• 산업진흥연구
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.153-162
• /
• 2023

명리학의 격국(格局) 해설서라 불리는 심효첨의 『자평진전(子平眞詮)』의 간명 방법은 격국(格局)을 선정하고 격(格)의 길흉을 구분하여 순역(順逆)의 원리에 따라 상신(相神)을 설정한다. 이때 월지(月支)의 지장간(地藏干)이 두 개 이상 투간(透干)하여 여러 격을 이루게 되어 겸격(兼格)이 되는 경우 격의 주체를 최종적으로 알고 있어야만 상신(相神)을 설정하고 격의 성패(成敗)를 판단할 수 있다. 하지만 『자평진전』에서는 겸격의 구조와 의미만을 설명하였고 겸격의 최종 주체를 결정하는 방법은 기술되지 않았다. 본 연구자는 겸격의 주체를 선정하는 연구를 위해 각종 문헌을 고찰했고 여러 가지 겸격의 실제 사례를 월령과 격국으로 나누어 비교 분석하여 월지와 회합(會合)한 지지(地支)의 종류, 월지의 지장간(地藏干)에서 투간된 천간의 기세(氣勢)와 일간(日干)의 강약(强弱)에 관련되었다는 공통된 결과를 도출했고 그 법칙을 주관적으로 정리했다. 본 연구 결과를 통해 겸격의 혼란을 줄일 수 있는 계기가 될 것으로 사료된다.

• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제1권2호
• /
• pp.273-293
• /
• 2001

In this paper, I examine the phenomenon of English depictive and resultative predications with specific attention given to the relation between accentual focus structure and argument structure. The goal is pursued primarily through a production experiment and analyses to establish the interconnection between focus and argument structure. The central claim is that the resultative predicate forms a complex predicate with a main verb, whereas the depictive predicate behaves as an adjunct in English secondary constructions. The result shows that the relationship between focus and accent depends at least in part on their argument structure, confirming that current focus theories about argument-head and adjunct-head structures in primary predication constructions can be extended to secondary predication constructions.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.13-30
• /
• 1999

There have been two opposing views on the structure of the so-called head internal relative construction(HIRC) in Korean/Japanese, i.e., a view that analyzes the HIRC categorially as a nominal projection and functionally as an argument(Kuroda 1992, Watanabe 1992, Hoshi 1996, Jhang 1991/1994, among others) vs. a view that analyzes the HIRC categorially as an adjunct clause and functionally as a non-argument(Murasugi 1994). This paper on the one hand points out several phenomena indicating that Murasugi's analysis is more viable, while on the other hand proposing a more complex structure than Murasugi's to account for other facts as well. The no/kes clause in the HIRC will be analyzed as the complement of a null perception verb whose projection constitutes part of an adjunct clause.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제3권2호
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 1999

There have been two opposing views on the structure of the so-called head internal relative construction(HIRC) in Korean/Japanese, i.e., a view that analyzes the HIRC categorially as a nominal projection and functionally as an argument(Kuroda 1992, Watanabe 1992, Hoshi 1996, Jhang 1991/1994, among others) vs. a view that analyzes the HIRC categorially as an adjunct clause and functionally as a non-argument(Murasugi 1994). This paper on the one hand points out several phenomena indicating that Murasugi's analysis is more viable, while on the other hand proposing a more complex structure than Murasugi's to account for other facts as well. The no/kes clause in the HIRC will be analyzed as the complement of a null perception verb whose projection constitutes part of an adjunct clause.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.35-49
• /
• 2005

Lakoff(1986) claim that sequential fading alone suffices to sanction ATB violations cannot be supported in Korean verbal coordination of TP, since extraction from the conjunction of TP in Korean is impossible regardless of whether the conjuncts are interpreted sequentially or non-sequentially. However, ATB violations are allowed in the coordination of Non-TP, only when the conjuncts are interpreted sequentially. 1 will argue that Non-TP, in coordination are ambiguous between a conjunct and adjunct analysis. Furthermore, a claim made here is that the distinction between the sequential and non-sequential reading in Non-TP coordination is a distinction made by syntax, while the sequential vs. non-sequential reading in TP coordination is derived from semantics or pragmatics.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.157-176
• /
• 1998

This paper claims that beneficiary adjuncts are best analyzed as involving external predication in a version of grammatical framework called Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. This paper also claims that verbal catefories need to include the attribute INDEX among their semantic components in order to account for the external predication proposed in this paper. This paper distinguishes between recipient and beneficiary reles and assumes that the former is a semantic argument of a verb-type relation and that the latter is an adjunct which makes a semantic contribution as a modifier. This approach achives a unified analysis of modification phenomena of nominal and verbal categories and it can also accomodate Parson's(1990) idea that a verbal category denotes a set of events, not just an event.

• 한국영어학회지:영어학
• /
• 제2권1호
• /
• pp.1-21
• /
• 2002

In this paper, a persistent L1 influence on L2 argument structure acquisition is observed in terms of complement and adjunct PPs. Since the distinction between these two PPs in L1 seems not as sharp as in L2, overgeneralization is anticipated in the L2 acquisition due to L1 transfer. Result of an experimental study shows that Korean learners of English do not successfully acquire L2 verb meanings as to which locative PP is obligatory and which is not. Generally, learners transfer the L1 properties when asked to judge grammaticality. Some possible source of constraints in L2 acquisition, such as input frequency and noticing ability is proposed as possible explanations of data. Finally, pedagogical implications in language classroom for vocabulary acquisition are discussed.

• 한국언어정보학회지:언어와정보
• /
• 제6권1호
• /
• pp.105-121
• /
• 2002

This paper investigates the effect of semantic argument structure on the comprehension and production of sentences by observing the prosodic realizations of English secondary predications. Specifically, the goal of this study is to show how the theory of predication, argument structure, and focus semantically interact to account for similarities and differences between English resultative and depictive predications. To address this issue, production and comprehension tests were performed. In the fried focus domain (verb phrase), subjects were asked to utter and to comprehend ambiguous sentences in the context monologues. The experimental results were generally consistent with general linguistic analyses: In the resultative constructions, secondary subject NPs tend to be accented, as in other argument-head constructions, while in the depictive constructions, secondary predicates tend to have accents, as in other adjunct-head constructions.

• 한국융합학회논문지
• /
• 제12권8호
• /
• pp.207-214
• /
• 2021

기존의 연구에서 기업의 다각화 정도가 클수록 기업가치가 하락한다는 다각화 할인 현상이 발생한다는 일관된 결과를 제시하고 있다. 그런데도 기업들이 지속해서 다각화를 추진하는 요소로 대리인 이론으로 설명된다. 그리고 대리인 문제를 해소하기 위해서는 효율적인 지배구조를 형성하는 것이 중요하다. 하지만 기존의 연구들은 주로 경영지분율 등을 중심으로 이루어져 왔고 이사회를 구성하는 개인에 대한 고려가 부족하다. 본 연구에서는 이러한 문제점들을 해결하기 위하여 이사들의 겸임 정보를 통하여 이들의 겸임이 이사회의 모니터링 효과에 어떠한 영향을 이를 통해 다각화에 어떠한 영향을 끼치는지 연구하고자 한다. 이를 위하여 2011년부터 2016년까지 6년간 유가증권시장에 기업을 대상으로 연구를 진행하였다. 분석 결과, 경영자와 사내이사 겸임의 경우 양(+)의 영향을 미치기는 하였으나 유의성은 확인할 수 없었다. 사외이사 겸임의 경우 다각화에 유의한 양(+)의 결과를 확인하였다.

• Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science
• /
• 제52권5호
• /
• pp.352-369
• /
• 2022

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate clinical and microbiological outcomes with the use of azithromycin as an adjunct to non-surgical subgingival professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) in the treatment of grade C periodontitis. Online database searches using high-level MeSH terms in a PICO structure were conducted along with hand-searching of relevant periodontal journals. Titles and abstracts of identified studies were independently reviewed by both authors and the full texts of studies meeting the inclusion criteria were independently reviewed. In total, 122 studies were identified through searches, of which 6 were included in the qualitative analysis and 4 in the meta-analysis. Three studies included in the meta-analysis were deemed at low risk of bias and 1 at serious risk. There were conflicting results on whether azithromycin reduced the number of subgingival pathogens or detectable subgingival Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans between the included studies. The meta-analysis revealed a statistically significant probing depth reduction difference in favour of azithromycin compared to the control at 3 months (weighted mean difference [WMD]=-0.39 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.66 to -0.13 mm; I²=0%) and 12 months (WMD=-1.32 mm; 95% CI, -1.71 to -0.93 mm; I²=0%). The clinical attachment level change was also statistically significant in favour of azithromycin compared to the control at 3 months (WMD=-0.61 mm; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.10 mm; I²=71%) and 12 months (WMD=-0.88 mm; 95% CI, -1.32 to -0.44 mm; I²=0%). Based upon these results, azithromycin offers additional improvements in some clinical parameters when used in conjunction with subgingival PMPR in patients with aggressive periodontitis over control groups. These improvements appear to be maintained for up to 12 months after treatment completion. However, due to a lack of well-designed studies, the conclusions that can be drawn from the available evidence are limited.