• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.163
• /
• pp.22-31
• /
• 2012

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.138
• /
• pp.28-39
• /
• 2008

• Korean Architects
• /
• no.8 s.36
• /
• pp.77-79
• /
• 1971

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.41
• /
• pp.45-58
• /
• 1999

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.151
• /
• pp.28-39
• /
• 2010

• Journal of Korea Fair Competition Federation
• /
• no.149
• /
• pp.30-37
• /
• 2010

• Journal of Information Management
• /
• v.38 no.4
• /
• pp.48-67
• /
• 2007

The economic burden which our society has to take exceeds the benefit that it becomes by the free circulation of information. Problems such as inconvenience or inequality between people can also occur since the regulation task of spam e-mail or SMS is imposed on two organs; the Department of Information and Communication and Free Trade Commission. The dualization of regulation separates related laws, which makes exception according to the $\ulcorner$Law on Information Communication Usage and Information Protection$\lrcorner$ or poses double regulation toward the same case. The spam prevention activity at free hands of information communication network provider such as portal site or mobile communication has many limitations along with comparison and analysis of spam regulations abroad. Therefore, examinations on legal obligation such as service restriction, identification and technical measure to spam prevention is needed. This study focuses on making the scope of spam regulation clear by considering the domestic related laws and the general environment of industry, on enacting law which regulates spam including advertisement and on deducting essential facts in enacting or modifying related laws and thus, deducting the form and contents of spam regulation law which is most decent in our domestic environment.

• Journal of Science and Technology Studies
• /
• v.4 no.1 s.7
• /
• pp.83-110
• /
• 2004

This article examines the legislation process of internet contents regulation through three phases from a policy network point of view. In the first phase, heated debates were initiated during the public hearings after the Ministry of Information & Communications announced its plan to introduce the internet contents grading system During the second phase, bills were submitted to the Standing Committee of the National Assembly, where the bills were deliberated, passed, and promulgated. In the third phase, issues on enforcement ordinance were resolved as the degree of conflict was mitigated. Policy network during the first phase started in a conflicting and distributed form, but has evolved into a conflicting and centralized form. The appropriate closure of the debate on the internet contents regulation can be explained by the structure of governmental departments, the character of new technology, and the mobilization of general public.

• The Journal of the Korea Contents Association
• /
• v.16 no.5
• /
• pp.148-156
• /
• 2016

Party is the main factor in modern country. Therefore, there are a lot of articles about the difference of public policies and citizen's recognition according to their supported party. However, there is few research about the regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. This study focuses on the differences of a regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. In result, there are a lot of differences of regulation recognition according to citizen's supported party. The people who support Saenuri Party have a positive recognition about a necessity of regulation, a fairness of regulation, a reliability of a regulation. But the people who don't support Saenuri Party have a negative recognition about those. In Korea, government regulations have a lot of relationship with a party and politics.

• Convergence Security Journal
• /
• v.14 no.3_2
• /
• pp.51-59
• /
• 2014

Korea also has tried to regulate the obscenity which is floating on the Internet in order to protect mainly minors. There are many statutes enacted to prohibit circulating pornographies to minors. However, there were minors who independently disseminate the pornographies to other minors. In the end, I can tell that existing statutes have not at least effectively regulate the obscenity on the Internet. Therefore, this article examines a possible limit of pornography on the Internet for the protection of minors, reviewing the CDA and the U.S. Courts' decisions. This article also examines the existing statutes' standard for regulating obscenity on the Internet in Korea. In addition, the article also tries to make a proposal to Korean legal systems that govern the obscenity on the internet.