• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.338-345
• /
• 1993

양성 종양, 악성 종양, 감염, 외상 등에 의한 하악골 결손은 중대한 심미적, 생물학적 결과를 일으킨다. 재건술의 일차적 목적은 완전한 기능 회복이며 이는 이차적으로 심미적 변형의 정상화를 유도한다. 저자들은 1981년에서 1990년까지 서울대학교 치과대학 구강 악안면외과에 내원하여 하악골 재건술을 시행받고 6개월 이상 추적조사가 가능한 61증례의 임상적 자료 및 방사선 검사를 통해 부위별 임상적 성공률을 조사하였다. 본 임상 논문의 목적은 하악골 결손부위와 부위에 따른 유리골 이식의 성공률을 연구하는데 그 의의를 두겠다. 유리골 이식의 임상적 연구를 요약해 보면 유리 자가골 이식의 대부분은 장골이었고 망상피질골이었다. 6개월 이상 추적조사가 가능한 61명의 환자에 있어 전체적 성공률은 80.3% 였다. 강선고정과 구외접근법이 다른 방법보다 그 예후에 있어 훨씬 더 좋은 결과를 나타냈고 다른 부위보다 하악 정중부위가 그 예후에 있어 훨씬 나쁜 결과를 보였다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제38권
• /
• pp.45.1-45.7
• /
• 2016

Background: We evaluated and compared the outcomes of different ossification processes in patients with alveolar cleft in whom correction was performed using endochondral bone graft or intramembranous bone graft. Methods: The patients were divided into two groups: the endochondral bone (iliac bone or rib bone) graft group and the intramembranous bone (mandibular bone) graft group. Medical records and radiologic images of patients who underwent alveolar bone grafting due to alveolar cleft were analyzed retrospectively. Through postoperative and follow-up radiologic images, the height of the interdental bone septum was classified into four types based on the highest point of alveolar ridge. Then, the height of the interdental bone septum and the area of the bone graft were evaluated according to the type of bone graft. In addition, the occurrence of complications and the need for an additional bone graft, the result of postoperative orthodontic treatment, and the eruption of impacted teeth were investigated. Results: Thirty patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in the change of the interdental bone height and the area of the bone graft according to the type of bone. There was no significant difference in the success rate of the surgery according to the type of bone. One patient underwent an additional bone graft surgery during the follow-up period. Conclusions: The outcomes of alveolar bone grafting were not significantly different according to the type of bone graft. If appropriate to the size of the recipient site, the chin bone is a useful graft material in alveolar cleft, as is the iliac bone.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제26권5호
• /
• pp.533-539
• /
• 2000

Recent development of dental implantology has taken an interest in the bone graft procedure. This is a review of literature, published from 1994 to November 1999. This study is provided by MEDLINE search. In this study, 718 patients received 829 graft with placing 2,677 endosseous implants. In mandible, nonvascularized or vascularized block bone grafts provided better results(success rate 95.2%) than particulate grafts(83.6%). But in maxilla, particulate grafts provided better results(93.7%, 86.2%) and more cases especially in sinus elevation. There were many cases using autogenous bone graft and revealed good results, but allogenic or alloplastic bone graft materials also were used by many surgeons.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제37권
• /
• pp.8.1-8.6
• /
• 2015

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of autogenous fresh demineralized tooth (auto-FDT) graft prepared at the chairside for alveolar bone grafting during dental implant surgery. Methods: In total, 38 patients requiring both tooth extraction (for endodontic or periodontal reasons or third molar extraction) and alveolar bone regeneration for dental implant placement were included. Within 2 h after clean extraction, the teeth were prepared at the chairside to serve as bone graft material. In the same sitting, blocks or chips of this graft material were used to reconstruct defects at the osteotomy site simultaneously with or before implant placement. Twelve months after prosthesis fabrication and placement, the clinical findings and implant success rates were evaluated. Histological studies were randomly conducted for selected cases. Results: Clinical evaluation showed favorable wound healing with minimal complications and good bone support for the implants. No implant was lost after 12 months of function following prosthetic rehabilitation. Histological examination revealed new bone formation induced by the graft material. Conclusions: Chairside preparation of autogenous fresh demineralized teeth after extraction can be a useful alternative to the use of autogenous bone or other graft materials for the immediate reconstruction of alveolar bone defects to facilitate subsequent implant placement.

• 대한치과보철학회지
• /
• 제58권1호
• /
• pp.23-29
• /
• 2020

목적: 이번 후향적 연구의 목적은 수압을 이용하는 방식을 변형한 방식인 S-reamer 와 겔 형태의 이식재를 이용한 상악동 거상술을 시행한 임플란트의 5년 이상 추적 관찰을 함으로써 성공률과 생존률을 조사하여 이 술식에 대한 평가를 하는데 있다. 재료 및 방법: 2008년에서 2014년까지 환자들을 추적 관찰하였다. 관찰된 환자는 59명이었고 식립 임플란트는 117개였다. 남성 34명, 여성 25명이고 연령대는 다양하였다. 잔존 수직 골의 골 량은 1 - 6 mm로 다양하였다. 상악동 거상술은 막의 천공없이 상악동을 천공하는데 S-reamer를 사용하였고 막을 거상하는데 겔 형태의 이식재를 사용하여 상악동 거상술을 시행하였다. 모든 임플란트는 거상과 동시에 식립하였고 5 - 6개월 치유 기간 후 보철물을 장착하였다. 방사선 검사는 추적 검사 할 때와 식립 후 바로 찍은 방사선 검사를 비교하였다 그리고 탐침을 통하여 화농여부, 염증여부, 출혈여부 등등 임상 검사를 통하여 검진 평가 하였다. Buser의 성공 기준을 참고하였고 모든 임플란트를 성공 임플란트, 생존 임플란트, 실패 임플란트로 분류하였다. 결과: 실패하여 제거한 임플란트는 5개였고 골 소실을 동반한 급성 염증 치료를 했거나 염증을 보인 임플란트가 4개였다. 생존율은 95.7%이고 성공률은 92.3%였다. 결론: S-reamer와 겔 형태의 이식재를 이용한 상악동 거상술이 1 - 6 mm 잔존 골이 있는 상황에서 막 천공이 없이 상악동을 거상할 수 있는 성공적인 술식임을 알 수 있었다.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제33권3호
• /
• pp.256-263
• /
• 2011

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of autogenous tooth graft materials after maxillary sinus bone grafts. Methods: The study involved 23 implants in 22 patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and the Department of Periodontics, Chosun University Dental Hospital, in 2008 and received autogenous tooth graft materials for maxillary sinus bone grafts. Results: For eight patients with maxillary bone graft materials prior to implant placement, the healing period averaged five months. For eleven patients with simultaneous maxillary bone graft and implant placement, eight patients received a second surgery, with an average healing time of six months. Three patients had a longer observation period with only a fixture implanted. Three patients who received only a bone graft required more time to implant placement because of the lack of residual bone and also for personal reasons. Only 5 patients had biopsies performed and complications such as infection and dehiscence healed well. The application of autogenous graft materials to the maxillary bone graft sites did not exert any significant effects on the success rates. When a mixture of graft materials was used, the post-surgical bone resorption rate was reduced. Histological analysis showed that new bone formation and remodeling were initiated during the three-to-six month healing period. Bone formation capacity increased continuously up to six months after the maxillary bone graft. Conclusion: According to this analysis, excellent stability and bone-forming capacity were seen in cases where autogenous materials were used alone or mixed with other materials. Autogenous tooth graft materials may be substituted instead of autogenous bones.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제50권6호
• /
• pp.329-338
• /
• 2012

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of vertical alveolar ridge augmentation using autogenous block bone graft, especially resorption rate, and outcomes of dental implants placed in the grafted site. Patients and Methods: Medical records and radiographs were reviewed. Twenty-seven patients who have been received the autogenous block bone graft which harvested from chin, ramus, and ilium, and the implant installation on 31 areas(22 maxillas and 9 mandibles) were included. Eight implants were installed simultaneously at the time of bone graft in 4 patients, and 65 implants were installed after 4.9 months(range 2~18 months) of autogenous block bone graft in 23 patients. The resorption amount and rate of augmented bone, and the success and survival rates implants were evaluated. Results: Mean height of the augmented block bone was $5.9{\pm}2.3mm$(range from 2.5 to 13.0 mm). Mean follow-up period after block bone graft was 30.4 months(range from 16 to 55 months). Mean resorption of the augmented block bone was $2.0{\pm}1.5mm$ (range from 0.5 to 7.24 mm). The success and survival rates of the implants were 78.1 % and 98.6%, respectively. Conclusion: This study indicates that the autogenous block bone graft is a useful and stable method for alveolar ridge augmentation for dental implant. And more augmentation is needed to compensate the resorption of the grafted bone.

• 대한치과의사협회지
• /
• 제50권12호
• /
• pp.743-754
• /
• 2012

urpose : The purpose of this study was to evaluate the US II plus/GS II Osstem$^{(R)}$ implants through the study for the clinical success rate during the installation of the Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft. Materials and Methods : This study was researched in the 4 medical institutions: Chonnam National University, Chosun University, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital, and FM dental clinic from May, 2002 to September, 2009. Based on the total number of 60 patients whose treatment was the installation of the US II plus/GS II Osstem¢Á implants after bone graft, we evaluated success rate of implants. We analysis the distribution of patient's age and gender, edentulous area, bone type, fixture length and diameter, installation and loading time, donor site, bone graft material and method, antagonistic teeth, and survival and success rate. From these analyses we got the following results. Results : 1. In this study, the total number of patients who have been installed with US II plus implant was 27, and total of 52 implants were installed. The average age was 38.9, with 16 male, and 11 female patients. 2. The total number of patients who have been installed with GS II implant was 33, and total of 54 implants were installed. The average age was 49.7, with 24 male, and 9 female patients. 3. As for bone graft method, either autogenous bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(88.4%) for US II plus. Chin, iliac, and Maxillary tuberosity were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and onlay method of bone graft was performed. 4. Allogenic bone or a mix of autogenous and heterogenous bone was used(77.8%) for GS II. Chin, ramus, and tibia were the donor sites for autogenous bone graft, and GBR method of bone graft was performed. 5. The duration from the installation of implants to setting of final prosthesis was average of 16 months and 10 months for US II plus and GS II respectively. Also, the final follow up period was average of 31 months and 28 months respectively. During this period, one GS II implant was removed from 1 patient due to failure of early osteointegration. 6. The survival rates were 100% and 98.1%, and success rates were 94.2% and 94.4% for US II plus and GS II implant respectively. Conclusion : On the evaluation of our clinical study, both US II plus and GS II Osstem¢Á implants showed the excellent clinical results after bone graft.

• Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
• /
• 제35권5호
• /
• pp.340-345
• /
• 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical success of bone reconstruction of the severely atrophic maxilla using autogenous block bone onlay graft from the ramus and ilium prior to dental implantation. And we measured the amount of vertical height change Material and Methods: 26 partially edentulous patients(32 case) who needed block onlay bone graft before implant placement in posterior maxillary area from 2002 to 2009 were selected for this study. Patients consisted of 20 males & 6 females and the average of their age was 54.2. Patients who were treated with ramal bone were 19 case and patients who were treated with iliac bone were 11 case. Digital panoramic X-ray was taken at the day of surgery, 3 months and 6 months later after the surgery. Vertical height change & resorption rate of grafted bone were measured with the same X-rays and compared Results: Two out of 32 bone grafts had to be removed because of inflamation at the grafts area(97.3%). The mean of radiographic vertical height change(change rate) of post-op. 3 month was 0.54mm(8.5%)and 6 month was 0.99mm(15.9%). Compairing to intraoral donor site(ramus), iliac bone had more vertical height change(1.18mm) at 6 month after surgery. Conclusions: Within the limit of this study, autogenous block onlay grafts can be considered a promising treatment for severely atrophic maxilla.

• Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.146-153
• /
• 2014

Purpose: This study compares and evaluates the efficacy of graft materials after maxillary sinus bone grafts with autogenous tooth bone graft material (AutoBT), demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) and deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM). Methods: The study involved 30 sinuses in 26 patients who visited the Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry in Ajou University Hospital and received either AutoBT, DFDBA or DBBM with sinus elevation using the lateral window technique. Sinus graft height was measured before, immediately after, and six months after bone graft with panoramic radiography and the height changes of the sinus floor was compared according to the graft materials. Results: After six months, the decrease ratio of graft heights were 13.57% for AutoBT group, 14.30% for DFDBA group, and 11.92% for DBBM group. There was no statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The new maxillary sinus floor formed by the upper border of bone graft material, can repneumatize after the maxillary sinus elevation. Thus, long-term stability of sinus graft height represents an important factor for implant success. We found that the three graft materials for sinus elevation do not differ significantly and all three graft materials showed excellent resistance to maxillary sinus repneumatization. However, due to the special circumstances of the maxillary sinus and small sample, the actual difference between the three graft materials may not have been detectable. Therefore further study needs to be conducted for more reliable study results.