• 한국농공학회논문집
• /
• 제54권5호
• /
• pp.57-67
• /
• 2012

This paper presents the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to evaluate water resources plan for agricultural reservoir. Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations (PROMETHEE) and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) were used to estimate weight and priority of alternatives to find out the most reasonable and efficient way of water resources assessment. The 6 criteria that both decision maker and beneficiary are satisfied have been identified to secure agricultural water resources and then the priority of 10 subcriteria was set. An enhanced PROMETHEE-AHP model was used to perform pairwise comparison and find out the priority of each alternative because the existing decision making model have uncertainty and ambiguity. Comparison analysis of decision making models was carried out to find a way of suitable decision making and validity of PROMETHEE-AHP model was suggested.

• 한국병원경영학회지
• /
• 제16권2호
• /
• pp.78-97
• /
• 2011

The purpose of this study is to analyze activating factors of medical tourism at Busan, and then decide on priority on the factors. As research methods, this study deduced priority of specialists' opinions by AHP analysis technique through structuralized questionnaire on the medical tourism's factors having been suggested from existing prior studies. The analysis results were same as followings. First, as a result of analysis on the main criteria, relative levels of importance were appeared high such as 'competitiveness', 'policy assistances from the government', 'medical care's infrastructure', and 'connectedness with regions' in order. Second, as a result of integrated results analyzing detailed criteria on the main evaluation standards, relative levels of importance were appeared high such as 'medical quality', 'health-related institution's improvement', 'medical infrastructure', 'medical charge', 'tourism-related institution's improvement', 'convenience', 'medical cooperation possibilities', and 'local industry compliance' in order. In conclusion, it is judged that activation of medical tourism shall be propelled after considering relative levels of importance on many policies or activating factors same as suggested in this study.

• 한국경영과학회지
• /
• 제19권3호
• /
• pp.41-51
• /
• 1994

The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is widely used for evaluation of large projects. If a group of experts with different expertise are involved in a AHP decision, they need some way to aggregate their opinions. In this paper, we suggest a way to aggregate the experts' priorities in a given hierarchy using the concept of the Bayesian decision analysis. A criterion that can be used for screening out unreliable data is introduced, and it is used for priority aggregation. Some numerical results are shown to illustrate the procedure.

• 대한안전경영과학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 대한안전경영과학회 2008년도 추계학술대회
• /
• pp.41-50
• /
• 2008

The study proposes a priority model for program directors in charge of Corporate Social Contribution to make the best decision. This empirical analysis aims to discover the most significant area among various programs of Corporate Social Contribution Activities. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is used to test the priority model. The study attempts to demonstrate how the model helps providing better decision choices in corporate practices. The priority preference in Corporate Social Contribution Activities programs among corporate social contribution practitioners, PR professors and NGO activists is examined in order to present preferred programs of corporate social contribution programs, which they value the most as a part of overall social welfare.

• 한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구
• /
• 제28권4호
• /
• pp.49-64
• /
• 2019

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to observe the relative priorities of importances among IT services for Smart tourism as well as the relative priorities of importances among ways for developing the IT Services. Design/methodology/approach AHP analysis model was designed with 3 layers in order to recognize the relative importances priorities of IT services and the ways developing the IT services in Smart tourism. The factors in the top layer consist of Pre-trip IT services, During-trip IT services and Post-trip IT services. The lower factors in second layer of the Pre-trip IT services consists of Tourism information search, Online reservation and Price comparison. The lower factors of the During-trip IT services consists of Context recognition, Virtual Reality and Drone Application. The lower factors of the Post-trip IT services consists of Interactive Sharing and Tagging. The factor of third layer, the ways of developing the IT services consist of Company leading, University leading and Industry-University Collaboration. The structural questionnaire based on the AHP analysis model was designed and used to survey experts in IT and tourism areas. The collected data by the question investigation was analyzed by AHP analysis technique. Findings The importance priority of During-trip IT service was highest among in the three type IT services of tourism life cycle. The importance priority of Price comparison service was highest among IT services for Pre-trip. The importance priority of the Context recognition service was highest among IT services for During-trip. The Interactive sharing service was highest among IT services for Post-trip. It would be confirmed for the IT service development ways of Company leading to be suitable for most of the It services, such as Tourism information search, Online reservation, Price comparison, Context recognition, Virtual reality, Drone application, Interactive sharing.

• 한국콘텐츠학회논문지
• /
• 제12권4호
• /
• pp.263-272
• /
• 2012

본 연구는 공무원 교육훈련정책의 상대적 중요도와 우선순위 분석을 통해 공무원교육훈련정책의 방향성을 모색해보고자 전문가들을 대상으로 AHP 방법론을 적용한 실증적 분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과를 요약해 보면 다음과 같다. 첫째, 측정영역별 평가요소에 대한 상대적 우선순위를 보면, 교육훈련운영시스템, 교육훈련프로그램, 교육인프라, 교육훈련평가관리 중에서 교육훈련운영시스템이 가장 중요한 평가요소로 분석되었다. 둘째, 평가항목의 관점에서 보면, 교육훈련프로그램에서는 Acting Learning 교육프로그램, 교육훈련운영시스템에서는 교육훈련기관 예산확충, 교육훈련평가관리에서는 교육훈련과 인사제도 연계, 교육인프라에서는 교수요원 확보 등이 상대적으로 가장 중요한 우선순위로 평가되었다. 이러한 분석결과는 공무원 교육훈련정책을 경험적으로 설명하는데 기여할 것으로 판단된다.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제29권4호
• /
• pp.43-50
• /
• 2006

The objective of this research is to select the most effective technique from AMT (Advanced Manufacturing Technologies) and IMP (Innovative Management Practices) for improving manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The research consists of several principal steps. The first step is to design critical criteria in evaluating manufacturing performance in shipbuilding enterprises. The second step is to develop sub-criteria of the critical criteria. The third step is to develop a four level AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) structure using the critical criteria, sub-criteria and techniques from AMT and IMP. The fourth step is to develope the pairwise comparison matrix by each level of AHP structure, which was based on survey data collected at the H heavy industry. And the last step is to select the most effective technique from AMT and IMP by using AHP analysis. The results of AHP analysis did not show clear difference in priority between techniques of AMT and IMP in terms of manufacturing performance of the shipbuilding enterprise. Thus, each critical criterion was assigned modified weights and examined the priority change of techniques by conducting performance sensitivity analysis.

• 한국의류산업학회지
• /
• 제9권1호
• /
• pp.81-88
• /
• 2007

This study aimed to develop priorities alternatives based on relative rather than absolute assignments on clothing evaluative criteria. The relative comparison approach includes much redundancy and is thus less sensitive to judgemental errors common to techniques using absolute assignments. By deriving evaluative criteria for consumers in choosing clothing, and considering their relative important or value in the priority of evaluation elements. When the consumer selects clothing, it requires multi-criteria decision making exercise and needs to make trade-offs between different alternatives. With an application of the AHP's hierarchical structuring and pair-wise comparisons, this study will determine the weight and priorities of evaluation factor in clothing evaluative criteria in choosing cloth, which will eventually lead to improve management. Items for the setting priority were decided as 'symbol', 'practicality', 'economy', 'vogue', and 'aesthetic' by council. The data for this research were collected from respondents of 108 females in Busan. Data were analyzed by frequency and AHP. As the results, 'economy' was decided as a most important item. And 'a fashionable color' evaluated as that of first priority in the totality evaluation elements.

• 대한한의진단학회지
• /
• 제18권3호
• /
• pp.175-186
• /
• 2014

The purpose of this study is to give priority in Yin-deficient questionnaire items. if adequate priority is given, clinical judgment and questionnaire of the results is expected to be similar. The AHP is a systematic procedure for analyzing the elements of any problem hierarchically. Based on survey of expertise, as series of pairwise comparison judgements is performed to evaluate the various elements in the hierarchy. We are expected to use the AHP analysis that would apply to oriental doctor's diagnostic process analysis. In this study, korean medical doctors experienced over 5 years was included. Results given the importance to Yin-deficient questionnaire items, Results given the importance to the questionnaire items, the most important item was Irritable fever on the five Hearts, the second was tidal fever.

• 한국수자원학회논문집
• /
• 제35권6호
• /
• pp.703-714
• /
• 2002

가뭄시 다양한 수요자의 수요량을 충족하지 못하고 한정된 물을 공급함으로 인해 많은 분쟁이 발생되고 있으며, 이를 해결하기 위하여 사회적 합의를 도출할 수 있는 용도별 용수 우선 순위의 의사 결정이 이루어져야 한다. 이와 같은 의사결정은 합리적이며 시스템적인 절차로 수행한다. 첫째, 가뭄으로 인한 영향을 받는 경제적, 환경적, 사회적 관점과 그와 관련된 세부적 속성들을 기준 레벨로 정하고 4가지의 대안을 명시한다. 둘째, 전문가와 지역주민에 대하여 쌍대비교 방법으로 설문을 실시한다. 최종적으로 의사속성결정법중의 하나인 계층분석과정(AHP)에 의해 상대적 가중치와 대안의 우선순위를 결정한다. 분석 결과 가뭄시 용수배분은 생활용수. 농업용수, 공업용수, 하천유지용수 순으로 배분하여야 하는 것으로 나타났다. AHP 기법은 설문시 일관성을 유지할 수 있는 방법만 개선된다면 수자원 시스템의 의사결정에 폭 넓게 적용될 수 있으리라 판단된다.