• 대한방사선치료학회지
• /
• 제28권1호
• /
• pp.1-5
• /
• 2016

본원에서 수술 후 방사선치료를 수행한 하지 연부조직육종 환자에 대해 용적세기조절회전치료(VMAT), 세기조절방사선치료(IMRT), 3차원입체조영방사선치료(3D-CRT)의 세 가지 치료계획을 수립하여 치료계획용적(PTV)과 대퇴골에 전달되는 방사선량을 각각 비교하였다. 세 치료계획방법 모두 치료계획용적에 전달되는 방사선량은 큰 차이를 보이지 않았으나 용적세기조절회전치료와 세기조절방사선치료의 경우 3차원입체조영방사선치료보다 대퇴골에 전달되는 방사선량을 줄일 수 있었다. 또한 용적세기조절회전치료의 경우 세기조절방사선치료 보다 치료에 필요한 monitor unit이 적어 치료시간 감소의 효과가 나타났다. 따라서 하지 연부조직육종 방사선치료 시 용적세기조절회전치료의 사용은 효과적인 방사선치료를 수행할 수 있을 것이라 사료된다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제8권2호
• /
• pp.27-34
• /
• 1997

방사선치료에서 three dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) 에 접근하는 방법으로 조사하는 방향에 따라 선량의 강도를 조절함으로서 암조직에만 집중적으로 선량을 조사하며 주위 정상조직에는 최소의 선량이 조사되도록 하는 방법으로 1990년대부터 Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center를 중심으로 연구되었다. 암조직의 치료부피를 최적화하기 위하여 암조직의 모양에 따라 선량분포곡선이 이루는 치료용적이 종양용적과 같아야 한다. 이러한 3DCRT는 암조직에 집중적으로 선량을 조사할 수 있어서 중요장기들의 한계선량을 유지하면서 암조직에 조사되는 선량을 20％ 정도 증가시킬수 있다. 방사선치료의 궁극적인 목적이 종양부위에 균등한 치유선량이 도달되게하고 병변 부위의 정상조직의 손상을 최소가 되게 하는 것이며, 이러한 수행을 위하여 CT planning 등을 이용하여 치료계획을 수립하여 치료용적과 종양용적을 거의 같게 할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 조사하는 부위에서 선량의 강도를 조절하여 암조직의 치료용적을 최적화하는 3DCRT를 얻는 것을 목적으로 폐암환자에서 강도 조절법을 사용한 치료계획에서 일반적인 치료계획을 시행한 경우를 비교하면 종양용적에 접근한 치료계획과 정상조직에 대한 선량 감소를 보여주고 있으며, 직장암 환자에서도 두 치료계획에서 선량분포가 잘 비교가 됨을 볼 수 있다.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제34권4호
• /
• pp.41-47
• /
• 2023

Purpose: This study aimed to dosimetrically compare the technique of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT), which is a traditional prophylactic cranial irradiation method, and the intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques used in the last few decades with the dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) technique. Methods: The 3D CRT, VMAT, IMRT, and DCAT plans were prepared with 25 Gy in 10 fractions in a Monaco planning system. The target volume and the critical organ doses were compared. A comparison of the body V₂, V₅, and V₁₀ doses, monitor unit (MU), and beam on-time values was also performed. Results: In planned target volume of the brain (PTV_Brain), the highest D99 dose value (P<0.001) and the most homogeneous (P=0.049) dose distribution according to the heterogeneity index were obtained using the VMAT technique. In contrast, the lowest values were obtained using the 3D CRT technique in the body V₂, V₅, and V₁₀ doses. The MU values were the lowest when DCAT (P=0.001) was used. These values were 0.34% (P=0.256) lower with the 3D CRT technique, 66% (P=0.001) lower with IMRT, and 72% (P=0.001) lower with VMAT. The beam on-time values were the lowest with the 3D CRT planning (P<0.001), 3.8% (P=0.008) lower than DCAT, 65% (P=0.001) lower than VMAT planning, and 76% (P=0.001) lower than IMRT planning. Conclusions: Without sacrificing the homogeneous dose distribution and the critical organ doses in IMRTs, three to four times less treatment time, less low-dose volume, less leakage radiation, and less radiation scattering could be achieved when the DCAT technique is used similar to conventional methods. In short, DCAT, which is applicable in small target volumes, can also be successfully planned in large target volumes, such as the whole-brain.

• Journal of Chest Surgery
• /
• 제53권4호
• /
• pp.184-190
• /
• 2020

Radiation therapy (RT) has improved patient outcomes, but treatment-related complication rates remain high. In the conventional 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) era, there was little room for toxicity reduction because of the need to balance the estimated toxicity to organs at risk (OARs), derived from dose-volume histogram data for organs including the lung, heart, spinal cord, and liver, with the planning target volume (PTV) dose. Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) is an advanced form of conformal RT that utilizes computer-controlled linear accelerators to deliver precise radiation doses to the PTV. The dosimetric advantages of IMRT enable better sparing of normal tissues and OARs than is possible with 3D-CRT. A major breakthrough in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC), whether early or locally advanced, is the use of proton beam therapy (PBT). Protons deposit their highest dose of radiation at the tumor, while leaving none behind; the resulting effective dose reduction to healthy tissues and OARs considerably reduces acute and delayed RT-related toxicity. In recent studies, PBT has been found to alleviate severe lymphopenia resulting from combined chemo-radiation, opening up the possibility of reducing immune suppression, which might be associated with a poor prognosis in cases of locally advanced EC.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제36권3호
• /
• pp.241-247
• /
• 2018

Purpose: A hybrid-dynamic conformal arc therapy (HDCAT) technique consisting of a single half-rotated dynamic conformal arc beam and static field-in-field beams in two directions was designed and evaluated in terms of dosimetric benefits for radiotherapy of lung cancer. Materials and Methods: This planning study was performed in 20 lung cancer cases treated with the VERO system (BrainLAB AG, Feldkirchen, Germany). Dosimetric parameters of HDCAT plans were compared with those of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plans in terms of target volume coverage, dose conformity, and sparing of organs at risk. Results: HDCAT showed better dose conformity compared with 3D-CRT (conformity index: 0.74 ± 0.06 vs. 0.62 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). HDCAT significantly reduced the lung volume receiving more than 20 Gy (V₂₀: 21.4% ± 8.2% vs. 24.5% ± 8.8%, p < 0.001; V₃₀: 14.2% ± 6.1% vs. 15.1% ± 6.4%, p = 0.02; V₄₀: 8.8% ± 3.9% vs. 10.3% ± 4.5%, p < 0.001; and V₅₀: 5.7% ± 2.7% vs. 7.1% ± 3.2%, p < 0.001), V₄₀ and V₅₀ of the heart (V₄₀: 5.2 ± 3.9 Gy vs. 7.6 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001; V₅₀: 1.8 ± 1.6 Gy vs. 3.1 ± 2.8 Gy, p = 0.001), and the maximum spinal cord dose (34.8 ± 9.4 Gy vs. 42.5 ± 7.8 Gy, p < 0.001) compared with 3D-CRT. Conclusions: HDCAT could achieve highly conformal target coverage and reduce the doses to critical organs such as the lung, heart, and spinal cord compared to 3D-CRT for the treatment of lung cancer patients.

• 한국의학물리학회지:의학물리
• /
• 제11권1호
• /
• pp.85-90
• /
• 2000

방사선치료에서 치료의 효과는 총선량, 치료회수, 1회 조사선량 등에 의해서 결정된다. 선량강도조절법을 사용하여 방사선치료를 행할 때 치료회수나 1회 조사선량을 고려하여 총선량에 미치는 효과를 살펴보고자 한다. 방사선치료의 목적은 암조직에는 충분한 선량을 조사하면서 주위 정상 조직에는 최소한의 선량을 조사되게 하여 치료성적의 향상으로 암환자의 생존율과 삶의 질을 높이는데 목적이 있다. 이러한 문제를 해결하기 위하여 많은 연구자들이 여러 가지 방법으로 해결하고자 노력한 결과 CT의 영상을 치료계획에 이용할 수 있게 되어 three dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3DCRT)를 개발하였다. 선량강도조절법을 시행하여 총선량을 75, 80, 85, 90Gy를 조사할 때, 처음부터 선량강도조절법을 사용하여 치료하는 경우와 일차적으로 45Gy를 조사하고 boost를 조사할 때 나머지 선량을 선량강도조절 법으로 사용하는 것을 TDF 환산법을 사용하여 비교하였다. 처음부터 선량강도조절법으로 치료할 경우에는 총선량에서 약 12.5 - 15 Gy 정도 감해서 조사하여야 하는 것으로 나타났다.

• Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
• /
• 제16권8호
• /
• pp.3365-3370
• /
• 2015

Radiotherapy has an important role in the treatment of prostate cancer. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques are all applied for this purpose. However, the risk of secondary radiation-induced bladder cancer is significantly elevated in irradiated patients compared surgery-only or watchful waiting groups. There are also reports of risk of secondary cancer with low doses to normal tissues. This study was designed to compare received volumes of low doses among 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT techniques for prostate patients. Ten prostate cancer patients were selected retrospectively for this planning study. Treatment plans were generated using 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT techniques. Conformity index (CI), homogenity index (HI), receiving 5 Gy of the volume (V5%), receiving 2 Gy of the volume (V2%), receiving 1 Gy of the volume (V1%) and monitor units (MUs) were compared. This study confirms that VMAT has slightly better CI while thev olume of low doses was higher. VMAT had lower MUs than IMRT. 3D-CRT had the lowest MU, CI and HI. If target coverage and normal tissue sparing are comparable between different treatment techniques, the risk of second malignancy should be a important factor in the selection of treatment.

• 한국방사선학회논문지
• /
• 제7권6호
• /
• pp.409-414
• /
• 2013

본 연구에서는 전립샘암 환자에게 방사선 치료법인 3차원 입체조형법과 세기조절치료법을 각각 적용 할 경우 선량분포의 차이를 관찰하여 치료기법의 우수성을 평가하고자 하였다. 실험대상자 10명의 컴퓨터 단층 모의치료영상을 얻어 종양학과 전문의가 종양용적 및 정상장기를 구분하고 종양용적에 흡수선량을 80 Gy로 설정한 후 각각 다른 치료계획을 수립하였다. 그 결과 선량분포윤곽은 세기조절치료법이 우수 하였고 종양조직의 흡수선량은 세기조절치료법이 처방선량에 근접(100.2%)하였으며 정상조직 흡수율(방광, 직장, 소장, 좌 우 대퇴골두) 또한 우수하였다. 즉, 전립샘암의 방사선 치료시 세기조절방사선치료가 입체조형치료법보다 선량적인 면에서 양호한 것으로 분석되었다.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제36권4호
• /
• pp.332-340
• /
• 2018

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze dosimetric parameters of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) delivered to extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue in the stomach (gastric MALT lymphoma) to find out advantages of VMAT and conditions for definite benefits of VMAT. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with stage I-II gastric MALT lymphoma received VMAT (n = 14) or 3D-CRT (n = 36) between December 2005 and April 2018. Twenty-seven patients were categorized according to whether the planning target volume (PTV) overlaps kidney(s). Dosimetric parameters were analyzed by dose-volume histogram. Results: Radiation dose to the liver was definitely lower with VMAT in terms of mean dose (p = 0.026) and V₁₅ (p = 0.008). The V₁₅ of the left kidney was lower with VMAT (p = 0.065). For those with PTV overlapping kidney(s), the left kidney V₁₅ was significantly lower with VMAT. Furthermore, the closer the distance between the PTV and kidneys, the less the left kidney V₁₅ with VMAT (p = 0.037). Delineation of kidney(s) by integrating all respiratory phases had no additional benefit. Conclusions: VMAT significantly increased monitor units, reduced treatment time and radiation dose to the liver and kidneys. The benefit of VMAT was definite in reducing the left kidney V₁₅, especially in geometrically challenging conditions of overlap or close separation between PTV and kidney(s).

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• 제34권2호
• /
• pp.145-155
• /
• 2016

Purpose: Radiation therapy targeting axilla and groin lymph nodes improves regional disease control in locally advanced and high-risk skin cancers. However, trials generally used conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT), contributing towards relatively high rates of side effects from treatment. The goal of this study is to determine if three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may improve radiation delivery to the target while avoiding organs at risk in the clinical context of skin cancer regional nodal irradiation. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with locally advanced/high-risk skin cancers underwent computed tomography simulation. The relevant axilla or groin planning target volumes and organs at risk were delineated using standard definitions. Paired t-tests were used to compare the mean values of several dose-volumetric parameters for each of the 4 techniques. Results: In the axilla, the largest improvement for 3D-CRT compared to 2D-RT was for homogeneity index (13.9 vs. 54.3), at the expense of higher lung $V_{20}$ (28.0% vs. 12.6%). In the groin, the largest improvements for 3D-CRT compared to 2D-RT were for anorectum $D_{max}$ (13.6 vs. 38.9 Gy), bowel $D_{200cc}$ (7.3 vs. 23.1 Gy), femur $D_{50}$ (34.6 vs. 57.2 Gy), and genitalia $D_{max}$ (37.6 vs. 51.1 Gy). IMRT had further improvements compared to 3D-CRT for humerus $D_{mean}$ (16.9 vs. 22.4 Gy), brachial plexus $D_5$ (57.4 vs. 61.3 Gy), bladder $D_5$ (26.8 vs. 36.5 Gy), and femur $D_{50}$ (18.7 vs. 34.6 Gy). Fewer differences were observed between IMRT and VMAT. Conclusion: Compared to 2D-RT and 3D-CRT, IMRT and VMAT had dosimetric advantages in the treatment of nodal regions of skin cancer patients.