• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제27권1호
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2018

환경영향평가를 수행하는데 있어 평가 대상항목을 선정하는 것은 매우 중요한 과정이다. 우리나라도 타 국가들과 마찬가지로 환경영향평가 수행에 앞서 평가 대상항목을 선정하는 과정을 거친다. 그러나 현재 "환경영향평가법시행령"에 규정된 평가항목을 사업특성에 따른 구분 없이 거의 그대로 적용하고 있어 대상사업의 특성을 반영한 효율적인 평가가 수행되는데 어려움이 있다. 또한 규정된 환경영향평가 항목을 상황에 따라 변화시키기 어려운 구조적 한계로 인해, 평가항목이 현재의 사회적 요구와는 괴리되어 있는 부분이 있다. 이에 본고에서는 현행 평가항목의 이용도와 실효성 검토를 바탕으로 국 내외 사회적 여건변화를 반영하여 평가항목의 조정안을 제안하고자 한다. 더불어 향후에도 환경영향평가 항목이 효과적으로 선정될 수 있도록 평가항목 운영상의 개선안을 제안하고자 한다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제7권1호
• /
• pp.117-123
• /
• 1998

The present study was performed to improve the Environmental Impact Assessment system by comparing and analysing EIA systems for Residential Developments in the light of the business practice. For the improvement of EIA system, future strategies from each of three part ; the organ of approval(Construction&Transportation Dept.) for residential developments, the organ of consultation(Environment Dept.) for EIA and a developer(Korea Nation Housing Corp.), were analysed, and EIA systems and the processes of Residential developments were analysed. Results from the analysis of problems have provided a proposal for improvement of the Environmental Impact Assessment.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제23권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2014

This study, focusing on the area expansion of limestone mines, identifies the problems of Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) and what impact the current problems exert on another mines developing process. The legal relations analysis reveals that the Management of Mountainous Districts Act and other related laws effect on EIA process, especially the case of area expansion of limestone mines excluded from EIA. However, these problems can create mismatch with the policy goal of EIA system and have a negative impact on the environment in the future. A series of indepth interviews with managers in related agencies found that those agencies have been unaware of the seriousness of the problem. Without any strategy, negative result made by development activities would get more serious and sustainable development may not be possible at all. In order to solve these problems, government should modify the current interdependent legal provision and create the incentive structure to participate actively related agency in the EIA system.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 1995

Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) in Korea has developed as a tool for environmental conservation and decision making since Environmental Impact Statement(EIS) preparation in 1981. For effective implementation of it, we do system development and method enhancement continuously. The recently introduced GIS (Geographic Information System) can integrate geographic and attribute data, which will be applied to scoping, assessment, and alternative assessment, etc. in EIA. This study has three major components. First, it explains building of EIA factors of natural environment, living environment, and socio-economic environment of the study area defined in EIS preparation regulation. Second, the study presents applications of assessment method concerning suitability analysis of landfill site using GIS. Finally, it shows integration of GIS and odor impact assessment. Based on these analysis, the study makes some recommendations and conclusions.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.49-60
• /
• 2021

환경영향평가 실무자들은 환경영향평가 정책을 수립하는데 매우 중추적인 역할을 하며, 환경영향평가 시행 시에는 이해관계자와의 정보공유, 의견조율 등을 통하여 환경 갈등을 예방하고 해소할 수 있다. 따라서 환경영향평가 정책 및 시행 등 시스템 전반에 대하여 실무자를 포함한 이해관계자의 인식을 파악하는 것은 환경영향평가의 개선 방향 및 정책 방향 설정에 도움이 될 수 있다. 그러나 현재 한국에서 시행되고 있는 환경영향평가 제도 및 운영에 대한 이해관계자의 인식 및 이해에 대한 정보는 부족한 상황이다. 그러므로 본 연구는 의사결정 수단이며, 환경 정보 분석기법을 통해 악영향을 최소화할 수 있는 사전예방적 기법인 환경영향평가 제도에 대해서 운영 및 절차상의 문제점들을 진단하고, 향후 환경영향평가 제도의 개선점과 시스템의 보완점을 모색하고자 하였다. 37개의 질문의 온라인 설문조사를 통해 환경영향평가 이해관계자 95명의 응답을 정리하였다. 이해관계자들은 현행 제도의 운영과 평가서 작성의 문제점 등에 대해 인식하고 있었으며, 이를 반영하여 나타났다. 부정 응답률(불만족 및 매우 불만족)이 높게 나타난 평가서 작성 기간 및 비용(49%), 새로운 방법의 도입(46%), 주민의견수렴 및 갈등관리의 항목(41%)은 추후 우리가 더 보완해야 할 부분이라 판단된다. 사회가 빠르게 발전하면서 제도도 그에 맞추어 보완이 필요하며, 조사결과 부정 응답이 높은 항목들에 대해 정책적인 개선 노력이 필요하다.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.21-30
• /
• 1992

Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) is developing as a tool for environmentally sound and sustainable development in Korea. For more effective implementation of it, we try to apply Environmental Information System (EIS) to EIA process. EIS is composed of geographic and attribute data related to environment and Geographic Information System(GIS), and it will be applied to scoping, prediction, and alternative assessment, etc. in EIA. This study focuses on application of geographic data using GIS in suitability analysis of alternative assessment. We use TIN, buffering, and overlaying in GIS functions.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.13-25
• /
• 1993

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) serves to identify a project's possible effects on the environment early enough sufficiently allowing for them to be taken into account in the decision-making process. The EIA in Germany is an instrument of environmental Policy which considers nature as an integrated system (ecosystem). In the german process of developing environmental policy, the EIA has been one of the instruments which introduced by law rather late. This means that the German Law of EIA has been made in 1900, 20 years after the beginning of the environmental policy in Germany. In the following paper I intend to ${\cdot}$ explain the basic concept of the EIA in Germany ${\cdot}$ describe the process of law building for EIA ${\cdot}$ give a short overview of applications and experiences with EIA ${\cdot}$ show the links between EIA and general environmental policy in Germany.

• 환경위생공학
• /
• 제8권1호
• /
• pp.29-47
• /
• 1993

The purpose of this study is to improve institution of EIA(Environmenta1 Impact Assessment) in Korea. For this study, institution of EIA in Korea and other countries and copies of EIS prepared in Korea were analyzed. As a result, improvements of EIA should require introducing EIA in projects and planning level, building environmental information system, estimating appropriate costs of EIS preparation.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제9권4호
• /
• pp.315-322
• /
• 2000

Environmental Impact Assessment(EIA) was first formally established in the Korea in 1981. Subsequently there has been a rapid growth in EIA activity, and over one hundred fifty environmental impact statements are now published in Korea each year. Although EIA now has almost 20 years of history in the Korea, elsewhere the development of roles and practice is more recent. Development is moving apace in many countries, including the Japan and the EU Member States. Such progress has not been without its problems, and a number of the current issues in EIA-scope of the assessment, the relative roles, the quality of assessment and monitoring and auditing after decision, and so on- are highlighted. So the purpose of this article is to reform the EIA roles and process, in extending the scope of activity, and assessing effectiveness. This article suggested improving the effectiveness of project assessment, widening the scope: stretegic environmental assessment, and extending EIA to project design process, environmental monitoring and feedback system.

• 환경영향평가
• /
• 제15권3호
• /
• pp.165-178
• /
• 2006

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS) are perceived by many to be separate environmental tools. EIA serves as a systematic and predictive tool for assessing the potentially significant impacts of developments on the environment. An EMS, on the other hand, is used to consider the key impacts of operational businesses on the environment. The main difference to note is that during the EIA process impacts on developments are predicted. A proposed development has yet to be built and therefore an element of uncertainty is associated with these assessments. With an EMS, the business or organization's processes are already in operation. Even though there is also an element of prediction involved, it is a comparatively easier task to investigate what the environmental impacts of these processes are. However, in contrast with the orientation of EIA to further development actions, EMS involves the review, assessment and incremental improvement of an existing organization's environmental effects. EMS can thus be regarded as a continuation of EIA principles into the operational stage of a policy, plan, program and project. EIA may be carried out without fully supporting necessary informations to EMS.