• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제31권6호
• /
• pp.15-27
• /
• 2004

The Seoul Woods Design Competition in 2003 was one of the most remarkable events within the field of landscape architecture in Korea since the Yeo-Ui Do Square Park Design Competition in the mid 1990s. This study examines the overall procedure, evaluations and competition guidelines for the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition and identifies the implications and issues related to Korean landscape architecture. In addition this study analyzes the design concepts, strategies and spatial composition, and programs of five selected design worts including the best awarded work. This study also examines key features and issues from the five selected design works. Finally, this study examines a new trend of landscape design in Korea, which can be observed at the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition. In this study, it is argued that the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition had significant implications for landscape architecture in Korea. Firstly, the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition was the greatest project in Korea in terms of its size. Therefore, it shows us an enhanced status of Korean landscape architecture. Secondly, the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition provided a good opportunity to redefine the concept of 'park' in Korean modern society. Thirdly, through the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition, we can observe a dramatic change and developments in Korean landscape design since the 1990s, as well as the present status of landscape design competitions in Korea. And this study identifies an emphasis of a program in design, an evolution in ecological approach an diminishment in concern of Korean tradition, and a change in design methods and media, which are some aspects of Korean contemporary landscape design observed at the Seoul Forest Park Design Competition.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제41권3호
• /
• pp.83-93
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 1983년 설계공모 제도가 한국 조경계에 도입되고 30년이 지난 현 시점에서 조경 설계공모 과정에서 발생되고 있는 문제점을 분석 고찰함으로써 향후 조경 설계공모 과정 개선에 기여할 수 있는 기초자료를 제공하기 위한 목적으로 수행하였다. 연구를 수행하기 위해 조경 설계공모에 관여하는 전문가를 대상으로 델파이 조사를 실시하여 문제점을 도출하였으며, 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 조경설계 공모 관련 이론과 선행연구를 분석한 결과, '설계공모 방식', '설계공모 지침', '당선작 선정과정', '당선작 이후 설계변화' 등 4가지 관점에서 문제점이 있는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 전문가 델파이 분석을 통하여 전문가들의 의견을 합의하는 과정을 이끌었고, 그 결과 총 12개의 항목으로 조경설계 공모 과정의 문제점이 도출되었는바, '설계공모 방식'에서는 '설계공모 기간의 문제', '설계공모 방식' 등 2가지의 항목, '설계공모 지침'에서는 '비위계적이고 혼란스러운 지침', '규정적으로 정해지는 지침', '지침의 분량의 과다' 등 3개 항목, '당선작 선정과정'에서는 '심사위원 전문성 결여', '비조경전문가 참여', '심사배점 방식에 문제점' 등 3개 항목, '당선작 이후 설계변화'에서는 '발주처 설계담당자의 잦은 인사이동', '설계기간의 기약 없는 과다연장', '발주처의견이 과다하게 반영되는 풍토', '원설계의 창의성을 저감시키는 발주처 의견' 등 4가지 항목이 문제점으로 나타났다.

• 건축역사연구
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.142-156
• /
• 1994

This paper aims to study on the periodical competition, the program, the jury organization, the reward, and copyright applied to the buildings which were constructed with architectural design competition performed in European and American region between 19c and 20c. The results of this study are as follows; 1. Befor 1900 Period, the type of buildings added to the competition program; between 1900 period and 1950 period, the works of strong nationality and rich local color were preferred; After 1950 period, the design drawings of high symbol and function were chosen 2. There are three types of design competitions: the open design competition, the invited and limited design competition, and the idea design competition. The open design competition has been most often made. 3. The juries were, most of all, composed of professional architects over 30 percent. 4. The program was written about building scale and appointments, described what form drawings, brief notes and air perspective wood have to be submitted. For instance, the use of colour was not permitted in the drawings, as this might possibly mislead the jurors. 5. The reward was given to the winners; the copyright was given to the first prize winner. 6. The standard of entry's qualification was mostly architect 7, Entry term was from a minimum month to a maximum year after annoncement of competition, it was approximetly 63% between 4 months and 8 months. I am convinced that architect gets freedom of pure creation and joy of society service through competition, architect justifies his profession and keep his useful and creative effort to society constantly, as long as the competition exists.

• 한국가구학회지
• /
• 제17권2호
• /
• pp.35-47
• /
• 2006

In 1990s, with the rapid development of the design part and the change of perception, various design competitions in a way to encourage the design industry have repeatedly implemented and abolished. They played positive roles of developing designs and nurturing talents. On the contrary, they caused a lot of problems of standardization of design, loss of identification of competitions, deterioration of the quality of design. Especially, though too many competitions are holding, the level of quality cannot catch up with the quantity, resulting in numerous side-effects. In the field of Furniture Design, many competitions are just an one time events and disappeared. Therefore, it is very difficult to keep the tradition of prestigious competition, playing the adverse role in the development of furniture design and lowering the will of creativeness of designers. In this study, I compared and analyzed the current issues and problems of Gyeonggi Furniture Good Design Contest, one of the representative competition as the national scale competition as of 2006, with examples from home and abroad to find out the positive and developmental methods. At the same time, I provided the ways that can be helpful in the design through the ways to facilitate competition and proposals of desirable competitions.

• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제41권6호
• /
• pp.62-71
• /
• 2013

본 연구는 현재 조경 설계공모 과정에서 발생되고 있는 문제점을 AHP 기법을 활용하여 분석 및 고찰함으로써 조경설계 공모제도 개선을 위한 기초자료 제시를 목적으로 수행하였다. 본 연구 결과, 첫째, 조경설계공모 제도의 문제점을 이루고 있는 1계층 항목에서는 '당선작 선정과정'이 가장 중요한 문제점으로 나타났고, 그 뒤를 따라 '당선작 이후 설계변화', '조경설계 공모 지침', '조경설계 공모 방식' 순으로 중요도가 나타났다. 둘째, 계층 1을 구성하고 있는 하위 항목에서는 '비 조경전문가의 심사 참여'가 가장 심각한 문제로 의견이 모아졌으며, '심사위원의 전문성 결여', '심사배점방식의 문제' 항목 등 '당선작 선정과정'에 해당하는 하위 요소가 전체 12개의 요소 중 가장 높은 순위를 차지하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 조경설계공모 당선이 이루어진 후에 일어나는 '발주자의 임의 설계변경 현상'에 대한 중요도도 높게 나타남으로써 조경설계공모의 문제점에서 간과할 수 없는 사항으로 분석되었다. 본 연구는 조경설계공모상 과정에서 발생하는 문제점의 우선순위를 선정함으로써 향후 제도 개선 시 선행적으로 검토가 이루어져야 할 부분을 찾았다는 점에 의의가 있었으며, 이러한 문제점을 근거로 향후 제도개선 방안에 대한 후속연구가 있어야 할 것임이 제안되었다.

• 한국BIM학회 논문집
• /
• 제6권4호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2016

This study is to examine the public participation activities in the progress of the design competition, purposed to provide urban public spaces by the reuse of industrial heritages. Through the case studies of Berlin Tempelhof Parkland, Mapo Depot and Seoul Station 7017, following activities are common: citizen idea competition, forum, field trip, survey and winners exhibition. However, those activities are more closely organized to the competition process in Tempelhof Parkland, than other tow projects of Seoul Metropolitan Government. Also, it enables to clear and develop the public ideas more that those programs such as survey, citizen idea competition and field trip, are linked to each other in the case of Tempelhof Parkland. It could be achieved by the unified organization between competition preparation and public participation operation.

• 한국디지털건축인테리어학회논문집
• /
• 제11권3호
• /
• pp.89-97
• /
• 2011

Accelerating economic growth since the 1960s, penetration rate of the House of Commons has been increased. However, design competition has been imposed for improve of the qualitative level in modern because it was quantitative increasing. Even though its design quality is improved by introducing design competition, distorting the design is increased for the purpose of election. For that reason, errors of information and design changes are increased. So BIM(Building Information Modeling) is adopted to solve the problems. In this study, BIM process on the basis of the existing design process was to clean up and LoI(Level Of Information) based on the level of information was newly defined. Working-level of the design competition is plan-basic design. LOI level is LOI1-LOI2 in plan and Lol3-LOI4 in basic design. At each step of the operation was to clean up the level of detail and content. Also exchange of data in each area and feedback about content are to clean up.

• 농촌계획
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.11-17
• /
• 2009

Rural Amenity Design Competition is opened every year since 2003 having an intention of improving spatial design and planning of rural area through developing values of rural amenity resources and applying in that area. The subject of this competition is broad and there's no limit in locations so that various solutions and original ideas could be proposed. This research examined 165 prizewinning works of the competition and analyzed the locations and areas, aims, main resources, spatial planning contents and experience programs to find out trends of rural spatial design. According to the study, the prizewinning works tends to 1) include spatial plan for an existing village planning, 2) aim rural tourism for citizens and increasement of resident's incomes, 3) develop vegetation and agricultural resources, 4) plan for natural landscape, commercialization of local special productions and agriculture, and 5) propose ecological experience programs. The same theme of the competition repeated every year had led to advanced design skills but also a stagnant of design contents. A subject and a main goal of the Rural Amenity Design Competition should be departmentalized each time hereafter to make for the weak points and propose progressive direction for the rural spatial design.

• 대한건축학회논문집:계획계
• /
• 제34권7호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2018

Nursery is a very important space for the development and growth of children. Domestic national nurseries mostly have uniform space composition, and there is no significant difference from the general architecture. Therefore, this study focused on presuming the cause of uniformity in domestic nursery space configuration through analysing the competition guidelines. For this purpose, we reviewed the procedure of the competitions and collected 57 competition guidelines for the last 10 years. The competition guideline was divided into design guidelines and evaluation items, and each of them were analysed focused on the contents of the items and the changes over time. The derived results suggested the problems which seem to affect the uniformity of the domestic nursery in three aspects: design guidelines, evaluation items, and the current procedure of nursery competitions.

• 한국실내디자인학회논문집
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.3-9
• /
• 2011

In this study, the change of critical elements of the design evaluation was investigated during two decades at the architectural competition which was held nationwide in Germany. Specifically, the periods of investigation span both from July 1989 to June 1990 and from July 2009 to June 2010. The results of the analysis show that the cost of construction, the maintenance cost, the design of facade and the energy conservation are being magnified for the new important elements. The images of buildings and the economic aspects are meant to be high. The frequency of the critical elements for interior spaces is approximately two times more important than those for the forms and outdoor spaces. Overall, many juries of the architectural competition in Germany were interested in the elements for interior spaces. The field of function accounts for roughly the half of four basic architectural fields such as function, others, aesthetic and construction fields. The critical elements are required persistently such as context, Circulation, organization of space, form, landscape and outdoor space design, arrangement of building, cost of construction, function, design of facade, location of main entrance. These items are regarded as the most important elements of the design evaluation at the competition. Knowing the change of critical elements of the design evaluation, we can understand the trend of architecture in Germany. The results of this study can be applied in Korea to develop the critical elements of design.