• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2006년도 제33회 추계학술대회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.119-119
• /
• 2006

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.115-122
• /
• 2018

Although the current internationally recommended standard for the use factor (U) applied to CyberKnife is 0.05 (5%), the CyberKnife shielding standard is applied more stringently. This study, based on clinical data, was aimed at examining the appropriateness of existing shielding guidelines. Sixty patients treated with G4 CyberKnife were selected. The patients were divided into two groups, according to whether they underwent skull or spine tracking. Based on the results, the use factors for each wall ranged from 0.028 (2.8%) to 0.031 (3.1%) for the intracranial treatment and 0.020 (2.0%) to 0.022 (2.2%) for the body treatment. Excessive barrier thickness resulted in inefficient use of space and higher cost to the institutions. Furthermore, because the use factor is influenced by the position of the robot, the use factor determined based on the clinical data of this study would facilitate more reasonable treatment room design.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.233-241
• /
• 2015

Purpose: To compare volumetric modulated arc therapy of RapidArc with robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of CyberKnife in the planning and delivery of SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment by analyzing dosimetric parameters. Materials and Methods: Two radiation treatment plans were generated for 29 HCC patients, one using Eclipse for the RapidArc plan and the other using Multiplan for the CyberKnife plan. The prescription dose was 60 Gy in 3 fractions. The dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) coverage and normal tissue sparing in the RapidArc and the CyberKnife plans were analyzed. Results: The conformity index was $1.05{\pm}0.02$ for the CyberKnife plan, and $1.13{\pm}0.10$ for the RapidArc plan. The homogeneity index was $1.23{\pm}0.01$ for the CyberKnife plan, and $1.10{\pm}0.03$ for the RapidArc plan. For the normal liver, there were significant differences between the two plans in the low-dose regions of $V_1$ and $V_3$. The normalized volumes of $V_{60}$ for the normal liver in the RapidArc plan were drastically increased when the mean dose of the PTVs in RapidArc plan is equivalent to the mean dose of the PTVs in the CyberKnife plan. Conclusion: CyberKnife plans show greater dose conformity, especially in small-sized tumors, while RapidArc plans show good dosimetric distribution of low dose sparing in the normal liver and body.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.73-80
• /
• 2018

Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is a new treatment delivery technique that decreases overall treatment time by using higher fractional doses than conventional fractionation. Here, a quantitative analysis study of CyberKnife-based APBI was performed on 10 patients with left-sided breast cancer who had already finished conventional treatment at the Inha University Hospital. Dosimetric parameters for four kinds of treatment plans (3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT, and CyberKnife) were analyzed and compared with constraints in the NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 protocol and a published CyberKnife-based APBI study. For the 10 patients recruited in this study, all the dosimetric parameters, including target coverage and doses to normal structures, met the NSABP B39/RTOG 0413 protocol. Compared with other treatment plans, a more conformal dose to the target and better dose sparing of critical structures were observed in CyberKnife plans. Accelerated partial breast irradiation via CyberKnife is a suitable treatment delivery technique for partial breast irradiation and offers improvements over external beam APBI techniques.

• 대한방사선치료학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한방사선치료학회 2005년도 춘계학술대회 초록집
• /
• pp.33-34
• /
• 2005

• 한국의학물리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국의학물리학회 2006년도 제33회 추계학술대회 발표논문집
• /
• pp.83-83
• /
• 2006

• Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society
• /
• 제45권3호
• /
• pp.157-163
• /
• 2009

Objective : In recent years, CyberKnife has emerged as an important treatment modality in the management of pituitary adenomas. Treatment results after performing CyberKnife and the complications of this procedure are reviewed. Methods : Twenty-six patients with pituitary adenomas received stereotactic radiosurgery with the CyberKnife (CKRS). The follow-up periods ranged from 7 months to 47 months (mean$\pm$SD : $30{\pm}12.7$ months). The patients consisted of 17 with non-functioning adenomas, 3 with prolactinomas and 6 with acromegaly. The change in the tumor volume, visual acuity, hormonal function, and complications by this therapy were analyzed in each case. Results : The tumor control rate was 92.3%. Hormonal function was improved in all of the 9 (100%) functioning adenomas. Hormonal normalization was observed in 4 of the 9 (44%) patients with a mean duration of 16 months. In two patients (7.6%), visual acuity worsened due to cystic enlargement of the tumor after CKRS. No other complications were observed. Conclusion : CyberKnife is considered safe and effective in selected patients with pituitary adenomas. However, longer follow-up is required for a more complete assessment of late toxicity and treatment efficacy.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제24권3호
• /
• pp.185-191
• /
• 2006

목 적: 국내 실정에 적합한 사이버나이프의 표준화된 품질관리 절차서가 없어 이를 개발하고 유용성을 평가하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 사이버나이프의 구조적 특성과 치료 방법 등을 고려하여 품질관리 검사항목을 설정한 후, 적합한 시행 시기에 맞추어 주기적 분류를 하였다. 그리고 설정된 항목들은 각각의 품질관리 목적에 따라 일반적인 품질관리(basic QC), 치료정확도 품질관리(delivery specific QC), 환자 맞춤형 품질관리(patient specific QC) 등 3개의 분야로 구분하였다. 국내의 두 개 기관을 대상으로 개발된 품질관리 절차서의 각 항목을 비교하여 허용오차를 분석하였다. 설정된 항목에 대한 허용 오차는 제작사에서 제공된 품질관리 자료와 현재 국내에 설치되어 있는 두 개 기관의 최근 3년간의 품질관리 수행 데이터 등을 근거하였으며, 각 항목에 대한 측정 결과를 토대로 품질관리 실태를 분석하고 개발된 품질관리 절차서의 타당성을 검증하였다. 결 과: 개발된 사이버나이프 품질관리 절차서의 항목에 대하여 두 개 기관을 대상으로 정확성을 상호 비교 분석하였다. 모든 측정 결과는 사이버나이프의 품질관리 절차서에서 제시한 허용오차 범위 내에서 일치하고 있음을 확인하였다. 결 론: 본 연구에서 개발된 품질관리 절차서를 통해 사이버나이프에 대한 성능평가 기준을 확립할 수 있으며, 영상유도 정위방사선치료에 대한 정확성 및 안전성을 확보할 수 있을 것으로 생각된다.

• 대한골관절종양학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.17-24
• /
• 2005

의학의 발달과 더불어 종양에 대한 국소치료는 광범위근치술(extended radical surgery) 로부터 기능보존술(function preserving surgery)로 발달하고 이것은 다시 최소침습술(minimal-invasive surgery)로 발전하여 왔다. 그러나 최근 들어서는 기술의 혁신적인 진보로 비침습적수술법(non-invasive surgery)이 개발되어 감마나이프(gamma knife), 사이버나이프(cyber knife), 및 하이푸나이프(HIFU knife) 등이 출현하게 되었다. 본 논문에서는 이들 중 하이푸나이프를 이용한 체외강력집속초음파치료(extracorporeal high intensity focused ultrasound therapy)에 대하여 발달사, 치료기 구조 및 치료과정, 조직학적 변화와 기전, 임상적용, 장단점 및 전망 등을 살펴보고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제30권1호
• /
• pp.65-68
• /
• 2004

CyberKnife is a stereotactic radiosurgery system which could be used to treat many tumors and lesions. It provides the surgeon unparalleled flexibility in targeting using a compact light linear accelerator mounted on a robotic arm. Advanced image guidance technology tracks patient and target position during treatment, ensuring accuracy without the use of an invasive head frame. CyberKnife with Dynamic Tracking Software is cleared to provide radiosurgery for lesions anywhere in the body when radiation treatment is indicated. It has often been used to radiosurgically treat otherwise untreatable tumors and malformations. Moreover, this instrument treats tumors at body sites, most of which are unreachable by other stereotactic systems. Compared with conventional radiotherapy, it is fundamentally different that using non-invasive, frameless, no excessive radiation exposure to normal tissue. In oral malignant neoplasm, surgical excision and radiation therapy should be tried first, additionally chemotherapy could be considered. However, after failure of conventional therapies, patients had poor systemic condition and surgical limitation. So, CyberKnife could be a suitable therapy. A 49 years man was referred in recurred mandibular cancer treated by radiotherapy. The tumor was considered inoperable, because of extensive invasion and was not expected to good response to conventional therapies. We experienced a case of CyberKnife after 4 cycle chemotherapies, so we report it with review of literature.