• 제목/요약/키워드: Assessment items

검색결과 1,793건 처리시간 0.032초

한의학 칠정(七情)에 기반을 둔 핵심감정평가척도 개발 연구 (A Study on the Development of the Core Emotional Assessment Questionnaire (CEAQ) Based on the Seven Emotions (七情))

  • 이고은;박보영;문광수;유제민;강형원
    • 동의신경정신과학회지
    • /
    • 제26권2호
    • /
    • pp.143-160
    • /
    • 2015
  • Objectives: The study purpose was to test the validity and reliability of the core emotional assessment questionnaire based on the seven emotions. Methods: Survey data were from 651 individuals and contained 141 items determined from a previous pilot study. Among the participants, 241 were retested. First, following analysis of the internal consistency reliability of the 141 items, we deleted items with Cronbach-$\alpha$ coefficient below 0.5. We then selected 100 final items after the first factor analysis. Second, the final 100 items were evaluated by internal consistency reliability, test-retest reliability, factor analysis, and correlational analysis. Results: Cronbach-$\alpha$ coefficient for the final 100 items were 0.866~0.956 and the test-retest reliability were above 0.70. The 100 items categorized into 7 factors explained 53.8% of the total variance. Analyzing the correlation of each chiljeong, we had a high positive correlation above 0.70 between sa and bi, bi and u, gong and kyeong. Conclusions: The final 100 items used for the core emotional assessment questionnaire based on the seven emotions showed satisfactory reliability and validity. Thus, it may be an appropriate instrument for measuring Chiljeong in the general population.

간호연구 질 평가 도구 및 보고지침 고찰 (Quality Assessment Tools and Reporting Standards in Nursing Research)

  • 김경희;김주현;임경춘;이경숙;정재심;최명애;채영란
    • Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science
    • /
    • 제14권3호
    • /
    • pp.221-230
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: Quality of nursing research should be evaluated before it is applied as an evidence for evidence-based nursing practice. This study attempted to analyze and to compare tools for the quality assessment and reporting standards of nursing research using CONSORT and STROBE checklist by types of research design. Methods: We searched the tools for quality assessment in nursing research based on the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA) publication. Then, we analysed and compared the tools for quality evaluation by types of research design. Results: According to the analysis using CONSORT checklist, ROB shows coherence in 17 items, Jadad shows coherence in 3 items, SIGN (for RCT) shows coherence in 26 items, and Downs & Black shows coherence in 24 items. According to the analysis using STROBE checklist, MINORS shows coherence in 25 items, NOS shows coherence in 21 items, SIGN (for Cohort studies & Case-control studies) shows coherence in 29 items, and RoBANS shows coherence in 21 items. Conclusion: Based on our analysis, we recommend that nursing researchers should report according to the reporting standards of tools for quality evaluation. We hope that our analysis can be helpful to develop evidence-based nursing.

Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the Korean Journal of Radiology

  • Ho Young Park;Chong Hyun Suh;Sungmin Woo;Pyeong Hwa Kim;Kyung Won Kim
    • Korean Journal of Radiology
    • /
    • 제23권3호
    • /
    • pp.355-369
    • /
    • 2022
  • Objective: To evaluate the completeness of the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in a general radiology journal using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four articles (systematic review and meta-analysis, n = 18; systematic review only, n = 6) published between August 2009 and September 2021 in the Korean Journal of Radiology were analyzed. Completeness of the reporting of main texts and abstracts were evaluated using the PRISMA 2020 statement. For each item in the statement, the proportion of studies that met the guidelines' recommendation was calculated and items that were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the studies were identified. The review process was conducted by two independent reviewers. Results: Of the 42 items (including sub-items) in the PRISMA 2020 statement for main text, 24 were satisfied by fewer than 80% of the included articles. The 24 items were grouped into eight domains: 1) assessment of the eligibility of potential articles, 2) assessment of the risk of bias, 3) synthesis of results, 4) additional analysis of study heterogeneity, 5) assessment of non-reporting bias, 6) assessment of the certainty of evidence, 7) provision of limitations of the study, and 8) additional information, such as protocol registration. Of the 12 items in the abstract checklists, eight were incorporated in fewer than 80% of the included publications. Conclusion: Several items included in the PRISMA 2020 checklist were overlooked in systematic review and meta-analysis articles published in the Korean Journal of Radiology. Based on these results, we suggest a double-check list for improving the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Authors and reviewers should familiarize themselves with the PRISMA 2020 statement and check whether the recommended items are fully satisfied prior to publication.

문항 유형에 따른 과학 능력 추정의 효율성 비교 (A Relative Effectiveness of Item Types for Estimating Science Ability in TIMSS-R)

  • 박정;홍미영
    • 한국과학교육학회지
    • /
    • 제22권1호
    • /
    • pp.122-131
    • /
    • 2002
  • 본 연구는 수행 평가 방식의 중요성이 대두됨에 따라 실지로 수행형 평가 문항이 전통적인 선다형 평가문항에 비해 어떤 학생들에게 어떻게 유용한지를 분석한 연구이다. 이를 위하여 제 3차 수학 과학 성취도 국제비교 반복 연구에 사용된 선다형과 수행형 평가문항들을 내용영역별로 분석하여, 수행형의 평가문항과 선다형의 평가문항의 효율성을 비교 분석하였다. 자료분석 결과 수행형의 문항이 선다형의 문항에 비하여 학생들의 능력을 더 정확하게 추정함으로써 효율성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 특히 환경이나 과학의 본성 영역에 비하여 지구과학, 생물, 물리와 화학 영역에서 수행형의 문항이 선다형의 문항에 비하여 학생들의 능력을 더 정확하게 추정하고 있음을 보여주었다. 또한 선다형의 문항에 비하여 적은 수의 문항으로 학생들의 능력을 추정함에도 불구하고 추정오차가 적어, 적은 수의 수행형 문항으로도 학생들의 능력을 정확하게 추정할 수 있음을 시사하고 있다.

말기 암환자의 변비 사정도구 개발 및 적용 (Development and Application of the Constipation Assessment Tool for Patients with Terminal Cancers)

  • 김명옥;박명희;류민애
    • 임상간호연구
    • /
    • 제18권2호
    • /
    • pp.205-214
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: The purposes of this study were to develop the constipation assessment tool for identifying their bowel movement patterns, and to provide basic information for the assessment and intervention protocol on constipation for patients with terminal cancers. Methods: The study followed the steps: the first step was to build a conceptual framework based on literature review; the second step was to develop a tentative instrument by analyzing the conceptual framework and existing instruments; the third step was to test content validity and reliability; and the final step was to apply the tool to patients with terminal cancers (N=112). Results: The constipation assessment tool was consisted of total nine items; under the categories of subjective and objective data for diagnosis had 4 items, and under the initial assessment category which includes stool type, physical examination, and abdomen X-ray had 5 items. Conclusion: The constipation assessment tool developed in this study is very easy to use and useful in nursing practice, especially in hospice and palliative care setting. Particularly this tool has items on patient assessment which would be considered as an evidence for choosing nursing interventions. Based on the constipation assessment tool, the development and application of intervention protocol on constipation for patients with terminal cancers is warranted in future research.

공간정보 기반의 환경영향평가 확대를 위한 인벤토리 작성 및 활용 방안 연구 (A Study on Inventory Construction and Utilization for Spatial Information-based Environmental Impact Assessment)

  • 조남욱;이명진
    • 대한원격탐사학회지
    • /
    • 제35권2호
    • /
    • pp.317-326
    • /
    • 2019
  • 개발사업 및 관련 환경영향은 공간 위에서 이루어지므로 환경영향평가 과정에서는 공간정보의 활용이 필수적이다. 본 연구에서는 환경영향평가의 공간정보 활용을 확대하기 위해 산재된 공간정보를 인벤토리로 구축, 환경영향평가 과정에서 활용할 수 있도록 제시하고자 한다. 이를 위해 환경영향평가 과정에서의 공간정보 이용 현황과 공공의 정보시스템에서 제공하는 환경 관련 공간정보 목록을 조사하였다. 그리고 선행연구 분석을 통해 도출한 인벤토리 구축 방법론을 적용, 환경영향평가 시 활용할 수 있는 공간정보 목록을 작성하였다. 그 결과 환경영향평가 업무에서 활용중인 공간정보는 64개 항목으로 조사되었으며, 자료 활용성 및 연계 갱신 가능성을 토대로 환경영향평가에 활용 가능한 국토환경공간정보는 45개 항목으로 조사되었다. 최종적으로 중복 제거 및 항목 재구성을 통해 14개의 신규 항목을 포함한 총 49개 항목을 도출, 공간정보 인벤토리로 제시하여 공간정보 기반의 환경영향평가에 기여할 수 있도록 하였다.

학교시설의 친환경성평가를 위한 평가분류체계 및 평가항목 개발에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Development of Categories and Items of the Environmental Assessment Method for School Buildings)

  • 조동우;유수훈
    • KIEAE Journal
    • /
    • 제4권3호
    • /
    • pp.137-142
    • /
    • 2004
  • The purpose of this study is to develop the assessment categories, items and detailed criteria for environmental friendly evaluation on the School. The results of this study brings on promoted environmental friendly appreciation, energy and resource conservation, reduction of contaminant, improvement of environment quality in and around buildings. For this purpose, analysis of domestic and foreign environmental friendly architectural citation screening system-BREEAM(1991), LEED 2.0(2001), GBTool(2002), KICTEAC (2000), KOEAM(2000), etc.-was preceded, and through interview, survey and forum with professional group, the developed evaluation items were verified and reappraised. The developed evaluation items were composed of thirty four essential evaluation items and nine bonus items.

Derivation of Indicators for Value Assessment of School Gardens

  • Hong, In-Kyoung;Yun, Hyung-Kwon;Jung, Young-Bin;Lee, Sang-Mi
    • 인간식물환경학회지
    • /
    • 제23권4호
    • /
    • pp.433-443
    • /
    • 2020
  • Background and objective: The boom in urban agriculture has also resulted in the creation of many school gardens. With the increase in various hands-on education programs, people are interested in assessing the value of school gardens. This study was conducted to derive indicators for service value assessement of educational farming experience using school gardens. Methods: Through literature review, we selected assessment items and sub-factors. The indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of school gardens are classified using the Delphi method that involve a focus group experts. In order to increase the reliability and validity of the selected and classified items, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. In addition, the relative importance and priority of each factor in each field were assessed using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Results: We classified the indicators into 4 criteria and come up with 13 items and 33 sub-factors in educational value, health value, economic value, and ecological and environmental value. Most of the items for the 4 value criteria derived were significant for assessing the value of agricultural experience services with content validity ratio (CVR) higher than 0.59 and reliability higher than .6 . In the value criteria, the experts rated educational value as the most important, followed by health value, ecological and environmental value, and economic value. In the assessment items, the most important was improvement of social functions. In the sub-factors, the most important was strengthening of ties (friendly interactions). Conclusion: Among the derived indicators assessing the value of school gardens, 4 criteria, 12 evaluation items and 29 sub-factors showed significance. The schematic index would be useful for the assessment.

공동주택 지속가능성 평가항목 선정에 관한 연구 (A Study on the Extraction of Assessment Items of the Sustainability in the Multifamily Housing)

  • 이강희;황은경
    • 한국주거학회논문집
    • /
    • 제14권6호
    • /
    • pp.69-77
    • /
    • 2003
  • The environmental problems aren't only restricted in single area or country, but also related in all around the world. Various approaches have been tried to protect and utilize properly the environment. Especially, building area has been attempted to provide the model which could explain the degree of environmental influence and technology development criteria to lessen the environmental impact in building life cycle. The environmental impact in the building life cycle can be overally explained with sustainability. Sustainability can be utilized to establish the target level of building to environmental influence. This paper aimed at extracting items to evaluate the building sustainability, divided into social, economic and environmental aspects. First, 93-items is extracted from 3 areas through existing literature review. Second, the 93-items would be controlled and reviewed into 21 items, which are five social aspect items, two economic aspect items and twelve environmental items, because 93 items can not properly be applied and evaluated. And, it provided the model to combine the extracted items of each area. In social aspect, the outdoor noise is more affect than any other items. In environmental aspect, the item of surface-to-volume is more affect than any other items.

저장탄약의 품목별 신뢰도평가 사례 연구 (A Case Study on the Reliability Assessment of Stockpile Ammunition)

  • 윤근식;이종찬
    • 품질경영학회지
    • /
    • 제40권3호
    • /
    • pp.259-269
    • /
    • 2012
  • Purpose: The purpose of this study was to find out that the statistical method of stockpile reliability of ammunition by items can be applied to the reliability assessment of stockpile ammunition. Methods: We reviewed the statistical method of stockpile reliability of ammunition by items and verified the possibility of its application by case study. Results: We found that the statistical method of stockpile reliability of ammunition by items is very useful and effective to present the reliability of ammunition based on each item and to predict the change of the reliability in the future. The reliability of proximity fuse was about 94.5% and was influenced by manufacture's year and the difference between lot and lot more than storage period. Conclusion: The statistical method of stockpile reliability of ammunition by items can be applied to the reliability assessment of various stockpile ammunitions such as ammunition for mortar and canon.