Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Autogenous Teeth: Preliminary Report

자가치아뼈이식재를 이용한 상악동증강술: 일차 보고

  • Jeong, Kyung-In (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Chul (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • 정경인 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김수관 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 오지수 (조선대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 임성철 (조선대학교 의학전문대학원 병리학교실)
  • Received : 2011.02.23
  • Accepted : 2011.03.22
  • Published : 2011.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of autogenous tooth graft materials after maxillary sinus bone grafts. Methods: The study involved 23 implants in 22 patients who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and the Department of Periodontics, Chosun University Dental Hospital, in 2008 and received autogenous tooth graft materials for maxillary sinus bone grafts. Results: For eight patients with maxillary bone graft materials prior to implant placement, the healing period averaged five months. For eleven patients with simultaneous maxillary bone graft and implant placement, eight patients received a second surgery, with an average healing time of six months. Three patients had a longer observation period with only a fixture implanted. Three patients who received only a bone graft required more time to implant placement because of the lack of residual bone and also for personal reasons. Only 5 patients had biopsies performed and complications such as infection and dehiscence healed well. The application of autogenous graft materials to the maxillary bone graft sites did not exert any significant effects on the success rates. When a mixture of graft materials was used, the post-surgical bone resorption rate was reduced. Histological analysis showed that new bone formation and remodeling were initiated during the three-to-six month healing period. Bone formation capacity increased continuously up to six months after the maxillary bone graft. Conclusion: According to this analysis, excellent stability and bone-forming capacity were seen in cases where autogenous materials were used alone or mixed with other materials. Autogenous tooth graft materials may be substituted instead of autogenous bones.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim SG, Kim HK, Lim SC. Combined implantation of particulate dentin, plaster of Paris, and a bone xenograft (Bio-Oss$^{\circledR}$) for bone regeneration in rats. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:282-8. https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2001.0236
  2. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  3. Kim YK, Lee JY. The evaluation of postoperatice safety of autogenous teeth bone graft. J Korean Implant Dentistry 2009;28:29-35.
  4. Kim YK. Systemic classification and application of alloplastic bony substitutes and autogenous teeth bone graft material. J Korean Implant Dentistry 2009;28:77-88.
  5. Xue J, Zhang L, Zou L, et al. High-resolution X-ray microdiffraction analysis of natural teeth. J Synchrotron Radiat 2008;15:235-8. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0909049508003397
  6. Kim SY, Kim SG, Lim SC, Bae CS. Effects on bone formation in ovariectomized rats after implantation of tooth ash and plaster of Paris mixture. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:852-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.023
  7. Kim YK, Kim SG, Lee JH. Cytotoxicity and hypersensitivity test of toothash. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;23:391-5.
  8. Velich N, Nemeth Z, Toth C, Szabo G. Long-term results with different bone substitutes used for sinus floor elevation. J Craniofac Surg 2004;15:38-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200401000-00013
  9. Busenlechner D, Huber CD, Vasak C, Dobsak A, Gruber R, Watzek G. Sinus augmentation analysis revised: the gradient of graft consolidation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1078-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01733.x
  10. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: Histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:857-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X
  11. Na TH, Kim SG, Yoon JH, Lim SC. Effect of the bone regeneration of the mixture of human or bovine tooth-ash and the plaster of Paris in rats. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;26:334-40.
  12. Acocella A, Bertolai R, Nissan J, Sacco R. Clinical, histological and histomorphometrical study of maxillary sinus augmentation using cortico-cancellous fresh frozen bone chips. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2011;39:192-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.019
  13. Hirsch JM, Ericsson I. Maxillary sinus augmentation using mandibular bone grafts and simultaneous installation of implants. A surgical technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:91-6. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1991.020207.x
  14. Schlegel KA, Zimmermann R, Thorwarth M, et al. Sinus floor elevation using autogenous bone or bone substitute combined with platelet-rich plasma. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e15-e25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.04.021
  15. Kim SG, Choi YO, Kim YK. Histologic evaluation of peri-implant defects with a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination and bioresorbable membrane barriers: a preliminary study. Hosp Dent Oral-Maxillofac Surg 2004;16:101-4.
  16. Kim YK, Yeo HH, Park IS, Cho JO. The experimental study on the healing process after the inlay implantation of toothash-plaster mixture block. J Korean Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;18:253-60.
  17. Kim SG, Chung CH, Kim YK. Grafting defects using a particulate dentin-plaster of Paris combination for implant placement: a case report. Hosp Dent Oral-Maxillofac Surg 2001;13:127-30.
  18. Johansson LA, Isaksson S, Lindh C, Becktor JP, Sennerby L. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement using locally harvested autogenous bone chips and bone debris: a prospective clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:837-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.093
  19. Hassan KS, Kassim A, Al Ogaly AU. A comparative evaluation of immediate dental implant with autogenous versus synthetic guided bone regeneration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral radiol Endod 2008;106:e8-e15.
  20. Serra E Silva FM, Ricardo de Albergaria-Barbosa J, Mazzonetto R. Clinical evaluation of association of bovine organic osseous matrix and bovine bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous bone graft in sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:931-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2006.02.026
  21. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00996.x
  22. Schaaf H, Streckbein P, Lendeckel S, et al. Sinus lift augmentation using autogenous bone grafts and platelet-rich plasma: radiographic results. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:673-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.004
  23. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Zetterqvist L, Lundgren S. A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34:273-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2004.09.009