• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제28권3호
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2004

본 연구의 목적은 21세기 국제물류전략의 근간이 되는 ASEAN과 한국의 주요 컨테이너항만의 경쟁력 파악과 비교ㆍ평가를 통하여 한국항만의 경쟁력 제고를 위한 對 ASEAN에 관한 정책적 시사점을 강구함에 있다. 연구방법론과 범위는 ASEAN과 한국에 있어서 컨테이너항만의 경쟁력이라는 정성적인 속성을 정량화하여 평가하는 계층퍼지 분석(HFP)기법을 도입하여 실증분석을 하였다. 연구의 결과 싱가포르가 1위, 부산과 마닐라항만이 공동 2위의 선두그룹으로 평가되었다. 본 논문의 기여도는 한국과 ASEAN의 항만경쟁력 비교 연구를 통해 사회과학분야의 연구에 적용할 수 있는 HFT방법론을 도입하여 정책수립에 응용한 최신의 실증적인 연구접근에 있다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제19권1호
• /
• pp.43-68
• /
• 2003

With development of Asia's economy, the ports in trunk route have increased its handling capacity According to previous studies, main determinants to become hub-port are referred to location, connection inland transport with hinterland, port service availability and efficiency, cost of port handling, socio-economic stability and port information system etc. This study aims to investigate the changes in factors determine port's competitiveness particularly in Asian neighbor ports such as Hong Kong port and Shenzen port, and Singapore port and the Port of Tanjung Pelapas in Malaysia by comparing and analyzing main indicators relating to those ports. In conclusion, main reasons which gained competitiveness by newly developed ports such as Shenzen port and the Port of Tanjung Pelapas were port price and massive hinterland space offered.

• 한국항만경제학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항만경제학회 2007년도 정책세미나 및 국제학술대회
• /
• pp.291-312
• /
• 2007

This paper is designed to look for a specialized strategies by drawing the special features of Busan New Port from both a comparative analysis of major factors of harbor competitiveness and a SWOT analysis of Yangshan Port, one of the biggest competitive ports in Northeast Asia, so that Busan New Port may preoccupy a status as the hub port of the area. The researcher would like to suggest the following measures to make Busan New Port serve as the central port of Northeast Asia on the basis of the findings; Korea should push ahead with creating a railroad transportation linking with Eurasia Contient, secure the amount of goods and resources with the help of the early development of the surrounding complex of the port, make a considerable progress in the level of port service, come up with a differentiation strategies for harbor marketing activities and improve its productivity.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제27권4호
• /
• pp.73-90
• /
• 2011

기업들의 국제 분업화와 SCM(supply chain management) 체계 확산을 계기로 SCM과 물류가 통합되었으며, 이러한 패러다임 변화에 의해 항만과 공항의 배후단지가 공급, 제조, 유통 등의 중심지가 되고 있다. 또한, 글로벌 SCM 체계의 확산 과정에서 글로벌 기업들은 항만 및 항만 배후부지의 경쟁력을 평가하는데 있어 입지여건을 매우 중요한 요인으로 평가하였고, 기존의 물동량 창출과 함께 배후부지에서의 부가가치물류(value added logistics)의 중요성이 강화되고 있는 상황이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 항만 배후부지의 경쟁력 평가 모형을 수립하고, 7개 국내외 항만 배후부지를 평가하고자 하였다. AHP 분석을 통해 항만 배후부지 경쟁력 평가요인들의 중요도 분석을 수행한 결과는 물류요인이 62.3%의 중요도를 보이며, 다음으로 배후경제요인(27.3%), 도시 및 정책요인(10.4%)의 순으로 분석되었다. 이러한 결과는 항만 배후부지 경쟁력 향상을 위해서는 상대적으로 중요도가 높은 물류 요소에 대한 활성화방안 마련이 가장 필수적임을 의미한다. 특히, 항만의 서비스노선과 항공 네트워크망 구축이 필요하며, 이를 지원하기 위한 인프라 확충도 뒤따라야 할 것이다. 국내외 7대 항만 배후부지 경쟁력에 대한 부산항의 평가 결과는 싱가포르, 홍콩, 상해에 이어 4위로 평가되었다. 향후 본 연구에서 제시한 항만 배후부지 경쟁력 평가모형을 바탕으로 국내 항만 배후부지의 경쟁력을 평가하여 차별화된 인센티브 제공 등에 대한 연구가 추가되어야 할 것이다.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제22권1호
• /
• pp.17-38
• /
• 2006

This paper suggests the development device of Busan-Jinhae free Economic Zone(BJFEZ) to strengthen the competitiveness of the Port of Busan and promote the regional development in Busan. It deals with the securable feasibility of necessary sites and development costs and financial resources, the foreign investments figure, and the structure of the BJFEZ Authority. In addition, to evaluate the background, process, and contents of 'Special Purpose Local Government', the paper looks into the amendment proposal of 'Act on designation and management of free economic zones' suggested by the central government from the regional view of point. As proposals to promote and activate BJFEZ, it is recommended in the paper that it is required, first, to draw the detailed political methods to guarantee sound and sustainable development project and investment environment in accordance with regional characteristics prior to marketing, second, to develop and implement differentiated policy means to facilitate foreign investment, third, to strengthen specialty of the BJFEZ authority, and finally, to set up the supporting role and cooperation of both the central and local governments.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.317-322
• /
• 2004

The competitiveness of a country or a city plays an important role as a determining factor in this age of globalization In view of tourism studies, the potential for a region to develop depends primarily on its ability to use and maintain economic advantages in its provision of tourist products and services. In spite of the importance of competitiveness in tourism studies, few researches have been done on competitiveness in Korea The purpose of this study is, therefore, to conduct a comparative analysis of competitiveness between coastal metropolitan cities in Korea-Busan, Ulsan and Incheon- developing tourism index and finding out urban competitiveness. The findings of this study will contribute to enhancing tourism promotion and mutual network with other cities and attracting domestic and international tourists.

• 유통과학연구
• /
• 제13권2호
• /
• pp.5-13
• /
• 2015

Purpose - In recent years, concerns over privatization have been growing in some public sectors. Privatization in Britain offers lessons for those who have intended to privatize their industry, and in particular, the port industry. Therefore, it is useful for researchers to examine British port privatization in detail, particularly the implications of UK port privatization. Research design, data, and methodology - After reviewing the historical development of the UK port industry, the important factors determining the success of the British port privatization process were identified. The interpretations could be lessons for some other country to consider port privatization in near future. Results - The key factors in relation to port privatization are first, regulation; second, ownership; and third, utilities and operations, which includes autonomy, efficiency, and competitiveness. In addition, the UK port management system is a pure private port system, which has been successful. Conclusions - In Britain, after deciding to privatize the erstwhile public ports, they were fully privatized, focusing on the aforesaid key factors. This offers important lessons for the privatization of other ports in the world.

• 한국항만경제학회지
• /
• 제17권1호
• /
• pp.27-51
• /
• 2001

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the productive efficiency of world container ports by using the DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) method and raw data from previous research in measuring the international competitiveness of world container ports. Ports have to cope with rapid changes in shipping environments. In order for a port to compete in the global market, it must provide port services promptly and accurately. Basically, there are two approaches to measuring the international competitiveness of a container port. First, there is the traditional productivity analysis method, which analyzes productivity based on the container port's facilities (efficiency, selectivity, land availability), and by its general capacity (handling ability, storage capacity, terminal productivity). Second there is multi-attribute utility analysis, which considers several elements including the reasons for selecting particular container ports and factors determining international competitiveness. This paper follows the first method (traditional productivity analysis) and extends the limitation of previous studies by using the DEA method newly, and suggesting: the relative productive efficiency of container ports. The main results of this paper are as follows: First, the results of the DEA analysis in terms of world container ports matches that of a previous study (Jun et al., 1993) at a level of 35%. The low ratio is due to the constrained set of input-output elements, the result of only twenty container ports being analyzed in this paper. Second, the result of the DEA analysis in terms of North-East Asia's container ports matches with that of a previous study (Ha, 1996) at a level of 100 percent. Therefore we can conclude that the DEA analysis is the best measurement method for international competitiveness. Policy implications for this study are as follows: First, when port authorities want to measure the international competition power of container ports and enhance their productive efficiency, they should consider the traditional method and newly introduce the DEA method. Second, according to the analysis results of the DEA method, pen authorities should recommend benchmarking ports as reference ports in order to enhance the productive efficiency of container ports that show an efficiency score of below 1.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제39권5호
• /
• pp.423-429
• /
• 2015

The expansion on the scale of international trade and rapid economic growth in Northeast Asia have caused intense competition among global companies for securing international logistics center in Northeast Asia. Analyzing location competitiveness for international logistics center in Northeast Asia, this paper aims to extract implications for enhancing locational competitiveness. Employing the relative importance among location selection factors extracted from AHP analysis in prior study, we evaluated the major five port-cities in Northeast Asia including Busan, Gwangyang, Shanghai, Qingdao and Tokyo. In the evaluations, Shanghai (3.926) ranked as the first, followed by Busan (3.859), Qingdao (3.555), Tokyo (3.013) and Gwangyang (2.915). Furthermore, the causal relationships between determinants for location choice decision (logistics factor, cost factor, market factor, service factor and environmental factor) and dependent variables (competitiveness of international logistics center, potentiality to growth, present intention to move into and future plan to move into) were analyzed to provide implications. Results provide useful insights for further improvements, and helps strategic agenda for future development of port-cities.

• 한국항해항만학회지
• /
• 제40권2호
• /
• pp.67-72
• /
• 2016

Vietnam's sea-port industry has experienced a significant development in recent years. Especially in Northern Vietnam, both the demand and supply of handling services for containerized cargoes have increased at a considerable rates. Accompany with such movement, the competition among container terminals in the area becomes fiercer. In this paper, Hierarchical Cluster Analysis is employed to classify all 11 container terminals in Northern Vietnam by collecting data concerning terminal competitiveness. After the classification, each group will be discussed in order to reveal more details about their competitive characteristics. The paper consists of five sections. Section 1 is the general introduction. Section 2 provides a general literature review about competitiveness and factors to evaluate competitiveness. Section 3 explains variables and methodology applied to do the analysis. Section 4 presents the results with linkage to the current condition. Section 5 summarizes the analysis results. It is shown that container terminals in Northern Vietnam should not only pay attention to their service qualities but also have to find out an appropriate mechanism to avoid unhealthy competition. The paper is expected to contribute a background for further researches in container terminals' competition in the region as well as hints for operators in planning and making decisions.