Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Linkage between Environmental Imact Assessment and Environmental Management System in Korea

한국에서의 EIA와 EMS의 연계방안 연구

  • Kim, Im-Soon (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Han, Sang-Wook (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Hea Sam (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kang, Seon-Hong (Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Kwon (Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Kwangwoon University)
  • 김임순 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 한상욱 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 김혜삼 (광운대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 강선홍 (광운대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김대권 (광운대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2006.01.25
  • Accepted : 2006.05.20
  • Published : 2006.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Environmental Management Systems (EMS) are perceived by many to be separate environmental tools. EIA serves as a systematic and predictive tool for assessing the potentially significant impacts of developments on the environment. An EMS, on the other hand, is used to consider the key impacts of operational businesses on the environment. The main difference to note is that during the EIA process impacts on developments are predicted. A proposed development has yet to be built and therefore an element of uncertainty is associated with these assessments. With an EMS, the business or organization's processes are already in operation. Even though there is also an element of prediction involved, it is a comparatively easier task to investigate what the environmental impacts of these processes are. However, in contrast with the orientation of EIA to further development actions, EMS involves the review, assessment and incremental improvement of an existing organization's environmental effects. EMS can thus be regarded as a continuation of EIA principles into the operational stage of a policy, plan, program and project. EIA may be carried out without fully supporting necessary informations to EMS.

Keywords

References

  1. 김임순외, 2003, 전략환경평가의 제도화 동향과 국내도입방안, 환경영향평가, 12 (13), 171-181
  2. 김임순 외, 2004a, 전략환경평가를 통한 환경평가의 개선방안에 관한 연구, 환경정책, 12(12), 81-110
  3. 김임순 외, 2004b, 도표로 본 환경평가, (주)블랙박스, p.13
  4. 김임순 외, 2005a, 대안적 환경평가 시스템연구: 통합적 의사결정을 위한 새로운개념의 영향평가 모형 (APEMI IA MODEL)의 국내 적용방안탐색, 환경영향평가, 14 (4), 179-193
  5. 김임순 외, 2005b, 환경평가와 환경경영의 연계방안, 연강학술논문집, 연강재단, pp.5-61
  6. 이병욱, 1998, EMS론, 비봉출판사, pp.381-407
  7. 코오롱 건설, 1999, 코오롱 건설 환경관리지침서
  8. 한국철도시설공단, 2004a, 품질EMS시스템
  9. 한국도로공사, 2004b, 환경관리매뉴얼
  10. 환경부, 2005, 지속가능경영추진 가이드라인, p. 1
  11. 한국표준협회, 2004, KS A ISO 14001, 환경경영 시스템 요구사항 및 사용지침
  12. 한국표준협회, 2004, KS A ISO 14004, 환경경영시스템-원칙, 시스템 및 지원기법에 대한 일반지침
  13. 한상욱, 199 5, 환경친화적 기업경영, 도서출판 동화기술, pp.133-168
  14. 한상욱, 1999, 환경영향평가제도, 도서출판 동화기술, pp.257-301
  15. 한상욱, 2001, 환경영향평가제도, 도서출판통화기술 p . 389
  16. Barry Sadler, 1996, International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, pp.1-36
  17. Barry Dalal-Clayton and Barry Sadler, 2005, Strategic Environmental Assessment, pp.1-113
  18. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2000, Strategic Environmental Assessment in South Africa pp.10-36
  19. IAIA, 1999, Principes of Environmental Impact Assessment Best Practice., pp.1-4
  20. IAIA, 2002, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Performance Criteria, Special Publication Series No.1., p1
  21. IAIA, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, Annual Conference Program
  22. IAIA, 2006, Power, poverty and sustainability, The role of impact assessment, 26th Annual Conference, International Association for Impact Assessment, Abstracts volume 23 - 26 May 2006 Stavanger Forum Stavanger, Norway
  23. ICON, 2001 , SEA and Integration of the Environment into strategic Decirin Making, European conununication Contact No.B43040199/136634/MAR134, p8
  24. Joe Weston, 1997, planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice pp.141-163
  25. John Glasson, et al. , 2005 , Instruction to Environmental Impact Assessment, Third Edition, edition, pp.334-338
  26. Jose Ants, 1998, EIA follow-up on the Role of EX point evolution in Environmental Impact Assessment, pp.177-238
  27. Jos Arts, Paul Tomlinson and Henk Voogd Contact information authors, 2005, EIA and SEA tiering: the missing link? Position Paper Conference on 'International experience and perspectives in SEA' International Association of Impact Assessment 26-30 September 2005, Prague
  28. Larry W. Canter, 1996, Environmental Impact Assessment, second edition pp.36-55, pp.637-651
  29. Sofia, 2002, Manual Environmental Assessment Planning and Progranunes in Bulgalia, pp.5-15
  30. THE NEPA TASK FORCE, 2003, Modernizing NEPA Implementation, THE NEPA TASK FORCE REPORT TO THE COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, September 2003, pp. 44-90
  31. UNEP, 2002, UNEP Environmental impact Assessment Training Resource Manual, Second Edition, pp.533-547
  32. UNEP, 2004, Environmental Impact Assessment and Strategic Environmental Assessment: Towards an Integrated Approach, pp.113-133
  33. United Nations, 2002, Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg South africa, 26, August-4 September, 2002 pp.1-72
  34. USCEQ, 1997, THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POllCY ACT: A Study of Its Effectiveness After Twenty-five Years, Council on Environmental Quality Executive Office of the President January 1997, pp.44-56