• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.177-177
• /
• 1989

This study concerns performance evaluation of the research-funding agencies focused on Korea Science and Engineering Foundation(KOSEF). On the basis of the constituents approach and the systems approach of organizational effectiveness theory, the evaluation items are derived reflecting generic characteristics of the research-funding agencies, and their priorities are determined using analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Three groups of constituents with differing interest and expections are identified, and their perceptions on the importance of the evaluation items are measured through questionnaire survey. Analyses show that the evaluation items perceived important by each constituency are significant different from one another. The implications of the result to the Government and KOSEF are discussed.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제44권1호
• /
• pp.1-8
• /
• 2021

As a nation experiencing rapid economic growth, South Korea and its government have made a continuous effort toward efficient research investments to achieve transformation of the Korean industry for the fourth industrial revolution. To achieve the maximum effectiveness of the research investments, it is necessary to evaluate its funding's worth and default risk. Thus, incorporating the concepts of the Black-Scholes-Merton model and the Greeks, this study develops a default-risk evaluation model in the foundation of a system dynamics methodology. By utilizing the proposed model, this study estimates the monetary worth and the default risks of research funding in the public and private sectors of Information and Communication technologies, along with the sensitivity of the R&D economic worth of research funding to changes in a given parameter. This study finds that the public sector has more potential than the private sector in terms of monetary worth and that the default risks of three types of research funding are relatively high. Through a sensitivity analysis, the results indicate that uncertainty in volatility, operation period, and a risk-free interest rate has trivial impacts on the monetary worth of research funding, while volatility has large impacts on the default risk among the uncertain factors.

• 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지
• /
• 제6권6호
• /
• pp.403-412
• /
• 2016

기술을 이용한 거래 및 투자가 활성화 되면서 기술에 대한 객관적인 평가의 필요성이 증대되고 있다. 그러나 현행 기술가치 평가방법은 신뢰성 및 객관성이 부족한 한계를 가지고 있다. 전통적인 평가방법론인 시장접근법, 수익접근법, 비용접근법 외에도 실물옵션법, 로열티산정법 등 다양한 평가방법론이 연구되고 있으나 시장에서 지배적인 평가방법론은 없는 실정이다. 기술의 가치는 대상에 따라 상대적으로 결정되기 때문에 유사한 기술이라도 동일한 가치 평가방법을 적용할 수 없다. 이에 대하여 소수의 전문가보다 다수 참여에 의한 판단이 객관적이고 나은 결과를 가져온다는 의미의 집단지성 및 크라우드 소싱을 통한 접근은 위와 같은 문제에 대한 대안을 제시해 준다. 본 논문에서는 크라우드 소싱 모델의 네가지 유형인 Wisdom, Voting, Funding, Creation을 접목하여 전문가 그룹을 활용한 직접적 평가 및 대중의 간접적 평가를 통해 기술가치 평가에 대한 객관성을 제고할 수 있는 방법에 대해 논의한다.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.424-443
• /
• 2013

교육과학기술부와 한국연구재단은 창의적 도전적 연구를 적극 장려하고자 2012년 기초연구사업 중점 추진방향으로 '한국형 그랜트' 지원 방식을 도입하였으며, 이에 따라 연구자가 추후 과제 신청시 기존 연구수행 성과를 집중적으로 평가 받게 되었다. 이에, 선정평가에서 과제관리 및 종료평가에 이르는 전주기적 성과관리 시스템의 필요성이 크게 대두되었다. 본 연구에서는 전주기적 성과관리 시스템의 첫 단계로 분야별 연구실적의 정량적 가이드라인를 제시하여 연구역량평가의 보조적 수단으로 사용할 방안을 도출하고자 하였다. 그 결과, 상위그룹 간 비교 시에는 순위보정영향력지수(Ranked Normalized Impact Factor, rnIF), 하위그룹 간 비교 시에는 영향력지수(Impact Factor, IF) 또는 rnIF를 정량가이드라인으로 제안하였다. SCI급 논문 수는 동일 분류 내 위상비교 또는 동일 위상내 분류별 비교 등에 사용할 것을 제안하였다.

• 품질경영학회지
• /
• 제41권1호
• /
• pp.163-180
• /
• 2013

Purpose: In this paper, we analyzed the factors that affect research grants using linear regression analysis in order to increase the effectiveness of investments in national research projects. Methods: We collected 15,454 pieces of data on research projects that finished between 2008 and 2010. Data preprocessing and visualization were done to derive statistically significant results. We identified factors that affected funding by using linear regression, and estimated increasing or decreasing tendencies based on those factors. Results: We identified the relative importance of the factors in awarding research grants. Strategies were suggested for the reasonable estimation of R&D budgets for investment purposes. Conclusion: This study will assist the decision-making process of governments in estimating funds required for R&D projects.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.23-44
• /
• 2017

This study explores how the technology commercialization process leads to either success or failure after transfer from PROs to SMEs by conducting a binomial logistic regression analysis. We found that the more additional development a firm implements on the transferred technology, the more likely the commercialization is to fail. The higher number of alternative technology and bigger market risk are associated with a greater likelihood of failure. On the other hand, the existence of complementary technology, the degree of cooperation with the technology provider, the size of the target market, the willingness of the CEO, and the funding availability are known to have positive effects on the success of technology commercialization. In addition, the case studies we conducted from the sample companies demonstrated that "market uncertainty," "technological issues depending on the technology-specific characteristics," and "a lack of funding capability" are some of the causes for failure of technology commercialization.

• 보건행정학회지
• /
• 제15권4호
• /
• pp.1-25
• /
• 2005

Legislation on pharmaceutical reimbursement decision using economic evaluation results was made in Korea in fm, but has yet to be fully implemented. We evaluated the quality of Korean economic evaluation studies of pharmaceuticals to understand gaps between legislation and implementation. From this evaluation, we propose policy options that might strengthen the research Infrastructure In order to support such studies. We reviewed 23 published studies for drugs conducted between 1996 and 2004. Evaluation criteria included methodological characteristics, healthcare system characteristics, population characteristics, and applicability of results. Large variation in study quality was observed, particularly with study design, outcome data, treatment patterns and interpretation. Korean clinical data used was mostly from observational studies of 1-2 hospitals. Foreign data was extracted from clinical trials that did not Include Asian population and their selection criterion was not clarified. With respect to treatment patterns, medical records and hospital bills were used without adjustment regarding area, hospital type, and others. And next frequent situation relied on expert opinion from academic physicians in specialty practice. preference measures, when used, were not elicited from the Korean population. $78.3\%$ of studies did not clarify the funding source. If the Korean economic evaluation policy is to provide meaningful data for decision makers, the quality of cost-effectiveness studies will need to improve dramatically. This may involve access to or creation of better data, more diverse funding, unproved training of researchers and evaluators, and partnerships with technology manufacturers.

• Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy
• /
• 제9권3호
• /
• pp.281-307
• /
• 2020

A variety of approaches are being applied to improve the existing ex-ante evaluation by expert panels in publicly funded R&D. While the objective evaluation criteria are constantly being improved to screen and select the superior projects, alternative approaches such as random prioritization and logical modeling are also underway to overcome the conservative bias of reviewers and to secure disruptive innovation. This study intends to find critical implications for ex-ante evaluation of public R&D system from the comparison of Indonesia and Korea. For the comparative analysis, literature review and expert in-depth interviews are conducted on the national R&D system and the selection evaluation process. In Korea, the selection criteria of projects are legally promulgated for establishing an objective evaluation system, and at the program level, the major considerations in the planning process are specified by Presidential Decree. On the other hand, while Indonesia conducts R&D in 47 strategic fields largely by public research institutes (PRI) based on the non-competitive government contributions. This study draws out implications of institutionalizing the planning process at the level of program, and of increasing the ratio of contract-based competitive funding at the level of project in the national R&D portfolio.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제5권4호
• /
• pp.39-50
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study was to evaluate site-based environmental education(EE) programs. For the evaluation, an evaluation chart was developed. The chart was consisted of twenty evaluation items in the following six categories : 'goals & objectives', 'instructional planning', 'instruction', 'learning outcomes & evaluation', 'features of program', and 'program operation'. One hundred sixty five site-based EE programs, funded by the Korean Ministry of Environment in 2000, were evaluated. After the evaluation, the programs were also categorized and analyzed according to regions, organizations, and amount of funds. The results indicated that awareness, participation, and attitude were addressed in the purpose of the programs, while knowledge and skills were not. The diversity of activities and teaching strategies of the programs were insufficient. Cultural aspects, fairness, originality, and accuracy were also insufficiently addressed. Assessment and evaluation of such programs were needed to be considered to a larger degree. From the analysis of programs according to categories, Choongbuk province in the regional aspect and schools in the organizational aspect got higher scores than others. Overall, the more funding the program received, the higher score it got in evaluation. Some improvements and strategies for activating site-based EE were recommended based on the result of the evaluation.

• 한국환경복원기술학회지
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.94-103
• /
• 2004

This article describes the current status of site-based environmental education (EE) in the Republic of Korea. Implications for site-based EE program development and operation are presented and recommendations for an improvement are provided. Questionnaires were mailed to 205 schools and organizations where site-based EE programs operated in 2002 with funding from the Korean Ministry of Environment. The questionnaire was designed and used to examine the scope, operation, and needs of site-based EE programs. The response rate was 27.3%. The results of the survey indicated that 'awareness', 'participation', and 'attitude' were addressed by the program goals and objectives more than 'knowledge' and 'skills'. The survey also indicated that activities in the programs were not variable and most were teacher/instructor-centered. Most of the programs reflected the 'connection with everyday life, direct experience and sensitivity'. There were some difficulties in motivating students and finding a good location and qualified instructional staff. Needs included well-designed program development and dissemination, professional development, increased funding support, and more effective program evaluation.