• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제5권3호
• /
• pp.107-119
• /
• 2003

Expectation and interest about e-CRM are rising for more efficient customer management in on-line including electronic commerce. The decision-making tree can be used usefully as the data mining technology for e-CRM. In this paper, the representative decision making techniques, CART, C4.5, CHAID analyzed the differences in personalization point of view with actuality customer data through an experiment. With these analysis data, it is proposed a new decision-making tree system that has big advantage in personalization techniques. Through new system, it can get following advantage. First, it can form superior model more qualitatively in personalization by adding individual's weight value. Second it can supply information personalized more to customer. Third, it can have high position about customer's loyalty than other site of similar types of business. Fourth, it can reduce expense that cost marketing and decision-making. Fifth, it becomes possible that know that customer through smooth communication with customer who use personalized service wants and make from goods or service's quality to more worth thing.

• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제54권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2008년도 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.247-251
• /
• 2008

도시재생 개발사업은 다양한 참여주체가 존재하고 이해관계자의 구도가 복잡하며, 수많은 프로젝트들이 복합적으로 연결되어 있다. 또한 다양한 이해관계자간의 추구 효익(benefit)이 충돌하여 서로 다른 목표를 추구함에 따라 다양한 커뮤니케이션 경로와 복잡한 의사결정 구조를 가지게 된다. 이에 따라 프로세스 단계별 발생하는 무수한 양의 의사결정업무와 복잡한 구조는 도시재생 사업의 기간을 연장시키고 효율성을 떨어뜨리는 원인이 되고 있다. 이에 도시재생 개발사업의 효율적 의사결정을 지원하는 "의사결정 거버넌스" 체계를 구축하기 위한 기초연구로서 도시재생개발사업의 업무 분석과 거버넌스 개념의 문헌고찰을 바탕으로 도시재생 개발사업의 의사결정 특징을 분석하고, 이를 통해 도출된 도시재생 사업의 의사결정 거버넌스 구성요소를 조합하여 "도시재생 사업의 의사결정 거버넌스 체계"의 개념도를 제시하였다.

• 한국수학교육학회지시리즈E:수학교육논문집
• /
• 제26권2호
• /
• pp.221-249
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 비구조화된 문제해결모형을 적용하여 수업을 하는 과정에서 나타나는 학생들의 의사결정과정을 관찰 분석함으로써 초등학교 현장에서의 비구조화된 문제 적용 가능성을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 서울 소재 C초등학교 5학년 학생 25명을 대상으로 확률과 통계영역 중 자료분석에 관한 비구조화된 문제를 제시하였고, 문제해결은 ABCDE(Analyze - Browse - Create - Decision Making - Evaluate) 모형을 적용하여 의사결정단계(자신의 견해 확립하기, 타인의 견해 검토하기, 문제해결에 적절한 견해를 결정하고 실행하기)에서 나타난 학생들의 의사결정과정을 분석하였다. 총 여섯 모둠 중 비구조화된 문제해결모형에 따라 수업진행이 비교적 잘 이루어진 상위 두 모둠은 문제에 대한 서로의 생각과 의견을 활발하게 나누며, 3단계의 의사결정과정이 모두 나타났다. 학생들의 고차원적인 문제해결력 향상을 위한 심화된 문제의 해결이 요구되는 현 상황에서, 비구조화된 문제의 개발 및 적용을 통해 학습자의 문제 해결의 가능성을 기대해 볼 수 있겠다.

• Imaging Science in Dentistry
• /
• 제36권1호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2006

During the diagnostic process of the various oral and maxillofacial lesions, we should consider the following: 'When should we order diagnostic tests? What tests should be ordered? How should we interpret the results clinically? And how should we use this frequently imperfect information to make optimal medical decisions?' For the clinicians to make proper judgement, several decision making tools are suggested. This article discusses the concept of the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity values) with several decision making tools such as decision matrix, ROC analysis and Bayesian analysis. The article also explain the introductory concept of ORAD program.

• 성인간호학회지
• /
• 제26권4호
• /
• pp.403-412
• /
• 2014

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to validate the Korean version of shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument developed by Lauri & $Salanter{\ddot{a}}$(2002). Methods: The subjects were 247 nurses working in eight hospitals of Korea. Data were collected by questionnaires from June to July, 2012 and were analyzed by Principal Component Analysis for construct validity and Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficient for reliability. Results: Factor loadings of the four subscales ranged from .32 to .73. The explained variance from the four factors was 48.54% of the total variance. The factors were named 'implementation of plan, monitoring and evaluation', 'plans of action', 'data collection', and 'data processing and identification'. The first factor consisted of 6 items which explained 13.21% of the total variance and the second factor contained 8 items. The Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ coefficients of the four subscales were from .64 to .81. Conclusion: The Korean version of the shortened Nursing Decision-Making Instrument has satisfactory construct validity and reliability. However, that the scores of the analytic items weren't reversed unlike the analysis method of the original tools is the biggest limitation of this study. In addition, based on the fact that there were several discrepancies for item interpretation of Korean comparing to the findings of the instrument development study, repetitive researches would be suggested.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.213-222
• /
• 2009

Two functions are considerable in the record management of policy management system operation. The first one is to prove that shows the conforming status of the management system requirements. The second one is to prove that shows the performing status whether the policy management system is operating effectively to the company. However, the second function requires the high level data analysis techniques, and it is more important for the decision making of the company operations. That is, the second function is more closer than the first function to the top manager's policy management tool. This paper is prepared to offer a study on the desirable record management which is necessary to the scientific decision making process. The scientific decision making requires the analysis of data derived from the reliable records. It is also aimed to enlighten the relations between the reliability of records and the adoption of the results of analysis in associated with the top manager's decision making.

• Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
• /
• 제43권1호
• /
• pp.26-34
• /
• 2010

Objectives: The purpose of this research is to analyze the impact of shared-decision making on patient satisfaction. The study is significant since it focuses on developing appropriate methodologies and analyzing data to identify patient preferences, with the goals of optimizing treatment selection, and substantiating the relationship between such preferences and their impact on outcomes. Methods: A thorough literature review that developed the framework illustrating key dimensions of shared decision making was followed by a quantitative assessment and regression analysis of patient-perceived satisfaction, and the degree of shared-decision making. Results: A positive association was evident between shared-decision making and patient satisfaction. The impact of shared decision making on patient satisfaction was greater than other variable including gender, education, and number of visits. Conclusions: Patients who participate in care-related decisions and who are given an explanation of their health problems are more likely to be satisfied with their care. It would benefit health care organizations to train their medical professionals in this communication method, and to include it in their practice guidelines.

• 한국경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회 2005년도 춘계공동학술대회 발표논문
• /
• pp.890-894
• /
• 2005

Coordination between supply chain partners is viewed critical to effective supply chain management. In many situations such as mutual investments or developing infrastructures for their operations related with each other, the coordination issue arises. Depending on the bargaining power balance between them, it is determined who will be able to exert more influence in making decisions related with such coordination. We consider two cases of the decision-making structure in the context of a simple supply chain consisting of two players, i.e., (1) the first case in which a supply chain partner dominates the decision-making process and the other passively follows the dominant player's decision, and (2) the other case in which the two players share the decision-making process equally. We examine which of the cases is better for the companies and where comes the value of the better case. To answer the research questions, we set up an optimal control theory model and derive an analytical solution. The analysis outcome indicates that the shared decision-making in general produces better results for both companies in the supply chain, and the value of the shared decision-making comes from more effective resource utilization than the dominated case.

• 간호행정학회지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.443-450
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This study was a descriptive correlation study to increase understanding of, and relationships among critical thinking disposition, clinical decision making and job satisfaction of cancer center nurses. Method: The participants in this study were 150 nurses working in one cancer center located in Gyeonggi Province. The statistic program, SPSS WIN17.0 was used for data analysis and data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation. Results: The critical thinking disposition of the participants showed statistically significant differences according to areas of practice (F=4.426, p=.005), and current position (F=9.346, p=.000). For clinical decision making of the participants, statistically significant differences were found according to current position (F=10.667, p=.000). Furthermore, for job satisfaction, there were statistically significant differences according to income (F=6.779, p=.002), length of career (F=2.701, p=.033) and current position (F=5.423, p=.005). There were significant positive correlations for critical thinking disposition with clinical decision making, and with job satisfaction. Conclusions: The results of the study indicate that to improve clinical decision making and job satisfaction of cancer center nurses, it is necessary to increase critical thinking disposition. To make this change, appropriate programs are needed to increase critical thinking and clinical decision making of general cancer center nurses.