• 비교문화연구
• /
• 제29권
• /
• pp.287-314
• /
• 2012

This article examines the problems with some words used in "Chinese novel Kam Pin Mui"that are presented in"the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary". The author analyses the problems into three aspects: first, error correction in meaning interpretation; second, supplementary correction in meaning interpretation; and third, additional error correction. The main points of the study are presented in the following. First, in relation to the error correction in meaning interpretation, this study finds out that the explanations of "Liezi", "daxuanmo", "kedui", "shaojian" in the "Great Chinese-Korean dictionary"are incorrect. The cases involve the explanations that have no foundation, do not get to the points, and have narrow meaning interpretations compared with original meanings. Second, as for the supplementary correction, this study points out that the explanations of "yiri", "jiaosa", "buxi", "langhu" are not sufficient. Thus, this study claims that the following meanings for each case should be added, including "long time," "abdominal pains during pregnancy," "a type of folk performing arts without stages in local areas of China, and "to devour in greedy gulps." Third, with respect to the additional error correction, this study analyses "the typos of the examples," "the setup of inaccurate meaning items," "the front-to-back arrangement of the examples," and "inconsistency between meaning interpretations and examples" displayed in the dictionary. The error correction in the dictionary can be possible only if the findings from several other disciplines should be incorporated, involving cultural history, the history of literature, philology, grammatology, linguistics, etc. It seems impossible for a person to solve all the problems with the errors in the dictionary. Thus, it will be greatly helpful to the author and the people who prepare for the new edition of "the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary" if we can get continuous supports and comments from relating scholars of other disciplines. As a result, all these efforts will contribute to the academic progress for the relevant disciplines and these academic activities may develop a new area of the study.

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제65호
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 2020

The dictionary is the most important tool for every Chinese learner to confirm the meaning and usage of words. Therefore, accuracy of headword's interpretation in the dictionary is crucial. This study aims to discuss the accuracy and the adequacy of headwords' interpretation in the Chinese-Korean dictionary through the Chinese corpus and Baidu. The scope of this study are 3000 words in the D3H1 region. According to the research results, the main problems of the vocabulary in this region can be divided into three categories: the first is the problem of lexical interpretation, the second is the problem of missing interpretation, and the third is other problems. In the D3H1 area, there are a total of 719 low-frequency vocabularies, and 54 headword's interpretations are not accurate or appropriate. This study is a detailed investigation and analysis of the problems of these 54 vocabularies.

• 한국정보과학회 언어공학연구회:학술대회논문집(한글 및 한국어 정보처리)
• /
• 한국정보과학회언어공학연구회 2005년도 제17회 한글 및 한국어 정보처리 학술대회
• /
• pp.139-144
• /
• 2005

When a Japanese learner in Korea tries to find Japanese dictionary, he must know the pronunciation of the target word. But it's not easy to know the pronunciation of target word from Japanese sentence. Because most of general Japanese sentence shows only HanJa(Chinese character) instead of Kana(Japanese alphabet). If the Japanese learner knows the Korean traditional pronunciation of the target word, he can input the word to electronic Japanese dictionary with the Korean pronunciation. For this solution, the dictionary service provider must convert the Japanese word to Korean pronunciation, in advance. After setting of the conversions as a additional searching process, we can find the target word through Korean pronunciation of the Japanese HanJa, This process is possible for the three reasons below, 1. Korean, Japanese and Chinese are using the nearly same HanJa. The difference is small. 2. Most Japanese learner in Korea, knows the Korean pronunciation of the HanJa. 3. The Korean pronunciation of the HanJa is nearly unique, a HanJa has a Korean pronunciation, generally.

• 한국의사학회지
• /
• 제29권1호
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2016

This article attempts to extract headwords for complication of "Donguibogam Dictionary" with Corpus-based Analysis. The computerized original text of Donguibogam is changed into a text file by a program 'EM Editor'. Chinese characters of high frequency of exposure among Chinese characters of Donguibogam are extracted by a Corpus-based analytical program 'AntConc'. Two-syllable, three-syllable, four-syllable, and five-syllable words including each Chinese characters of high frequency are extracted through n-cluster, one of functions of AntConc. Lastly, The output that is meaningful as a word is sorted. As a result, words that often appear in Donguibogam can be sorted in this article, and the names of books, medical herbs, disease symptoms, and prescriptions often appear especially. This way to extract headwords by this Corpus-based Analysis can suggest better headwords list for "Donguibogam Dictionary" in the future.

• 한국언어정보학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국언어정보학회 1995년도 Language, Information and Computation = Proceedings of the 10th Pacific Asia Conference, Hong Kong
• /
• pp.133-138
• /
• 1995

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제67호
• /
• pp.25-41
• /
• 2020

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题。本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题。为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇。若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实。为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容。

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제70호
• /
• pp.39-60
• /
• 2021

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题。本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题。为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇。若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实。为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容。

• 중국학논총
• /
• 제61호
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2019

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题. 本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题. 为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇. 若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实. 为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容.

• 정보관리학회지
• /
• 제24권4호
• /
• pp.375-391
• /
• 2007

현재 유니코드 CJK 한자코드는 부수 기준 배열방식을 따르고 있어 한자의 한글음가를 기준으로 하는 우리의 문자생활 방식과 차이가 있으며, 우리나라 고유한자나 동형이음어, 이두문자, 그리고 이체자 관계 등을 모두 수록하고 있지 않아 정보시스템에 그대로 적용하기에는 무리가 있다. 따라서 유니코드 기반 정보시스템의 정확한 한자표현 및 한자검색을 위해서는 한자를 포함하는 자료에 대한 정확한 이해를 바탕으로 여러 가지 지원방안을 마련해야 한다. 이러한 측면에서 역사분야 정보검색시스템에서는 한글음가 및 한국에서만 사용되는 동형이음어 처리를 위한 한자-한글음가 사전, 본래 한자의 음가와 다르게 읽히는 한자를 위한 특수용어사전, 이형자와이체자를 위한 이체자사전, 그리고 유니코드 CJK 통합한자에 등록되어 있지 않은 한자를 위한 신출 한자목록을 지원하고 있다.

• 한국정보처리학회논문지
• /
• 제4권1호
• /
• pp.184-194
• /
• 1997

최근 상용 오프라인 문자 인식시스템들이 계속 발표되고 있다. 본 눈문에서는 적 은 메모리와 빠른 시간내에 검색이 가능한 자기조직화 구조를 가진 단어 사전을 구축 하고 검색하는 알고리즘을 제시하며 오프라인 문자 인식 시스템을 이용하여 오인식 교정의 측면에서 문장부호, 영문자, 한자를 인식한 후에 나온 오인식된 문자들을 수 집하여 오인식 형태를 제분류하였다. 영문자에 대해서는 영문자의 오인식 형태와 오 인식의 예들을 조사하고 오인식이 자주 일어나는 글자에 대해 오인식 혼동 테이블을 작성하였으며 25,145개의 영어 단어가 입력된 자기조직화된 영어 단어 사전을 가지고 교정을 행하여 0.5%의 인식률 향상을 가져왔다. 한자에 대해서도 영문자와 마찬가지 로 오인식 행태를 조사하고 혼동 테이블을 작성하였으며 34,593개의 단어가 입력된 자기조직화된 한자 단어 사전을 이용하여 교정을 행하여 인식률을 6.1% 향상시켰다.