• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.321-330
• /
• 1993

Purpose: A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence of radiation induced lung damage after the radiation therapy for the patients with carcinoma of the lung. Method and Materials: Sixty-six patients with lung cancer (squamous cell carcinoma 27, adenocarcinoma 14, large cell carcinoma 2, small cell carcinoma 13, unknown 10) were treated with definitive, postoperative or palliative radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy between July 1987 and December 1991. There were 50 males and 16 females with median age of 63 years (range: 33~80 years). Total lung doses ranged from 500 to 6,660 cGy (median 3960 cGy) given in 2 to 38 fractions (median 20) over a range or 2 to 150 days (median in days) using 6 MV or 15 MV linear accelerator. To represent different fractionation schedules of equivalent biological effect, the estimated single dose (ED) model, $ED=D{\dot}N^{-0.377}{\dot}T^{-0.058}$ was used in which D was the lung dose in cGy, N was the number of fractions, and T was the overall treatment time in days. The range of ED was 370 to 1357. The endpoint was a visible increase in lung density within the irradiated volume on chest X-ray as observed independently by three diagnostic radiologists. Patients were grouped according to ED, treatment duration, treatment modality and age, and the percent incidence of pulmonary damage for each group was determined. Result: In 40 of 66 patients, radiation induced change was seen on chest radiographs between 11 days and 314 days after initiation of radiation therapy. The incidence of radiation pneumonitis was increased according to increased ED, which was statistically significant (p=0.001). Roentgenographic changes consistent with radiation pneumonitis were seen in $100\%$ of patients receiving radiotherapy after lobectomy or pneumonectomy, which was not statistically significant. In 32 patients who also received chemotherapy, there was no difference in the incidence of radiation induced change between the group with radiation alone and the group with radiation and chemotherapy, among the sequence of chemotherapy No correlation was seen between incidence of radiation pneumonitis and age or sex. Conclusions: The occurrence of radiation pneumonitis varies. The incidence of radiation pneumonitis depends on radiation total dose, nature of fractionation, duration of therapy, and modifying factors such as lobectomy or pneumonectomy.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제16권1호
• /
• pp.35-41
• /
• 1998

배경 : 직장암에서 근치적 절제술을 시행한 후에 병리소견상 장막을 침범하였거나 임파절 전이가 있는 경우에 수술 후 방사선 치료와 항암화학요법을 시행하는 것이 국소재발을 억제하고 생존율을 높일 수 있는 것으로 알려져 있다. 연세암센타에서도 수술 후 국소 진행성 병변이거나 임파절 전이가 있는 경우에 5-FU와 Leucovorin을 방사선 치료와 같이 사용하여 왔으며, 그 치료 결과를 방사선 치료 단독군과 비교 고찰하여 방사선치료와 항암화학요법 병용치료의 효과를 평가해 보았다. 대상 및 방법 : 1989년 10월부터 1994년 5월까지 연세암센타에 내원하여 방사선치료를 받았던 142 명의 환자들을 대상으로 하였고, 방사선 단독치료군은 69명, 방사선 항암화학요법 병용치료군은 73명이었다. 대상환자를 살펴보면 병기는 방사선 단독치료군과 병용치료군에서 B2가 24예($35.3\%$)와 24예($32.9\%$), B3가 2예($2.9\%$)와 3예($4.1\%$), Cl이 1예($1.5\%$)와 4예($5.5\%$), C2가 33예($48.5\%$)와 36예($49.3\%$), C3가 8예($11.8\%$)와 6예($8.2\%$)로 방사선 단독치료군과 항암제 방사선 병용치료군의 Modified Astler-Coller 병기는 대등한 분포를 보였다. 수술 후 치료로 방사선 단독치료군은 골반강에 4500cGy를 조사후 원발부위에 540-1600cGy의 축소조사를 시행하여 총 4500-6040cGy를 조사하였고(중앙값 5400cGy), 병용치료군은 수술 후 1-2개월에 5-FU을 단독으로(평균 494.8$mg/m^2$, 13예) 또는 5-FU와 Leucovorin을 함께(5-FU 393.9$mg/m^2$, Leucovorin 20$mg/m^2$, 60예) 5일씩 4주 간격으로 2차례 시행한 후, 9주째에 방사선 치료를 시작하고 방사선치료 첫 주와 5주의 방사선치료시작일에 각각 3일간 3차, 4차 항암제를 같은 양으로 병합시행하근 그 후 4주간격으로 시행하여 총3-12차례에 걸쳐 항암화학요법을 시행하였다. 방사선치료는 골반강에 4500cGy를 조사 후 축소조사하여 총 4500-5040cGy를 조사하였다(중앙값 5040cGy). 추적관찰기간은 3-81개월로 중앙값이 38개월이었다. 결과 : 5년 생존율은 방사선 단독치료군과 병용치료군에서 각각 $60.1\%,\;66.3\%$로 유의한 차이는 보이지 않았고(p=0.39), 5년 무병생존율도 각각 $54.2\%,\;65.5\%$로 병용치료군에서 약간 높았으나 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 보이지 못했다(p=0.18). 원격전이없는 생존율도 $55.2\%$와 $68.6\%$로 유의한 차이는 없었다(p=0.12). 그러나 5년 국소제어생존율은 단독치료군 $50.3\%$, 병용치료군 $65.8\%$로 병용치료군에서 높은것으로 나타났다(p=0.04). 결론 : 수술 후 국소재발억제와 원격전이를 줄여 무병생존율과 생존율을 높이기 위해 시행한 항암제 방사선 병용치료는 수술후 방사선치료 단독시행한 치료군보다 국소제어율을 높여주는 것을 알 수 있었으나($50.3\%\;vs.\;65.8\%,\;p=0.04$), 원격전이에는 영향을 주지 못하여 무병생존율이나 생존율에 유의한 차이를 보이지 못하였다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제31권4호
• /
• pp.177-184
• /
• 2013

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the patterns of care and treatment outcomes in patients with primary thyroid lymphoma (PTL) in a single institution. Materials and Methods: Medical records of 29 patients with PTL treated between April 1994 and February 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy (n = 17) or thyroidectomy (n = 12). Treatment modality and outcome were analyzed according to lymphoma grade. Results: The median follow-up was 43.2 months (range, 3.8 to 220.8 months). The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range, 21 to 83 years) and 24 (82.8%) patients were female. Twenty-five (86.2%) patients had PTL with stage IEA and IIEA. There were 8 (27.6%) patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and the remaining patients had high-grade lymphoma. Patients were treated with surgery (n = 2), chemotherapy (n = 7), radiotherapy (n = 3) alone, or a combination of these methods (n = 17). Treatment modalities evolved over time and a combination of modalities was preferred, especially for the treatment of high-grade lymphoma in recent years. There was no death or relapse among MALT lymphoma patients. Among high-grade lymphoma patients, 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) were 75.6% and 73.9%, respectively. Complete remission after initial treatment was the only significant prognostic factor for OS (p = 0.037) and PFS (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Patients with PTL showed a favorable outcome, especially with MALT lymphoma. Radiotherapy alone for MALT lymphoma and chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy for high-grade lymphoma can be effective treatment options for PTL.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권14호
• /
• pp.5681-5686
• /
• 2015

Background: Pancreatic cancer ranks fourth in deaths caused by cancers throughout the world. Gemcitabine chemotherapy is the primary method of treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, and in asco2014, it is still firstline chemotherapy. Howeve,r gemcitabine+fluorouracil regimens are also licensed and widely used worldwide. Clinical trials are the best way to evaluate drug efficacy. In this study, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess whether gemcitabine+fluoropyrimidine combination therapy improves the prognosis of unresectable pancreatic cancer compared with gemcitabine treatment alone. Materials and Methods: A quantitative up-to-date meta-analysis was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of gemcitabine-based combination treatment compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Inclusion was limited to high-quality randomized clinical trials. Results: A total of 12 studies were included in the present analysis, with a total of 3,038 patients recruited. The studies were divided into three subgroups including 5-FU / CAP / S-1 combined with gemcitabine. For the primary endpoint of overall survival (OS), gemcitabine-based combination therapy demonstrated significantly better outcome (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.95) than gemcitabine monotherapy. The analysis of progression free survival (PFS) also provided a significant result for the combined therapy in a total of 8 trials (2,130 patients) (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.86). With subgroup analysis according to the method of dosing delivery, we found that in the injection group with 3 trials (889 patients), a negative result was found (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.77-1.12); while a positive result was observed in the oral group with 9 trials (2,149 patients) (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.95). Conclusions: Gemcitabine combination therapy provides a modest improvement of survival, but is associated with more toxicity compared with gemcitabine monotherapy.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권10호
• /
• pp.4285-4289
• /
• 2015

Purpose: Blood hemoglobin levels are known to influence response to radiotherapy. This retrospective analysis compared the effect of hemoglobin levels upon response to radiation among patients treated with radiation alone (by accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy) versus those treated with concurrent cisplatin chemoradiotherapy. Materials and Methods: Among patients treated for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix (LACC) during 2009-10, a total of 60 fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In this time frame, external beam radiotherapy was delivered with either concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT, n=31) (45Gy over 25 fractions, with weekly cisplatin at 40mg/m2), or with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy (AHRT, n=29) (20Gy over 10 daily fractions over the first two weeks, followed by 30Gy over 20 fractions over the next two weeks, with two fractions of 1.5Gy per day, without the use of chemotherapy). Mean weekly hemoglobin (MWH) levels of all patients were calculated as the arithmetic means of weekly recorded blood hemoglobin levels. As per MWH, patients in both of the AHRT or the CRT groups were classified into two subgroups-those with MWH between 10-10.9g/dL, or with MWH>11g/dL. Complete response (CR) to external beam RT phase (prior to brachytherapy) was declared after clinical examinations and computed tomography. The CR rate was noted for both MWH sub-groups within each of the AHRT and CRT groups. Results: Within the AHRT group, patients with MWH>11g/dL had a much better CR rate in comparison to those with MWH:10-10.9g/dL (80% vs. 21.1%) which was statistically significant (p 0.0045). Within the CRT group, there was no significant difference in the outcomes within the MWH>11g/dL and MWH:10-10.9g/dL sub-groups (CR rates of 80% vs. 61.9%, p=0.4285). Conclusions: The importance of maintaining a minimum hemoglobin level of 11g/dL during RT is much greater for patients treated with RT alone, than for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Enhanced haemoglobin levels during RT may to an extent negate the ill-effects that may otherwise arise due to non-use of concurrent chemotherapy.

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.11-15
• /
• 2018

Background/Objectives: The efficacy of radiotherapy alone versus chemoradiotherapy has been studied in patients with T2N0M0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Materials & Methods: Thirty nine patients with newly diagnosed T2N0M0 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were treated with either radiotherapy(RT group, 66-70Gy) or chemoradiotherapy(CRT group, cisplatin based concurrent chemoradiation with or without 2 cycles induction chemotherapy including cisplatin, $5-FU{\pm}$ docetaxel / radiation therapy same with above mentioned). The mean follow-up was 73.5 months. Results: The overall survival (OS), disease specific survival (DSS), disease free survival (DFS), and larynx preservation survival (LPS) at 5 years were 70%, 79%, 67%, and 71%. The complete response rate was 82.4% in RT group, and was 95.5% in CRT group. OS (57% vs 80%), DSS (69% vs 86%), DFS (52% vs 77%), and LPS (63% vs 77%) at 5 years were higher in CRT group than RT group, but it was not statistically significant. In subsite analysis, CRT group tends to improve DFS, compared to RT group, in glottic cancer (p=0.06). The toxicities were tolerable and no fatal case was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Chemoradiotherapy is effective as primary therapy for T2 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and showed manageable treatment induced toxicity.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.96-102
• /
• 2006

목적: 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료의 효율성을 치료 반응률, 생존율, 실패양상, 치료부작용 등의 관점에서 평가하기 위해 후향적 연구를 수행하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1993년 2월부터 2002년 10월까지 총 76명의 환자가 조직학적으로 증명된 국한성병기 소세포폐암으로 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료를 시행 받았다. 대상환자 중 남성은 84% (64/76)이었고, 중앙연령은 57세였다(32-75세). 흉부방사선치료는 120 또는 150 cGy/fraction로 최소 6시간의 간격을 두고 하루 두 번, 한 주에 5일 시행하였다. 총 흉부조사선량의 중앙값은 50.4 Gy였다(45-51 Gy). 동시 화학치료은 3주 간격으로 교대 CAV ($cytoxan\;1000mg/m^2,\;adriamycin\;40mg/m^2,\;vincristine\;1mg/m^2$)/PE ($cisplatin\;60mg/m^2,\;etoposide\;100mg/m^2$)이거나, 혹은 단독 PE 요법이 사용되었다. 화학치료 횟수의 중앙값은 6회였다(1-9회). 예방적 전뇌조사는 완전관해를 보인 환자에게 25 Gy/10 fractions로 시행되었다. 중앙추적관찰기간은 18개월이었다(1-136개월). 결과: 치료의 반응률은 86%이었다: 완전관해가 39명(52%), 부분관해가 26명(34%)이었다. 중앙생존기간은 23개월이었다. 1년, 2년, 3년 생존율은 각각 72%, 50%, 30%이었다. 단변량분석에서 치료 반응률이 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀졌다(p<0.001). 등급 3 이상의 급성부작용은 백혈구감소 46명(61%), 적혈구 감소 5명 (6%), 혈소판 감소 10명(13%), 식도염 5명(6%), 그리고 폐독성이 2명(2%)에서 있었다. 추척관찰이 가능했던 73명의 환자 중 총 38명(52%)에서 병의 진행이 관찰되었다. 첫 번째 원격전이 장소의 빈도는 뇌가 가장 높았다. 결론: 하루 두 번 분할조사에 의한 동시 화학방사선치료는 국한성병기 소세포폐암 환자에서 나쁘지 않은 부작용과 함께 양호한 치료반응 및 생존율의 결과를 보였다. 생존율의 유의한 예후인자로 밝혀진 치료 반응률을 향상시키기 위해 방사선치료 분할방식, 화학요법제제, 화학방사선치료의 결합방식에 대한 추가적인 연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제22권3호
• /
• pp.177-183
• /
• 2004

목적: 초기 병기 비강 natural killer/T-ceil 림프종에 대한 CHOP 항암화학요법과 국소 방사선치료의 순차적 적용 결과를 보고하고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 1995년 3월부터 1999년 12월 사이에 성균관의대 삼성서울병원 종양센타에 비강 I/II 병기natural killer/T-cell 림프종으로 등록된 17명의 환자들 중 14명의 환자들에 대하여 순차적 항암화학요법과 방사선치료를 적용하였고 이들에 대한 분석을 시행하였다. 치료방침은 우선 CHOP 항암화학요법을 3주 간격으로 3~4회 시행한 후 5주간에 걸쳐 육안적 병변과 인접한 림프절 부위에 대한 국소 방사선치료를 추가하는 것이었다. 결과: 방사선치료의 시작 전에 시행한 국소종양의 항암화학요법에 대한 반응평가는 50%의 환자들에서 양호한 반응(완전관해 5명+부분관해 2명)을 보였고 나머지 50%의 환자들에서는 병변이 진행하였다. 5명의 환자에서 국소재발이 나타났는데 이들 중 2명은 원격전이를 동반하였고, 영역 림프절 재발을 수반한 경우는 없었다. 3년 생존율과 무병생존율은 50.0%와 42.9%였으며, 모든 사망과 재발사례는 치료개시 후 13개월 이내에 발생하였다. 예후인자의 단변량 분석에서 'B' 증상이 없는 경우, 항암화학요법과 전체 치료방침에 양호한 반응을 보인 경우, 국제예후지표상 저위험군 등이 양호한 생존율과 관련이 있었다. 결론: 본 연구의 치료방침에 의한 결과는 과거의 방사선치료 단독 또는 방사선치료 후 항암화학요법 추가에 따르는 결과들과 비교해 볼 때 재발양상과 생존율의 측면에서 유리한 점이 없었다. 따라서 방사선치료와 항암화학요법을 새로운 병용방법에 관한 연구개발이 요망된다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제11권2호
• /
• pp.355-361
• /
• 1993

본 연구는 1991년 5월부터 국소적으로 진행된 자궁경부암 (FIGO stage IIB~IVA) 환자를 대상으로 5-FU와 Cis-platinum을 방사선 치료와 동시에 투여하여 치료 독성, 치료의 적합성과 국소관해율을 평가하기 위해 시행되었다. 방사선 치료는 외부방사선 조사로 전골반부에 23회에 걸쳐 4140 cGy 시행후, 고선량 근접치료기로 강내조사를 6회 내지 7회 (A점에 $3000\~3500$ cGy) 시행하였으며, B점에 추가조사를 시행하여 IIB병기 환자는 6000 cGy까지 IIIB병기 환자는 6500 cGy가지 B점에 조사되도록 하였다. 첫 번째 항암화학요법은 외부방사선 치료 시행의 두번째 주에 5-FU는 $1000 mg/m^2/24hr$를 96시간 동안에 걸쳐 토여하고 Cis-platinum은 $20mg/m^2/day$를 3일 투여하였다. 두번째 항암화학요법은 처음과 동일한 방법으로 첫번째 고선량 근접 강내 치료가 시행될 때 투여 되었다. 1993년 8월까지 총 16명의 환자(10 IIB 병기, 4 IIIB병기, 2 IVA 병기)가 등록되었으며, 이중 2명은 외부방사선 2회 조사후 치료를 중단하였으며, 1명은 강내치료중 3등급의 비뇨기계독성으로 치료를 중단하였다. 2회의 항암화학 요법이 종료된 후 독성의 평가가 가능했던 14명의 환자중 5명이 3등급의 위장관독성이 발생하였으나, 4명은 치료종료후 평가에서 회복되었다. 1명은 병기 IIIB환자로 초기에 서혜부 임파절 전이가 있어 다량의 방사선이 조사되었는데, 치료종료 후에 위장관독성이 악화되었고, 1개월후 원격전이로 사망하였다. 치료후 치료전 체중의 $10\%$ 이상 감소된 환자는 2명이었고, 1명이 3등급의 백혈구 감소를 보였다. 환자의 평균 치료 기간은 75일(포준 치료 기간은 $70\pm7$일)이었고, 80일 이상인 환자는 3명 (84, 84, 89일)이었다. 추적관찰 가능했던 13명 환자중 8명이 완전관해를 보였고, 특히 IIB병기 환자의 경우 9명중 8명이 완전관해를 보였다. 본 연구결과 진전된 자궁 경부암에서 방사선과 항암화학요법 병행치료는 효과나 독성면에서 수용가능 하였으나 향후 근치적 방사선치료 단독으로 시행된 경우와의 전향적 비교연구가 필요할 것으로 생각된다.

• 대한두경부종양학회지
• /
• 제33권2호
• /
• pp.55-58
• /
• 2017

Background. Lymphoma of the vocal fold is extremely rare due to low lymphoid content in the larynx. To date, fewer than 100 cases of laryngeal lymphoma have been reported; however, none of these literatures are concerned about exclusive laryngeal involvement of recurred lymphoma which initially appeared in other body sites. Specific consensus about management for these patients yet to exist, due to its rare occurrence; however, the main modality of treatment is chemotherapy alone or in combination with radiation therapy. Case. Herein, we report a case of a 51-year-old female patient who had recurrent T-cell lymphoma developing in bilateral vocal folds. The patient was originally diagnosed of T-cell lymphoma in right colic flexure 10 years ago, and was cured by chemotherapy. Immunohistochemical stain revealed the histologic type of recurred tumor in the vocal folds that are identical to the previously cured lymphoma. Conclusion. To the best of our knowledge, this was the first case that recurrent lymphoma occurred solely in the vocal folds. Despite its rarity, lymphoma should be put in the index of suspicion among those patients with decreased vocal fold mucosal wave without definite vocal fold mass who had a history of cured lymphoma.