• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 2003.05b
• /
• pp.73-74
• /
• 2003

생활수준이 향상됨에 따라 환경질에 대한 일반인의 관심이 증가하게 되었으며, 이러한 관심의 영역은 공공재로서의 환경질로부터 점차 환경질과 건강상태와의 상관관계를 파악하고자 하는 보건학적 영역으로 확대되어 가고 있다. 특히, 직업의 특성상 외근을 주로 하게되는 일부를 제외하고는 대부분의 현대인이 하루 중 실내환경에서 보내는 시간이 80% 이상을 차지하게 되어 실내공기질(Indoor Air Quality)에 직ㆍ간접적으로 건강에 미치는 영향에 대한 관심이 매우 커지게 되었다. (중략)

• Journal of Environmental Policy
• /
• v.4 no.1
• /
• pp.93-111
• /
• 2005

Defining soil quality in scopes and applications is one of the prerequisite for the sustainable management of soil environment to orient researches, strategies and policies. However, definition of soil quality is controversial depending upon a viewpoint of soil science or soil environment. Soil quality can be, irrespective of the disciplines, defined as the capacity of a soil to function within ecosystem boundaries to sustain biological productivity, maintain environmental quality and promote plant and animal health. Common to all of the soil quality concepts can be summarized as the capacity of soil to function effectively at present and in the future. The OECD includes soil quality as one of the agri-environment indicators. This article intends to i) summarize the current soil quality research, and ii) provide information on protocol of soil quality assessment. A framework for soil quality was divided into three steps: indicator selection as minimum data set (MDS), scoring of the selected indicators, and integration of scores into soil quality index. Korean government suggested possible physical and chemical indicators such as bulk density and organic matter for paddy and upland soils to OECD. The framework of soil quality assessment is not yet implemented in Korea. Countries such as USA, Canada and New Zealand have constructed the framework on soil quality assessment and developed a user-friendly version of soil quality assessment tools to evaluate the integrated effects of various soil management practices. The protocol provided in this review might help policymakers, scientists, and administrators improve awareness about soil quality and understand the way of soil environment management.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment Conference
• /
• 2000.11a
• /
• pp.310-313
• /
• 2000

본 연구에서는 현재 사용 종료된 매립지 재사용을 위해 정비를 실시 중인 전국 매립지 중에서 충남 공주시 금홍동에 위치한 사용 종료된 매립지를 대상으로 하여 사업 지구 및 그 주변지역의 환경질 평가를 위하여 토양에 관한 오염도 조사를 실시하였다. 시료는 매립지 내 1개 지점과 주변 논 2개 지점, 밭 1지점으로 총 4개 지점에서 채취하였다. 토양시료의 분석항목은 토양환경보전법에서 제시하는 총 11개 항목으로 하였으며, 실험방법은 토양오염공정시힘방법에 준하여 실시하였다. 실험결과 토양환경보전법상 농경지에 대한 우려기준과 비교하여 전 항목이 기준에 크게 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 토양질의 면에서 된다면 이 매립지 부지는 일반적인 용도의 토지로써 사용이 가능하다고 사료된다.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.12 no.7
• /
• pp.453-462
• /
• 2012

The purpose of this study is to analyze the quality of life and provide an objective evaluation, and differentiated according to the local population for the realization of the quality of life policies are intended to provide baseline data. This study analyzed to the Development of Quality of Life indicators and weights for age differences in the quality of life, first to select the literature and previous studies analyzing the primary evaluation criteria. Second, the final evaluation of professional conduct FGI indicators are derived. Third, experts will conduct analysis to target weights. As a result of the first domain-specific weights family safety, economic stability, residential culture, health and welfare, and traffic environment in order. In particular, a family safe zone more than twice that of the other areas appeared to be important. Is determined. Second, age weighted analysis, the higher the age, economic stability, while important, safe area for families, the more the weight of age shows a deterioration. As income increases per capita housing area and the city park area, the exhibition shows the importance of housing across all age, environment, culture, suggests that increasing interest will.

• Journal of Korea Water Resources Association
• /
• v.54 no.9
• /
• pp.657-666
• /
• 2021

Ecosystem biodiversity is rapidly being lost due to changes in habitat, fragmentation of habitat, climate change, and land use changes by human activities. Recently, attempts have been made to approach the watershed management level to secure the health of the watershed, but studies on how to approach biodiversity and habitat management are still in lack. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the habitat quality of Geum river basin using Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) habitat quality model. The results of habitat quality was verified to eco-natural map and ecological watershed health evaluation results. The habitat quality of watershed was evaluated from 0 to 0.86 and the results showed that habitat quality was higher in upstream than downstream. Compared the habitat quality value in each eco-natural grade, the average habitat quality of 1st, 2nd and 3rd grades were 0.80, 0.76 and 0.71 respectively. The results of the correlation analysis with ecological watershed health data, the coefficient of determination (R²) was 0.58, and the person coefficient was 0.76. The results of this study may be used as foundation data to support habitat protection and implementation of long-term biodiversity-related policies.

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 1996.07a
• /
• pp.11-24
• /
• 1996

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 2006.04a
• /
• pp.47-52
• /
• 2006

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 1995.10a
• /
• pp.135-136
• /
• 1995

• Proceedings of the Korea Air Pollution Research Association Conference
• /
• 1996.07a
• /
• pp.103-112
• /
• 1996

• Proceedings of the Korean Environmental Sciences Society Conference
• /
• 1998.04a
• /
• pp.27-29
• /
• 1998