• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.120-127
• /
• 2014

Background: Since December 2010, online computerized prospective drug utilization review (pDUR) has been implemented in Korea. pDUR involves the review of each prescription before the medication is dispensed to the individual patient. The pDUR is performed electronically by Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA), which is a Korean governmental agency, and then HIRA provides medical institutions and pharmacies with information that can be helpful to them in preventing potential drug problems such as drug/drug interactions or ingredient duplication. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the Korean pDUR implementation on the proportion of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) using claims data from HIRA. Methods: A before-after comparison of the prevalence of DDIs between prescription was conducted, using HIRA administrative claims data of medical institution from January 2010 to December 2011. The analysis unit was the prescription issued and pairs before and after. The main outcome measures were the proportion of DDIs within- (control group) or between- physician encounters. To examine the difference, a paired t-test was applied. Results: We found that DDIs proportion between prescription decreased significantly (t=3.04, p=0.0026) after the implementation of pDUR, whereas there is no significant reduction within prescription (t=1.15, p=0.2518). With respect to the prevalence of DDIs between drug groups, the most dramatic reduction was occurred between 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors and anti-fungal agents. Conclusion: It seems effective that giving a direct feedback to prescribers by a prospective DUR. Further research is needed to assess the impact of DUR to final outcomes such as hospitalization.

• 약학회지
• /
• 제55권3호
• /
• pp.173-184
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study was to review foreign retrospective Drug Utilization Review(DUR), and so to suggest a development plan suitable for use with domestic situation. Literature review of foreign retrospective DUR program and domestic project such as DUR and prescribing analysis project were reviewed. To improve prescribing quality, developed countries such as US, Canada, UK, France, and Australia have implemented various forms of policy. Based on the review of foreign retrospective DUR program, we suggested to apply practical implementation of retrospective DUR program.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제39권1호
• /
• pp.20-29
• /
• 2013

Medical errors such as adverse drug event, improper transfusion, wrong-site surgery, mistaken patient identity and so on commonly occur at health care practice. Information technology, like Drug Utilization Review(DUR) system which reviews, analyzes, and interprets medication data when prescribing, can play a key role in reducing such medical errors and improving patient safety. Korean Government has guided all hospitals to implement concurrent DUR(cDUR) system, which is the first case worldwide in that all healthcare providers have to use cDUR system when prescribing. This paper introduced a case study that a tertiary hospital has integrated the cDUR system into its comprehensive Hospital Information System(HIS) and analyzed the whole prescription data during a week right after adoption of cDUR system. Considering technical strength and weakness, the cDUR system was integrated into the HIS, using Broker Servers for minimizing doctors' anxiety. As the quantitative analysis of the whole prescription data, DUR conflict events, which mainly included duplicate medications and contra-indicated drug interactions for outpatients, were 2.77%. Although only 0.7% is for the contra-indicated drug interactions, it will be greatly devoted to achieve the purpose of DUR such as improving patient safety.

• 약학회지
• /
• 제53권6호
• /
• pp.368-376
• /
• 2009

DUR (Drug Utilization Review) originally referred to the evaluation of drug usage details: however DUR refers to the system used to support the services of prescribing and dispensing through linking from Health Insurance Review and Assessment (HIRA) Service in Korea. HIRA is going to begin the DUR enforcement for extending to nationwide coverage after pilot test. Objectives: The aims for this study were to evaluate and clarify the current opinions of the pharmacists for the recognition and acceptance rates before nationwide coverage concerning DUR system. Methods: A 16-question-questionnaire was developed and pilot tested. For 40 days of survey by both on-line and fax paper, it was carried out on 80 pharmacists working at community pharmacy in Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do. Results: Most of answers were broadly positive and interested in begining the DUR system and kept in mind that the goal of DUR is safety guarantee for people. On the other hand, most of answerers worry that delay of patient waiting time and inharmonious communication with doctors in DUR processing can be a major obstacle to begin the DUR system. Conclusion: To solve several problems, the most important things are to make good reciprocal relationships between doctors and pharmacists, investigate intervention tool to shorten patient waiting time, and activate educational program of inspecting items for the pharmacists.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제21권1호
• /
• pp.14-21
• /
• 2011

Drug Utilization Review (DUR) is known to play an important role to improve appropriateness of drug prescriptions. This retrospective, observational study was conducted to compare prescription patterns after installation of Computerized DUR Program (Drug Information Framework-$Korea^{TM}$) (Jan-Mar 2008; After) to before DUR program (Jan-Mar 2007: Before). 8 physicians affiliated in the S University Hospital were enrolled in the study and their 3 months' prescription data were analysed for drug prescription trends and DUR conflict events per 7 DUR screening modules (drugdrug interaction, therapeutic duplication, allergy, dosing, disease contra-indication, geriatric contra-indication, pediatric contra-indication). Average rate of DUR modules usage in 2008 (After) were 0.72. Average number of prescription drug per patient were reduced from 5.6 (Before) to 3.8 (After), and DUR program seemed to effect positively on physician's prescription related decision process. Overall DUR conflict events occurred by 8 physicians for 3 months were 17,923 Before and 20,057 After DUR program, and DUR conflict events per prescription were 2.8 Before and 2.9 After, respectively. Therapeutic duplication (37%), geriatric contra-indication (34%) and dosing (18%) were high ranked DUR conflicts. As the study was not sufficient to show a consistent trend to reduce DUR conflicts After, another study to confirm it's effectiveness would be recommended. This study would be of help to develop awareness of DUR program to healthcare providers.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.234-241
• /
• 2019

의약품을 사용할 때 나타나는 부작용은 국민의 건강을 크게 위협할 수 있다. 현재 의약품 부작용에 대한 보고가 매우 미흡한 것이 현실이다. 이에 현재 약국에서 사용하고 있는 의약품 사용평가(DUR:Drug Utilization Review)에 의약품 부작용 보고를 연계하게 된다면 활성화될 수 있다. 의약품 사용평가가 활성화되어 있는 미국 의약품 관리 체계 연구를 통해 의약품 부작용 보고 활성화 방안을 찾을 수 있다. 약국에서 의약품 관리 프로그램으로 사용되는 'Pharm IT 3000'에서 의약품 부작용 보고의 활성화 방안을 연구해 보았다. 문헌연구와 실제 프로그램 운영 방식 연구를 통해 Pharm IT 3000 처방 조제 현황 항목에 의약품 사용평가를 연동시켜 부작용 보고가 편리하게 되는 방안을 찾게 되었다.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제31권2호
• /
• pp.104-114
• /
• 2021

Objective: To explore the perception of drug utilization review (DUR) system and DUR modernization pilot project among healthcare professionals and patients. Methods: We conducted 8 times of focus group interviews (FGI) between August 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. The healthcare professionals and patients who participated in the DUR modernization pilot project were included in the present study. Based on the type of project participation or medical institution, the participants were divided into the following four groups: group 1, hospital; group 2, clinic; group 3, pharmacy; and group 4, patient. Within each group, interviews were conducted under a pre-defined agenda to identify the implicit perceptions of the participants; the contents of the interviews were, then, categorized. Results: Healthcare professionals established a consensus on the positive aspects of the DUR system and DUR modernization pilot project. However, substantial concerns remain, such as additional workload associated with monitoring adverse events or acquiring consents from patients. Furthermore, a difference of opinion over the DUR convenience system was observed. Among 3 DUR convenience system, the personal medication history review service was highly utilized, but pop-up hold function and communication system was rarely used. Conclusion: We observed that systematic intervention using the DUR system is effective for both healthcare providers and consumers. Adverse events caused by inappropriate drug use can be prevented by continuous patient monitoring. Therefore, the role of DUR system needs to be expanded to establish a safe drug management system.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.9-17
• /
• 2019

Objective: The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of implementing a systematic Drug Utilization Review (DUR) system on contraindicated drug use and pharmaceutical expenditures in Korea. Methods: A literature search was conducted using search engines such as PubMed, EMBASE, NDSL, and RISS for relevant systematic studies. The database search was performed and updated in April 2018. Two independent reviewers evaluated the abstracts to find potentially eligible articles. Results: In total, 1433 potentially eligible studies were selected, and 11 articles were eventually shortlisted for inclusion in the present review system. The outcome showed that contraindicated drug use decreased after implementation of the DUR system in Korea. The analysis also showed that the DUR system contributed to a reduction in pharmaceutical expenditures. Conclusions: Our study showed that implementing the DUR system reduced both contraindicated drug use and pharmaceutical expenditures in Korea.

• 한국임상약학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.25-32
• /
• 2019

Objective: South Korea made a list of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) for elderly patients in 2015 and has prompted medical professionals to prescribe proper medication by using the drug utilization review (DUR) system. It has been three years since the system was introduced, but related studies have rarely been conducted. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the DUR system on the prescription of PIMs for elderly patients. Methods: The data on the prescription of PIMs for elderly patients (${\geq}65$ years) who received medical treatment between March 1st and May 31st in 2015 (before introduction of the DUR system) and who received medical treatment between March 1st and May 31st in 2018 (after introduction of the DUR system) were retrospectively collected from electronic medical records. Results: The prescriptions of PIMs decreased from 3,716 (7.7%) to 3,857 (6.9%) (p < 0.001). The prescription of escitalopram and paroxetine, among selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, increased significantly, and that of short-acting benzodiazepines also increased significantly from 454 (0.93%) to 624 (1.2%). Conclusion: Prescription of PIMs for elderly patients significantly decreased (p < 0.001) after the DUR system was introduced. Further expanded studies of PIMs need to be conducted for the safety of elderly patients.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.178-184
• /
• 2024

연구배경: 본 연구는 의료질평가지원금 drug utilization review (DUR) 평가지표 도입 전·후의 DUR 점검률 및 의약품 중복처방 예방률 변화 차이를 비교하여 DUR 평가지표의 도입과 안전한 의약품 사용 간의 효과성을 파악하고자 한다. 방법: 본 연구는 2018년 건강보험심사평가원(Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service) DUR 자료(DUR 평가지표 도입 전)와 2023년 의료질평가지원금 평가 결과 산출 자료(DUR 평가지표 도입 후)를 활용하였다. 종속변수는 DUR 평가지표로, DUR 점검률과 의약품 중복처방 예방률 지표를 활용하였다. 독립변수는 DUR 평가지표 도입 여부이며, 통제변수는 의료기관 단위변수로, 종별 구분, 설립 구분, 소재지, DUR 청구 software 업체, 병상 수를 선정하였다. 결과: DUR 평가지표 도입 전·후의 의약품 중복처방 예방률 변화 차이를 분석한 결과, DUR 평가지표 도입 전·후의 의약품 중복처방 예방률은 통계적으로 유의미한 차이가 있었으며, DUR 평가지표 도입 후 의약품 중복처방 예방률이 유의미하게 증가하였다. 결론: 본 연구의 정책적 시사점은 다음과 같다. 첫째, DUR 시스템의 지속적인 평가 진행이 필요하다. 본 연구를 통해 DUR 평가지표 도입 후 의약품 중복처방 예방률이 유의하게 증가한 것을 확인하였다. 따라서 DUR 시스템의 효과를 계속해서 검토하고 의약품 사용의 안전성을 확대하기 위해 DUR 시스템의 지속적인 평가 진행이 필요할 것으로 판단된다. 둘째, DUR 시스템 정보를 활용하는 의료기관과 이를 관리하는 기관과의 협력 파트너십 구축이 필요하다. 의료기관의 적극적인 DUR 점검 참여와 관리기관의 다각적인 지원을 바탕으로 공동의 노력과 협력이 이루어진다면, DUR 시스템의 활성화를 통해 안전한 의약품 사용을 보장하고 국민건강을 보호하며, 의료의 질적 수준 향상을 불러올 것으로 판단된다.