• 사료
• /
• s.56
• /
• pp.50-57
• /
• 2012

사료공업은 현대축산 수산양식업의 발전을 위한 기초산업이자 도시와 농촌주민에게 동물성 식품을 공급하는 영역에까지 영향을 미치는 민생산업이다. "12.5" 규획기간은 중국 특색 양식업의 현대화를 위한 중요한 시기이며, 사료공업강국을 건설하기 위한 핵심적 시기라고 할 수 있다. $\ll$국민경제 및 사회 발전 제12차 5개년 규획 강요 국민경제화사회발전제12개오년규획강요(國民經濟和社會發展第十二個五年規劃綱要)$\gg$와 $\ll$전국 농업 및 농촌경제 제12차 5개년 규획 전국농업화농촌경제제12개오년규획(全國農業和農村經齊第十二個五年規劃)$\gg$에 따라 '사료공업 발전 "12.5" 규획'을 제정하였다. 이에 본지는 한국농촌경제연구원에서 발표한 본 자료를 2회에 걸쳐 전재한다.

• 사료
• /
• s.57
• /
• pp.79-84
• /
• 2012

사료공업은 현대축산 수산양식업의 발전을 위한 기초산업이자 도시와 농촌주민에게 동물성 식품을 공급하는 영역에까지 영향을 미치는 민생산업이다. "12 5" 규획기간은 중국 특색 양식업의 현대화를 위한 중요한 시기이며, 사료공업강국을 건설하기 위한 핵심적 시기라고 할 수 있다. $\ll$국민경제 및 사회 발전 제12차 5개년 규획 강요 국민경제화사회발전제십이개오년규획강요(國民經濟和社會發展第十二個五年規劃綱要)$\gg$와 $\ll$전국 농업 및 농촌경제 제12차 5개년 규획 전국농업화농촌경제제십이개오년규획(全國農業和農村經濟第十二個五年規劃)$\gg$에 따라 '사료공업 발전 "12 5" 규획'을 제정하였다.

• Journal of the Economic Geographical Society of Korea
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.359-374
• /
• 2023

The main purpose of this paper is to explore the relationship between the transformation of Chinese regional development policy and trends in spatial inequality in mainland China. More specifically, it has attempted to identify the effects of Chinese regional development policies on regional economic inequality by investigating the coefficient of variation and Gini coefficient with GRDP in the province level. Regional inequality in China had increased from 1979 economic reform, but has eased since the 10th Five Year Plan(2001~2005) due to large-scale state investments in the western, central and northeastern regions. However, the analysis is likely to be resulted from the national level. Trends in regional inequality are differentiated in accordance with the eastern, central, northeastern and western regions. For example, regional inequality in the central region has increased, whereas other three regions has decreased since the 10th Five Year Plan. It has played a role in cutting down regional inequality in the national level. In particular, the central region has kept inequality since the 12th Five Year Guideline. It has led to the convergence of the regional economies in the national level. It has stemmed from some limits to greater regional policies in the Central region enforced in the 11th Five Year Guideline(2005~2010).

• International Area Studies Review
• /
• v.18 no.3
• /
• pp.147-173
• /
• 2014

The economic growth of China, an average of 9% as an external performance, has caused lots of side effects in the country. The social issues such as income gap, especially the wide gap between the rich and poor, and regional divide are the main cause of concerns that China's economic growth is not sustainable. It prompted the Chinese government to realize that institutional regulations on CSR are not optional but required to promote the sustainable development of corporations. In 2006, CSR was addressed for the first time in China, as the government established the November 5 Plan and revised "Company Law". The government garnered social attention by introducing CSR for the first time in November 5 Plan. Also, the government established December 5 Plan in 2011 to set a key goal as 'sustainable development' and reflect concrete measures for CSR in its corporate policy. In particular, Commercial Bank has a social responsibility to establish more concrete, forceful regulations than those of general corporations, as a financial intermediary. Thus, this study is aimed at exploring how the social responsibility of Commercial Bank is reflected in the Banking Act, the issues, and legislative directions on the social responsibility of Commercial Bank in China.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.329-353
• /
• 2010

This paper deal with government logistics policy in related low carbon in China. The government policy of promoting low-carbon way is more dependent on the top-down enforcement rather than voluntary market principles. It will succeeded in transforming the environment-friendly image, to focus on creating a mindset the company can go on voluntary carbon-reduction. The three factors of low-carbon economy and the new energy and industrial development policy is technology and funding, and that most of the government's policy has a crucial role. Due to the nature of the Chinese economy, government policies impact on the development of the industry is very important, and even for China's industrial restructuring of the logistics industry in the areas of government policy support for green economic growth, its role is expected to be very large. In Future, Chinese government will promote low carbon policies through the optimization of the logistics network to reduce energy waste, pursue the low carbon-reduction of logistics machinery and equipment, and develop an mode to appropriate demand for green low-carbon economic growth.

• Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society
• /
• v.17 no.2
• /
• pp.421-447
• /
• 2014

Traditional medicine has been integrated into the national health system in many countries such as Korea, China, Taiwan, etc. Korea and China are most representative among them. The purpose of this study is to compare the policies on traditional medicine in Korea and China focusing on where it came from and where it is headed. In this regard, the study suggested the first analysis tool in the world for analyzing the policy of traditional medicine. The results of the study are as follows: First of all, the development process of Korean Medicine (KM) and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) shows the same pattern, that is, both are influenced by its own national policies. Secondly, the difference between the two countries is due to the gap in the development status or the different aspects in national heath system. TCM is more vitalized in health system and has larger category, and stays ahead in globalization compared to KM. TCM covers Chinese medicine, integrative medicine and ethno-medicine. Korea emphasizes the role of KM in the declining birthrate and aging society, and promotes the overseas patient invitation strategy. China, on the other hand, establishes the medical system for emergency medical treatment and preventive treatment of major diseases and promotes overseas expansion of TCM service. In addition, Korea stressed the safety and distribution of herbal medicine, and China emphasizes production technologies. Korea has a strong medical device industry along with the government's fostering policy; however, in China, medical devices are in the R&D stage yet. Even though both countries promotes the drug development from natural products, Korea focuses on developing herbal cosmetics in application industry, but China shows weakness in policies on application industry. China shores up the foundation for culture and theory of traditional medicine, while Korea doesn't have related policy. Korea places emphasis on promoting collaboration with international organizations and medical volunteer programs, whereas China is more interested in mutual cooperation and real trade with other countries.