uncontrolled, which is reflected in investment differences within the EU and maintenance costs.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제9권2호
• /
• pp.25-30
• /
• 2011

Transport is animportant sector of government regulation. Every country has its own transport policy, but European countries are evolving a common transport policy, which has a long history. The establishment of a consistent common policy in the EU's transport sector is still underway. The key motivations of this policy are 1) to establish and implement a common transport policy, 2) to clarify the concept of sustainability in the transport sector, and 3) to integrate transport services into a common infrastructure. One of the policy's objectives is the progressive movement towards sustainable development in the transport section. The EU'stransport policy has recognised that intermodality is a very important competitive tool. The EU's policy thrustin intermodal transport can be catergorised into infrastructure, technology, and standards and rules. However, obstacles to success can be detected. Cases like that of TEN-T and Marco Polo illustrate European intermodal policies in practice. As regards sustainability in the transport sector, intermodality can be an alternative solution to the increasing imbalance between transport modes and congestion arising from increased road use. Sustainability has been emphasised by the EU, which aims to establish intermodality in its future alternative transport systems while fostering sustainable development in the transport sector. Therefore, intermodality can be defined as a general trend in the current transport market, drawing interest from public institutions and transport-related market players. The EU has thus made an effort to facilitate intermodality in its territory, materialised through various policy options. Therefore, looking into the EU's intermodal transport policies is worthwhile, as doing so can provide useful lessons for all concerned parties.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.207-232
• /
• 2013

FTA상의 특혜관세 혜택을 누리기 위해서는 무엇보다도 수출입기업 스스로가 해당 FTA협정상의 원산지 규정 등에 대한 내용을 정확히 이해하고 올바로 활용할 수 있는 능력을 배양하는 것이 중요하다. 또한 FTA는 본질적으로 기업들에게 혜택을 주는 제도이지만 그에 따른 의무와 엄격한 충족을 전제로 하는 것이기 때문에 협정상 선결요건의 정확한 이해와 적용도 중요하다. 본 연구는 한 EU FTA 원산지의정서 제13조에 규정되어 있는 직접운송 요건을 충족하는지의 여부와 관련하여, 최근 관세청에 접수되어 결정이 내려진 심사청구사례를 분석하는 것이다. 이를 위하여 우선 한 EU FTA하에서 원산지규정과 협정관세적용을 위한 직접운송 요건의 적용 법리를 분석을 토대로, 본 사례의 사실관계와 대상결정 및 본건 관련법령과 결정내용을 상세하게 분석한 후, 본 사례가 수출입기업들에게 주는 시사점과 실무상의 대응책 및 제도적 보완방안을 구체적으로 제시하고자 한다. 한편 본 연구는 국내외 학술문헌을 분석도구로 활용하는 문헌분석적 연구방법과 한 EU FTA 협정문의 주요내용을 법리적으로 분석하는 법리적 연구방법을 주로 채택하였다. 이외에 문헌연구의 한계를 극복하고 객관성을 향상시키기 위하여 심사청구되어 관세청이 결정한 최근의 사례를 분석하여 관련분야에 인용하는 사례분석적 연구방법도 병행하였다.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권10호
• /
• pp.123-133
• /
• 2015

Purpose - The Korean government has devised intermodal transportation policies and granted subsidies to shippers and logistics companies that made a conversion of transportation means through the policies. This provides support by expanding the complex uniform railroad transportation and overhauling the deteriorated railroad facilities. As for 2013, however, the freight transportation percentage of railroad was 4.5% in tons and 8.5% in ton kilometers. Meanwhile, since the 1990s, developed countries such as the U.S. and Europe have been trying to expand intermodal freight transport with a legal and institutional support to build a logistics system corresponding with social and economic environmental changes. In this study, I set out to examine the effects of the intermodal freight transport policies in the EU and the U.S., and to explore the direction of setting up a rail intermodal transport system in South Korea. Research design, data, and methodology - The paper used a qualitative research methodology through the literature review. First, was an overview of Intermodal transportation in the EU, U.S. and UN. Second, it describes the development of transport in Europe and the U.S. with particular emphasis on intermodal freight transport. Third, it explores the direction of setting up a intermodal freight transport in South Korea. The last section contains concluding remarks. Results - As for the EU, it has been promoting integration between transport and intermodal logistics network designs while utilizing ITS or ICT and supports for rail freight intermodal by giving reduction to a facilities fee or subsidizing for rail freight in order to minimize the cost of external due to freight transport. On the other hand, as for the U.S., it has been made up of an industrial-led operating project and has been promoting it to improve accessibility between intermodal hubs and cargo terminals through intermodal corridor program, and an intermodal cargo hub access corridor projects, etc. Moreover, it has tried to construct intermodal transport system using ITS or ICT and to remove Barrier. As a result, in these countries, the proportion of intermodal freight transport is going to be the second significant transport compared with rail and maritime transport. An Effective rail intermodal transport system is needed in South Korea, as seen in the case of these countries. In order to achieve this object, the following points are required to establish radical infrastructure policy; diversify investment financing measures taken under public-private partnerships, legal responsibilities, improvement of utilization of existing facilities to connect the railway terminal and truck terminal, and enhancement service competitiveness through providing cargo tracking and security information that combines the ITS and ICT. Conclusions - This study will be used as a basis for policy and support for intermodal freight transport in South Korea. In the future, it is also necessary to examine from the perspective of the shipper companies using the rail intermodal transport, ie, recognition of shipper, needed institutional supports, and transportation demand forecasting and cost-effective analysis of the railway infrastructure systems improvement.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제48권
• /
• pp.57-76
• /
• 2010

This study reviews maritime transport policy regarding liner conference and the changes in the liner market over the decades. Liner shipping industry has long been protected from competition by block exemption. To prevent excessive competition in punctual operation and its inelastic market structure, liner shipping companies formed conferences that are protected to fix the prices under the law. In the US, deregulation in transport sector began from 80's and continuing with OSRA 1998, conferences were dissolving. On the other hand, the EU with close conference system, Regulation 4056/86 contained block exemption remained in force for unlimited time without review clause. However, in Oct 2008, the EU has announced its removal, and conferences were no longer permitted to fix the price nor exchange information. Although OSRA 1998 has already broken up conferences by allowing individual service contracts, but the repeal of the immunity for price fixing will alter significantly the rule on cooperation in the industry since it is a unilateral move by the EU, especially in transatlantic lane. There are rapid changes in shipping market getting much more complicated, and with removal of 4056/86 allowing the market to be more competitive, opening up the industry with far more diverse strategic options. Hence this paper reviews on liner shipping industry and its changes of policies over the years from protected market to open competition market of today.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제11권5호
• /
• pp.455-464
• /
• 2008

최근 유럽의 교통시장은 이전과는 다른 큰 변화를 겪고 있다. 변화의 핵심은 지역통합에 따른 철도교통망의 정비와 철도교통시장의 개방과 경쟁체제의 도입이다. 유럽위원회(European Commission)는 정책적으로 서비스 향상을 위해 시장을 개방하고 새로운 사업자의 진입보장을 추진하고 있다. 본 논문에서는 철도교통의 경쟁가능성의 검토와 사례분석을 통한 경쟁의 성과를 살펴보고 우리나라에의 적용방향을 제시하였다. 철도교통의 경우 국가운영이라는 특수성과 높은 투자비용 등으로 경쟁보다는 쪽-전성이 인정되어 왔다. 그러나 최근 유럽의 경우, 유럽연합이라는 특수성과 유럽각국이 가지고 있는 지방권이라는 개념을 통해 중앙정부와 지역단위에서 경쟁체제의 도입이 추진되고 있다. 여기에서는 사례분석을 통해 경쟁체제를 도입한 국가에서 수송량 향상이라는 성과가 나타나고 있다고 분석하고, 이는 향후 가속화될 것이라고 전망하였다. 아울러 철도교통시장에서의 경쟁체제의 도입가능성에 대해 논의가 이론적으로나 경험적으로 보다 더 활성화될 수 있다는 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 향후 우리나라의 경우도 향후 철도서비스의 향상과 비용절감 등을 위해 철도시장의 경쟁체제를 도입하는 문제를 심각하게 검토해 볼 필요가 있다고 하겠다. 이를 위해서는 철도시장의 성장가능성, 새로운 경쟁자의 참여 가능성, 비용구조와 PSO의 보다 정확한 정의, 기술적인 문제의 해결 등 선결조건에 대한 면밀한 검토가 의다 깊게 이루어져야 할 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제68권
• /
• pp.23-42
• /
• 2015

According to the increasing attention to safety and security in maritime shipping, there are diverse security systems in international logistics activities. Although prior studies on maritime transport and port security reviewed security policy and practices in order to provide useful insights for strategic agenda, a few focused on attitude to respond it. Moreover, there are no prior study on a comparative study between continents. To tackle this, this paper compared confrontation attitude to maritime transport and port security between South Korea and European Union. Results identified that maritime shipping security incorporates container cargo security management, logistics security management, logistics security certificate system, and environmental impacts management caused by maritime shipping. Further, the comparison between two countries suggests that South Korea need to take more positive attitude to respond, such as investment in equipment and technologies for maritime shipping security, construction of comprehensive management system, political supports for logistics security, and training and education for safety and security. The results provide useful insights for strategic review of security systems in South Korea, and to help strategic agenda for future improvement.

• 한국철도학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국철도학회 2008년도 추계학술대회 논문집
• /
• pp.695-697
• /
• 2008

Reduction of $CO_2$ emission is one of major issues in the whole industries, especially transport system. Railroad companies in the advanced countries such as EU, Japan, etc. have made great efforts on the improvement of their systems including energy sources, operational efficiency and PR of achievement resulted. Recently, to emphasize the environment-friendly characteristics of the railroad as public transport, the importance of PR is emerging. The achievements were listed in annual, sustainability and corporate responsibility reports. And the superiority of railroad in $CO_2$ emission can be confirmed in web sites and simple advertizing materials. In this study, we proposed the PR programs of achievement and ongoing works in Korean railroad through the case studies on web-based and off-line programs of railroad companies in EU and Japan.

• 한국철도학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.108-118
• /
• 2010

본 논문은 1948년 영국철도의 국유화이후 최근 2007년까지 철도정책의 변화과정을 분석하였다. 영국철도는 철도국유화 이후 1994년 민영화 그리고 2000년 대형 철도사고 이후 정부기능 강화, 철도를 통한 환경문제의 적극적인 해결, EU철도법의 국내법 적용 등 새로운 변화가 나타나고 있다. 본 논문에서는 1948년 이후 각 정당의 철도정책과 정책변화요인 그리고 민영화이후의 정책에 따른 수송량의 등의 변화 등을 정성적으로 분석하였다. 본 연구에서 영국철도정책의 변화는 집권정당의 이념, 교통 혼잡과 지구온난화, EU통합철도운영 등의 외부적 요인과 철도사고 등의 내부요인 등에 기인하는 것으로 분석되었다. 본 연구에서 밝혀낸 영국철도정책의 특징은 첫째 철도정책이 국유화, 민영화를 거듭하면서도 어느 정도 일관된 철도정책이 있었다는 것이다. 이는 1974년 철도법이후 철도의 사회적 역할에 대한 명확한 인식에서 비롯한다. 두 번째로는 철도를 도로와 연관하여 생각하는 종합교통정책이 지속되었다는 것이다. 세 번째로는 환경문제의 해결에 철도가 적극적인 역할을 하고 있다는 것이다. 이러한 변화는 새로운 철도정책을 모색하는 우리에게 시사점을 주고 있다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제43권
• /
• pp.371-393
• /
• 2009

The biggest issue of the current international maritime transport is that EU had decided to apply the Competition Law about Shipping Conference since 2008 and UNCITRAL Convention which is the substitute of international rules related with existing maritime transport passed UN General Assembly. This movement indicates that international rules of international maritime transport are not focusing on shipping companies or forwarders anymore but consignors. According to the current circumstances, it is time for us to convert existing shipping companies and forwarders centered rules system into consignors centered international rules system as well. Thus, this study has compared and analyzed between each country's law of Shipping Conference and Korean governing law, Ocean Shipping Act.