대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제58권1호
  • /
  • Pages.23-29
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

S-reamer와 겔 형태의 이식재를 이용한 치조정 접근법을 통한 상악동 거상술 임플란트의 성공률과 생존율: 5년 이상 추적 관찰을 통한 후향적 연구

Success and survival rate of the implant with crestal sinus lift using S-reamer and gel-type graft material: A retrospective study by more 5-years follow check up

  • 김종진 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조성암 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Kim, Jong Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Cho, Sung Am (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.10.21
  • 심사 : 2019.12.16
  • 발행 : 2020.01.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 이번 후향적 연구의 목적은 수압을 이용하는 방식을 변형한 방식인 S-reamer 와 겔 형태의 이식재를 이용한 상악동 거상술을 시행한 임플란트의 5년 이상 추적 관찰을 함으로써 성공률과 생존률을 조사하여 이 술식에 대한 평가를 하는데 있다. 재료 및 방법: 2008년에서 2014년까지 환자들을 추적 관찰하였다. 관찰된 환자는 59명이었고 식립 임플란트는 117개였다. 남성 34명, 여성 25명이고 연령대는 다양하였다. 잔존 수직 골의 골 량은 1 - 6 mm로 다양하였다. 상악동 거상술은 막의 천공없이 상악동을 천공하는데 S-reamer를 사용하였고 막을 거상하는데 겔 형태의 이식재를 사용하여 상악동 거상술을 시행하였다. 모든 임플란트는 거상과 동시에 식립하였고 5 - 6개월 치유 기간 후 보철물을 장착하였다. 방사선 검사는 추적 검사 할 때와 식립 후 바로 찍은 방사선 검사를 비교하였다 그리고 탐침을 통하여 화농여부, 염증여부, 출혈여부 등등 임상 검사를 통하여 검진 평가 하였다. Buser의 성공 기준을 참고하였고 모든 임플란트를 성공 임플란트, 생존 임플란트, 실패 임플란트로 분류하였다. 결과: 실패하여 제거한 임플란트는 5개였고 골 소실을 동반한 급성 염증 치료를 했거나 염증을 보인 임플란트가 4개였다. 생존율은 95.7%이고 성공률은 92.3%였다. 결론: S-reamer와 겔 형태의 이식재를 이용한 상악동 거상술이 1 - 6 mm 잔존 골이 있는 상황에서 막 천공이 없이 상악동을 거상할 수 있는 성공적인 술식임을 알 수 있었다.

Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the method using the S-reamer and gel-type graft material by the success rate and survival rate. Materials and methods: Implantation period was from 2008 to 2014, Follow check up year is 2019. There were 59 patients and 117 implants. All implants were placed in the posterior maxilla with the sinus lift. The patients population consisted of 34 men and 25 women, ranging from 19 to 75 years. The residual bone heights were from 1 mm to 6 mm. Sinus was perforated with S-reamer without membrane tearing and gel type bone graft material was used for membrane lifting and filling the space. all implants were placed simultaneously. Panoramic X-ray was taken. After 5 - 6 months healing period, final prostheses were restored. After more 5-years implant surgery, Panoramic X-ray was obtained and X-ray analysis and clinical examination were performed. Success criteria was referred to a Buser's success critera. All implants were classified to success implant, survival implant, failed implant. A success implant was satisfying success criteria, a survival implant was a implant that was acute infection with suppuration and bone loss, a failed implant was a implant that was mobile, removed. Results: Five implants were removed, and 4 implants had infected with bone loss. Survival rate was 95.7% and success rate was 92.3%. Conclusion: This retrospective study presented that this method with S-reamer and gel-type graft material was a successful treatment without membrane tear in the condition of 1-6 mm residual bone height.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-29.
  2. Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006;77:1340-7. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050402
  3. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01132.x
  4. Tatum OH. Maxillary sinus grafting for endosseous implant. Presented at the annual meeting of the alabama implant study group. Birmingham, AL, April 1977.
  5. Schwartz-Arad D, Herzberg R, Dolev E. The prevalence of surgical complications of the sinus graft procedure and their impact on implant survival. J Periodontol 2004;75:511-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.4.511
  6. Schwarz L, Schiebel V, Hof M, Ulm C, Watzek G, Pommer B. Risk factors of membrane perforation and postoperative complications in sinus floor elevation surgery: Review of 407 augmentation procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;73:1275-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.01.039
  7. Katranji A, Fotek P, Wang HL. Sinus augmentation complications: etiology and treatment. Implant Dent 2008;17:339-49. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181815660
  8. Summers RB1. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.
  9. Engelke W, Deckwer I. Endoscopically controlled sinus floor augmentation. A preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:527-31. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080612.x
  10. Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction with placement of 265 implants: a 6-year retrospective study. Implant Dent 2000;9:363-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200009040-00014
  11. Sotirakis EG, Gonshor A. Elevation of the maxillary sinus floor with hydraulic pressure. J Oral Implantol 2005;31:197-204. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2005)31[197:EOTMSF]2.0.CO;2
  12. Andreasi Bassi M, Lopez MA. Hydraulic sinus lift: a new method proposal. J Osteology Biomaterials 2010;1:93-101.
  13. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  14. Lee HW, Lin WS, Morton D. A retrospective study of complications associated with 100 consecutive maxillary sinus augmentations via the lateral window approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:860-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2793
  15. Del Fabbro M, Rosano G, Taschieri S. Implant survival rates after maxillary sinus augmentation. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:497-506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00571.x
  16. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  17. Pikos M. Complications of maxillary sinus augmentation. In Jensen OT (eds): The sinus graft. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Quintessence, 2006. p. 103-15.
  18. Al-Dajani M. Incidence, risk factors, and complications of schneiderian membrane perforation in sinus lift surgery: A meta-analysis. Implant Dent 2016;25:409-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000411
  19. Wallace SS, Mazor Z, Froum SJ, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Schneiderian membrane perforation rate during sinus elevation using piezosurgery: clinical results of 100 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007;27:413-9.
  20. Lalo J, Broukris G, Djemil M, Beleh M. Safe technique for sinus floor elevation through alveolar crest with stop sinus osteotomes. Implantodontie 2005;14:62-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.implan.2005.05.006
  21. Bernardello F, Righi D, Cosci F, Bozzoli P, Soardi CM, Spinato S. Crestal sinus lift with sequential drills and simultaneous implant placement in sites with <5 mm of native bone: a multicenter retrospective study. Implant Dent 2011;20:439-44. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182342052
  22. Lopez MA, Andreasi Bassi M, Confalone L, Carinci F. Maxillary sinus floor elevation via crestal approach: the evolution of the hydraulic pressure technique. J Craniofac Surg 2014;25:e127-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000457
  23. Kim YK, Lee JY, Park JW, Kim SG, Oh JS. Sinus membrane elevation by the crestal approach using a novel drilling system. Implant Dent 2017;26:351-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000570
  24. Rosen PS, Summers R, Mellado JR, Salkin LM, Shanaman RH, Marks MH, Fugazzotto PA. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:853-8.
  25. Peleg M, Garg AK, Mazor Z. Predictability of simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic posterior maxilla: A 9-year longitudinal experience study of 2132 implants placed into 731 human sinus grafts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:94-102.
  26. Thor A, Sennerby L, Hirsch JM, Rasmusson L. Bone formation at the maxillary sinus floor following simultaneous elevation of the mucosal lining and implant installation without graft material: an evaluation of 20 patients treated with 44 Astra Tech implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:64-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.10.047
  27. Johnson GK, Hill M. Cigarette smoking and the periodontal patient. J Periodontol 2004;75:196-209. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.2.196
  28. Jones JK, Triplett RG. The relationship of cigarette smoking to impaired intraoral wound healing: a review of evidence and implications for patient care. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992;50:237-9; discussion 239-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(92)90318-T
  29. Wallace RH. The relationship between cigarette smoking and dental implant failure. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000;8:103-6.
  30. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302.
  31. Kumar A, Jaffin RA, Berman C. The effect of smoking on achieving osseointegration of surface-modified implants: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:816-9.
  32. Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointegrated dental implants. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:79-89. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.79
  33. Hinode D, Tanabe S, Yokoyama M, Fujisawa K, Yamauchi E, Miyamoto Y. Influence of smoking on osseointegrated implant failure: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:473-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01244.x
  34. Misch CE. Progressive bone loading. In: Misch CE, ed. Dental implant prosthetics. St. Louis: Mosby; 2005. p. 511-30.
  35. Appleton RS, Nummikoski PV, Pigno MA, Cronin RJ, Chung KH. A radiographic assessment of progressive loading on bone around single osseointegrated implants in the posterior maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:161-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01089.x
  36. Siadat H, Panjnoosh M, Alikhasi M, Alihoseini M, Bassir SH, Rokn AR. Does implant staging choice affect crestal bone loss? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;70:307-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2011.09.006
  37. Ozyuvaci H, Bilgic B, Firatli E. Radiologic and histomorphometric evaluation of maxillary sinus grafting with alloplastic graft materials. J Periodontol 2003;74:909-15. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.6.909