• 한국응급구조학회지
• /
• 제18권2호
• /
• pp.95-108
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This descriptive study examined awareness of and ethical attitudes associated with Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders in 119 emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Method: In total, 255 paramedics and basic EMTs completed questionnaires between March and May, 2013. Data were analyzed using the SPSS WIN 18.0 program. Results: A chi-square analysis revealed significantly different responses given by paramedics and basic EMTs: Paramedics gave "the reason in which DNR is not necessary", as being "due to unclear DNR decision time" whereas basic EMTs answered that this was "due to a legal problem" ($x^2$ = 12.680, p < .05). Paramedics disagreed with the statement, "It is natural for medical teams to have less interest in patients with DNT orders", whereas basic EMTs agreed with the statement ($x^2$ = 6.666, p < .05). Conclusion: A unified manual on attitude toward DNR orders, taking account of social and culture factors, needs to be developed. This research provides a base line for future research.

• 임상간호연구
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.73-84
• /
• 2010

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the ethical awareness and attitude of patients' families towards Do-Not-Resuscitate(DNR), and thus provide basic information required to develop Korean appropriate DNR instructions and practice informed consent for DNR. Methods: During April 2010, 219 patient family members visiting the hospital were surveyed using a questionnaire. Results: Most of the participants preferred DNR to meaningless treatment for incurable patients. They recognized the necessity of explaining DNR to the patient with a terminal disease. They also requested DNR orders for themselves if they were in the same medical condition. In making a DNR decision, the patient's family agreed and preferred that it reflect the opinion of the patient and the doctor in charge. They also agreed that treatment should be given with the best efforts even if a DNR decision had been made for the patient. Conclusion: To make a decision on DNR for a patient who is terminally ill or for whom survival is not possible, a practice of informed consent and guidelines for executing the DNR reflecting the patient's opinion are required.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제17권5호
• /
• pp.762-771
• /
• 2005

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify characteristics of patients who were recipients of decision-making DNR, to describe the situations of DNR, and to analyze the APACHE III and MOF scores. Method: Data collection was conducted through reviews of medical records of 51 patients and through interviews with families of patients who were decision-makers for DNR at C university K Hospital located in Seoul from April to September 2002. Results: The men's APACHE III and MOF scores were higher than the women's and the non cancer patients were higher than cancer patients. Some 80.4% of DNR orders was by communication, while 11.8% of consents were written. Each of APACHE III and MOF scores of patients in the intensive care unit was higher than the patients in general ward at both points of admission and decision-making of DNR. APACHE III and MOF scores positively correlated statistically with each other. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that APACHE III and MOF scores be useful for decision-making of DNR as a tool measuring severity.

• 중환자간호학회지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.11-24
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to grasp the subjectivity of the nurses toward DNR (Do not resuscitation) order. Methods: Q methodology was employed to explore the nurses' subjectivity. Q population consisted of 292 statements that were obtained through individual in-depth interviews targeting 30 employees(nurses, doctors, staff members) and literature review. Finally, 30 nurses classified 34 statements using a 9 point scale. Results: The current survey that probed into the subjectivity of the nurses relative to DNR order abstracted four categories. The first type (restrictive acceptance type) perceived the determinants of DNR as the patient's hopeless state. The second type (evidence-based type) emphasized the decision based on the guideline. The third type (medical personnel-centered type) showed the characteristic that depends passively on the professional judgement. The fourth type (rationalistic type) emphasized rational characteristic that DNR decision needs to be made by considering several situations such as economic and psychological burden of family and the quality of life. Conclusion: These types of nurse's perception need to be considered in the nurses' continuing educational program in order to confront affirmatively and positively with ethical dilemma.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제38권2호
• /
• pp.298-309
• /
• 2008

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to describe the experiences of do-not-resuscitate (DNR) among nurses. Methods: Data were collected by in-depth interviews with 8 nurses in 8 different hospitals. Conventional qualitative content analysis was used to analyze the data. Results: Eight major themes emerged from the analysis: DNR decision-making bypassing the patient, inefficiency in the decision-making process of DNR, negative connotation of DNR, predominance of verbal DNR over written DNR, doubts and confusion about DNR, least amount of intervention in the decision for DNR change of focus in the care of the patient after a DNR order, and care burden of patients with DNR. Decision-making of DNR occurred between physicians and family members, not the patients themselves. Often high medical expenses were involved in choosing DNR, thus if choosing DNR it was implied the family members and health professionals as well did not try their best to help the patient. Verbal DNR permission was more popular in clinical settings. Most nurses felt guilty and depressed about the dying/death of patients with DNR. Conclusion: Clearer guidelines on DNR, which reflect a family-oriented culture, need to be established to reduce confusion and to promote involvement in the decision-making process of DNR among nurses.

• 대한간호학회지
• /
• 제51권1호
• /
• pp.15-26
• /
• 2021

Purpose: This study aimed to distinguish and describe the types of perceptions of do not resuscitate (DNR) proxy decisions among families of elderly patients in a long-term care facility. Methods: This exploratory study applied Q-methodology, which focuses on individual subjectivity. Thirty-four Q-statements were selected from 130 Q-populations formed based on the results of in-depth interviews and literature reviews. The P-samples were 34 families of elderly patients in a long-term care hospital in Busan, Korea. They categorized the Q-statements using a 9-point scale. Using the PC-QUANL program, factor analysis was performed with the P-samples along an axis. Results: The families' perceptions of the DNR proxy decision were categorized into three types. Type I, rational acceptance, valued consensus among family members based on comprehensive support from medical staff. Type II, psychological burden, involved hesitance in making a DNR proxy decision because of negative emotions and psychological conflict. Type III, discreet decisions, valued the patients' right to self-determination and desire for a legitimate proxy decision. Type I included 18 participants, which was the most common type, and types II and III each included eight participants. Conclusion: Families' perceptions of DNR proxy decisions vary, requiring tailored care and intervention. We suggest developing and providing interventions that may psychologically support families.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.179-187
• /
• 2015

환자가 죽음에 임박했을 때 환자, 보호자, 의사 사이에서 심폐소생술에 대한 논의는 피할 수 없는 주제이다. 환자가 회복 불가능한 말기의 암환자인 경우에는 환자의 품위 있는 죽음을 고려하여 심폐소생술을 시행하지 않음(Do-not-resuscitate, DNR)을 결정하게 된다. 그러나 DNR에 대한 선택은 환자와 보호자의 심폐소생술과 DNR의 의미 및 그 결과에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 한다. DNR에 대하여 환자, 보호자, 의료진이 상담을 할 때는 환자의 질환이 더 이상 치료가 불가능하며, 심폐소생술이 환자의 생명을 연장시키는 것이 아니라 죽음의 과정을 연장시키는 것이며, 심폐소생술 이후에 삶의 질이 급격히 나빠질 수 있는 상황이라는 합의가 필요하다. 충분한 이해는 환자 또는 보호자가 품위 있는 죽음을 위한 DNR을 선택하도록 한다. 국내에서는 DNR 자체 보다는 이미 생명유지장치를 가지고 있는 환자에서의 생명유지장치의 제거에 대한 법적인 문제가 2차례 발생하면서 사회적으로 품위 있는 죽음에 대한 일반 대중의 관심이 이전보다 증가하였다. 환자와 의료진을 대상으로 한 설문에서는 DNR에 대한 인식과 의지가 80년대에 비해 2000년대 초반에 이르러 상당히 증가하였으나, 실제 의료 현장에서는 DNR의 결정에 있어 환자가 직접 관여를 하는 경우는 많지 않았고 DNR 작성 시점과 사망 시점과의 시간 간격이 1주 이내로 환자가 관여를 하거나 임종시기의 의료를 결정하기에는 너무 짧은 문제가 있었다. 이러한 문제는 조기 완화의료의 확산을 통하여 개선이 가능할 것으로 생각된다. 일부에서는 DNR이라는 용어보다는 자연적인 죽음을 허용함(Allow-Natural-Death)이라는 용어로 바꾸어서 설명하는 것이 이해를 돕고 선택의 갈등을 줄인다는 보고를 하여 DNR 논의와 결정에 있어서 적절한 시기 이외에도 환자와 보호자에게 많은 어려움이 있다는 것을 보여 주고 있다. DNR은 말기암환자에서 품위 있는 죽음을 위해 고려해야 하는 사항이며, 임상에서 DNR이 잘 시행되도록 임상적, 제도적 노력이 필요하다.

• 재활간호학회지
• /
• 제14권2호
• /
• pp.118-128
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of bereavement for main family members who had made and followed DNR decision for their family members. Method: This qualitative study was based on a grounded theory, and used in-depth interview techniques with the bereaved 10 main family members who had been treated and died under DNR order. Results: The causal condition of the family member was 'Releasing', and the main consequent phenomenon were 'Blaming self and ruminating'. The contextual condition was 'The memory of the deceased'. The action/reaction strategy was 'Purifying'. The intervening condition was 'Supporting system', and the consequence was 'Acceptance'. The experience after bereavement of the family member on DNR decision were rational processes that purified themselves and healed the guilt feeling about the decision from reflective assessment and response about DNR decision. Based on this results, the substantive theory 'Reflective self healing' was derived. Conclusion: The main family members in following DNR decision are more likely to have unhealthy emotional condition than others in normal bereavement process. But they overcame the grief of bereavement through reflective self healing process.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.122-130
• /
• 2017

목적: 본 연구는 중환자실 간호사가 DNR 환자 임종을 경험하면서 수용하는 개인의 주관적 경험의미와 그 구조를 기술하는 것이다. 방법: 대상자는 종합병원 중환자실 간호사 8명이었으며, 심층면담을 통한 질적 연구로 현상학적 연구방법을 이용하였다. 결과: 중환자실 간호사들의 DNR 환자 임종경험은 '정답이 없는 죽음의 양면성, 죽음과 일의 경계에서 경험하는 딜레마', '가족이 안고 있는 죽음의 무게 감당하기', 상실로 얻은 삶에 대한 성찰',의 4가지 주제모음으로 나타났다. 결론: DNR에 대한 판단기준과 DNR 결정 절차에 대한 상세한 규정, DNR 환자 간호윤리 지침 및 교육이 필요하고, DNR 환자 가족에 대한 중재 프로그램 개발이 요구된다.

• Journal of Hospice and Palliative Care
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.93-99
• /
• 2017

목적: 본 연구는 심폐소생술금지에 동의한 암환자를 대상으로 연명치료 변화를 확인하기 위해 시도된 후향적 조사연구이다. 방법: 연구대상자는 S시에 소재한 A종합병원에서 2013년 1월 1일부터 12월 31일까지 종양내과 병동에 입원치료하고 사망한 암환자로 심폐소생술금지에 동의한 250명이 선정되었으며, 이중 심폐소생술금지를 입원당일 동의하였거나(N=40) 동의 후 3일 이내 사망한(N=10) 경우는 제외하였다. 대상자의 특성과 연명치료의 변화를 의무기록을 통해 조사하였으며, 심폐소생술금지 지시 동의 전 1일과 심폐소생술금지 지시 동의 후 3일 혹은 사망시점까지 조사하여 유지, 중단, 추가로 연명의료 변화를 판정하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS Win 21.0 프로그램을 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 연구대상자는 총 200명으로, 50~59세 나이 군이 36.0%로 가장 많이 차지하였고 남자가 62%였다. 재원일은 15일이었고, 입원하여 10일되는 시점에서 심폐소생술금지에 동의하였다. 심폐소생술금지에 동의 후 35.7~100%에서 연명치료가 계속 유지되었다. 인공호흡기 치료는 중단되지 않고 100% 유지되었으며, 수혈(37%), 혈액검사(37.4%), 산소요법(23.5%) 순으로 추가되었다. 중단된 연명치료 중 가장 빈도가 높은 것은 수혈(13.5%)이었고, 다음으로 혈액검사(11.5%), 비경구성 영양제투여(8.5%) 순이었다. 결론: 심폐소생술 지시 동의 후에 대부분 연명치료는 계속되었고 중단되는 경우는 드물었다. 의료진과 가족들 간의 연명치료 범위에 대한 이견을 좁히고, 무의미한 연명치료 중단에 대한 결정을 합의하기 위한 적극적인 논의가 요구된다.