• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제1권1호
• /
• pp.27-41
• /
• 2013

We investigated how bibliometric indicators such as publication count and citation count affect the assessment of research performance by computing various bibliometric scores of the works of Korean LIS faculty members and comparing the rankings by those scores. For the study data, we used the publication and citation data of 159 tenure-track faculty members of Library and Information Science departments in 34 Korean universities. The study results showed correlation between publication count and citation count for authors with many publications but the opposite evidence for authors with few publications. The study results suggest that as authors publish more and more work, citations to their work tend to increase along with publication count. However, for junior faculty members who have not yet accumulated enough publications, citations to their work are of great importance in assessing their research performance. The study data also showed that there are marked differences in the magnitude of citations between papers published in Korean journals and papers published in international journals.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제29권2호
• /
• pp.193-204
• /
• 2012

이 연구에서는 인용 및 동시인용 문헌 네트워크에서의 중심성 지수를 사용한 추론 통계 적용의 첫 번째 단계로써 이들 간 관계의 선형성을 살펴보고자 하였다. 703개의 문헌 동시인용 네트워크를 활용하여 인용 빈도, 연결정도 중심성, 인접 중심성, 매개 중심성 간의 4가지 주요 관계의 패턴을 살펴본 결과, 모든 인용 및 중심성 간 관계가 선형모델보다는 비선형적 모델로 더 잘 설명될 수 있음을 통계적으로 확인되었다. 따라서 이들 간의 인과관계에 대한 다중회귀분석과 같은 추론 통계 분석의 기반이 되는 선형성을 확보하기 위해서는 논리적인 기준에 근거한 데이터 변환이나 실제값을 구간값으로 변환하는 과정이 필요하다고 할 수 있다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제26권3호
• /
• pp.377-394
• /
• 2009

본 연구는 기존의 연구성과 분석의 한계를 극복하고 영향력이나 파급효과 등 질적 중심의 연구성과 분석을 위해 텍스트 마이닝, 인용 분석 등을 활용한 새로운 계량정보학적 분석지표를 제안하였다. 즉, 논문품질지수, 인용 영향력지수, 지식확산지수, 국제협력연구지수, 우수논문 생산지수 등 새로운 연구성과 분석지표를 제안하여 질적인 측면을 중심으로 한 연구성과 분석이 가능하도록 하였다. 그리고 제안된 지표를 활용하여 사례분석을 수행하여 그 가능성을 확인하였다.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제37권1호
• /
• pp.197-220
• /
• 2020

최근 한국연구재단에서는 학술지평가에 KCI 인용지수를 반영하려는 계획을 발표하였다. 원칙적으로 학술지 평가는 다양한 지표를 통해서 개별 학술지의 상황과 특성을 최대한 반영할 수 있어야 한다. 이 연구에서는 예고된 학술지 인용지수 평가방안을 검토하여 세 가지 개선안을 제안하였다. 첫 번째 개선안은 인용지수로 5년 IF를 추가로 고려하는 것이고, 두 번째 개선안은 순위를 산출하는 범주 수준을 융통성 있게 선택하게 허용하는 것이며, 세 번째 개선안은 두 방법을 함께 적용하는 것이다. 이 연구에서 제안한 개선안은 KCI 학술지 평가의 부작용을 최소화하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.43-60
• /
• 2015

Purpose This study intended to introduce new approaches to identify the intellectual structure of supply chain management(SCM) researches, which combines author co-citation analysis(ACA) and social network analysis(SNA). Design/methodology/approach We searched RISS(www.riss.kr) and NDSL(www.ndsl.or.kr) database and collected 292 academic papers on supply chain management between 2001 and 2011. Among 9,637 references of these papers, we analyzed 1,848 references that were published by domestic authors. We produced a correlation matrix of 32 author co-citation matrix and conducted multi-variate statistical analysis such as factor analysis. We also performed social network analysis to identify the main researchers in SCM. Findings We found four main sub-areas of supply chain management research: SCM adoption factors, logistics, SCM performance, and SCM structure. We could present the authors who played important roles within the network by using SNA indicators. The finding of this research also suggests more collaborations among domestic researchers are required to overcome the low co-citation rates among domestic authors.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제3권4호
• /
• pp.35-48
• /
• 2015

The aim of this study is to compare country output and citation impact as well as to assess the level of interdisciplinarity in the field of tribology research during the period 1998-2012, based on the SCOPUS database. Macro-level scientometric indicators such as growth rate, share of international collaborative papers, citation per paper, share of un-cited papers, and publication efficiency index were employed. Further, the Simpson Index of Diversity was used to measure the level of interdisciplinarity. The performance of top countries contributing more than 1000 papers during the study period was discussed. Contributions and share of continents and countries by income groups were examined. Further research contributions and citation impact of selected country groups were analyzed. This study reveals that high levels of interdisciplinarity exist in tribology research. Asia outperforms the other world regions and China contributes most of the papers (25%), while the United States receives most of the citations (22%).

• 정보관리연구
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.23-41
• /
• 2012

전 세계적으로 이용되는 인용색인 서비스인 Web of Science(WoS)는 데이터 수록 범위에 한계가 있음이 인용색인 연구에서 지적되어 왔다. 또한 국내 학술논문이 인용하는 해외 문헌의 비율이 전체의 약 75%를 차지한다는 것이 인용패턴 분석연구에서 밝혀진 바 있다. 본 연구에서는 WoS DB의 데이터 수록 범위를 검증하기 위한 첫 번째 단계로써 WoS DB에 포함되어 있지 않은 국내 연구자의 인용문헌 즉, 한국과학기술인용 DB(Korea Science Citation Database: KSCD)에 수록된 참고문헌 데이터 일부를 JCR 학술지 영향력지수 산출과정에 포함시켜 학술지 영향력 지수(Impact Factor: IF)의 변화 및 그에 따른 학술지 순위변동 여부를 조사하였다. 구체적으로 국내 문헌정보학 분야 학술지에 수록된 참고문헌을 JCR 2009 문헌정보학 분야 학술지 IF 산출과정에 포함하였다. 하지만 학술지 IF의 변화와 그에 따른 순위 차이가 통계적으로 유의하지 않았고, 이에 데이터 범위를 넓혀 컴퓨터 공학 및 전자공학 분야 학술지 45종에 수록된 참고문헌을 추가로 분석하여 JCR 2010 전자공학 분야 학술지 IF 산출과정에 포함하였다. 그 결과, 부분적으로 통계적으로 유의한 학술지 순위 변화가 일어났다. 본 연구는 한정된 데이터를 사용하였음에도 불구하고 미미하지만 통계적으로 유의한 JCR 학술지 순위 변동을 보여줌으로써 WoS DB에 포함되지 않은 인용 데이터의 잠재적 가치를 제시하였다.

• International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.171-180
• /
• 2023

This study is to develop a performance analysis model for SMEs.Based on similar performance indicators through previous studies, performance indicators for SMEs were rewritten.Through the Korean Journal Citation Index (KCI), 75 related data were classified and a comprehensive SME performance analysis model was developed.Performance analysis was divided into two axes and classified into tables.The horizontal axis is the spatial performance range, which is divided into three areas: performance management by department/function, integrated performance management for the entire organization, and governance performance management requiring policy feedback. The vertical axis is subdivided into short-term, mid-term, and long-term by time and growth stage, and is divided into three parts: technical performance according to technological input, economic performance as organizational performance, and social performance for policy utilization. Then, performance indicators were mapped to each column. As a result of the survey, 28% of technical performance was analyzed as a result of frequency analysis, and performance indicators were organized into five categories: IT, R&D, certification, patent, and innovation. Economic performance was divided into 29%, BSC, HRD, logistics, production quality management, financial support, asset management, etc. 6 categories, social performance 43%, ESG, marketing, export, policy support, consulting, cooperation, etc. 7 categories.Limitations of the study include the narrowness of the survey that derived only performance indicators despite being a meta-analysis, and the performance model was mapped and classified according to growth stage and support period.however Insufficiency of validity due to lack of evidence, performance indicators were developed, but there were limitations in utilization for practical use.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.56-75
• /
• 2021

We introduce a new research assessment measure, called the research excellence index. The measure, which we denote by RE-index, accurately assesses the research performance of a researcher. The methodology used in deriving the RE-index tackles many of the flaws of popular research performance indicators such as publication counts, citation counts, and the h and g indices. A dataset is introduced, which takes advantage of the wide coverage of Scopus and the Library of Congress, and, at the same time, deals with the Scopus database depth problem. For an academic publication x, a prestige-type and length scores are assigned, and if x is published in an academic periodical publication J, the stature of J is identified through a quartile score. The three scores are used to assign a value score to every academic publication, and cited academic publications are given citation scores that encompass both cases of including and excluding self-citations. The foregoing scores are used to derive another set of scores measuring the combined qualitative and quantitative aspects of the creative work, citations of creative work, informative work and citations of informative work of a researcher. The scores take into consideration co-authorship. From these scores, two versions of the RE-index for a researcher are derived, covering the cases of including and excluding self-citations. The new measure is calculated for two mathematicians.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제5권1호
• /
• pp.15-32
• /
• 2015

This article analyzes motivations behind social sciences blog posts citing journal articles in order to find out whether blog citations are good indicators for the societal impact or benefits of research. A random sample of 300 social sciences blog posts (out of 1,233 blog posts) from ResearchBlogging.org published between 01/01/2012 to 18/06/2014 were subjected to content analysis. The 300 blog posts had 472 references including 424 journal articles from 269 different journals. Sixty-one (22.68%) of all cited journals were from the social sciences and most of the journals with high frequency were highly cited general science journals such as PNAS and Science. Seventy-five percent of all journals were referenced only once. The average age of articles cited at the time of citation was 5.8 years. Discussion and criticism were the two main categories of motivations. Overall, the study shows the potential of blog citations as an altmetric measure and as a proxy for assessing the research impact. A considerable number of citation motivations in blogs such as disputing a belief, suggesting policies, providing a solution to a problem, reacting to media, criticism and the like seemed to support gaining societal benefits. Societal benefits are considered as helping stimulate new approaches to social issues, or informing public debate and policymaking. Lower self-citation (compared to some other altmetric measures such as tweets) and the fact that blogging involves generating content (i.e. an intellectual process) give them an advantage for altmetrics. However, limitations and contextual issues such as disciplinary differences and low uptake of altmetrics, in general, in scholarly communication should not be ignored when using blogs as a data source for altmetrics.