• Strategy21
• /
• s.38
• /
• pp.5-12
• /
• 2015

• Proceedings of KOSOMES biannual meeting
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.232-232
• /
• 2017

• Maritime Security
• /
• v.3 no.1
• /
• pp.1-44
• /
• 2021

China's new Maritime Policy Law (MPL) purports to regulate the duties of China's maritime police agencies, including the China Coast Guard, and safeguard China's sovereignty, security, and rights and interest. The MPL has potentially far-reaching application, as China claims extensive maritime areas off its mainland and in the South China Sea. This expansive application of maritime law enforcement jurisdiction is problematic given that most of China's maritime claims are inconsistent with international law. To the extent that the MPL purports to assert jurisdiction over foreign flagged vessels in disputed areas or on the high seas, it contravenes international law. Numerous provisions of the MPL regarding the use of force are also inconsistent with international rules and standards governing the use of maritime law enforcement jurisdiction, as well as the UN Charter's prohibition on the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. China could use the MPL as a subterfuge to advance its illegal territorial and maritime claims in the South and East China Seas and interfere with coastal State resource rights in their respective exclusive economic zone.

• Annual Conference on Human and Language Technology
• /
• 2019.10a
• /
• pp.190-194
• /
• 2019

개체명 인식이란 주어진 문서에서 개체명의 범위를 찾고 개체명을 분류하는 것이다. 최근 많은 연구는 신경망 모델을 이용하며 하나 이상의 단어로 구성된 개체명을 BIO 표기법으로 표현한다. BIO 표기법은 개체명이 시작되는 단어의 표지에 B(Beginning)-를 붙이고, 개체명에 포함된 그 외의 단어의 표지에는 I(Inside)-를 붙이며, 개체명과 개체명 사이의 모든 단어의 표지를 O로 간주하는 방법이다. BIO 표기법으로 표현된 말뭉치는 O 표지가 90% 이상을 차지하므로 O 표지에 대한 혼잡도가 높아지는 문제와 불균형 학습 문제가 발생된다. 본 논문에서는 BIO 표기법 대신에 BIT 표기법을 제안한다. BIT 표기법이란 BIO 표기법에서 O 표지를 T(Tag) 표지로 변환하는 방법이며 본 논문에서 T 표지는 품사 표지를 나타낸다. 실험을 통해서 BIT 표기법이 거의 모든 경우에 성능이 향상됨을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Coastal and Ocean Engineers Conference
• /
• 1998.09a
• /
• pp.88-93
• /
• 1998

수치 파수조기법은 해양구조물에 작용하는 비선형 파랑하중을 해석할 수 있는 가장 유망한 도구로 인식되고 있다. 이러한 수치 파수조기법은 새롭고 다양한 형태의 해양구조물에 대한 정확하고 엄밀한 설계는 물론이고, 실험 조파수조의 여러 가지 문제점을 극복하기 위해서도 매우 필요한 기법이라고 할 수 있다(Kim, 1995). 수치 과수조기법을 위한 경계치 문제 해석법으로는 고차경계요소법을 이용한 해석법이 가장 효율적인 것으로 알려져 있다. (중략)

• Proceedings of KOSOMES biannual meeting
• /
• 2017.04a
• /
• pp.276-276
• /
• 2017

• The Korean Journal of Air & Space Law and Policy
• /
• v.24 no.2
• /
• pp.187-210
• /
• 2009

Space law(or outer space law) and the law of the sea are branches of international law dealing with activities in geographical ares which do not or do only in part come under national sovereignty. Legal rules pertaining to the outer space and sea began to develop once activities emerged in those areas: amongst others, activities dealing with transportation, research, exploration, defense and exploitation. Naturally the law of the sea developed first, followed, early in the twentieth century, by air law, and later in the century by space law. Obviously the law of the sea, of the air and of outer space influence each other. Ideas have been borrowed from one field and applied to another. This article examines some analogies and differences between the outer space law and the law of the sea, especially from the perspective of the legal status, the exploration and exploitation of the natural resources and environment. As far as the comparisons of the legal status between the outer space and high seas are concerned the two areas are res extra commercium. The latter is res extra commercium based on both the customary international law and treaty, however, the former is different respectively according to the customary law and treaty. Under international customary law, whilst outer space constitutes res extra commercium, celestial bodies are res nullius. However as among contracting States of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, both outer space and celestial bodies are declared res extra commercium. As for the comparisons of the exploration and exploitation of natural resources between the Moon including other celestial bodies in 1979 Moon Agreement and the deep sea bed in the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, the both areas are the common heritage of mankind. The latter gives us very systematic models such as International Sea-bed Authority, however, the international regime for the former will be established as the exploitation of the natural resources of the celestial bodies other than the Earth is about to become feasible. Thus Moon Agreement could not impose a moratorium, but would merely permit orderly attempts to establish that such exploitation was in fact feasible and practicable, by allowing experimental beginnings and thereafter pilot operations. As Professor Carl Christol said until the parties of the Moon Agreement were able to put into operation the legal regime for the equitable sharing of benefits, they would remain free to disregard the Common Heritage of Mankind principle. Parties to one or both of the agreements would retain jurisdiction over national space activities. In so far as the comparisons of the protection of the environment between the outer space and sea is concerned the legal instruments for the latter are more systematically developed than the former. In the case of the former there are growing tendencies of concerning the environmental threats arising from space activities these days. There is no separate legal instrument to deal with those problems.

• Journal of the Korean Society of Marine Environment & Safety
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.428-436
• /
• 2015

This paper considered the concept and characteristic OSV operation business for support the offshore plant and suggested amendment Maritime Transportation Laws, legislative proposals to solve the legal absence and to develop offshore service industry. Because Maritime Transportation Laws specialized for the carriage of passenger and goods by sea is not perfectly covered with Offshore support business in Korea. So it is necessary to make an explicit amendments for the article of Maritime Transportation Laws that founds absence of the law with the definition of terms to correspond related existed regulation reflected on the characteristic offshore support business by using OSV to develop offshore plant industry including support, service, supply, transportation etc. I expect that this paper will be a basic study to make a government policy, law, regulation to activate Offshore Service Industry in the future.

• Strategy21
• /
• s.45
• /
• pp.60-90
• /
• 2019

The use of the high seas are supported by the two pillars of customary principles --the freedom of navigation and the flag state control on its vessels, which are codified in the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. There have been attempts to limit and retrain the two pillars as maritime regimes are newly created to address new maritime threats, while coastal stares' control over the seas expand. The pillars have been created over thousands years since human beings took to the sea and have served as a foundation to use the oceans peacefully and orderly. Therefore, any retreat or exception from these principles would undermine the fundamental framework for the use of the oceans and eventually these regimes would be subject to control of maritime powers. In conclusion, new maritime regimes such as the sanction measures on North Korea should be enforced within the framework of international law and comply with the fundamental principles such as innocent passage and the freedom of navigation at the high seas.

• Proceedings of the Korean Quaternary Association Conference
• /
• 2002.06a
• /
• pp.1-1
• /
• 2002