• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제24권
• /
• pp.3-23
• /
• 2004

It is our common understanding that the carrier is bound to deliver the goods to the consignee named in a non-negotiable straight bill of lading without its presentation. But recently Court of Appeal, Singapore, held that "where a straight bill of lading is issued it is necessary for the bill of lading to be presented by the consignee to the carrier by sea in order to obtain delivery of the goods. A straight bill of lading, just like a bill of lading to order, confers title including the right to receive the goods mentioned on the bill of lading. Only the possibility of negotiation is excluded. The carrier by sea is liable where he delivers the goods to the consignee named in the straight bill of lading without delivering the bill of lading itself."

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.1-11
• /
• 2018

최근 ICT와 함께 IoT, 클라우드, 인공지능 등의 신기술들이 정보화 사회를 폭발적으로 변화 시키고 있다. 그러나 APT(Advanced Persistent Threat), 악성 코드, 랜섬웨어 등 최신 위협과 개인정보 처리 위탁 업무 확대로 수탁사 관련 개인정보 유출 사고도 더욱 더 증가하고 있다. 따라서 수탁사 보안 강화를 위해 본 연구는 위수탁 개요 및 특징, 보안 표준 관리 체계, 선행 연구들을 현황 분석하여 점검 항목을 도출하였다. 그리고 수탁관련 정보통신망법, 개인정보보호법 등의 법률들을 분석 매핑한 후 최종 수탁사 개인정보 보호 관리 수준 점검 항목들을 도출하고 이를 토대로 AHP 모형에 적용하여, 점검 항목간 상대적 중요도를 확인하였다. 실증 분석 결과 내부관리체계 수립, 개인정보 암호화, 생명주기, 접근 권한 관리 등의 순으로 중요도 우선 순위가 나타났다. 본 연구의 의의는 수탁사 개인정보 취급시 요구되는 점검 항목을 도출하고 연구 모형을 실증함으로써 고객 정보 유출 위험 감소 및 수탁사의 개인정보 보호 관리 수준을 향상시킬 수 있으며, 점검 항목의 상대적 중요도를 고려하여 점검 활동을 수행한다면 투입 시간 및 비용에 대한 효과성을 높일 수 있을 것이다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제51권
• /
• pp.317-358
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study aims to analyse the key differences of the sea waybill and electronic B/L in the international transport documents. Sea waybills look remarkably like ordinary bills of lading. Indeed, in two important ways, they are just like bills of lading: the front of the document will near a description of the quantity and apparent condition of the goods; and the back of the document provides evidence of the terms of the contract of carriage. They differ from bills of lading in that, far from indicating that the goods described are deliverable to the order of the shipper or of the consignee, they will make it explicit that the goods are deliverable only to the consignee. Again, different carries will do thai in a variety of ways. For example, the document may call itself non-negotiable, omitting the word order from the consignee box on the front of the document, and stating explicitly that the goods will be deliverable to the consignee or his authorised representative on proper proof of identity and authorisation. The Hague-Visby Rules and Hamburg Rules give no guidance as to any right to instruct the carrier in respect of goods while they are in transit. However, in applying Article 50 of the Rotterdam Rules, in particular when applying it in the context of seawaybills, straight bills of lading or ship's delivery orders, regard would need to be had to preserve the shipper's rights under any of those three documents even after the buyer of goods covered by them has acquired rights of its own. And, the right of control is defined at Article 1.12 of the Rotterdam Rules. The right to give instruction is further limited by the terms of Article 50.1 to three particular types of instruction in respect of the goods, relating broadly to the goods, their delivery en route, and the identity of the consignee. And, the CMI formulated the CMI Uniform Rules for Sea Waybills for voluntary incorporation into any contract of carriage covered by such a document. Recognising that neither the Hague nor the Hague-Visby Rules are applicable to sea waybills, the CMI Rules provide that a contract of carriage covered by a waybill shall be governed by whichever international or national law, if any, would have been compulsorily applicable if the contract had in fact been covered by a bill of lading or similar document of title.

• 항공우주정책ㆍ법학회지
• /
• 제1권
• /
• pp.193-222
• /
• 1989

The purpose of this study is to review the rights and duties of cargo owners, the party to the contract of international carriage of goods by air under the Warsaw Convention System and the IATA conditions. It is generally known that air freight is the most-cost mode of transportation. However, should there be considerations of total distribution cost, the use of air freight leads exporters to be advantageous in physical distribution. The Warsaw Convention System defined and limited the rights and duties of cargo owners and air carriers paticipating in the international carriage of goods, but it does not regulate every aspect of air transportation. Therefore, the unregulated parts are governed by national laws and by individual contracts of carriage. The International Air Transport Association(lATA), a worldwide organization of airlines, has formulated model conditions of contract for the carriage of cargo. These models are not uniformly followed but they serve as a basis for many of the individual standard form of contracts prepared by air carriers. The contract of air carriage of goods is a contract of adhesion, 'the consignor recognizing and accepting the conditions laid down by the carrier'. There are consignors and carriers as the parties to the contract of international carriage of goods. In addition to his basic right, implied in Warsaw Convention Article 18 and 19, to require devery of the goods in good condition and at the date agreed upon, the consignor has the right to dispose the goods in the course of the journey up to the moment when the consignee is entitled to require delivery. If it is impossible to carry out the orders of the consignor, the carrier must so inform him forthwith. The right conferred on the consignor ceases at the moment when that of the consignee begins in accordance with Warsaw Convention Article 13. Nevertheless, if the consignee declines to accept the air waybill or the goods, or if he cannot be communicated with, the consignor resumes his right of disposition. Unless it is otherwise agreed, it is the duty of the carrier to give notice to the consignee as soon as the goods arrive. The consignee is entitled, on arrival of the goods at the place of destination, to require the carrier to hand over to him the air waybill and to deliver the goods to him, on payment of the charges due and on complying with the conditions of carriage set out in the air waybill. The air waybill is supposed to be made out by the consignor. If the carrier makes it out, he is deemed, subject to proof to the contrary, to have done so on behalf of the consignor, whether there is one air waybill or several, each must be made out in three original parts. The first is for the carrier, the second is for the consignee, and the the third is handed to the consignor when the shipment has been accepted. The consignor is responsible for the correctness of the particulars and statement concerning the cargo appearing in the air waybill. Each of the original parts of the air waybill has evidential value and possession of his part is a condition for the exercise by the consignor or consignee of his rights under the contract of carriage. Hague Protocol set forth in Article 9 that nothing in this. Convention prevents the issue of a negotiable air waybill, but Montreal Additional Protocol No. 4 deleted this article. All charges applicable to a shipment are payable in cash at the time of acceptance thereof by the carrier in case of a prepaid shipment or at the time of delivery thereof by the carrier in case of a collect shipment. The carrier shall have lien the cargo for unpaid charges and, in the event of non-payment thereof, shall have the right to dispose of the cargo at public or private sale and pay itself out of the proceeds of such sale any and all such amounts. In conclusion, the Warsaw Convention System has the character of ambiguity in various respects, not only in the part of the forms of documents but also in conditions of contract. Accordingly, the following propositions might be considered: (1) If the carrier does not obey the orders of the consignor for the disposition of the goods without proper reasons, he will be liable strictly for any damage which may be caused thereby to the cargo owner. The special agreement and carrier's conditions of carriage which limit unreasonably the consignor's right of disposition of the goods will be nullified. (2) The instrument of the Warsaw Convention System which is not yet in force(Montreal Additional Protocol No. 4) would considerably simplfy the processing and keeping of computerized records of the carriage. Until this instrument enters into force, the airlines will be faced with practical problems preventing them to substitute computerized data processing techniques for the formal issuance of the documents. Accordingly, Montreal Additional Protocol No. 4 should become effective as soon as posisble. From a practical point of view in the international trade, the issuance of negotiable air waybill should be permitted for the security of the bank.

• 한국전자거래학회지
• /
• 제14권4호
• /
• pp.299-313
• /
• 2009

국내 물류 환경이 점차 글로벌 물류로 변화됨에 따라 업무 처리에 다양한 물류 주체들이 참여하고, 화물은 컨테이너에 포장되어 여러 단계를 거쳐 수화인에게 전달된다. 또한 화물 배송 과정 중간에 화물이 손상되거나 유실될 가능성이 크다. 이 때문에 송화인과 수화인을 비롯한 여러 물류 주체들에게 있어서 수출입 화물에 대한 흐름의 파악은 매우 중요한 문제가 되고 있다. 하지만 현실적으로는 여러 가지 문제로 인해 화물이 전달되는 과정을 일관되게 추적하는 것은 매우 어려운 실정이다. 그 원인은 화물과 정보 흐름이 일치하지 않는다는 것과 업무자동화 측면에서 표준 정보 및 프로세스가 아니어서 물류 주체 간 데이터 연동이 어렵다는 것이다. 이에 본 논문에서는 화물 추적 업무에 있어서 단일화되고 통합된 비즈니스 협업을 위한 비즈니스 프로세스를 정의하고, 그 결과를 이용해 표준 데이터를 정의하고자 한다. 개발된 프로세스 모델과 표준 데이터는 국제적으로 상호운용성을 지원할 수 있도록 하였다.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제37권4호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2012

With the enormous growth and various applications of private brands, national brand manufacturers are confronted with a dilemmatic situation. That is, paradoxically, some manufacturers have come to produce private brands of retailers which are potential competitors to their own brands. This study reveals why manufacturers with their own brands let themselves do the consignment production of retailers' private brands although those private brands may become strong competitors of their own brands and then investigates the condition in which manufacturers may benefit from such consignment production. Through an analysis of a game theoretical model assuming a monopoly market, the present study presents the theoretical backgrounds and provides new insights about consignment production of manufacturer with its own brand for retailer's private brand. First, such consignment production can play a role in mitigating the loss in the consignee manufacturer's own brand sales caused by the private brand in the competitive environment. Second, the effectiveness of such role is affected by the quality of the private brand produced under consignment. In other word, only if the consignee manufacturer keeps the quality of the private brand low, the manufacturer can maintain the benefit from its own brand. In addition, a consigner retailer needs to consider the final objective of launching its private brand, when it chooses its consignee manufacturer of the brand. Finally, a manufacturer with its own brand may consider consignment production as not merely an unavoidable option compelled by a retailer's power but a reasonable strategic choice to reduce the risk from competition.

• 융합보안논문지
• /
• 제20권3호
• /
• pp.79-88
• /
• 2020

인터넷 기업의 영업 이익과 업무 효율성을 높이기 위해 개인정보를 이용한 업무 위탁행위가 증가되고 있다. 개인정보를 위탁받은 업체들에서 개인정보 노출 사고가 발생하는 경우 업무를 위탁한 기업들이 고스란히 피해를 입게 된다. 본 연구는 개인정보를 위탁받은 업체들의 업무 속성들을 분석하고 개인정보의 중요도에 따른 가중치를 적용하여 개인정보 노출 위험성이 높은 업체를 식별할 수 있는 모델을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 개인정보 위탁관계, 개인정보 위탁서비스, 개인정보 이용항목들을 분석하고 사회연결망 분석과 군집분석을 활용하여 네트워크 중심성이 높은 업체 중 정보보호인증 획득이 필요한 업체를 식별하였다. 본 연구 결과는 개인정보를 이용하는 기업들을 관리하는 민간기업이나 공공기업의 정보보호 전략 수립에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.95-113
• /
• 2016

주민번호를 포함한 개인정보의 처리업무는 상당한 전문지식과 많은 비용이 소요되어 IT 전문 업체에 위탁 처리하는 경우가 보편화 되었다. 개인정보 관련 사고는 점차 증가하고 있으며, 사고 유형의 대부분은 수탁자에 의한 누출 혹은 유출에 의해 발생하고 있다. 개인정보보호 실태점검과 관리수준 진단 결과 공공기관에서의 수탁자에 대한 개인정보 사고 예방노력과 개인정보보호 관리체계 구축 노력이 시급한 상황이다. 본 논문에서는 개인정보 보호의 효율적 제고 방안에 대하여 연구하였다. 개인정보 처리 업무위탁에 대한 법률사항을 분석하고, 관리체계 구축을 위한 법률 기준 지표를 선택하여, 수탁자에 대한 개인정보보호 관리수준 분석 방안과 수탁자 개인정보보호 관리체계 강화 방안을 제시하였다. 개인정보보호 관리체계 강화 방안으로 수탁자 개인정보보호 관리체계를 제시하였고, 세 가지 법률 강화방안을 제시하였다. 본 논문에서는 개인정보보호 관리체계 강화 방안을 구성하기 위하여 공공기관의 대표적 개인정보 처리 위탁업무 중 IT유지보수, 고지서인쇄, 콜센터와 관련된 30개 수탁자들을 대상으로 설문조사를 통해 조사하였고, 강화 방안에 대한 문헌 근거를 제시하였으며, 개인정보 위탁자와 수탁자에 대한 FGI를 통해 강화방안에 대한 검증을 실시하였다.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제6권
• /
• pp.11-51
• /
• 1993

This study is focused on the problems and the suggestions of proper ideas for solving them which are arisen from appling CIF, Incoterms 1990 into the contract of sale after reviewing of the contents of traditional CIF contract and the main changes of CIF, Incoterms 1990. This study summerized as follows: First, when the seller provide the buyer with non-negotiable sea waybill or inland waterway document instead of negotiable bill of lading, it is my feeling that the essence of symbolic delivery in traditional CIF contract is fading. And if the buyer has paid for the goods in advance, or a bank wishes to use the goods as security for a loan extended to the buyer, it is not sufficient that the buyer or the bank be named as consignee in a non-negotiable document. This is true because the seller by new instractions to the carrier could replace the named consignee with someone else. To protect the buyer or the bank it is therefore necessary that the original instructions from the seller to the carrier to deliver the goods to the named consignee be irrevocable. Second, CIF term can only be used for sea and inland waterway transport. When the ship's rail serves no practical purposes such as in the case of roll-on/roll-off or container traffic, CIP term instead of CIF term is more appropriate to use. Third, the EDI method still contains many legal and technical problems to be solved in order to be used thoroughly' in the international sale of goods. Therefore, the parties wishing to replace the traditional paper-based trade documents by electronic messages must exchange the agreement on EDI each other in order to prevent and sol ye unexpected problems. Forth, it may be that the goods are to be carried in bulk without such marking or naming of consignee as would amount to appropriation. Then the risk will not pass until effective appropriation has been made. Therefore, the seller needs to appropriate by issuing of separate bills of lading or delivery orders for parts of the bulk cargo. And in case the goods are bought while they are carried at sea, some problems on the passing of risk would arise. One possibility is that the buyer might have to assume risks which have already occured at the time when the contract of sale is entered into force. The other possibility would be to let the pissing of the risk concide with the time when the contract of sale is concluded. The parties are advised to ascertain the applicable law and any solution which might follow there form. Finally, Incoterms are restricted to deal with the main principles for the division of functions, costs and risks between the parties and the rest is left to their individual contract as supplemented by the custom of the trade, the individual terms of the contract of sale and the applicable law. Thus, the parties are advised to ascertain the applicable law on their individual contract of sale in order to solve the problems on the transfer of property, the remedy and so on.

• 무역상무연구
• /
• 제53권
• /
• pp.181-206
• /
• 2012

The straight bill of lading is regarded as the documents of title except in American law after The Rafaela S case. The Carewins case also decided that the exclusion clause of bill of lading did not exempt carriers from liability when the carriers delivered the cargo to the consignee without the production of original bill of lading. And the court said that the carrier was responsible for delivering the goods against a forged bill of lading regardless of exemption clause of bill of lading in the Motis case. It may be assumed through these cases that the straight bill of lading as a document of title gives documentary security to the banks in trade finance. However, there can be some downside to the efficacy of the straight bill of lading as collateral. First, when it is subject to the English law, the shipper can arbitrarily change the consignee different from the one named in the document. Second, some bills of lading bear provisions relating to the carrier delivering the goods upon reasonable proof of identity without the surrender of an original and/or genuine bill of lading.