• The Transactions of the Korea Information Processing Society
• /
• v.6 no.4
• /
• pp.1081-1089
• /
• 1999

Volume data modeling is concerned with finding a mathematical function which represents the relationship implied by the 3D data. Modeling a volume data geometrically can visualize a volume data using surface graphics without voxelization. It has many merits in that it is fast and requires little memory. We proposes, a method based on wavelet transformation and tetrahedrization. we implement a prototype system based on the proposed method. Last, we evaluated the proposed method comparing it with marching cube algorithm. the evaluation results show that though the proposed method uses only 13% of the volume data, the images generated is as good as the images generated by the marching cubes algorithm.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.40 no.6
• /
• pp.571-581
• /
• 2020

Vegetation affects water level change and flow resistance in rivers and impacts waterway ecosystems as a whole. Therefore, it is important to have accurate information about the species, shape, and size of any river vegetation. However, it is not easy to collect full vegetation data on-site, so recent studies have attempted to obtain large amounts of vegetation data using terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). Also, due to the complex shape of vegetation, it is not easy to obtain accurate information about the canopy area, and there are limitations due to a complex range of variables. Therefore, the physical structure of vegetation was analyzed in this study by reconfiguring high-resolution point cloud data collected through 3-dimensional terrestrial laser scanning (3D TLS) in a voxel. Each physical structure was analyzed under three different conditions: a simple vegetation formation without leaves, a complete formation with leaves, and a patch-scale vegetation formation. In the raw data, the outlier and unnecessary data were filtered and removed by Statistical Outlier Removal (SOR), resulting in 17%, 26%, and 25% of data being removed, respectively. Also, vegetation volume by voxel size was reconfigured from post-processed point clouds and compared with vegetation volume; the analysis showed that the margin of error was 8%, 25%, and 63% for each condition, respectively. The larger the size of the target sample, the larger the error. The vegetation surface looked visually similar when resizing the voxel; however, the volume of the entire vegetation was susceptible to error.