• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권6호
• /
• pp.357-363
• /
• 2022

Kinship is a permanent relationship which is likely to impact the regulations adopted by the legislator to deal with crimes involving close relatives. Accordingly, the title "Impact of Kinship on a Criminal Case" is intended to highlight the legal provisions related kinship, regarding such case, and the procedures associated therewith; as the legislator takes kinship into account, particularly with respect to the procedures related to crimes between relatives; and it is the legislator's aim to protect such relation.

• 의료법학
• /
• 제15권2호
• /
• pp.435-459
• /
• 2014

Supreme Court of Korea has been mitigating the burden of proof on the malpractice and causal relation by a patient in accordance with the practical transfer of such burden of proof on causal relation as well as relieving a doctor's burden of proof on mistake in the civil damage claim suits on the malpractice. However, a prosecutor shall strictly prove the causal relation between malpractice and unfavorable results as well as a doctor's mistake in the criminal cases for making a doctor accept the professional negligence resulting in death or injury in accordance with In Dubio Pro Reo principles. Furthermore, it shall not be allowed to relieve the burden of proof on malpractice and causal relation which has been frequently applied in the civil proceedings. Nevertheless, it was widely known that the front-line courts accepted the malpractice and causal relation by quoting the legal principles on relieving the burden of proof on malpractice and causal relation applied in the civil cases even in criminal cases with no or insufficient proof on malpractice or causal relation. However, the latest precedents in Supreme Court explicitly declared the opinion that there was no reason to apply the legal principle to relieve the burden of proof on the malpractice and causal relation in the criminal cases requiring the proof 'which doesn't cause any reasonable doubt' on malpractice and causal relation in accordance with the legal principles 'favorable judgment for a defendant in case of any doubt' on the basis of the strict principle of 'nulla poena sine lege.' Accordingly, Supreme court definitely clarified that there would be no reason to relieve the burden of proof on malpractice and causal relation in criminal cases by reversing several original judgments accepting malpractice and causal relation even though there were no strict evidence.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.1-23
• /
• 2012

Defamation on the Internet is a criminal offense. Of late, the damage it has been causing has grown exponentially. Here, we suggest some ideas to expand the use of arbitration in Korea. We suggest that all disputes arising in connection with current contracts be settled under the rules of conciliation and arbitration. As a countermeasure to the requirements for defamation or damages, the field of criminal arbitration regulations needs to be defined strictly. In conclusion, the UK does not make provisions for arbitration as a specific subject. With respect to foreign legislation, it is necessary to take a look at ways to expand arbitration in our country. The scale of arbitration must be expanded to allow for greater protection of criminals in exchange for their cooperation in arbitration cases and relative to the amount of the damages in dollars. There must also be detailed instructions regarding the eligibility criteria for and proper handling of these arbitration cases.

• 한국화재조사학회논문지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.23-30
• /
• 2008

범죄자 프로파일링은 최신 과학수사기법으로 외국에서는 물론 국내에서도 많은 관심을 받고 있는 분야이며, 이에 대한 연구가 최근 들어 경찰 실무에서 뿐만 아니라 사회과학자들에게서도 주목을 받고 있는 실정이다. 범죄자 프로파일링은 미국에서 1960년대 이후 급증한 연쇄살인 범죄에 대한 새로운 수사기법으로 개발된 분야로서, 연쇄살인 범죄자에 대해서는 비교적 다양한 연구가 수행된 반면 방화범죄자에 대해서는 국내 외의 연구가 매우 부족한 상황이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 외국에서 수행된 연구 및 방화범죄자의 유형 구분이 가능한가에 대한 외국의 연구 결과들을 검토하여 국내에서 방화범죄자의 프로파일링이 어떻게 이루어져야할 것인가에 대한 기초 연구를 제공하고자 한다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제6호
• /
• pp.215-233
• /
• 2003

The Serial murder is a serious social phenomenon that gives a shock to community and society, because of it's habituate and scheme. We could identify a happening of serial killing crime at Western society, especially in U. S, but hardly to find many cases in Korea except some of cases. We can easily prospect the happening of serial killing crime at Korea in the future, at least it exists that home and social disorganization cause by divorcing and hasty economic development. There will be a reserve criminal who have distorted personality effected by undesirable surrounding, therefore he may become a serial murder. This study examines criminal psychological analysis of On Bo Hwan's serial murder case in 1994 at Korea, according to criminal records and press report and his statement and confession. This paper also show his domestic background and growing atmosphere and human relation between his parents.

• 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지
• /
• 제23권6호
• /
• pp.75-79
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this paper is to introspect again the role of the criminal law at a time when it is said that numerous criminal and legal discussions are needed to develop the so called "reply manipulation " case that is shaking the nation's political history. The research method considered the literature and precedents discussed in the past, and discussed the issue of subculture abuse caused by the internet, which is a product of convenience and affluence that came with the Forth industrial revolution through criminal law. Through a computer program, a discussion was held on what penalties would be imposed on the criminal law for attempting to manipulate public opinion by manipulating the so-called number of comments or Reaction. Question of whether the criminal law should further emphasize the need for a discussion on the need for a method to strengthen the preventive functions of the criminal law and expand the scope of punishment in order to address new causes of risk that came with the development of science. Without reflecting on whether such as "government-inspired demonstration "would be possible in today's world that was in the public perception of the authoritarian government of the past, it is a problem to see that the political goals of a particular group can be achieved by manipulating comments or creating public opinion on the Internet. The duty of criminal law is to protect the interests of the law. The role of the criminal law should be maintained the self limiting as far as possible in cases of violation or danger of the law. Still, it is a problem that the role of the criminal justice system today is too aggressive and is seen as a top tool rather than a last resort for solving problems. he role of the internet will be expanded further in the Hyper Connected society. To solve these problems, we should look forward to a change in the priority of other laws and policies other than criminal law.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제17권3호
• /
• pp.600-607
• /
• 2021

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 가상화폐를 통한 범죄수익금의 자금세탁 경로를 범죄스크립트 분석을 이용하여 살펴보고, 이에 대한 형사사법기관의 예방 및 대책 방안을 강구하기 위함이다. 연구방법: 자금세탁을 통한 가상화폐의 수익 경로에 대하여 선행연구 조사결과와 우리나라에서 발생된 범죄사례 등을 바탕으로 범죄스크립트 기법을 활용하여 자금세탁 경로를 분석하였다. 연구결과: 자금세탁을 한 가상화폐 대부분이 범죄수익금으로 전환되고, 이 수익금은 다시 세탁되어 현금화 되거나 범죄자금으로 쓰이는 악순환이 발생되는 특징을 가지고 있다. 이에 스크립트를 통해 본 결과 자금세탁의 경로는 익명성을 이용한 가상화폐거래소에서 주로 범죄수익금으로 전환되고 있으며, 이 경로를 여러 번 반복되기 때문에 가상화폐소를 이용하여 세탁되어진 자금을 형사사법기관 등에서 찾는 것이 매우 어려운 것으로 파악되었다. 결론: 가상화폐를 이용한 자금세탁의 방법이 교묘화 되어가고 있어 이에 따른 흐름을 파악한 뒤 자금세탁에 대한 가상화폐 거래금지 또는 몰수에 따른 강력한 처벌과 피해를 예방할 수 있는 제도적 보완장치가 마련되어야 할 것이다.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.41-55
• /
• 2022

기술보호의 중요성이 날로 강조됨에 따라 기술보호를 위한 다양한 보호조치들이 수행되고 있으나 기술유출을 위한 시도가 끊이지 않고 있으며 이에 대한 대안으로 기술유출 범죄에 대해 보다 강력한 처벌이 사회적으로 요구되고 있는 실정이다. 이러한 사회적 요구에 맞춰 그간 꾸준히 처벌 기준이 상향되어 왔으며 현재도 추가적인 강화 내용을 담은 입법안들이 국회에 계류 중인 상황이다. 하지만 범죄에 대한 억제력을 실질적으로 제고하기 위해서는 처벌 기준을 강화하는 것만으로는 충분하지 않으며 처벌의 확실성이 높아졌을 때야 비로소 그 효과를 온전히 발휘될 수 있다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 처벌 자체의 강화적인 부분보다는 현 제도 하에서 처벌의 확실성을 높이기 위한 방안을 모색하는데 초점을 맞췄으며 이를 위해 기술유출 형사사건 중 무죄 사건을 중심으로 사례 및 원인을 유형별로 분석함으로써 기술유출 형사사건에서의 무죄율이 일반 형사사건 대비 높은 이유를 도출해보고 이를 토대로 부당한 무죄사건을 줄이기 위한 개선 고려사항들을 논의하고자 하였다.

• 시큐리티연구
• /
• 제43호
• /
• pp.231-257
• /
• 2015

오늘날 주요 선진국들은 신안보 현실에 부응하여 형사특례 도입 등 관련 법제를 강화하고 있는 추세이다. 이러한 형사특례 절차를 마련하고 있는 것은 안보와 관련된 수사에서는 피의자의 인권이라도 어느 정도 제한할 수밖에 없다는 판단에서 출발한 것이다. 즉, 간첩, 테러 등 안보사범에 대해서 수사 절차를 다르게 적용하는 것은 개인적 보호법익보다는 국가의 법익과 사회적 법익을 우선으로 고려하여 어느 정도 한도에서는 감청을 허용하고 영장주의 예외를 허용하고 증거인멸과 더 큰 테러와 간첩행위에 의한 국가적 손실을 예방하기 위해 변호인 접견권을 제한하거나 테러 혐의자의 가택이나 사무실을 폭넓게 수색하도록 허용하고 있다. 이와 같이 안보사범의 처리에 있어 형사절차의 개선과 강화는 매우 중요하다. 하지만 우리나라는 선진국과 같이 예비와 음모죄를 강화하거나, 내수사 단계에서의 수사여건을 개선하는 등 적극적 노력보다는 일반 형사범의 처벌과정과 거의 차이가 없음을 알 수 있다. 이러한 분위기가 지속된다면 최근의 신안보 현실에서 국가적 위협요인에 대하여 효과적으로 대응하기 어렵다. 이를 개선하기 위해서는 선진국의 안보법제도를 고려하여 우리의 상황에 적절한 형사절차 등의 특례조항을 도입해야 한다. 이 논문에서는 국내 안보사례 분석을 통해 안보형사법제의 개선방안을 논의해 보았다.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.93-119
• /
• 2009

Nowadays the number of crimes is increasing rapidly and society is getting more and more dangerous. Recently the criminal aspect of our society, the intelligence, diversity, localized area, as well as for the crime victims also difficult to predict the damage recovery is not easy to change their level of pain and are also serious. This phenomenon is increasingly expected to intensify, the proper response is a factory. The more so if the victim of murder. The criminal mediation working on the operational adjustments Borrower payment, Construction charges, investments and financial transactions due to interpersonal conflicts that occurred as a fraud, embezzlement, breach of trust property crimes such accused, individuals between the defamatory, offensive, encroachment, violating intellectual property rights and private Disputes about the complaint case and other criminal disputes submitted to mediation to resolve it deems relevant to the case who are accused. But the core of a detective control adjustment, adjust the members' representative to the region, including front-line player or a lawyer appointed by the attorney general at this time by becoming parties to this negative view may be ahead. Some scholars are criticizing the current criminal justice system for the absence of proper care for the criminal victims, as an alternative to the traditional criminal justice system. The introduction of the summary trial and related legal cases, the command structure, compensation system, crime victims' structural system can be seen as more classify, crime subject to victim's complaint, By case with a criminal misdemeanor in addition to disagree not punish criminal, minor offense destination, traffic offenders, regular property crime, credit card theft, intellectual property rights violators can be seen due to more categories can try. They sued in law enforcement, Prosecution case has been received and if any one party to the criminal detective Arbitration request arbitration by the parties can agree to immediately contact must be referred to arbitration within 15 days of when the arbitration case will be dismissed. These kinds of early results of the case related to, lawyers are involved directly in the arbitration shall be excluded. Arbitration system is the introduction of criminal justice agencies working to help resolve conflicts caused by adjustment problems will be able to. This article does not argue that we should stick to the traditional justice system as a whole. Instead it argues that the restrictive role of the traditional justice is to be preserved.