• 인터넷정보학회논문지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.57-65
• /
• 2014

최근 한국의 대규모 IT 서비스 프로젝트의 수익률은 저하되고 있는 것으로 파악된다. IT 서비스 프로젝트의 수익률을 저하시키는 가장 큰 이유는 프로젝트와 관련된 여러 위험 요인들이 프로젝트의 일정 지연 및 비용 초과를 초래한 것으로 파악 된다. 이러한 일정 지연 및 비용 초과 현상을 방지하기 위해서는 프로젝트의 위험 요인들을 계약 체결 전에 식별하는 것이 매우 중요하다. 왜냐하면 발주사와 개발사간 계약 조건 협상 시 식별된 위험 요인들을 제거할 수 있기 때문이다. 본 연구에서는 IT 서비스 프로젝트의 특성으로 인해 프로젝트 수행 과정에서 발생할 수 있는 계약 위험 요인들을 사전에 파악하고 평가할 수 있는 체크리스트를 제시하고, 이를 실제 금융 산업의 IT 서비스 프로젝트에 적용하여 그 효과를 확인하고자 하였다. 적용 사례를 분석한 결과 IT 서비스 프로젝트의 위험 요인들을 식별하고 제거하는데 본 연구에서 제시된 체크리스트가 효과가 있음을 확인하였다.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.719-728
• /
• 2023

연구목적: 이동식크레인은 높은 사망률에 기여하는 기계로 최근 6년간(2016~2021) 사고사망사례 중 건설업 2,574건을 분석한 고위험요인(SIF)정보에서 이동식크레인의 사고는 총 61건의 재해가 발생하였다. 현장의 안전대책에도 불구하고 제대로 활용이 안되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 표준 리스크 평가 지수를 제시하여 사고예방에 기여하고자 한다. 연구방법: 전문가 면담과 사망사고 사례분석, 현장실태분석, 문헌조사를 통해 위험성평가의 4M방식의 표준 리스크 평가 지수 방법을 제시하고자 한다. 연구결과: 현장 8개현장 위험성평가를 분석한 결과 재해예방에 실질적인 기여를 할 수 없다는 결론을 얻었으며, 표준 리스크 평가 지수 방식의 개선방안으로 적용하여야 한다. 결론: 건설현장에서 표준 리스크 평가 지수방식으로 전환함으로써 안전보건관계자 및 근로자가 쉽게 이용할 수 있고 재해감소에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 제안한다.

• 한국재난정보학회 논문집
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.444-456
• /
• 2022

연구목적: 연구실험실에는 사전유해인자위험분석을 실시하도록 하고 있으나 실행하지 않는 연구실험실이 많다. 연구실험실의 안전을 확보하기 위한 목적으로 좀 더 쉽게 위험성평가를 적용 할 수 있도록 개선점을 찾고자 한다. 연구방법: 선행논문 및 과학기술정보통신부 연구실 안전관리 실태조사 보고서 자료를 활용하였다. 사전유해인자위험분석과 산업안전보건법에 의한 위험성평가를 비교하여 연구하였다. 연구결과: 연구실험실에 대한 위험성을 평가할 수 있는 기법을 제시하였다. 연구실험실 위험성평가시 가능성(빈도)과 중대성(강도)의 크기를 추정할 수 있도록 방법을 제시하였다. 결론: 연구실험실에서 쉽게 적용할 수 있도록 체크리스트 형태의 위험성평가 기법을 제시하였고, 실제 평가해 보았다. 연구실험실에서 위험성평가를 통한 개선을 실시하여 안전사고 예방에 도움이 될 것으로 기대한다.

• Architectural research
• /
• 제22권4호
• /
• pp.105-112
• /
• 2020

The purpose of this study is to establish a method for assessing a building's risk against disaster, tentatively named the Korean integrated disaster evaluation simulator (K-IDES). Based on previous studies, FEMA's risk management series and FEMA IRVS are selected as case studies for developing a frame work of K-IDES, through the comparative analysis of domestic building design guides, codes, and special acts related to disasters, in order to develop a risk assessment methodology for quantitative results. The assessment method consists of a classification system and calculating risk, and a simulation applying the developed checklist in K-IDES to similar types of high-rise buildings will be conducted to validate its accuracy. The final goal is to systemize an integrated risk management in a high-rise building against disasters for the purpose of recognizing vulnerable areas from the beginning of the design process and reinforcing it from potential threats after construction.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.56-69
• /
• 2001

Objectives : This study was designed to develop and standardize a checklist for ergonomic risk factors, and to provide ergonomic guidelines for managing cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs) in automobile assembly lines. Methods : The Checklist for Ergonomic Risk Factors (CERF-1) was developed based on the results of previous studies, and then modified after performing pilot study. Information on the symptoms possibly related with CTDs was obtained using a self-reported Questionnaire from 465 automobile assembly workers. Their job conditions were examined to assess risk factors through both direct observation and video analysis. Results : Rate of detecting risky job through CERF-1 was 85.6%, and was similar to that (88.8%) by Occupational Safety and Health Adminstration(OSHA) checklist but higher than that (63.7%) by American National Standards Institute(ANSI) Z-365. Relationship of the exposure scores derived from CERF-1 with levels of symptom was greater (r=0.49) than OSHA (r=0.28) and ANSI Z-365 (r=0.22). Considering the relationship, jobs scoring higher than 16 could be classified as the Risk Job. and lower than 16 as the Low Risk Job. Sensitivity and specificity of the Risk Job were 92.5 % and 31.5 %, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) after age adjustment was 5.69 (95 % confidence interval 3.15-10.29) for the Risk Job, and these ORs were significantly different from those of the Low Risk Job. The exposure scores were Quite valid, in that the scores at the main survey were significantly correlated with those at the follow-up survey, as suggested by test-retest(r=0.88) and inter-rater reliability(r=0.80). Conclusions : The CERF-1, developed in this study, will be an efficient tool for evaluation of risk jobs for CTDs in automobile assembly lines, and can be used easily by health care providers.

• 한방재활의학과학회지
• /
• 제33권4호
• /
• pp.61-78
• /
• 2023

Objectives This systematic review aimed to analyze the effectiveness, safety and the reporting quality of scalp acupuncture (SA) treatment for musculoskeletal disease (MSD). Methods Eleven databases were systematically searched up to July 12th 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of SA treatment for MSD were selected manually by the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias (RoB) 1.0 and the reporting quality of studies was evaluated using Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement and Standards for Reporting Interventions in Clinical Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA) 2010 checklist. Results Ten clinical studies were met the inclusion criteria. Most of studies reported SA treatment significantly alleviated pain and functional disability of MSD patients and no serious adverse effects were reported. In RoB assessment, blinding of participants and personnel was found to have the highest RoB and allocation concealment was found to have the most unclear RoB. In CONSORT 2010 statement evaluation, all studies reported 15.3 items (41.4%) on average. In STRICTA 2010 checklist evaluation, all studies reported 11.2 items (65.9%) on average. Conclusions The systematic review found that SA treatment may alleviate pain and functional disability of MSD patients and have little severe adverse effect. The reporting quality of included studies was mainly low, therefore, further studies with strict adherence to the CONSORT and STRICTA checklist should be encouraged.

• 한국산업보건학회지
• /
• 제16권4호
• /
• pp.385-397
• /
• 2006

A high prevalence of farmer's work-related musculoskeletal disorders(MSDs) have been reported in precedent studies. To offer the basic data for reducing the melon farmer's MSDs, a questionnaire survey about MSDs symptoms and work loaded body part and video analysis by 3 checklist(REBA, RULA, OWAS) for musculoskeletal risk assessment were carried. 94 melon farmers for this questionnaire and 1 typical farm for risk assessment were participated. A total of 80.9% of the farmers reported musculoskeletal symptoms and 60.6% reported musculoskeletal symptoms over NIOSH standard. The mainly symptom body part is low back, knee and shoulders. Main risk factors in melon farm are awkward postures, heavey/frequent lifting and repetitive hand/arm motions. The high risk tasks induced by video analysis were harvesting, removing the sprouts and covering with rags. These result can be used practically for planning intervention strategy and programs to prevent farmer's MSDs.

• 한국건설관리학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국건설관리학회 2004년도 제5회 정기학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.504-509
• /
• 2004

건설사업의 안전관리는 건설공사의 종류, 공법, 공정, 기후의 특성, 환경적 영향 등 여러 가지 복잡한 제반 요소에 영향을 받는 특성을 지니고 있으나, 현재 계획 및 설계단계에서 설계 실무를 담당하는 설계전문가들 조차도 안전에 관하여 고려하지 않고 설계업무를 수행하고 있으며, 설계로 인하여 대상 시설물이 어느 정도의 안전도를 지니게 되는지에 대한 인식이 부족한 실정이다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 건설사업의 안전사고 예방차원에서 유해위험을 설계단계에서 사전 안전도 차원의 설계를 수행하도록 유도하기 위하여 건설안전영향평가의 개념을 도입하고자 하며, 이에 따라 안전영향평가 관련 기술동향을 분석하여 위험도 방식에 근거한 합리적인 안전영향평가모형을 제안하였다. 제안된 안전영향평가모형은 건설사업의 안전영향 요소 수집 및 사고시나리오 작성방안, 설계와의 연관성 여부에 근거하여 설계에 의한 안전영향요소와 시공에 의한 안전영향요소로의 분류방안, 그리고 이에 대한 사건중요도 산정기법이 제안되어 있으며, 설계에 의한 안전영향요소로 분류된 각각의 안전영향요소와 설계항목과의 상관성을 규명한 안전영향평가 Checklist 개발방안과 이에 따른 위험도 접근방법에 의한 안전영향평가방안을 제시하고자 한다.

• KIEAE Journal
• /
• 제16권3호
• /
• pp.47-55
• /
• 2016

Purpose: This study was aimed at providing the basic checklist as a means to assess the crime risk in physical environment of the pedestrian passage at residential area. Method: For this purpose, the preliminary checklists were selected according to the review of the precedent studies of checklists in exterior pedestrian passage. The usefulness and the importance of the preliminary checklists were analyzed through the seven expert group meetings, the 87 questionnaires survey of the crime experts & the architectural/urban experts, preliminary assessment and field survey. Results: The assessment categories of checklists were sorted into six types, i.e. spatial structure & function, lighting, landscaping, security facilities, other facilities and cleaning & maintenance. The 49 checklists were proposed according to the assessment categories. The final checklists were divided key checklists and general checklists based on the results of experts' weighting of each list item. There were significant differences between crime experts' weighting and architectural/urban experts' weighting in several checklists, i.e. dividing between pavements and streets, the brightness of light, white light.

• Safety and Health at Work
• /
• 제2권3호
• /
• pp.260-272
• /
• 2011

Objectives: The promotion of health and safety (H&S) awareness among hospital staff can be applied through various methods. The aim of this study was to assess the risk level of physical hazards in the hospital sector by combining workers' perception, experts' evaluation and objective measurements. Methods: A cross-sectional study was designed using multiple triangulation. Hospital staff (n = 447) filled in an H&S questionnaire in a general hospital in Athens and an oncology one in Thessaloniki. Experts observed and filled in a checklist on H&S in the various departments of the two hospitals. Lighting, noise and microclimate measurements were performed. Results: The staff's perception of risk was higher than that of the experts in many cases. The measured risk levels were low to medium. In cases of high-risk noise and lighting, staff and experts agreed. Staff's perception of risk was influenced by hospital's department, hospital's service, years of working experience and level of education. Therefore, these factors should be taken into account in future studies aimed at increasing the participation of hospital workers. Conclusion: This study confirmed the usefulness of staff participation in the risk assessment process, despite the tendency for staff to overestimate the risk level of physical hazards. The combination of combining staff perception, experts' evaluation and objective measures in the risk assessment process increases the efficiency of risk management in the hospital environment and the enforcement of relevant legislation.