• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.155-162
• /
• 2002

한국목록규칙 제4판 초안의 (지도자료)를 위한 목록 규칙을 분석하고 그 내용을 AACR2R(1998), NCR, 그리고 ISBD에서의 해당 목록 규칙들과 비교·분석한 뒤, 더욱 효율적인 지도자료 조직을 위한 한국목록규칙 제4판 초안의 수정안들을 제시하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.163-168
• /
• 2002

본 연구는 새롭게 제정된 한국목록규칙 4판 초안 중에 고서목록규칙의 내용을 분석하여 수정이 요구되는 부분의 발견과 그 대안을 모색함으로써 한국목록규칙이 도서관 현장의 자료조직과정에서 보다 효율적으로 사용되는데 일조하기 위하여 작성되었다. 그 결과 보완되어야 할 사항과 11개의 수정이 요구되는 사항을 제시하였다.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.44 no.4
• /
• pp.123-143
• /
• 2013

This study is to suggest the direction for KCR4's revision based on analysis of trends in cataloguing rules at home and abroad, characteristics of KCR4, and professional cataloguer's survey about revision of KCR4. Results of the study is summarized as follows. First, after Paris principles, the international attention to cataloguing rules is recently centered on ICP and RDA based on FRBR. Second, most cataloguing librarians feel confused over because KCR4 after 2003 is an unfinished rules without provisions on the authority control and heading's selection and form. So they want to revise KCR4. Third, the results of the professional cataloguer's survey showed mostly that KCR4 should be revised adopting international cataloguing rules like RDA and including contents of access points, detailed rules of the authority control, and the description in elements instead of resource's type.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.5-23
• /
• 2014

The bibliographic records have been built up following the Digital Library System (DLS) cataloging rules in the school libraries. But it is hard to use DLS cataloging rule as the standardization guidelines in building up the bibliographic records in school libraries because it is not the detailed cataloging rules, has inconsistency in its own rules, and disagrees with KCR4 rules. Therefore, this study is to suggest the new amendment for DLS cataloging rule to improve the bibliographic records quality and to produce the standardized bibliographic records. To grasp the problems of the DLS cataloging rules, DLS cataloging rule was analyzed with KCR4 rule and the interviews were conducted to the 9 school librarian that have experienced over 3 years. The result showed that it was needed to correct the terms to accord with KCR4, and to amend the DLS rule in each area.

• Proceedings of the KSPS conference
• /
• 1994.02a
• /
• pp.45-53
• /
• 1994

음 변화 규칙을 음성규칙(A)와 음운규칙(B)와 기타(C)로 분류한다면, A.음성규칙의 발생 총계는 B.음운규칙의 발생 총계보다 2배 이상 더 많다. 여기에 가장 발생 빈도가 높은 규칙부터 순서대로 10개만 정리하면 다음과 같다. 순위 규칙부류 명칭 백분율 1 A 음절 말 유성자음의 불파화 31.84, 2 A 유성음화 19.37 3 B 장모음화 10.00, 4 A 설측음화 9.78, 5 B 경음화 6.43, 6 B 음절말 장애음 중화 5.16, 7 A ㅅ 구개음화 3.71, 8 C 음절 조정 규칙 3.10, 9 B 단모음화 1.60, 10 A ㄴ 구개음화 1.42 별도로 진행한 총체적 연구(이상억에 의하면, 음성규칙, 즉 A가 총 6개 있는데 그 중 5규칙이 10위 내에 나타나 상위 쪽에 3번이나 포함되어 있는 점이 주목된다. 특히 규칙 1과 2의 합계는 전체 중 51.2%를 넘는다. 규칙 10위까지의 합계는 전체 중 92.4%를 차지한다. 13.장모음화(10%)는 12.단모음화(1.6%)보다 훨씬 높은 출현빈도를 보인다. 또 각종 구개음화 규칙의 순위는 ㅅ(7위), ㄴ(10위), ㄹ(17위), ㄷ(26위) 구개음화로 분포되어 있음이 밝혀졌다. 한편 삭제규칙(음운탈락 및 단순화) 계열이 14, 15, 19, 21, 25, 28위에 널리 나열되어 있는 데 반해, 삽입규칙은 23위에 ㄴ삽입 하나가 보일 뿐이다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.28 no.1
• /
• pp.23-42
• /
• 2011

This study is to compare the descriptive cataloging rules between AACR2 and RDA, and then to find a direction of future cataloging and KCR 4. RDA is new cataloging rules that embody the International Cataloging Principles(2009), FRBR and FRAD. It is a structure of bibliographic control of all kinds of resources, and the rules can be flexibly applicable in the international cataloging community. It is critical to embody RDA in KCR 4 because RDA is likely to affect the future cataloging through its collocation function and relation function to construct semantic web of OPAC. This study analyzed the descriptive rules of work, expression, and manifestation based on RDA draft(2008) of JSC for Development of RDA. It analyzed the changes in the cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA in such descriptive areas as title, type of resources, statement of responsibility, edition, publication, physical description and series in the manifestation level, and the preferred access points in both expression and work levels. The findings of this study will provide implications in revising KCR4.

• Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society
• /
• v.33 no.3
• /
• pp.235-256
• /
• 2002

The purpose of this study is to suggest a reform after detecting out issues and problems associated with the KCR 4th ed.(draft). KCR(Korean Cataloguing Rules) is representative cataloguing rules in Korea, the 4th ed.(draft) of which was prepared by Cataloguing Committee(department of KLA) in 2001. As a result of this study, a lot of problem which are glossary, context, inconsistency of the contents, rules applied to card catalog, and others, were found out. Thus, substantial improvements were able to be suggested.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.47 no.3
• /
• pp.275-293
• /
• 2013

This study conducted comparative analysis of cataloging descriptions and rules in KCR 4 and CCR 2, as follows, for the purpose of seeking understanding of classical materials cataloging rules and networking of oriental historical data cataloging (bibliographical descriptions). First, to compare the general rules, the objects of descriptions and composition of descriptions, recording order, and punctuation and information source of descriptions were analyzed. As a result, KCR 4 is more detailed in terms of author role identifications and information source regulations and CCR2 is more detailed in terms of regulations related to printing and publications and serial publications. Second, to compare the details, the main titles and liability indications, edition details, publication details and format details, and note details. As a result, regarding the description of edition type and publication details, KCR4 has detailed regulations and CCR2 has characteristic summary in terms of note details.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2002.08a
• /
• pp.147-154
• /
• 2002

본고에서는 한국목록규칙 제4판 초안에 있어서, 제8장 "정지화상자료"의 목록규칙을 분석하고자 한다. 이를 위해, International Standard Bibliographic Description for Non-Book Materials(1987), Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed. (1998), 그리고 일본목록규칙(1994)을 중심으로 비교하였다. 이에, 다양한 형태를 띄고 있는 정지화상자료에 있어서, KCR 4판의 "정지화상자료" 목록규칙이 목록규칙 사용자나 자료를 찾는 이용자로 하여금 편리하게 이용할 수 있도록 서지사항을 일관성있게 규정되어 있는지에 관하여 분석해 보고자 한다. 그리하여 초안을 더 수정·보완하여, KCR 4판을 발행하는데 있어서 조금이나마 도움이 되고자 한다.

• Journal of IKEEE
• /
• v.17 no.3
• /
• pp.332-338
• /
• 2013

BPEL is a standard executable language for specifying actions within business processes with Web services. BPEL workflow requires rule engine to describe application process in BPEL, as the requirements increase. It is needed to develop new BPEL's engine or modify BPEL's engine in order to add the functionality of rules to BPEL engines, but this method is not easy to implement and it requires very high cost. In this paper, we present an R4BPEL document, which uses the original BPEL grammar and includes a rule document. With this method, it is possible to build rule-based BPEL environment easily by adding web services with rules and R4BPEL document analyzer to the general-purpose Web services. In this paper, we campared a BPEL's document in proposed system with a BPEL's document in the existing system. And we demonstrated the simplicity of the rule-based system.