Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.1.023

A Study on Considerations in KCR4 through Changes of Cataloging Rules from AACR2 to RDA  

Lee, Mi-Hwa (이화여자대학교)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society for information Management / v.28, no.1, 2011 , pp. 23-42 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is to compare the descriptive cataloging rules between AACR2 and RDA, and then to find a direction of future cataloging and KCR 4. RDA is new cataloging rules that embody the International Cataloging Principles(2009), FRBR and FRAD. It is a structure of bibliographic control of all kinds of resources, and the rules can be flexibly applicable in the international cataloging community. It is critical to embody RDA in KCR 4 because RDA is likely to affect the future cataloging through its collocation function and relation function to construct semantic web of OPAC. This study analyzed the descriptive rules of work, expression, and manifestation based on RDA draft(2008) of JSC for Development of RDA. It analyzed the changes in the cataloging rules from AACR2 to RDA in such descriptive areas as title, type of resources, statement of responsibility, edition, publication, physical description and series in the manifestation level, and the preferred access points in both expression and work levels. The findings of this study will provide implications in revising KCR4.
Keywords
RDA; resource description and access; KCR4; AACR2; MARC21; FRBR; FRAD;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Delsey, T. 2009a. AACR2 versus RDA in From Rules to Entities: Cataloging with RDA. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
2 Delsey, T. 2009b. FRBR and FRAD as Implemented in RDA. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
3 Hider, P. 2009. “A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly,47(6): 544-560.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Hitchens, A and E. Symons. 2009. “Preparing catalogers for RDA training." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(8): 691-707.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Howarth, L. C. and J. Weihs. 2008. “Enigma variations: Parsing the riddle of main entry and the rules of three from AACR2 to RDA." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2): 201-220.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 IFLA. 2009. Functional Requirements for Authory Data. NY: Saur.
7 Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA. 2008. RDA: Resource Description and Access. [cited 2009.12.23]. .
8 Jones, E. 2007. “The shape of things to come: Resource Description and Access(RDA)." Serials Librarian, 52(3/4): 281-289.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Library of Congress. 2010. RDA TEST: Train the Trainer. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
10 Library of Congress. Network Development and MARC Standards Office. 2010. RDA in MARC. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
11 Oliver, C. 2010. Introducing RDA: a Guide to the Basics. Chicago: American Library Association.
12 박진희. 2009. RDA와 KCR4의 기술규칙 분석에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 40(2): 111-138.   과학기술학회마을
13 이미화. 2010. MARC 데이터의 RDA 저작 및 표현형 요소 분석을 통한 한국목록규칙 및 KORMARC의 고려사항. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 41(2): 251-272.   과학기술학회마을
14 조재인. 2005. 표현형 계층을 중심으로 한 FRBR 모형 분석 및 목록 체계 수용에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회지, 36(2): 221-239.   과학기술학회마을
15 한국도서관협회. 2003. 한국목록규칙. 4판. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
16 American Library Association. 2002. Anglo-American Cataloging Rules. 2nd ed. revised. IL: American Library Association.
17 Bianchini, C. and M. Guerrini. 2009. “From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them.” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(2): 105-124.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Schiff, A. L. 2010. Changes from AACR2 to RDA: a Comparison of Examples. [cited 2010.10.11]. .
19 Tillet, B. 2009. “Changes from AACR2 for texts." Presented at ABA Supervisors' Forum. [cited 2010.4.23]. .
20 Taylor, A. G. 2006. Introduction to Cataloging and Classification. 10th ed. CT: Libraries Unlimited.
21 Weihs, J. and L. C. Howarth. 2008. “Uniform titles from AACR to RDA." Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4): 362-384.   DOI   ScienceOn