• Title/Summary/Keyword: Citedness

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.016 seconds

A Bibliometric Analysis of the Research Performance by Researchers in the Biological Sciences: Based on the K University (생명과학 분야 연구자들의 연구 성과 분석 연구 - K 대학교를 중심으로 -)

  • Kim, Mee-Jean
    • Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
    • /
    • v.51 no.2
    • /
    • pp.273-294
    • /
    • 2020
  • The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the publication patterns of the 1,029 journal articles by the Life Sciences' faculty at the K University, for the years 2004-2017 and to investigate any difference between their publication patterns and the citedness for the years 2004-2018. Among the three funding agency types, the research publications supported by foreign funding received the more citations than publications by other types of funding, and the study also found a statistical difference in the citedness (F = 10.467, p < .000***). In addition, the internationally co-authored publications received more citations than three other types of co-authored publications in terms of the immediacy index per publication and the average citations per publication.

The Citedness of a Scientific Paper Written/Published in a Scientifically Peripheral Country by Worldwide Science Literature: The Case of Korea

  • 서은경
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.10 no.2
    • /
    • pp.87-109
    • /
    • 1993
  • Thls study attempts to determ~ne the c~tedness of a scient~fic research paper wr~tten/published In Korea, one of the scient~fically per~phrral countries and the citednes ot a Korean sc~entist In mathematlc and chemistry. It was found that there is a neglig~ble proportion of c~tatlons In papers by fore~gn scientists to scient~fic l~terature from Korean and Korean sc~ent~sts. Thus, it can be true that Korean sclence or sc~ent~sts make a relatively small contr~but~on to world science: however it 1s also true that the per~pehral journal has ~ t s own scientif~c value follocal area.

  • PDF

Research Productivity and Citation Performance of Researchers by Co-authorship Type in the Biological Sciences (생명과학 분야 연구자들의 공동연구 유형별 연구 생산성과 인용 성과 분석)

  • Kim, Mee-Jean
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.52 no.3
    • /
    • pp.149-169
    • /
    • 2018
  • The purpose of this study is to provide an in-depth analysis on the research productivity and the research performance of the School of Biological Sciences' faculty at the S University by their co-authorships and further to identify any difference in the citedness by their co-authorships. For the years 2004-2013, a total of 1,135 publications, published by thirty-nine faculty members, were collected and their publication patterns were analyzed by co-authorships. For the years 2004-2016, the citations to the 1,135 publications were analyzed by co-authorships. Among the four co-authorship types, the total number of publications by the domestic and international co-authorships amounted to 832(73.3%), and the study also found a statistical difference in the citation performance, i.e., the average number of citations per paper by co-authorships (F =4.830, $p=0.003^{**}$).

Evaluation of Korean Medical Journals: a Bibliometric Analysis (서지정보를 이용한 한국 의학학술지 평가)

  • 이춘실
    • Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
    • /
    • v.17 no.1
    • /
    • pp.49-65
    • /
    • 2000
  • The availability and use (citedness) of Korean medical journals are measured based on the bibliometric data of 82 journals evaluated by the Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors between 1997 and 1999. A Korean medical journal is held on the average by one half of Korean medical libraries investigated. Only 10 journals (12.2%) are covered in any of 36 abstract and index databases in the field of medicine searchable through DIALOG. The journal self-citation rate is 3.402%. 1.092% of papers are cited at least once by SCI journal papers within 3 years after publication. The average SCI impact factor of Korean medical journals is 0.111, However, the impact factor of MEDLINE or SCISearch journals is 10 times higher. The results show that the Korean medical journals are not easily available domestically and internationally. They are hardly cited by Korean colleagues or by foreign scholars either.

  • PDF

A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Conference Papers of Information Science (학술대회 논문의 참고자료 인용패턴 분석 - 정보과학 분야를 중심으로 -)

  • Lee, Danielle
    • Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
    • /
    • v.51 no.4
    • /
    • pp.35-52
    • /
    • 2017
  • This paper aims to explore the citation patterns of conference papers in 'Information Science' discipline and to analze impacts of various cited works-related factors on future citations of conference papers. Existing bibliometric studies has investigated citation patterns and the statistical relations between a variety of bibliographic factors and the future citations of literature. However, the attentions have been focused largely on journal articles, and the bibliometric studies targeting conference papers are still in an infant stage. Therefore, this study, which is based on 1,904 conference papers in 'Information Science' field, examined several citation patterns and the contributions of the factors about cited works - the number of cited works, type of cited works, citation rates and ages of cited works at the time of being cited and the rate of self-citedness - to the future citation of the citing target articles. The data source of this study including the properties of target articles and cited works and citation rates of target articles was Scopus. As the results, 53% and 29% of the cited works were conference papers and journal articles, respectively. 14% of them are non-traditional types such as web pages, technical reports, patent, etc. More than 60% of the cited works were 5 years old or less. Among several factors considered in this paper, the number of conference papers and the number of non-traditional types of works are the most contributing factors on the citation rates of target articles. The recency of the cited works is also significant contributor on the citation rates of target articles. That is, the target articles citing more conference papers and non-traditonal types of works earned more citations. The target articles citing recent works also earned more citations.