• 컴퓨터교육학회논문지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.137-146
• /
• 2011

에드워드 드 보노가 개발한 육색 사고모자 기법은 사고의 수월성을 높이고 확산적 사고력 함양에 효과적이다. 특히 토론학습에서 문제를 다양한 입장에서 분석함으로써 합리적인 해결 방안을 모색하는데 효과적이다. 본 논문에서는 효과적인 토론학습을 위하여 육색 사고모자 기법을 바탕으로 학습자의 사고를 안드로이드 기기의 센서를 활용하여 음성과 이미지로 공유할 수 있는 시스템을 개발하였다. 시스템 설계를 위해 토론학습 설계구조모형을 제작하여 도구 및 가이드라인을 분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 토론학습 시스템을 개발하여 현장교육전문가를 대상으로 시연과 실습을 통해 시스템의 효용성 검증과 개선 방향을 분석하였다. 평가 결과 개발한 시스템은 기존의 웹 기반 토론 학습 시스템에 비해 학습 동기 유발 및 토론 능력 향상에 효과적일 것으로 분석되었다.

• 과학기술학연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.77-109
• /
• 2013

현재 의료체계의 주된 변화로 근거중심의학(Evidence-based Medicine: EBM)의 전지구적확산을 꼽을 수 있다. 최근 STS 연구들은 EBM이 실제 의학 실행 속에서 어떻게 사용되고 작동하는지에 대한 검토를 수행했는데, 이 글은 이러한 맥락 속에서 전립선암 특이항원(Prostate-specific Antigen: PSA) 의 조기진단 검사 도구 사용 여부를 둘러싸고 미국에서 벌어진 논쟁을 추적한다. 본 연구는 EBM이 PSA 검사 조기진단의 지지자와 반대자 양측에서 논쟁의 자원으로 이용되었으며, 그 과정에서 '확고한 과학적 기준'을 제시할 것으로 기대되던 EBM의 과학적 증거 위계가 행위자들의 의도에 따라 사실상'유연하게' 해석되고 동원되었음을 보일 것이다. 나아가, 이 글은 현재 EBM이 PSA 검사 반대자를 지지하는 것처럼 보이는 일은 삶의 질이라는 가치가 EBM의 체계 내에 주요한 변수로 부상하는 역사적 맥락에 의해 만들어진 결과임을 드러낼 것이다. 본 사례 연구는 EBM 시대에 의료기술에 관한 논쟁을 검토하는 연구자들이 EBM이라는 대상을 주어진 것으로 간주하기 보다는 논쟁 속에서 맥락화하여 논쟁과 함께 분석해야 함을 시사한다.

• 한국언론정보학보
• /
• 제18권
• /
• pp.63-97
• /
• 2002

본 논문은 텔레비전이 시사토론 장르를 어떻게 구축하고 있으며, 그러한 장르적 양식이 사회적 공론장으로서의 공적 토론에 어떻게 의미를 부여하는가에 관심을 갖고 텔레비전에서 방영되는 시사토론 네 편을 대상으로 2001년 6월 한달 간의 포맷, 주제, 참여자, 통용되는 지식 등을 텍스트 분석하였다. 그 결과 텔레비전 토론은 시사성 주제, 심야편성, 논쟁적 토론, 찬반구도, 생방송 등의 특징적 틀을 공유하고 있었으며, 특히 정책토론의 경우 거의 똑같은 형식과 내용을 반복하고 있었다. 이 들은 경성/거시적인 주제, 권위적이고 조직적인 진행, 전문가와 남성으로 구성된 패널, 집단적 이해의 반영, 제한된 수용자 접근권을 공통적인 특징으로 보여주고 있었다. 토론장르가 수적으로는 활성화되어 있지만 획일적인 관습의 반복에 따라 결국 공론장의 다양한 가능성은 엄격하게 재생산되는 관습적 틀 속에 함몰되어 양식만이 재생산되는 모습을 보여주었다. 가치토론장르에서 새로운 시도가 나타나고는 있지만 보다 민주적이고 심층적인 토론을 이끌어내기 위해서는 장르관습의 전반적인 변화가 요청된다.

• 한국학교수학회논문집
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.91-101
• /
• 2001

Nowadays the number of students that is losing their interest as well as learning desire in mathematics is increasing because of lack of logical thought creative power and abstract expression that present-day mathematics requires by reason of discrepancy of extreme scholastic ability by speciality of mathematics. In these conditions, we reduce the number of learning depression by bringing about learning desire or learning interest on mathematics, and students learn effective learning methods to be voluntary learning of discovery themselves that studies basic concepts, principles, rules through logical thought of students to solve difference of scholastic ability, thus we assumed that debate studies through small group activities in ability group would be one of ways to improve learning power, so the results of our research are as follows; 1. Debate studies through small group activities were very effective because of reinforcing the achivement level of students. 2. By this learning method, an individual or cooperrative learning was fostered, and lively discussions were accomplished. And learning attitudes of students were changed by the extension of cooperative learning abilities through advices or by themselves. 3. A personal opinion is payed regard by accepting an individual idea in the process of making questions. Learners can correct wrong concepts in the process of correcting wrong answers. So if we apply above-mentioned studies with easy contents from the lower grades, the effectiveness would increase as learners go to the higher grade. According to the results of various researches as follows; "The teaching-learning method oriented coopperative debate studies is effective to find solutions to mathematical problems." If small group activities are applied in the educational situation to search the course of a desirable cooperation learning through small group activities to improve scholastic abilities for a discoverable problem-solving power. I think that the teaching-learning method oriented cooperative debate studies is one of the most desirable methods to increase the problem-solving ability.

• 공학교육연구
• /
• 제24권1호
• /
• pp.34-45
• /
• 2021

This research is a case study about "Critical Thinking and Debate Education" class which was done for freshmen at the engineering college of "S" Women's University. Real time remote classes through LMS and ZOOM were the most effective tools under on-line circumstances, considering the fact that video lectures only cannot cultivate students' capabilities of critical thinking and communication. Throughout the analysis on students' self-reflection journals and lecture evaluations, this paper examined considerable future points and the pros and cons of "Critical Thinking and Debate Education" under online presentation and discussion situation. As research outputs, students told they could feel less nervousness and anxiety when they exercise and have a presentation because they could choose familiar space for them. In addition, students also told that they feel comfortable about both self-feedback and peer evaluation, repeatedly seeing the recorded video clip. However, on the contrary, sometimes students felt uncomfortable due to unstable internet connection through the online classes, and they also were regretful about the missing chances of interaction between a teacher and students and of intimate exchanges among students. They also told they had felt a kind of limit of enhancing their presentation skills just in front of the monitor. Considering these outcomes, this research paper points out that online education needs to be proceeded by strengthening multi layered feedback to students with the build-up of a non-face-to-face stable educational infrastructure, application of online instructional strategy, and utilization of YouTube platform and video contents. Through this research paper, I hope the new system of encompassing on/off line "Critical Thinking and Debate Education" and effective teaching and learning method can be developed soon by strengthening the strength of online education.

• 인문언어
• /
• 제2권2호
• /
• pp.183-201
• /
• 2002

Since the end of the Cold War, debate about the grand struggle between capitalism and communism has been largely replaced by debate about religious sectarianism. Some have even referred to a "clash of civilizations" in the wake of the spread of Islamic fundamentalism. This is in fact an old debate, but it has been given new life by arguments about globalization and economic development as envisioned by the West, and especially by the terrorist attacks in New York on September 11, 2001. While the political right has had little difficulty treating religious belief as a fundamental human and social interest, much of the political left has remained committed to secular Enlightenment, even when it criticizes the hegemony of the West. The dispute depends upon competing notions of history, secularism, and progress, and ultimately on the possibility or desirability of universal solidarity. While for many a world unified by one religion may no longer make sense, the old Enlightenment dream that a single version of secular and universal reason will eventually prevail over religious difference may also need to be reconsidered. The process that we call secularization is neither as singular, nor as transparent, as we might think.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.44-57
• /
• 1999

KIPS is a net-world, cyberspace for scholars in Public Administration and Policy Sciences in WWW. All knowledge-intensive work has its core the publishing and debating of document. We have created a cyber forum for that work KIPS Cyber Forum has adapted ‘D3E’, the web-tool kit for non-technical users to easily debate and publish documents that exploit to the full networked interactive web media. And, for real-time communication, we added it the voice conferencing system. KIPS has opened Cyber Forum service in November 1998. The visitors on KWS Cyber Forum are increasingly growing, but the participants on the debate are a few. This means that the problems of Cyber Forum Service are not technical, but participation. The result imply that, at now, high participation of scholars on the debate is needed, at first, by the detailed guides for internet, www and relevant technical information. After that more expertly designed interface is to be important.

• 천문학회보
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.32.2-32.2
• /
• 2016

The globular cluster (GC) systems in most elliptical galaxies show bimodal color distributions. This phenomenon has been generally regarded as a bimodal metallicity distribution, indicating the presence of two sub-populations in a GC system. However, since a new explanation on the bimodality was introduced where the nonlinear metallicity-to-color conversion can cause bimodal color distributions, the origin of this phenomenon has been under hot debate. In this presentation, we briefly review the ten-year debate on the origin of GC color bimodality, and present our recent pieces of evidence on the nonlinear nature of GC color-metallicity relations.

• 논리연구
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.103-118
• /
• 2011

최원배 교수는 논문 "수학적 대상의 존재와 우연성"에서 하트리 필드, 그리고 헤일/라이트 사이에서 벌어진 논쟁을 다룬다. 이들 사이에서 벌어진 논쟁은 간단하게 말해서 수학적 대상의 존재/비존재가 우연적이라면 이것에 대한 설명이 있어야 한다고 요구하는 헤일과 라이트의 주장과 그에 대한 설명이 있을 필요가 없다는 필드의 반박이라고 할 수 있다. 본 논문에서 필자는 최원배 교수의 논문에 대해 3가지의 의문점을 제기한다. 첫 번째와 세 번째 의문점은 최원배 교수의 논의에서 중요한 구분이 분명히 제시되어 있지 않거나 다소 잘못 이해한 부분이 있다는 것이고, 두 번째 의문점은 최원배 교수의 논증에 대한 반론이다.

• 국제초고층학회논문집
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.1-9
• /
• 2024

Today, most architectural and engineering historians no longer consider the Home Insurance Building to be the first skyscraper. Despite this, the popular belief remains that William Le Baron Jenny invented the first skyscraper when he designed the Home Insurance Building in 1884. This paper recounts the history of how Jenney won the public debate starting in 1896, despite his building being only a small evolutionary step forward. In that year, a series of letters in The Engineering Record allowed Jenney and his colleagues to engage in a public relations campaign to recast the debate about the first skyscraper to place the Home Insurance Building as the pivotal structure in skyscraper history.