• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제38권3호
• /
• pp.112-126
• /
• 1996

This study was conducted to develop an optimal runoff bydrograph model by comparison of the peak discharge and time to peak between observed and simulated flows derived by four different models, that is, linear time-invariant, linear time-variant, nonlinear time-invariant and nonlinear time-variant models under the conditions of heavy rainfalls with regionally uniform rainfall intensity in short durations at nine small watersheds. The results obtained through this study can be summarized as follows. 1. Parameters for four models including linear time-invariant, linear time-variant, nonlinear time-invariant and nonlinear time-variant models were calibrated using a trial and error method with rainfall and runoff data for the applied watersheds. Regression analysis among parameters, rainfall and watershed characteristics were established for both linear time-invariant and nonlinear time-invariant models. 2. Correlation coefficients of the simulated peak discharge of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using four models were shown to be a high significant to the peak of observed runoff graphs. Especially, it can be concluded that the simulated peak discharge of a linear time-variant model is approaching more closely to the observed runoff hydrograph in comparison with those of three models in the applied watersheds. 3. Correlation coefficients of the simulated time to peak of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using a linear time-variant model were shown to be a high significant to the time to peak of observed runoff hydrographs than those of the other models. 4. The peak discharge and time to peak of simulated runoff hydrogaphs by using linear time-variant model are verified to be approached more closely to those of observed runoff hydrographs than those of three models in the applied watersheds. 5. It can be generally concluded that the shape of simulated hydrograph based on a linear time-variant model is getting closer to the observed runoff hydrograph than those of three models in the applied watersheds. 6. Simulated hydrographs using the nonlinear time-variant model which is based on more closely to the theoritical background of the natural runoff process are not closer to the observed runoff hydrographs in comparison with those of three models in the applied watersheds. Consequently, it is to be desired that futher study for the nonlinear time-variant model should be continued with verification using rainfall-runoff data of the other watersheds in addition to the review of analyical techniques.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제46권1호
• /
• pp.59-71
• /
• 2013

신뢰성 있는 홍수빈도해석을 수행하기 위해서는 충분한 홍수량 및 강우자료가 필요하다. 강우자료의 경우 우리나라 대부분 지역에서 30년 이상의 극치자료가 활용이 가능한 반면 홍수량 자료는 상대적으로 충분한 자료가 확보되지 않아 신뢰성 있는 빈도해석이 어려운 실정이다. 이에 따라 강우모의 기법에 근거한 홍수빈도곡선 유도방안연구가 몇몇 연구에서 제안된 바 있으나, 기본적으로 입력된 강우의 빈도와 홍수의 빈도가 동일하다고 가정함으로 인하여 발생하는 불확실성이 상당부분 내포되어 있다. 이러한 점에서 본 연구의 목적은 강우모의기법과 불확실성 분석이 고려된 홍수빈도곡선 유도방법을 개발하는 것으로 홍수빈도곡선을 유도하는데 있어서의 핵심은 미래에 발생 가능한 극치강수량을 효과적으로 재현할 수 있는 강수량 모의발생 기법과 강우-유출관계의 불확실성 분석에 있다. 본 연구에서는 극치강수량 모의를 위해 불연속 Kernel Pareto 분포를이용한 다지점 강수모의기법과 Bayesian HEC-1 (BHEC-1) 모형을 연계하여 본연구의 대상유역인 대청댐 유역의 강우-유출 관계의 불확실성을 고려한 홍수빈도곡선을 개발하고 모형의 적합성을 평가하였다. 최종적으로 기존 홍수빈도결정방법과 비교를 통해서 모형의 적합성을 확인하였다.

• 한국농공학회지
• /
• 제37권3_4호
• /
• pp.34-47
• /
• 1995

It is experienced fact as a regular annual event that the structure to he designed on unreasonable flood for the agricultural structures including reservoirs have been brought not only loss of lives, but also enormous property damage. For the solution of this problem at issue, this study was conducted to develop an optimal runoff hydrograph model by comparison of the peak flows and time to peak between observed and simulated flows derived by linear time-invariant and linear time-variant models under the condition of having a short duration of heavy rainfall with uniform rainfall intensity at nine small watersheds which are within the range of 55.9 to 140.7 square kilometers in area in Han, Geum, Nagdong and Yeongsan Rivers. The results obtained through this study can be summarized as follows. 1. Storage constants and Gamma function arguments were calculated within the range of 1.2 to 6.42 and of 1.28 to 8.05 respectively by the moment method as the parameters for the analysis of runoff hydrograph based on linear time-invariant model. 2. Parameters for both linear time-invariant and linear time-variant models were calibrated with nine gaged watershed data, using a trial and error method. The resulting parameters including Gamma function argument, N and storage constant, K for linear time-invariant model were related statistically to watershed characteristic variables such as area, slope, length of main stream and the centroid length of the basin. 3. Average relative errors of the simulated peak discharge of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using linear time-variant and linear time-invariant models were shown to be 0.75 and 5.42 percent respectively to the peak of observed runoff hydrographs. Correlation coefficients for the statistical analysis in the same condition were shown to be 0.999 and 0.978 with a high significance respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that the accuracy of a linear time-variant model is approaching more closely to the observed runoff hydrograph than that of a linear time-invariant model in the applied watersheds. 4. Average relative errors of the time to peak of calibrated runoff hydrographs by using linear time-variant and linear time-invariant models were shown to be 16.44 and 19.89 percent respectively to the time to peak of observed runoff hydrographs. Correlation coefficients in the same condition were also shown to be 0.999 and 0.886 with a high significance respectively. 5. It can be seen that the shape of simulated hydrograph based on a linear time- variant model is getting closer to the observed runoff hydrograph than that of a linear time-invariant model in the applied watersheds. 6. Two different models were verified with different rainfall-runoff events from data for the calibration by relative error and correlation analysis. Consequently, it can be generally concluded that verification results for the peak discharge and time to peak of simulated runoff hydrographs were in good agreement with those of calibrated runoff hydrographs.

• 한국수자원학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국수자원학회 2008년도 학술발표회 논문집
• /
• pp.485-489
• /
• 2008

To achieve the optimal sewer layout design, most developed models are designed to determine pipe diameter, slope and overall layout in order to minimize the least cost for the design rainfall. However, these models are not capable of considering the superposition effect of runoff hydrographs entering each junction. The suggested Optimal Sewer Layout Model (OSLM) is designed to control flows and distribute the node inflows while taking into consideration the superposition effect for reducing the inundation risk from the sewer pipes. The suggested model used the genetic algorithm to determine the optimal layout, which was connected to the SWMM (Storm Water Management Model) for the calculation of the hydraulic analysis. The suggested model was applied to an urban watershed of 35 ha, which is located in Seoul, Korea. By using the suggested model, several rainfall events, including the design rainfall and excessive rainfalls, were used to generate runoff hydrographs from a modified sewer layout. By the results, the peak outflows at the outlet were decreased and the overflows were also reduced.

• 대한토목학회논문집
• /
• 제29권3B호
• /
• pp.269-279
• /
• 2009

대유역에서 계획홍수량 추정은 ARF, 강우 시공간분포 및 강우-유출 모형의 매개변수 등에서 많은 불확실성이 발생한다. 과거 동시 강우사상을 이용한 계획홍수량의 추정은 이들 불확실성을 개선할 수 있다. 본 연구는 과거 동시 강우사상과 저류 함수모형을 이용하여 대유역의 홍수량을 추정하는 방법을 제시하였다. 과거 동시 강우사상의 시공간분포를 이용하여 계획 강우량과 강우의 시공간분포를 산정하였고 비선형 강우-유출 반응을 재현할 수 있는 저류함수모형을 이용하여 홍수량을 추정하였다. 추정된 계획홍수량은 실측홍수량에 의한 빈도분석 결과와 비교하여 본 연구에서 제시한 홍수량 추정기법의 적용성을 평가하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 실측홍수량의 빈도해석과 비슷한 결과를 얻었으며 이는 대유역의 홍수량 추정에서 본 연구의 홍수량 추정과정을 충분히 이용할 수 있음을 보여준다.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제65권4호
• /
• pp.25-32
• /
• 2023

KDS (Korean Design Standard) for agricultural drainage is a planning standard that helps determine the appropriate capacity and type of drainage facilities. The objective of this study was to analyze the inundation of the agricultural basin considering the current design standard and the critical rainfall duration. This study used the rainfall durations of 1-48 hour, and the time distribution method with the Chicago and the modified Huff model. For the runoff model, the NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) unit hydrograph method was applied, and the inundation depth and duration were analyzed using area-elevation data. From the inundation analysis using the modified Huff method with different rainfall durations, 4 hours showed the largest peak discharge, and 11 hours showed the largest inundation depth. From the comparison analysis with the current method (Chicago method with a duration of 48 hours) and the modified Huff method applying critical rainfall duration, the current method showed less peak discharge and lower inundation depth compared to the modified Huff method. From the simulation of changing values of drainage rate, the duration of 11 hours showed larger inundation depth and duration compared to the duration of 4 hours. Accordingly, the modified Huff method with the critical rainfall duration would likely be a safer design than the current method. Also, a process of choosing a design hydrograph considering the inundation depth and duration is needed to apply the critical rainfall duration. This study is expected to be helpful for the theoretical basis of the agricultural drainage design standards.

• 물과 미래
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.49-57
• /
• 1993

본 연구는 하수관거 설계시, 계획강우의 임계지속기간을 결정하기 위한 것으로서, 지속기간내의 시간적 강우분포형은 Huff의 4분위법에 의하였으며, 20분~240분의 9개의 지속기간을 10년 빈도강우에 대하여 검토하였다. 본 연구에서는 서울시 관내의 18개 유수지 배수구역을 대상으로 해석을 시도하였으며, 유출해석을 위하여 ILLUDAS 모형을 이용하였다. 하수관거의 설계수문량 기준이 되는 첨두유출량을 최대로 발생시키는 계획강우의 임계지속기간은 대체로 30,60분으로 판단되었다. 계획강우의 시간적 분포형별로 임계지속기간을 설정할 수 있도록 첨두유량-유역면적-임계지속기간의 관계도를 제시하였다.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제11권7호
• /
• pp.621-626
• /
• 2002

Depth-area-duration(DAD) relations are important to hydrological plans and designs for the water resources as well as the flood defence. And these relations have been still in analysis and use today because they can be applied to readily available data. In this paper, rational and consistent DAD models were developed using the multiple regression analysis and basic relationships of area ratio-runoff volume about heavy rainfall occurring in the Im-Jin river basin, 1999. In addition, revised DAD models and curves that can convert a maximum point rainfall to mean area rainfall were developed and evaluated. As results, these models seem to have predictive value in order to plan and design hydrological structures of flood defence in the Im-Jin river basin.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제44권12호
• /
• pp.941-954
• /
• 2011

본 연구에서는 국내의 다목적 댐을 대상으로 강우-유출 모형에 의한 과거의 홍수량 산정방식과 최근의 홍수량 산정방식을 유역 면적 규모별로 분류하여 비교 분석하였다. 홍수량에 영향을 미치는 기본인자로 강우량, 강우의 시간분포, 유효우량 산정방법, 강우-유출 모형, 매개변수 추정 및 기저유량 등을 선정하여 각 인자별 민감도 분석을 수행함으로써 홍수량에 미치는 영향을 정량적으로 분석하였다. 분석결과 최근의 방법으로 산정한 홍수량과 과거의 방법으로 산정한 홍수량이 유역면적 규모에 따라 다양한 변동폭으로 증가하거나 감소하였는데, 강우의 시간분포 변경이 홍수량을 감소시키는 원인으로 분석되었고, 최근 기상이변에 의한 강우량의 증가와 단위도의 매개변수 추정방법의 변경이 홍수량을 증가시키는 가장 큰 원인으로 분석되었다.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제48권8호
• /
• pp.605-612
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 치수 구조물의 규모를 결정하는 가장 기초가 되는 분석과정인 설계홍수량 산정 방법 중 실측 홍수량을 바탕으로 산정하는 홍수량 빈도해석방법과 설계강우법, 강우-유출해석 후 연최대 첨두홍수량 빈도해석방법을 비교 분석하는데 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 기존의 설계홍수량 산정방법인 설계강우법과 강우량을 이용하여 유출을 모의하고 최대유출량을 빈도해석하는 방법을 비교 분석하였다. 대상 유역은 상대적으로 강우량과 유출량 자료의 기록이 오래된 7개 유역(남강댐 유역, 소양강댐 유역, 안동댐 유역, 임하댐 유역, 섬진강댐 유역, 충주댐 유역, 합천댐 유역)을 선정하였다. 실측 유출량 빈도해석 자료를 참값으로 가정하여 분석한 결과 섬진강댐 유역, 합천댐유역, 임하댐유역, 안동댐 유역에서는 본 연구에서 제시한 강우-유출해석 후 연최대 첨두홍수량 빈도해석방법이 상대적으로 홍수량 빈도해석 값에 가까운 결과를 나타내었고, 남강댐유역, 소양강댐유역, 충주댐유역에서는 기존의 설계강우법이 실측 유출량 빈도해석 값에 더 가까운 결과를 나타냈다. 이러한 결과로 볼 때 지금까지 사용되어온 설계강우법이 최선의 방법은 아니며 상대적으로 유역면적이 작은 지역에서는 금회 연구에서 제안하는 강우-유출해석 후 연최대 첨두홍수량 빈도해석방법이 좋은 결과를 나타냈다고 볼 수 있다.