• Title/Summary/Keyword: Delvo test

Search Result 3, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Comparison of Antimicrobial Residue Detection in Goat Milk by the Delvo, Eclipse 100, and Parallux Tests (Delvo test, Eclipse 100 및 Parallux를 이용한 산양유의 잔류항균물질 검출 비교)

  • Ham, Jun-Sang;Jeong, Seok-Geun;Shin, Ji-Hye;Han, Gi-Sung;Chae, Hyun-Seok;Yoo, Young-Mo;Ahn, Jong-Nam;Hur, Tae-Young;Ko, Sang-Hyun;Park, Kwang-Wook;Choi, Seok-Ho;Lee, Wan-Kyu
    • Food Science of Animal Resources
    • /
    • v.28 no.1
    • /
    • pp.59-62
    • /
    • 2008
  • The aim of this work was to assess the Delvo test for the detection of antimicrobial residues in goat milk. A total of fifty six samples (eight farms, seven samplings each) were analyzed by the Delvo, Eclipse 100, and Parallux tests. None of the samples showed positive results with the Parallux test which is based on immune-chemical methods. However, 37.5% of samples showed positive results with the Delvo test. 3.6% of samples showed positive results with the Eclipse 100 test, which is based on a microbiological method. The Delvo test is included in the 'standard methods for the examination of raw milk' by the National Veterinary Research and Quarantine Service as a microbiological method used for the detection of antimicrobial residues. Because "raw milk" is defined as 'milked state of cow, ewe and goat milk for sale or for processing' in the Animal Food Products Processing Law, the Delvo test should be excluded from the 'standard method for the examination of raw milk', or additional official documents referring to the Delvo test as not appropriate for the detection of antimicrobial residues of goat milk are required.

A Comparative Study of the Detectable Methods of Residual Antibiotics in Milk (우유중 잔류 항생물질 분서방법에 관한 비교연구)

  • 백선영;김형일;박건상;김소희;권경란
    • Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
    • /
    • v.11 no.2
    • /
    • pp.129-132
    • /
    • 1996
  • Recently, as concern about the residual antibiotics in milk increase, the detection methods of residual antibiotics used extensevely at the present time were investigated and compared to their properties and the detection limits of variable antibiotics. At first, comparactive tests of the detectable sensitivity of 4 test organisms, B. cereus, B. subtilis, M.luteus, B.stearothermophilus C-953, were performed by disc assay. As a result, B.stearothermophilus was the most sensitive strain of all other strains and showe the detect limit of 5-50 ppb for penlicillins (PCs). And also, B.subitilis was showed the more effective detection limit, 200-400 ppb, for aminoglycosides (AGs) and M.luteus was showed predominant sensitivity , 50-500 ppb for macrolides(MLs) and B.cereus was the most sensitive strain for tetracyclines (TCs) and showed the detection limit of 100-400 ppb. Therefore, each test strains were showed a different sensitivity in the detection of the different antibiotic families. When the detection limit of disc assay and other methods were compared, TTCmethod was less sensitive than other methods showing 5-50 ppb detectable lebel for PCs. Also, for the detection of other antibiotic families TTC method was showed the worst sensitivity and Delvo and Charm Farm tests were similar to the detectable properties of AGs and MLs. Although disc assay was showed the similar detection limit for PCs with Delvo and Charm Farm, it was more widely effective for the detection of kanamycin, erythromycin, chlortetracycline, doxycycline, verginiamycin and so on than Delvo or Charm Farm. CharmII test was showed the best sensitivity for the most of antibiotics except neomycin and gentamycin. But it was necessary that different tests must be performed to each antibiotic family and so it was regarded that the effectiveness of that method was low.

  • PDF

Determination of Sulfamethazine Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Several Screening Methods (HPLC 및 신속검출방법을 이용한 우유내 Sulfamethazine의 분석에 관한 연구)

  • 김철현;백승천;문지웅
    • Journal of Food Hygiene and Safety
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.71-77
    • /
    • 1997
  • Sulfonamides, a therapeutically important group of antimicrobial drugs, are widely used to treat and prevent the acute systemic and skin infections in dairy cattle. They also pose an economic hazard through inhibition of growth of dairy starter cultures. This study was carried out to compare four screening methods for detection of sulfamethazine in milk and determine the positive milk sample by HPLC method. Sulfamethazine was used to spike at five levels of sulfamethazine. The Lac-Tek test and CharmII test were also consistent better than TTCII test and Delvo SP test in sulfamethazine detection. Analysis probabilities of obtaining a positive response with TTCII test and Delvo SP test assay at 50 ppb sulfamethazine level in milk samples were only 14%, 42% each. Whereas using the Lac-Tek test and CharmII test would have resulted in 100% identification of the five levels. Determination of sufamethazine using the HPLC method in the spiked milk were 10.64, 19.30, 30.76,38.83 and 50.23 ppb, respectively.

  • PDF