• 한국항공운항학회지
• /
• 제14권1호
• /
• pp.43-48
• /
• 2006

The present study was carried out in order to develope a seven-hole pressure probe which is able to measure high flow angles. The seven-hole pressure probe is a non-nulling, directional velocity probe used for measuring three dimensional flow that having high flow angles. A 4 mm diameter seven-hole conical pressure probe was manufactured with a cone angle of 70$^{\circ}$. The probe was comprised of seven 1 mm diameter stainless steel tubes packed close together and fitted into an outer stainless steel sleeve. The calibration procedure is based on the use of the Callington's polynomial curve-fit method. The validity of the seven-hole conical pressure probe is demonstrated by comparisons with hot-wire data.

• 한국항공우주학회지
• /
• 제45권7호
• /
• pp.531-538
• /
• 2017

비행속력 및 받음각과 옆미끄럼각을 측정할 수 있는 플러시 대기자료측정장치를 소형의 무인항공기를 대상으로 설계/제작하였다. 동체 노즈콘 표면에 4개 압력 측정점과 5개 압력 측정점의 2가지 타입으로 플러시 압력공들을 만들었다. 플러시 압력공의 교정 압력 데이터는 전기체를 전산유체해석 코드로 계산하여 구축하였다. 교정압력 데이터로부터 받음각, 옆미끄럼각, 전압계수, 정압계수는 4차 다항식으로 표현하고, 최소자승법으로 교정계수 행렬을 구하였다. 비행시험 결과 4개 플러시 압력공 및 5개 플러시 압력공을 이용하여 예측된 비행속력, 받음각과 옆미끄럼각은 비교를 위해 장착한 5-압력공 프로브로 예측된 것과 잘 일치하였으며, 특히 4개의 압력공으로 5개 압력공과 거의 동일한 결과를 얻을 수 있었다.

• 한국항공운항학회:학술대회논문집
• /
• 한국항공운항학회 2005년도 추계학술발표대회 논문집
• /
• pp.182-185
• /
• 2005

• 동력기계공학회지
• /
• 제10권4호
• /
• pp.56-64
• /
• 2006

This paper shows the development process of a straight-type five-hole pressure probe for measuring three-dimensional flow velocity components. The data reduction method using a bi-cubic curve-fitting program in a new calibration map was introduced in this study. This new calibration map can be applied up to the application angle, ${\pm}55^{\circ}$ of a probe. As a result, for the application angle of ${\pm}45^{\circ}$, an error for yaw and pitch angles appeared from $-1.76^{\circ}\;to\;1.83^{\circ}$ and from $-1.91^{\circ}\;to\;1.75^{\circ}$, respectively. Moreover, an error for a vector magnitude and a static pressure compared with a dynamic one showed from -7.83% to 4.87% and from -0.73 to 0.77, respectively. Even though this data reduction method showed unsatisfactory errors in a vector magnitude, it resulted in an easy and simple application method. Especially, when it was applied to an actual flow field including a swirling flow, a good result came out on the whole. However, in order to obtain a better result, it is thought that a more sophisticated interpolation method needs to be introduced.