• Cross-Cultural Studies
• /
• v.29
• /
• pp.287-314
• /
• 2012

This article examines the problems with some words used in "Chinese novel Kam Pin Mui"that are presented in"the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary". The author analyses the problems into three aspects: first, error correction in meaning interpretation; second, supplementary correction in meaning interpretation; and third, additional error correction. The main points of the study are presented in the following. First, in relation to the error correction in meaning interpretation, this study finds out that the explanations of "Liezi", "daxuanmo", "kedui", "shaojian" in the "Great Chinese-Korean dictionary"are incorrect. The cases involve the explanations that have no foundation, do not get to the points, and have narrow meaning interpretations compared with original meanings. Second, as for the supplementary correction, this study points out that the explanations of "yiri", "jiaosa", "buxi", "langhu" are not sufficient. Thus, this study claims that the following meanings for each case should be added, including "long time," "abdominal pains during pregnancy," "a type of folk performing arts without stages in local areas of China, and "to devour in greedy gulps." Third, with respect to the additional error correction, this study analyses "the typos of the examples," "the setup of inaccurate meaning items," "the front-to-back arrangement of the examples," and "inconsistency between meaning interpretations and examples" displayed in the dictionary. The error correction in the dictionary can be possible only if the findings from several other disciplines should be incorporated, involving cultural history, the history of literature, philology, grammatology, linguistics, etc. It seems impossible for a person to solve all the problems with the errors in the dictionary. Thus, it will be greatly helpful to the author and the people who prepare for the new edition of "the Great Chinese-Korean dictionary" if we can get continuous supports and comments from relating scholars of other disciplines. As a result, all these efforts will contribute to the academic progress for the relevant disciplines and these academic activities may develop a new area of the study.

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.65
• /
• pp.23-38
• /
• 2020

The dictionary is the most important tool for every Chinese learner to confirm the meaning and usage of words. Therefore, accuracy of headword's interpretation in the dictionary is crucial. This study aims to discuss the accuracy and the adequacy of headwords' interpretation in the Chinese-Korean dictionary through the Chinese corpus and Baidu. The scope of this study are 3000 words in the D3H1 region. According to the research results, the main problems of the vocabulary in this region can be divided into three categories: the first is the problem of lexical interpretation, the second is the problem of missing interpretation, and the third is other problems. In the D3H1 area, there are a total of 719 low-frequency vocabularies, and 54 headword's interpretations are not accurate or appropriate. This study is a detailed investigation and analysis of the problems of these 54 vocabularies.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2005.10a
• /
• pp.139-144
• /
• 2005

When a Japanese learner in Korea tries to find Japanese dictionary, he must know the pronunciation of the target word. But it's not easy to know the pronunciation of target word from Japanese sentence. Because most of general Japanese sentence shows only HanJa(Chinese character) instead of Kana(Japanese alphabet). If the Japanese learner knows the Korean traditional pronunciation of the target word, he can input the word to electronic Japanese dictionary with the Korean pronunciation. For this solution, the dictionary service provider must convert the Japanese word to Korean pronunciation, in advance. After setting of the conversions as a additional searching process, we can find the target word through Korean pronunciation of the Japanese HanJa, This process is possible for the three reasons below, 1. Korean, Japanese and Chinese are using the nearly same HanJa. The difference is small. 2. Most Japanese learner in Korea, knows the Korean pronunciation of the HanJa. 3. The Korean pronunciation of the HanJa is nearly unique, a HanJa has a Korean pronunciation, generally.

• The Journal of Korean Medical History
• /
• v.29 no.1
• /
• pp.47-54
• /
• 2016

This article attempts to extract headwords for complication of "Donguibogam Dictionary" with Corpus-based Analysis. The computerized original text of Donguibogam is changed into a text file by a program 'EM Editor'. Chinese characters of high frequency of exposure among Chinese characters of Donguibogam are extracted by a Corpus-based analytical program 'AntConc'. Two-syllable, three-syllable, four-syllable, and five-syllable words including each Chinese characters of high frequency are extracted through n-cluster, one of functions of AntConc. Lastly, The output that is meaningful as a word is sorted. As a result, words that often appear in Donguibogam can be sorted in this article, and the names of books, medical herbs, disease symptoms, and prescriptions often appear especially. This way to extract headwords by this Corpus-based Analysis can suggest better headwords list for "Donguibogam Dictionary" in the future.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Language and Information Conference
• /
• 1995.02a
• /
• pp.133-138
• /
• 1995

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.67
• /
• pp.25-41
• /
• 2020

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题。本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题。为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇。若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实。为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容。

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.70
• /
• pp.39-60
• /
• 2021

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题。本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题。为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇。若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实。为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容。

• 중국학논총
• /
• no.61
• /
• pp.1-18
• /
• 2019

当我们翻开中韩词典时, 就不难发现令人莫名其妙的词汇不在少数, 而且在部分词汇的解释上也存在着不少问题. 本文主要探讨了这些词汇被收录于词典是否合适和词语释义是否正确的问题. 为此, 先从中韩词典里筛选出在中国教育部语言文字应用研究所和北京大学中国语言学研究中心所提供的现代汉语语料库中出现频率较低的词汇. 若考虑到这两个语料库为全方位收集现代汉语而做了巨大的努力, 而且肯定这一学术成果的话, 就能推测此文里筛选出的这些词汇很可能不太正规或现在不怎幺使用等事实. 为了使这种推测能得到更准确的印证, 作者在百度网上又检索了是否出现它们的用例, 且对词语释义和实际用例是否一致做了详细的比较, 就发现不少词汇确实存在各种问题, 根本不适合被收录到词典, 或必须修改释义内容.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.375-391
• /
• 2007

Unicode Han ideograph character set differed from the our principle of the phonetic value ordering in that it followed the principle of KangXi radical-stroke ordering of the characters. Therefore, information system should support ideograph search on precise analysis of materials which consist of korean character (hangul) and ideograph character (hanja). History Information system has been maintaining Hanja(Chinese Character) to Hangul Dictionary, Terminology Dictionary for composition, borrowing, non-ideographic principles, Variant Forms Dictionary, and Recently discovered Chinese Characters List.

• The Transactions of the Korea Information Processing Society
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.184-194
• /
• 1997

In the recent years number of commercial off-line character recognition systems have been appeared in the Korean market. This paper describes a "self -organizing" data structure for representing a large dictionary which can be searched in real time and uses a practical amount of memory, and presents a study on the character correction for off-line printed sentence marks, Japanese, English, and Chinese character recognition. Self-organizing algorithm can be recommenced as particularly appropriate when we have reasons to suspect that the accessing probabilities for individual words will change with time and theme. The wrongly recognized characters generated by OCR systems are collected and analyzed Error types of English characters are reclassified and 0.5% errors are corrected using an English character confusion table with a self-organizing dictionary containing 25,145 English words. And also error types of Chinese characters are classified and 6.1% errors are corrected using a Chinese character confusion table with a self-organizing dictionary carrying 34,593 Chinese words.ese words.