• Title/Summary/Keyword: DOP-PCR

Search Result 6, Processing Time 0.017 seconds

Application of Chromosome Manipulation, DOP-PCR and AFLP Methods to Isolate Sex-Specific DNAs from Rumex acetosa L.

  • Jin, Dong-Chung;Kim, Joong-Soon;Park, ji-Young;Bong, Jae-Wook;Hur, Yoon-Kang
    • Journal of Photoscience
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.75-82
    • /
    • 2005
  • Rumex acetosa L. is a dioecious flowering plant with well developed sex chromosome system: 2n = 12 + XX in the female plants and 2n = 12 + XY1Y2 in the male plants. To isolate sex-linked DNA, we carried out chromosome micromanipulation, followed by DOP-PCR, AFLP of the PCR products, reverse Southern hybridization and sequence analysis. From 500 AFLP specific clones, 13 X-chromosome and 5 Y-chromosome specific clones were obtained. Except one clone RADAX-239 ($\underline{R}umex\;\underline{a}-\underline{D}OP-PCR-\underline{A}FLP-\underline{Y}-chromosome\;specific$), all clones appear to be R. acetosa plant-specific sequences and non-coding sequences. Southern blot analysis using these clones could not discriminate genomic DNAs either from male or female plants. Results of this study imply that both autosome-origin and degeneration of sex chromosomes are prevalent in plant systems.

  • PDF

Comparison of Non-amplified and Amplified DNA Preparation Methods for Array-comparative Gnomic Hybridization Analysis

  • Joo, Hong-Jin;Jung, Seung-Hyun;Yim, Seon-Hee;Kim, Tae-Min;Xu, Hai-Dong;Shin, Seung-Hun;Kim, Mi-Young;Kang, Hyun-Mi;Chung, Yeun-Jun
    • Molecular & Cellular Toxicology
    • /
    • v.4 no.3
    • /
    • pp.246-252
    • /
    • 2008
  • Tumor tissue is usually contaminated by normal tissue components, which reduces the sensitivity of analysis for exploring genetic alterations. Although microdissection has been adopted to minimize the contamination of tumor DNA with normal cell components, there is a concern over the amount of microdissected DNA not enough to be applied to array-CGH reaction. To amplify the extracted DNA, several whole genome amplification (WGA) methods have been developed, but objective comparison of the array-CGH outputs using different types of WGA methods is still scarce. In this study, we compared the performance of non-amplified microdissected DNA and DNA amplified in 2 WGA methods such as degenerative oligonucleotide primed (DOP)-PCR, and multiple strand displacement amplification (MDA) using Phi 29 DNA polymerase. Genomic DNA was also used to make a comparison. We applied those 4 DNAs to whole genome BAC array to compare the false positive detection rate (FPDR) and sensitivity in detecting copy number alterations under the same hybridization condition. As a result microdissected DNA method showed the lowest FPDR and the highest sensitivity. Among WGA methods, DOP-PCR amplified DNA showed better sensitivity but similar FPDR to MDA-amplified method. These results demonstrate the advantage and applicability of microdissection for array-CGH analysis, and provide useful information for choosing amplification methods to study copy number alterations, especially based on precancerous and microscopically invaded lesions.

Synthesis of L-threo-2,3-Dihydroxyphenylserine (L-threo-DOPS) by Thermostable L-Threonine Aldolase Expressed in Corynebacterium glutamicum R (Corynebacterium glutamicum에서 발현된 L-Threonine Aldolase를 이용한 파킨슨병 치료제 L-threo-2,3-Dihydroxyphenylserine (L-threo-DOPS)의 합성)

  • Baik, Sang-Ho
    • Microbiology and Biotechnology Letters
    • /
    • v.36 no.2
    • /
    • pp.128-134
    • /
    • 2008
  • In order to examine efficient L-threo-2,3-Dihydroxyphenylserine (L-threo-DOPS) synthesis process using whole cell biocatalyst, a thermostable L-threonine aldolase (L-TA), which cloned from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) and improved for stability, was expressed in a Corynebacterium glutamicum R strain. The constructed Corynebacterium expression vector, pCG-H44(1) successfully expressed L-TA in C. glutamicum R strain, but showed very low expression level. In order to improve the expression level, the expression vector named pCG-H44(2) was reconstructed by eliminating 1 nucleotide between SD sequence and start codon of L-TA. The pCG-H44(2) vector plasmid was able to overexpress L-TA approximately 3.2 times higher than pCG-H44(1) in C. glutamicum R strain (CGH-2). When the whole cell of CGH-2 was examined in a repeated batch system, L-threo-DOPS was successfully synthesized with a yield of 4.0 mg/ml and maintain synthesis rate constantly after 30 repeated batch reactions for 130 h.

Generation of FISH Probes Using Laser Microbeam Microdissection and Application to Clinical Molecular Cytogenetics

  • Shim, Sung-Han;Kyhm, Jee-Hong;Chung, Sung-Ro;Kim, Seung-Ryong;Park, Moon-Il;Lee, Chul-Hoon;Cho, Youl-Hee
    • Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
    • /
    • v.17 no.7
    • /
    • pp.1079-1082
    • /
    • 2007
  • Chromosome microdissection and the reverse FISH technique is one of the most useful methods for the identification of structurally abnormal chromosomes. In particular, the laser microbeam microdissection (LMM) method allows rapid isolation of a target chromosome or a specific region of chromosomes without damage of genetic materials and contamination. Isolated chromosomes were directly amplified by the degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction (DOP-PCR), and then the FISH probes labeled with spectrum green- or spectrum red-dUTP were generated by nick-translation. Whole chromosome painting (WCP) probes were successfully generated from only 5 copies of the chromosome. With this method, we produced 24 WCP probes for each human chromosome. We also tried to characterize a marker chromosome, which seemed to be originated from chromosome 11 on conventional banding technique. The marker chromosomes were isolated by the LMM method and analyzed by reverse FISH. We elucidated that the marker chromosome was originated from the short arm of chromosome 5 ($5p11{\to}pter$). A fully automated and computer-controlled LMM method is a very simple laboratory procedure, and enables rapid and precise characterization of various chromosome abnormalities.

Plant genome analysis using flow cytometry

  • Lee Jai-Heon;Kim Kee-Young;Chung Dae-Soo;Chung Won Bok;Kwon Oh-Chang
    • Proceedings of the Korean Society of Crop Science Conference
    • /
    • 1999.05a
    • /
    • pp.162-163
    • /
    • 1999
  • The goal of this research was (1) to describe the conditions and parameters required for the cell cycle synchronization and the accumulation of large number of metaphase cells in maize and other cereal root tips, (2) to isolate intact metaphase chromosomes from root tips suitable for characterization by flow cytometry, and (3) to construct chromosome-specific libraries from maize. Plant metaphase chromosomes have been successfully synchronized and isolated from many cereal root-tips. DNA synthesis inhibitor (hydroxyurea) was used to synchronize cell cycle, follwed by treatement with trifluralin to accumulate metaphase chromosomes. Maize flow karyotypes show substantial variation among inbred lines. thish variation should be sueful in isolating individual chromosome types. In addition, flow cytometry is a useful method to measure DNA content of individual chromosomes in a genotyps, and to detect chromosomal variations. Individual chromosome peaks have been sorted from the maize hybrid B73/Mol7. Libraries were generated form the DOP-PCR amplification product from each peak. To date, we have analyzed clones from a library constructed from the maize chromosome 1 peak. Hybridization of labeled genomic DNA to clone inserts indicated that $24\%,\;18\%,\;and\;58\%$ of the clones were highly repetitive, medium repetitive, and low copy, respectively. Fifty percent of putative low cpoy clones showed single bands on inbred screening, blots, and the remaining $50\%$ were low copy repeats. Single copy clones showing polymorphism will be mapped using recombinant inbred mapping populations. Repetitive clones are being characterized by Southern blot analysis, and will be screened by in situ hybridization for their potential utility as chromosome specific markers.

  • PDF