Acknowledgement
Supported by : 한국연구재단
References
- 교육과학기술부 (2008). 초튜학교 교육과정 해설 (IV)- 수학, 과학, 실과. 서울; 대한교과서 주식회사.
- 교육인적자원부 (2007) 초등학교 교육과정. 교육인적자원부.
- 김경희 . 백희수 (2010). 비와 비율 영역에 대한 우리나라와 싱가포르 교육과정 및 교과서 비교 -TIMSS 평가목표와 공개문항을 중심으로, 학교수학. 12(4), 473-491.
- 김민경. 이지영. 홍지연. 김은경 (2011) 초등학교 수학교과서에서 나타난 '문제'의 비구조성(ill-structured)에 관한 연구, 학습자중심교과교육연구,11(2), 1-21.
- 김성동 (2001). PISA 2000 수학 평가 결과 분석 연구. 서울. 한국교육과정평가원.
- 임해미. 김수진. 김경희 (2012). 국가수준 학업성취도 평가와 국제 학업성취도 평가의 연계를 통한 우리나라 학생들의 수학 성취 특성 분석, 수학교육학연구, 22(1), 1-22.
- 한국교육과정평가원 (2004). 교사, 수업, 그리고 학생 성취: TIMSS 1999 결과를 중심으로. 서울. 선명인쇄주식회사.
- 한국교육과정평가원 (2007). PTSA 2006 결과 분석 연구: 과학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 수학적 소양 수준 및 배경 변인 분석, 연구보고 RRE 2007-1.
- Bransford, J. D. (1994). Who yz gonna call? Thoughts about teaching problem solbing. In P. Hallinger, K. Lithwood,& J. Murphy (Eds), Cognitive perspectives on edumtional leadership. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1983). The IDEAL problem solver: A guide for improving thinking, leaming, and creativity. New York: Freeman.
- Chi, M. T. H., & Glaser, R. (1985). Problem solving ability. In R. J. Stemberg (Ed.), Human abilities: An irifomation processing approach. NY W. H. Freeman.
- Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2003). Scaffolding students' problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Techrwlogy Research and Development, 51 (1),21-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504515
- Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual Framework for scaffolding ill-structured problem-solving proceses using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836
- Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21, 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653026
- Goos, M. (2004). Learning mathematics in a classroom community of inquiry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(4), 258-291 https://doi.org/10.2307/30034810
- Greeno, J. (1978). Natures of problem-solving abilities. In W. Estes (Ed.), Handbook of learning and cognitive processes (pp. 239-270). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hong, N. S. (1999). The relationShip between well-structured and ill-structured problem solving in multimedia simulation. The Pennsylvania State University.
- Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613
- Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Sinnott, J. D. (1972). A model for solution of ill-structured problems: Implications for everyday and abstract problem solving. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Everyday problem solving: Theory and application (pp.72-99). New York: Praeger.
- Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knawledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Tech Report No. 441. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading.
- Spiro, R. J., Vispoel, W., Schmitz, j., Samarapungavan, A., & Boerger, A. (1987). Knowlege acquisition for application: Cognitive flexibility and transfer in complex content domains. In B. C. Britton (Ed.), Executive control processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Stillman, G. A., & Galbraith, P. L. (1998). Applying mathematics with real world connections: Matacognitive characteristics of secondary students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36, 157-189. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003246329257
- Wood, P. K (1983). Inquiring systems and problem structures: Implications for cognitive development. Human Development, 26, 249-265. https://doi.org/10.1159/000272887
- Wood, T. (1999). Creating a context for argument in mathematics class. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 171-191 https://doi.org/10.2307/749609
- Venville, G., Rennie, L., & Wallace, J. (2004). Decision making an sources of knowlege: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology and mathematics. Research in Science Education, 34, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000033762.75329.9b
Cited by
- 과제의 구조화 정도에 따른 초등학생들의 통계적 변이성 이해 양상에 대한 사례 연구 vol.21, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmec.2018.21.2.131