• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.15-29
• /
• 2020

This study aims to describe the general patterns of Korean research in Arts and Kinesiology, particularly from the perspective of authorship. Among the 12 sub-areas of Arts and Kinesiology indexed in the Korean Citation Index (KCI), journals in three sub-areas, "Arts," "Design," and "Kinesiology" have the longest publishing histories and produced the largest volume of articles. 68 journals in the "Arts," "Design," and "Kinesiology" sub-areas were accredited in the KCI between 2001 and 2019; 40,955 articles which were published in the journals between the years of accreditation and the end of 2019 serve as the context of this article. Authorship, affiliated institutions and countries, openness to new authors, top researchers, topological properties of authorship networks, overall research performance by authors, and co-authorship patterns were analyzed and compared among three sub-subjects.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제12권1호
• /
• pp.17-34
• /
• 2022

This informetrics study was conducted to find out the distribution of articles and authors that published in African Journal of Library, Archives and Information Studies [AJLAIS]) from 2009 to 2018; considering the year-wise growth of research articles; authorship pattern and collaboration ratio; subject and geographical distributions of authors; and authors' productivity level. A descriptive informetrics research design was adopted. Quota sampling technique was used to select all the articles published within the ten-year period. Data collected through a self-designed checklist was analyzed using frequency count and percentage. The findings revealed that 141 articles, contributed by 266 authors were published by AJLAIS during the period. An annual average growth of 1.20% was recorded. Overall year-wise authorship pattern revealed that majority of articles (62.41%) published in AJLAIS were multiple authored. Also, articles on Informetrics and ICT dominated the journal. Some subject areas not covered were identified such as: indexing and serial collections management. Average collaborative index across the 10-year period for the journal was 0.62. South Africa and Nigeria were the two major prolific contributors to AJLAIS, just as evidence-based research papers of survey type (65.25%) were the most common to the journal. There should be increased numbers of articles in each edition over the coming years, and awareness should be created by the publishers to familiarize the researchers with the publishing requirements of the journal. Also, LIS researchers should concentrate more on areas usually left untouched by previous studies. The study is original as no other similar study was found on publication pattern of articles in AJLAIS covering a ten year period of 2009-2018. The findings of the study will also serve as a feedback mechanism for the Publisher of the Journal and LIS researchers on how to improve the journal and LIS research in general.

• 디자인학연구
• /
• 제20권2호
• /
• pp.117-128
• /
• 2007

Design management has become a critical facet of corporate management for leveraging strategic and competitive advantages. In order to identify the pattern and the development of design management studies, we investigated contents of the periodical journals published by Design Management Institute (DMI): the Design Management Review and the Academic Review. An in-depth analysis was performed on 64 themes, 722 articles, and 704 authors of these two journals between 1989 and 2005, and the primary research topics and authorship patterns were identified. Based on these findings, several directions for advancing design management studies were suggested.

• 지적과 국토정보
• /
• 제50권2호
• /
• pp.203-219
• /
• 2020

본 연구의 주된 목적은 한국 지적 과학 분야 공동 저술 활동의 공간분포패턴을 식별하는 것이다. 분석 결과 소수의 연구자들이 한국 지적 공동 저작 네트워크에서 중요한 역할을 수행 한 것으로 나타났다. 특히 일부 저자는 네트워크의 다른 노드에 막대한 영향을 미쳤을 뿐만 아니라 연구자 간 중재자 역할을 충실히 수행하였다. 또한 한국 지적학 공동 저술 네트워크의 영향력 있는 연구자들은 특정 지역에 집중되어 있었다. 게다가, 연구자들 사이의 거리는 제한된 범위에서 공동 저작 결정에 영향을 미쳤다. 본 연구는 공간 분석 기법을 사용하여 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 식별했다는 점에서 기존의 연구들과 큰 차이가 있다. 그러나 본 연구는 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 식별하기 위해 2019년도 데이터만을 사용했다는 점에서 한계를 지니고 있다. 이러한 한계들은 우리가 향후 연구에서 복수 년도 자료를 이용하여 공동 저작 활동의 공간 분포 패턴을 분석한다면 극복할 수 있을 것이다.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.76-106
• /
• 2021

The study analyzed bibliometric data of papers published in Korea Citation Index (KCI) and Web of Science (WoS) journals from 2002 to 2021. After examining size differences of KCI and WoS domains in the number of authors, institutions, and journals to put publication and citations counts in perspective, the study investigated co-authorship patterns over time to compare collaboration trends of Korean and international scholars and analyzed the data at author, institution, and journal levels to explore how the influences of authors, institutions, and journals on research output differ across domains. The study also conducted frequency-based analysis of keywords to identify key topics and visualized keyword clusters to examine topic trends. The result showed Korean LIS authors to be twice as productive as international authors but much less impactful and Korean institutions to be at comparable levels of productivity and impact in contrast to much of productivity and impact concentrated in top international institutions. Citations to journals exhibited initially increasing pattern followed by a decreasing trend though WoS journals showed far more variance than KCI journals. Co-authorship trends were much more pronounced among international publication, where larger collaboration groups suggested multi-disciplinary and complex nature of international LIS research. Keyword analysis found continuing diversification of topics in international research compared to relatively static topic trend in Korea. Keyword visualization showed WoS keyword clusters to be much denser and diverse than KCI clusters. In addition, key keyword clusters of WoS were quite different from each other unlike KCI clusters which were similar.

• 한국도서관정보학회지
• /
• 제48권1호
• /
• pp.191-206
• /
• 2017

본 연구는 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 연구협업의 특성을 기관 단위로 협업지수들을 활용하여 비교 분석 하였다. 학문 분야로서 문헌정보학 분야에서의 협업에 대한 연구는 국가 단위로 비교하는 연구는 몇몇 이루어졌으나, 단위 국가 내에서 일어나는 기관 단위 협업에 대한 연구는 많지 않다. 본 분석을 위해 KCI(Korea Citation Index) 웹사이트에서 주제별 분류를 통해 문헌정보학 분야에 해당하고 KCI에 등재된 8개의 저널들을 데이터로 선택하였다. CC(Collaborative Coefficient), CAI(Co-Authorship Index), Local Collaborative Index(LCI), Domestic Collaborative Index(DCI)의 협업지수를 통하여 문헌정보학 분야 기관 간 협업 패턴에 대해서 비교 분석하였다. 중앙대학교, 연세대학교, 이화여자대학교의 경우 대학교라는 기관 특성 상 공동 연구가 주로 교수와 대학원생 간의 협업, 교수들 간의 협업 형태로 많이 이루어지는 점이 반영되었다. 멀티, 메가 단위의 공동 저자 유형에서 매우 높은 지수를 나타낸 KISTI의 경우 연구소라는 기관의 특성이 반영된 것으로, 팀 단위로 프로젝트 성격의 공동 연구가 이루어지는 것이 보편적인 연구소의 특성이 영향요인으로 작용한 것으로 볼 수 있다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제29권3호
• /
• pp.164-173
• /
• 2011

Purpose: This research aimed to analyze the patterns of co-authorship network among the Korean radiation oncologists and to identify attributing factors for the formation of networks. Materials and Methods: A total of 1,447 articles including contents of ‘Radiation Oncology' and 'Therapeutic Radiology' were searched from the KoreaMed database. The co-authorship was assorted by the author's full name, affiliation and specialties. UCINET 6.0 was used to fi gure out the author's network centrality and the cluster analysis, and KeyPlayer 1.44 program was used to get a result of key player index. Sociogram was analyzed with the Netdraw 2.090. The statistical comparison was performed by a t-test and ANOVA using SPSS 16.0 with p-value < 0.05 as the significant value. Results: The number of articles written by a radiation oncologist as the first author was 1,025 out of 1,447. The pattern of coauthorship was classified into five groups. For articles of which the first author was a radiation oncologist, the number of singleauthor articles (type-A) was 81; single-institution articles (type-B) was 687; and multiple-author articles (type-C) was 257. For the articles which radiation oncologists participated in as a co-author, the number of single-institution articles (type-D) was 280 while multiple-institution articles (type-E) were 142. There were 8,895 authors from 1,366 co-authored articles, thus the average number of authors per article was 6.51. It was 5.73 for type-B, 6.44 for type-C, 7.90 for type-D, and 7.67 for type-E (p = 0.000) in the average number of authors per article. The number of authors for articles from the hospitals published more than 100 articles was 7.23 while form others was 5.94 (p = 0.005). Its number was 5.94 and 7.16 for the articles published before and after 2001 (p = 0.000). The articles written by a radiation oncologist as the first author had 5.92 authors while others for 7.82 (p = 0.025). Its number was 5.57 and 7.71 for the Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology and others (p = 0.000), respectively. Among the analysis, a significant difference in the average number of author per article was indicated. The out-degree centrality of network among authors was 4.26% (2.03-7.09%) while in-degree centrality was 1.31% (0.53-2.84%). The three significant nodes were classified and listed as following: Choi, Eun Kyung for 1991-1995, Kim, Dae Young for 1998-2001, Park, Won and Lee, Sang Wook for 2003-2010. Choi, Eun Kyung and Kim, Dae Young appeared in two cases, and ranked as the highest degree in centrality. In the key player analysis, Choi, Eun Kyung and Lee, Sang Wook appeared in two cases, and ranked as the highest. From the cluster analysis, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul National University and Yonsei University revealed as the three large clusters when Ulsan University, Chonnam National University, and Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Science as the medium clusters. Conclusion: The Korean radiation oncologist's society shows a closed network with numerous relationships among the particular clusters, and the result indicates it is different from other institutions in the pattern of co-authorship formation of the major hospitals.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제15권10호
• /
• pp.387-399
• /
• 2015

최근 보건의료분야에서는 협동연구를 위한 연구팀을 구성하기 위해 협업네트워크를 구축하고 연구자 역할을 파악함으로서 분야별 전문가 집단을 도출하고 있는 추세다. 본 연구는 1개 전문암센터 연구자들을 대상으로 기관 내 연구자들의 역할을 분석하고 협동연구 형태를 확인하기 위해 공저자 네트워크 분석을 수행하였다. 분석 자료는 2000년부터 2010년까지 SCI(E)에 발표한 연구논문 1,194건의 논문 저자 2,437명을 대상으로 중심성 분석을 하였다. 공저자 네트워크는 논문 수만 반영된 단순 중심성 값과 논문 수, 학술지 영향력 지수, 저자 기여도가 반영된 가중치 중심성 값을 산출하여 연구자 역할에 유의한 차이가 있는지 분석하였다. 단순 중심성 값과 가중치 중심성 값에 의한 연구자별 순위는 통계학적으로 유의하게 차이가 있었다(t=11.66, p=0.00). 논문의 다양한 속성이 고려된 공저자 네트워크 분석 결과는 연구자의 역할에 대한 보다 객관적인 자료를 제공함으로서 협동연구 수행을 위한 분야별 전문가를 확인할 수 있는 자료로 활용이 가능할 것이다.

• International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology
• /
• 제13권3호
• /
• pp.47-56
• /
• 2023

This study depicts a Scientometric technique of Bifurcation Research output in India for around five years during 2016-2020. It is an active field of analysis in which the bulk of investigation is being done. Scopus is an advanced research platform, assisting in finding, probing and yielding information in the sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities. The contemporary study discusses the "Bifurcation" as reflected in SCOPUS for 2016-2020. This study examines the highly prolific authors, document type etc. The study exhibited that 2017 shown maximum research papers 1700 (20.44%), the lowermost maturity rate was deciphered in 2018 (19.65%), the standard value of the period of collaboration is 0.18. The time series examines for single-authored, multi-authored, and collaborative papers are 137.8, 1564 and 1701.8 respectively.

• Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice
• /
• 제6권2호
• /
• pp.36-45
• /
• 2018

The utmost intention of this work is to identify various field areas which are most prevalent in library and information science education. The study also denotes the rate of tendency on the rapid growth and development of research production among information specialists in Bangladesh. In order to carry out the study, an extensive literature review was carefully done to collect the basic elements of research patterns. It is noted that in the period of 1980-2016, 200 articles were published in library and information science by Bangladeshi researchers in 62 journals. In this article a total of 200 articles were reviewed. The result of the present study shows that the ratio of female authors had fewer contributions than male authors did. The majority of articles were published from the United Kingdom. The study also shows that the largest numbers of articles (19 papers, 9.50%) were published in the Social Science Journal of the University of Rajshahi from Bangladesh. The paper also shows that about 71.50% of papers have been cited while 28.50% of papers did not receive any citation. The present research might be helpful for revealing the country's research trends in library and information science. However, this study may also inspire development of a subject-based indigenous database and can act as an important device for research scholars.