• 한국CDE학회논문집
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.26-34
• /
• 2012

Assembly scheduling in shipbuilding is responsible for determine assembly process orders and departmental production schedule for the block, the basic composite unit of ships. It is necessary much more information to decide production scheduling as the characteristic of shipbuilding which has been more complex and more various and also, a lot of waste of time and of human power is generated in the course of data processing. The target shipbuilding manufacturer of this study use empirical techniques, based on the user's discretion, to compile and to apply data which are scattered in DB storages separately. Because of that reason, the user should not only be performed identification and screening operations but also modification and verification for vast amounts of data, so it is hard to keep the consistency of the data and also the operation time is not constant. Accordingly, the object in this study is by presenting an efficient DB framework to reduce wasting time and man-hour at experienced-oriented process, abate user's manual operations and support an efficient scheduling in assembly processes.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.49-80
• /
• 1999

본 연구는 자연어 비불리언 탐색에서 탐색결과에 근거하여 질의를 수정, 확장, 결합하여 검색효과를 향상시키는 시스템들을 개념모델별로 성능을 고찰하고, 성능에 영향을 끼치는 요소들을 분석하여, 이론적인 개념의 틀을 제시하였다. 용어의 가중치기법, 문헌의 순위화방법, 용어선정알고리즘, 질의확장에 사용된 문헌수와 용어수, 적합성판정정보의 출처 및 척도, 배움표본의 크기, 부적합문헌정보의 사용여부, 용어확장방법, 질의의 크기, DB의 종류와 크기 등에 의해 영향을 받는 것으로 분석되었다.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.396-416
• /
• 2021

Objectives: This study was conducted to analyze the trends of government R&D (R&D) projects related to laboratory safety over the past 20 years. Methods: We collected publications from various databases(DBs) with words such as laboratory(ies), lab(s), researcher(s), laboratory worker(s), safety, environment, hazard(s), risk(s), and so on. Selected publications were analyzed by the research funds and the number of projects according to the investment subject and research characteristics. Results: About 93% of the total R&D budget went to government policy projects, not scientific research. Second, from the perspective of 'safety management activities', most of the research is related to management and inspection at the organizational level. Issues that need to be discussed at the national level like policy governance are not included. Third, focusing on the 'safety management cycle', there were few studies related to 'prediction' or 'post-response'. Fourth, when an analysis framework combining the perspectives of 'safety management activities' and 'safety management cycle' is applied, most of the budget is spent on infrastructure such as digital management systems, whereas basic knowledge for prevention and production of evidence was very few. Conclusions: In order to prevent policy planning without policy evaluation, implementation without strategy, and evaluation without evidence, it is necessary to expand investment in empirical research on risks, research on the effectiveness of current application methods, and research on theory development. The government budget for laboratory safety-related projects should be managed separately from the R&D budget for scientific research. Although less than 5% of the budget allocated to scientific research is the total budget, an optical illusion occurs because both the project budget and the scientific research budget are counted as R&D budgets.