Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2020.8.3.2

Bibliometric Analysis of Korean Journals in Arts and Kinesiology - from the Perspective of Authorship  

Lee, Danielle (College of Business and Economics, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice / v.8, no.3, 2020 , pp. 15-29 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to describe the general patterns of Korean research in Arts and Kinesiology, particularly from the perspective of authorship. Among the 12 sub-areas of Arts and Kinesiology indexed in the Korean Citation Index (KCI), journals in three sub-areas, "Arts," "Design," and "Kinesiology" have the longest publishing histories and produced the largest volume of articles. 68 journals in the "Arts," "Design," and "Kinesiology" sub-areas were accredited in the KCI between 2001 and 2019; 40,955 articles which were published in the journals between the years of accreditation and the end of 2019 serve as the context of this article. Authorship, affiliated institutions and countries, openness to new authors, top researchers, topological properties of authorship networks, overall research performance by authors, and co-authorship patterns were analyzed and compared among three sub-subjects.
Keywords
bibliometric analysis; authorship pattern; arts; design; kinesiology;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Shin, E.-J. (2019). Journal publishing and authorship in library and information science by early career researchers in South Korea. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 7 (1), 6-16.   DOI
2 Sun, J., & Jiang, C. (2014). Sino-South Korean scientific collaboration based on co-authored SCI papers. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 2 (1), 48-61.   DOI
3 Thelwall, M., & Delgado, M. M. (2015). Arts and humanities research evaluation: No metrics please, just data. Journal of Documentation, 71 (4), 817-833.   DOI
4 Yi, H.-J., Kim, G.-H., & Jang, B.-S. (2009). A study on analyzing the authorship tendency of the authors in the specific organizations: Focusing on the H Medical University G Hospital. Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science, 20 (3), 209-218.
5 Adams, J. (2013). Collaborations: The fourth age of research. Nature, 497 (7451), 557-560.   DOI
6 Al, U., Sahiner, M., & Tonta, Y. (2006). Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (8), 1011-1022.   DOI
7 Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-ofthe-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (1), 1-67.   DOI
8 Cabot, J., Izquierdo, J. L. C., & Cosentino, V. (2018). Are CS conferences (too) closed communities? Communications of the ACM, 61 (10), 32-34.   DOI
9 Chai, K.-H., & Xiao, X. (2012). Understanding design research: A bibliometric analysis of Design Studies (1996-2010). Design Studies, 33 (1), 24-43.   DOI
10 Choi, W. S. (2017). A study on the research trend of Western music theory and analysis in Korean Journal of Musicology, 2006-2015. Music Theory Forum, 24 (2), 159-205.   DOI
11 Fischbach, K., Putzke, J., & Schoder, D. (2011). Co-authorship networks in electronic markets research. Electronic Markets, 21 (1), 19-40.   DOI
12 Greene, M. (2007). The demise of the lone author. Nature, 450 (7173), 1165.   DOI
13 Kim, J.-S., & Hwang, D.-R. (2014). A bibliometric study of research trends in hair. Journal of the Korean Society of Beauty and Art, 15 (2), 123-138.
14 Ho, H.-C., & Ho, Y.-S. (2015). Publications in dance field in Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105 (2), 1031-1040.   DOI
15 Hwang, D.-R. (2011). The bibliometric analysis of dance literatures. Korean Journal of Dance, 66 (66), 217-243.
16 Hwang, D.-R., & Yang, H. S. (2012). Bibliometric analysis on the research trends in Korean dance. Research of the Performance Art and Culture, 24, 465-506.
17 Lee, J. Y., & Chung, E. (2018). Citation impact of collaboration from intra- and inter-disciplinary perspectives: A case study of Korea. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 6 (1), 65-82.   DOI
18 Ko, Y. M., Kim, B.-Y., & Min, H.-R. (2014). A study on a conceptual taxonomy of author keywords of humanities, social sciences, and art and sport in the Korea Citation Index (KCI) by analysis of its meaning and lexical morpheme. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 48 (4), 297-322.   DOI
19 Lee, D. H. (2019). Predicting the research performance of early career scientists. Scientometrics, 121 (3), 1481-1504.   DOI
20 Lee, J.-W., & Bak, H.-R. (2016). Characteristics of Korean researchers through bibliometric analysis of papers published in international LIS journals. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47 (1), 217-242.   DOI
21 Lee, M. (2017). Network analysis of scholarly journals in the field of public administration: Focusing on shared authors of 67 journals for 2002-2016. Korean Public Administration Review, 51 (2), 271-313.   DOI
22 Guan, J., Yan, Y., & Zhang, J. J. (2017). The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations. Journal of Informetrics, 11 (2), 407-422.   DOI
23 Onodera, N., & Yoshikane, F. (2015). Factors affecting citation rates of research articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66 (4), 739-764.   DOI
24 Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Betweenness centrality as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of scientific journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58 (9), 1303-1319.   DOI
25 Leydesdorff, L., Hammarfelt, B., & Salah, A. (2011). The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (12), 2414-2426.   DOI
26 Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
27 Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101 (suppl 1), 5200-5205.   DOI
28 Oh, S.-K. (2015). Bibliometric analysis of research trends in the performing arts: Focusing on early childhood play activities and drama activites. Journal of the Korea Academia- Industrial Cooperation Society, 16 (8), 5250-5259.   DOI
29 Park, J.-H., & Heo, J.-Y. (2017). The research collaboration pattern of library and information science field in Korea: Application of collaboration indices. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48 (1), 191-206.   DOI
30 Park, K.-B. (2011). An analysis and survey of Korean research on music education: Focusing on the research published in Korean journals since 1980. Korean Journal of Arts Education, 9 (2), 57-76.
31 Rodrigues, F. A. (2019). Network centrality: An introduction. In E. E. N. Macau. (Ed.), A mathematical modeling approach from nonlinear dynamics to complex systems (pp. 177-196). Cham: Springer.