• 한국항공운항학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항공운항학회 2005년도 춘계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.54-57
• /
• 2005

• 해양환경안전학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 해양환경안전학회 2017년도 추계학술발표회
• /
• pp.6-7
• /
• 2017

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제28권2호
• /
• pp.71-77
• /
• 2020

The checklist currently used for aviation safety inspection performed by ASIs(Aviation Safety Inspectors) consists of inspection groups and multiple items, it does not have safety attribute and structured hierarchy system which required to efficiently process aviation safety analysis. On this study, categorized the domestic and foreign ASI checklist by safety attribute from ICAO recommended and presented composition of checklist for safety assurance by comparative analysis composition of domestic and foreign ASI checklist.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제24권2호
• /
• pp.59-67
• /
• 2016

The checklist currently used for Aviation safety inspection performed by ASIs consists of inspection groups and multiple items, it does not have structured hierarchy system which required to efficiently process aviation safety analysis. On this study, through mapping taxonomy of HFACS onto current checklist to secure structured hierarchy system and present a specification on systematic frequency and severity to perform safety risk assessment of detected hazard.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제23권4호
• /
• pp.66-72
• /
• 2015

Recently due to shortage of pilots from aviation developed countries such as America, Japan and etc, not even regional airlines but also major airlines are facing difficulties of pilot shortage. Through statistic data, ICAO and Boeing Company are predicting that roughly 8 thousands of new pilots will be short per year. Therefore, to solve this pilot shortage, countries are searching solutions like reducing air route, and extending regular retirement. This study analyzes domestic pilot supply market and compares systems of pilot training between the domestic system and the system of America and Japan. From the comparison, the study has deducted improvements for the role of domestic certification system, ATO(Approval of Training Organizations) operation, and related organizations including the government.

• 한국항행학회논문지
• /
• 제26권6호
• /
• pp.528-535
• /
• 2022

항공기 제작 및 운송 기술 발달로 국내 항공산업은 비약적인 발전을 이루었으나, 항공안전 사고는 지속해서 발생하고 있다. 관리 감독기관에서는 위험기반 항공안전데이터를 기반으로 위해 요인과 위험도를 분류하고, 운송사업자별 안전 경향성 파악과 취약분야를 도출하여 사전점검을 수행함으로써 사건·사고를 사전 예방중에 있다. 그러나 자연어 형식으로 기술된 항공안전데이터의 휴먼 분류는 지식과 경험, 성향에 따라 서로 다른 분류 결과를 초래하고, 이벤트 내용의 의미 파악 및 분류를 위한 작업에 상당한 시간을 소요케 한다. 이에, 본 논문에서는 KoBERT 모델을 fine-tunning하고 5천 건 이상의 항공안전데이터를 기계학습 시켜 신규 데이터의 분류 값을 예측한 결과 79.2%의 정확성을 보였다. 그리고 유사 이벤트에 대해 동일한 결과 예측과 fail 된 데이터 중 일부는 휴먼 에러에 의한 오류임을 확인할 수 있었다.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제30권4호
• /
• pp.33-44
• /
• 2022

As the majority of Korean MRO demand is outsourced overseas, AMO by major foreign authorities is required to promote the Korean MRO industry to keep Korean MRO demand on shore. This study aims to promote consulting for AMO (obtaining repair station certification) by U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for Korean maintenance companies. We analyzed AMO process, studied various industry cases, developed a model for AMO consulting, and identified core competencies for consultants. We suggested a five-step modified Milan model to apply AMO consulting process. We identified seven core competencies (ethics, communications, problem-solving, technical, relationship, resource management, organizational understanding) both social and technical for consultants. Additionally, we text analyzed more than 260 FAA AMO consultant resumes on Linkedin and interpreted frequent words (airline, audit, inspector, DER, regulation, ISO, system) to their competencies. This study contributes to promote consulting for the Korean MRO industry to be recognized by FAA and to develop the Korean MRO industry.

• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제12권3호
• /
• pp.41-63
• /
• 2004

The area covered by product liability in broadest sense is so vast that an attempt to analyse all its impact on the aviation world risk. Every effort has been made to confine our review of subject a closely as possible to its influence on aircraft manufacturers, airlines and passengers, in spite of strong connections with other spheres of commercial. Product Liability in aviation is the liability of aircraft's manufacturer, processor or non-manufacturing seller for injury to the person or property of a buyer or third party caused by a product which has been sold. Here-in a product is aircraft, third party is passengers who suffered damage by defective design, defective construction, inadequate instructions for handling in aircraft. Whenever a product turns out to be defective after it has been sold, there are under Anglo-American law three remedies available against the aircraft's manufacturer (1) liability for negligence (2) breach of warranty (3) strict liability in tort. There are Under continental law Three remedies available against the aircraft's manufacturer (1) liability for defective warranty (2) liability for non-fulfillment of obligation (3) liability in tort. It is worth pointing out here an action for breach of warranty or for defective warranty, for non-fulfillment of obligation is available only to direct purchaser on the basis of his contract with the aircraft's manufacturer, which of course weakness its range and effectiveness. An action for tort offers the advantage of being available also to third parties who have acquired the defective product at a later stage. In tort, obligations are constituted not only by contract, but also by stature and common law. In conclusion, There in no difference in principle of law. In conclusion I would like to make few suggestions regarding the product liability for aircraft's manufacturer. Firstly, current general product liability code does not specify whether government offices(e.g. FAA) inspector conducted the inspection and auditory certificate can qualify as conclusive legal evidence. These need to be clarified. Secondly, because Korea is gaining potential of becoming aircraft's manufacturer through co-manufacturing and subcontracting-manufacturing with the US and independent production, there needs legislation that can harmonize the protection of both aircraft's manufacturers and their injured parties. Since Korea is in primary stage of aviation industry, considerate policy cannot be overlooked for its protection and promotion. Thirdly, because aircraft manufacturers are risking restitution like air-carriers whose scope of restitution have widened to strict and unlimited liability, there needs importation of mandatory liability insurance and national warranty into the product liability for aircraft's manufacturers. Fourthly, there needs domestic legislation of air transportation law that clearly regulates overall legal relationship in air transportation such as carrier & aircraft manufacturer's liability, and aviation insurance.

• 해양환경안전학회지
• /
• 제26권1호
• /
• pp.39-46
• /
• 2020

사고는 사후조치보다 사전예방이 더 중요하며 이는 하인리히의 법칙을 그 이론적 배경으로 들 수 있다. 준해양사고제도는 유사사고를 사전에 방지할 수 있는 매우 의미 있는 제도로 국제해양사고조사코드(CI Code)의 발효에 따라 우리나라에서는 2010년에 도입되어 오늘에 이르고 있다. 이에 선박소유자나 선박운항자는 준해양사고 발생 시 지정된 통보서식에 따라 중앙수석조사관에게 통보하도록 되어있으나 아직까지 자발적인 통보건수는 미미한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제의 한 원인으로 현재 준해양사고제도의 통보절차와 통보서식이 미흡하다는 점에 주목하여 이를 심층적으로 분석하여 개선방향을 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 관련규정, 영국과 싱가포르 등 선진해운국의 사례, 항공 및 철도 등 국내 유사교통기관의 사례와 국내 주요 해운선사의 준해양사고 통보절차 및 통보서식을 분석하였고, 이를 바탕으로 개선방향을 제안하였다. 통보절차의 주요개선방안에는 준해양사고의 자율보고로의 전환, 보고주체의 확대, 통보자의 신분보장의 명기 등이 포함되며, 통보서식 개정의 주요내용은 통보라는 용어대신 보고라는 용어의 사용, 통보서식에 신분보장의 대한 내용 반영, 선택형 기입항목의 확대를 통한 통계적 가치 증대 등이 포함된다.