• 한국조경학회지
• /
• 제41권4호
• /
• pp.77-84
• /
• 2013

지구온난화에 따른 기후변화로 인하여 자연재해의 발생빈도와 강도가 증가함에 따라 조경분야에도 피해가 늘어나는 추세이다. 이는 법률적 분쟁으로 이어져 사회적 경제적 피해도 증가하고 있고 있다. 특히, 외부환경에 영향을 많이 받는 조경수목의 경우 자연재해로 인한 피해를 많이 받고 있으나, 이에 대한 피해판정기준이나 재해기준의 구체적인 범위가 설정되어 있지 않아 피해 복구 및 보상에 많은 문제가 발생하고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 자연재해로 인한 조경수목의 피해 관련기준의 개선방향을 제시하고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 조경수목의 피해사례 및 판례를 분석하고, 한국과 일본의 자연재해 관련 법제도 및 기준의 비교 분석을 시행하였다. 판례분석 결과, 자연재해로 조경분야 피해는 명확한 법적 근거가 제시되어 있지 않아, 감정인의 소견이 판정결과에 많은 영향을 미치고 있었다. 이에 전문적이고 객관적인 감정절차가 요구됨을 알 수 있었다. 자연재해 관련 법제도 및 기준 비교분석에 있어, 우리나라의 경우 조경수목에 대한 자연재해 관련 법규 및 기준이 미흡하였으며, 일본의 경우 조경수목에 대한 구체적인 재해판정 기준이 제시되어 있었다. 이에 조경분야 자연재해 관련 제도 및 기준의 개선을 위해 '관련 법령 개정', '감정 및 손해사정 기준개정', '조경공사 표준시방서개정', '재해보험가입의무화', '계약에 따른 합리적 이행', '재해복구 비용계상 의무화' 등을 개선방향으로 제안하였다.

• 통상정보연구
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.309-331
• /
• 2009

In 25th April. 2008, the Korea legislature gave advance notice on the Revision Bill of Commercial Law in Insurance Division in partial, one of which is the principle of utmost good faith to be codified in accordance with the effectuation of the Revision Bill enforcement. For this, even though the disclosure duty is not included in the Revision Bill, it should also be discussed in relation to the principle of utmost good faith because it is based upon the principle of utmost good faith and forms a part of utmost good faith. In Marine Insurance industry in Korea, there are the sections and the clauses in relation to the English governing law included in the Policies and the Clauses used in Korea and, also, they still come into effect for the Korea Courts' judgements. So. we, Korea, should carefully pay attention to the trend of English courts' leading case, academic world and insurance industry on the disclosure duty in U.K. This study is thus based upon sections 17 and 18~20 of the Marine Insurance Act 1906 and sections 651, 652 and 655 of Commercial Law in Insurance Division, which appear throughout this work. The objective of this work is to analyse the duty of disclosure on Korean and English Insurance Laws including cases cited in this work, comparing the differences resulted from the analysis of the two countries‘laws and legal cases.

• 대한치과의료관리학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.14-24
• /
• 2021

Dentists and dental hygienists are major collaborators, as expressed by the concept of "Four-handed dentistry." Dentists are guaranteed their legal duties and rights in accordance with the Medical Act, whereas dental hygienists are currently stipulated in the scope of their legal duties under the Act on Medical Technicians. However, there is a difference between the actual work and the legal work performed by dental hygienists; therefore, the work is dependent on many legal controversies and authoritative interpretations. The purpose of this study is, first, to develop a reliable questionnaire tool regarding the actual work performed by dental hygienists in dental hospitals and clinics, and second, to examine the awareness of the appropriateness of legal work based on the developed questionnaire. The target subjects of the survey were dental hygienists and dentists, and the dental hygienists were those who worked in dental hospitals and clinics as license reporters of the Korean Dental Hygienists Association. A total of 1,294 dental hygienists and 39 dentists were included in the final analysis. In the dental hygienist group, 19 items received the response "appropriate for legal work" in over 90% of cases, accounting for 25% of the total 76 items. In addition, in a total of 31 items, more than 80% of the responses were appropriate for legal work. Among them, the highest was 'Scailing' (97.7%), followed by "Extraoral-Panorama" (97.1%). In the dentist group, 10 out of 76 items showed over 90% adequacy for legal work, and among them, "instrument cleaning and sterilization" was the highest at 100%. It was followed by "Intraoral radiography," "Scailing," and "Toothpick method, TPM" with 97.4%. In the case of dentists, 28 out of a total of 76 items showed an appropriateness of more than 80% for legal work. This study comprehensively investigated the actual work of dental hygienists in line with timely and appropriate social issues and provided reliable statistics in evidence-based dentistry.

• Journal of Korea Trade
• /
• 제24권8호
• /
• pp.171-188
• /
• 2020

Purpose - This is an exploratory study that aims to apply text mining techniques, which computationally extracts words from the large-scale text data, to legal documents to quantify trade claim contents and enables statistical analysis. Design/methodology - This is designed to verify the validity of the application of text mining techniques as a quantitative methodology for trade claim studies, that have relied mainly on a qualitative approach. The subjects are 81 cases of arbitration and court judgments from China published on the website of the UNCITRAL where the CISG was applied. Validation is performed by comparing the manually analyzed result with the automatically analyzed result. The manual analysis result is the cluster analysis wherein the researcher reads and codes the case. The automatic analysis result is an analysis applying text mining techniques to the result of the cluster analysis. Topic modeling and semantic network analysis are applied for the statistical approach. Findings - Results show that the results of cluster analysis and text mining results are consistent with each other and the internal validity is confirmed. And the degree centrality of words that play a key role in the topic is high as the between centrality of words that are useful for grasping the topic and the eigenvector centrality of the important words in the topic is high. This indicates that text mining techniques can be applied to research on content analysis of trade claims for statistical analysis. Originality/value - Firstly, the validity of the text mining technique in the study of trade claim cases is confirmed. Prior studies on trade claims have relied on traditional approach. Secondly, this study has an originality in that it is an attempt to quantitatively study the trade claim cases, whereas prior trade claim cases were mainly studied via qualitative methods. Lastly, this study shows that the use of the text mining can lower the barrier for acquiring information from a large amount of digitalized text.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제18권4호
• /
• pp.101-112
• /
• 2020

본 연구는 공유와 연결이라는 4차 산업혁명의 핵심적인 가치를 구현하고 있는 신규 사업인 승차 공유경제 산업의 현황과 경제·산업적, 법률적 쟁점에 관해 논의하고자 했다. 대립하고 있는 두 집단 간의 입장을 이해하고자 공유 경제의 산업적 쟁점 및 법률적 쟁점에 대한 국내외 사례에 관한 문헌 조사를 통해 연구를 진행했다. 연구 결과 승차공유 산업은 생산, 공급, 분배, 소비가 하나의 플랫폼에서 이루어지는 종합경제의 면모를 보였다. 접근이 용이한 모바일 애플리케이션 기술을 통해 이용자에게 가치를 공유하고 새로운 서비스로 종합할 수 있게 만들었다. 택시 산업과 승차공유 산업의 갈등 해결을 위해 본 연구는 승차 공유 기업은 합법적인 서비스 제공을 위해 기여금을 내거나 택시 총량제 방안을 마련하고, 택시업계는 서비스 개선과 새로운 공유 플랫폼 서비스를 선택했던 소비자의 입장에 관한 이해가 필요할 것임을 제안한다. 본 연구는 공익과 사익 간의 균형 문제와 법적 안정성 문제에 관한 종합적인 분석 및 정책을 제안했다는 점에서 큰 의의가 있다.

• International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security
• /
• 제22권7호
• /
• pp.85-90
• /
• 2022

In modern conditions of the development of public relations, there is a continuous development of technologies. This not only reflects the convenience of service users, and new technology but also contributes to the emergence of new disputes to protect the rights of stakeholders. Therefore, it is urgent to study the distinctions between the jurisdiction of commercial, civil and administrative courts in resolving IT disputes. The work aims to study the peculiarities of delimitation of the jurisdiction of commercial, civil, and administrative courts through the prism of IT measurement. The research methodology consists of such methods as a historical, comparative-legal, formal-logical, empirical, method of analogy, method of synthesis, method of analysis, and systematic method. Examining the specifics of delimiting the jurisdiction of commercial, civil, and administrative courts through the IT dimension, it was concluded that there is a problem in determining the jurisdiction of the court. In addition, the judicial practice on this issue is quite variable, which negatively affects the predictability of technology in resolving potential disputes. In this regard, the criterion models for distinguishing between commercial, administrative, and civil proceedings according to the legal classification of the parties, as well as the nature of the claim are identified. This separation will contribute to a more accurate application of legal norms and methods of application of administrative norms and reduce the number of cases of improper proceedings.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.278-283
• /
• 2016

Background Disputes regarding medical malpractice occur between practitioners and patients. As patients have become increasingly aware regarding medical care, an increase in the unexpected side effects of procedures has been observed, thereby leading to an increase in disputes regarding medical malpractice. In this study, we reviewed trends in precedents involving cosmetic surgery-related medical disputes, with the goal of helping to prevent unnecessary disputes in the future. Methods We conducted a search of the judgments made in South Korean courts between 2000 and 2013 that were related to the field of plastic surgery. A total of 54 judgments were analyzed, and the selected precedents were reviewed and classified according to the kind of negligence involved. Results The claim amounts ranged from under 8 million KRW (6,991 USD) to 750 million KRW (629,995 USD). The most common ratio of the judgment amount to the claim amount was 20%-30%. The judgments were classified according to the following categories: violation of the duty of explanation in 17 cases (29%), violation of the duty of care in 10 cases (17%), violation of both duties in 20 cases (35%), and no violation of duty in six cases (10%). Conclusions Cosmetic surgery-related suits require different approaches than general malpractice suits. The Supreme Court requires plastic surgeons to determine the type, timing, methods, and scope of their treatments when considering possible results. Therefore, practitioners should be educated on their rights and responsibilities to enable them to cope with any possible medical dispute that may arise.

• Archives of Plastic Surgery
• /
• 제44권4호
• /
• pp.283-292
• /
• 2017

Background Settlements between doctors and patients provide a solution to complicated disputes. However, some disputes may be renewed as a result of negligence by both parties. The purpose of this study was to review the legal issues that may potentially arise during the preparation of settlement agreements and to propose a list of requirements for ensuring the effectiveness of these settlement agreements. Methods Data from 287 civil cases concerning aesthetic surgery that took place between 2000 and 2015 were collected from a court database in South Korea. Factors that influenced the effectiveness of settlement agreements were analyzed. Results Among the 287 court precedents, there were 68 cases of covenant not to sue. Eighteen cases were dismissed because the settlement agreements were recognized as effective, and 50 cases were sent forward for judgment on their merits because the agreements were not recognized as effective. The types of surgery and types of complications were classified by frequency. We evaluated the geographical distribution of the precedents, the settlement timing, and the effectiveness and economic impact of the settlements. We found that there was no statistically significant relationship among these factors. Four major factors that made a settlement agreement legally effective were identified, and the data showed that fee-free reoperations were not considered by the court in determining the compensation amount. Conclusions When preparing a settlement agreement, it is advisable to review the contents of the agreement rather than to take the preparation of a settlement agreement per se to be legally meaningful.

• 한국중재학회지:중재연구
• /
• 제25권1호
• /
• pp.47-64
• /
• 2015

Pursuant to Article 109(1) of the Attorney-at-Law Act of Korea, a person, not an attorney-at-law, who receives or promises to receive money, articles, entertainment or other benefits or who gives or promises to give those things to a third party, in compensation for providing or mediating legal services, such as examination, representation, arbitration(emphasis added), settlement, solicitation, legal consultation, making of legal documents, etc. shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 7 years or by a fine not exceeding KRW 50 million or may be punished by both and there is no specific provision on qualification of arbitrator except on nationality of an arbitrator in the Arbitration Act of Korea. Then, the question arises, can any non-lawyer arbitrator who receives arbitrator's fees be punished in accordance with the Attorney-at-Law Act in Korea? To search for an answer for this matter, this paper examines the Arbitration Act or the Civil Procedure Code of 33 major countries in the world and explains a research on the participation ratio of non-lawyer arbitrators in all 360 arbitration cases registered in 2012 at the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (KCAB).

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제17권4호
• /
• pp.209-218
• /
• 2017

한국에서는 어린이집 아동학대가 지속적으로 발생하고 있어 사회적으로 문제가 되고 있다. 이에 정부에서는 어린이집의 관리감독을 강화하고 있으며, 아동학대에 대한 강력한 대처와 예방을 통해 아동이 건강한 사회 구성원으로 성장할 수 있도록 아동학대특례법을 제정하였다. 본 연구에서는 어린이집에서 발생한 아동학대 사건의 판례를 살펴봄으로써 학대 가해자에 대한 법적용을 파악하였고, 아동학대특례법이 적용됨에 따라 가해자에 대한 처벌이 어떠한 변화를 보이는지 분석하여 그에 따른 시사점을 제시하였다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 대법원과 각 지방법원 홈페이지를 검색하여 어린이집 학대사건과 관련한 21건의 판례를 수집하였다. 판례를 분석한 결과, 아동학대특례법이 적용된 아동학대 사건에서도 피고인의 형량은 크게 증가하지 아니하여 국민의 법감정과 괴리가 있었다. 따라서 어린이집에서의 아동학대를 방지하기 위해서는 학대 가해자에 대한 보다 엄격한 법적용이 요구됨을 알 수 있다. 그리고 학대 유형에 따른 학대 정의를 명확히 규정하며, 어린이집 관리자에게도 양벌규정을 적용하여 학대 발생에 대한 엄중한 책임을 물어야 할 것이다.