• Journal of vocational education research
• /
• v.37 no.1
• /
• pp.55-75
• /
• 2018

The purpose of this study was to develop the evaluation scales that can access hierarchically the lifelong education field training program based on relevant stakeholders. To fulfill this purpose, both qualitative and quantitative research methods were applied. First of all, four groups of stakeholders were selected such as trainees, professors, field instructors, and program inspectors. The in-depth interviews with 13 experts in the field were conducted, and as a result, the scale with hierarchy of evaluation area, evaluation section, and evaluation item for each stakeholder was developed. In order to verify the content validity of the evaluation scales, delphi surveys for each stakeholder were conducted, using 35 expert panels. After delphi survey, the scale was applied to 90 trainees, 22 professors, and 31 field instructors. SPSS program was used to analyze the descriptive statistics, validity, and reliability. Finally, the evaluation scale of the trainer was identified as 8 evaluation areas, 14 evaluation sections and 51 evaluation items. And the professor's scale consisted of 6 areas, 10 sections and 40 items. The field instructor's scale was determined as 3 areas, 7 sections and 31 items, and the program inspector's evaluation scale was confirmed as 7 areas, 15 sections, and 32 items.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.20 no.5
• /
• pp.845-855
• /
• 2009

The purpose of this study was to examine the category function, the item structure, and the model-data fit of the Copenhagen neck functional disability scale (CNFDS) with neck pain subjects using Rasch rating scale analysis. The data was obtained from the assessments of 71 college students with neck pain. The 'concentration' item showed misfit and fourteen items were founds to be fits for self-reporting of disability due to neck pain. The most difficult item of the remaining 14 items was 'help' and the easiest item was 'social contact'. The subjects and items reliability of separation reliability were 0.85 and 0.97. The CNFDS for self-reporting of disability due to mild neck pain has been proved valid and reliable. This study is suggested that individuals with mild neck pain may be used the modified CNFDS that were not included 'concentration' item and were adjusted the 2 response levels.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• v.13 no.2
• /
• pp.279-294
• /
• 1996

This study was carried out to develop a Korean language version of Zung's self-rating anxiety scale(SAS) from august, 1994 to September, 1996. The subjects consisted of 205 normal control subjects from the general population group, and 97 subjects with anxiety disorders. These 97 subjects were chosen from a group by the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV of in patients and out patients. Both normal control subjects and anxiety disorder subjects were drawn utilizing a cluster of sampling methods. In order to analyze the data on anxiety scores, Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient method was carried out, as well as reliability, factor analysis and discriminant function analysis, utilizing the SPSS/PC+ program. The results obtained were as follows: The mean average of the total anxiety scores were 32.36 + 6.35 for the normal control subjects and 50.53 + 7.67 for anxiety disorder subjects. Test-retest reliability(coefficient r=0.98, p < 0.001), and internal consistency(coefficient r=0.96, p < 0.001) were satisfactory. Factor analysis using oblique technique rotation yielded four factors. The normal control subjects scored higher concerning the symptoms such as sweating, restlessness, apprehension, insomnia and dyspnea, and lower for faintness, mental disintegration, paresthesia, dizziness and tremor. On the other hand, for the anxiety disorders, apprehension, restlessness, sweating, dyspnea and insomnia scored higher, and lower for faintness, paresthesia, nightmare, dizziness and tremor.

• Journal of the Korean Geographical Society
• /
• v.36 no.2
• /
• pp.177-190
• /
• 2001

As standardized test and current perfomance assessment have some problems in the aspects of contextuality, authenticity and intelligence faimess, the aim of this study is to propose an 'intelligence-fair and authentic assessment(IFAA)as an appropriate altemative and to make sure of the probability of its application. In geographical education, an idealistic assessment can be realized when the tasks bear authenticity, multiple intelligence of students are accepted and the objective are confirming with general purpose. IFAA model consists of 5 elements. They are the selecting for strategic ideas, the developing a real-life task, the constructive instructing with teacher, the offering opportunity of multiple representation and the allotting of marks for each items, IFAA model proposed in this study is worth considering in educational validity and realistic adaptability.

• Proceedings of the CALSEC Conference
• /
• 2003.09a
• /
• pp.351-356
• /
• 2003

■ 수준평가시스템[EIII] 기업의 정보화 추진 활동과 자원, 정보시스템 구성요소 등에 대한 실태를 측정하고 표현할 수 있는 방법을 통하여 정보화 수준을 파악하고, 이를 계량적으로 표현함으로써 기업의 정보화 역량을 분석하고 판단 ■ 특징 ㆍ포괄적인 평가 항목 및 평가 척도 적용 ㆍ영역, 용도, 업종별 다양한 관점에서 기업정보화 수준 분석 ㆍ정보 환경 변화를 수용할 수 있는 평가 체계 ■ 평가범위 ㆍ정보시스템 환경적 측면 ： 정보시스템 구성 요소 및 기반 구조 ㆍ정보시스템 관리적 측면 ： 정보시스템을 계획, 통제, 관리 ㆍ 정보시스템 과정 측면 ： 정보시스템의 활용 및 유지(중략)

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.29 no.2
• /
• pp.211-238
• /
• 2013

The Port Logistics Information System (Port-MIS) is the system that processes all of port management such as entry and departure of ships, using facilities within ports, port traffic control, cargo entering and carrying and tax collection in 31 trade ports over the whole country. Lately, The Port Logistics Information System (Port-MIS) has been reformed as a WEB-based system and established basis to provide real time information support structure, diversification of civil complaint system, and optimized civil complaint service by using wire and wireless internet. The typical study on the Port Logistics Information System was C/S program and EDI-centered. But it has significance to study on service quality measurement of WEB Port-MIS that has been served as a new web-based platform since April 2010, for there was no such a study until now.

• Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.292-305
• /
• 1995

This study was carried out to develop a Korean language version of Zung's self-rating depression scale (SDS). The subjects consisted of 173 males and 161 females drawn from various groups of the general population by a cluster of sampling methods. In order to analyze the data on depression scores, Pearson's product moment correlation coefficient method was carried out, as well as reliability and factor analysis, by the SPSS/PC+ program. The results obtained were as follows: The mean average of the total depression scores were $40.60{\pm}8.66$ for the subjects. Thirty-seven subjects (11.1%) showed high depression scores of 50 or over. Test-retest reliability(coefficient r=0.82, p <0.001), internal consistency(coefficient r=0.84, p <0.001) were satisfactory. Factor analysis using oblique technique rotation yielded five factors. The items of confusion, indecisiveness, decreased libido, diurnal variation, and psychomotor retardation were scored higher by the subjects. The items of suicidal rumination, psychomotor agitation, constipation, irritability, and weight loss were scored lower.

• Proceedings of the Korea Water Resources Association Conference
• /
• 2005.05b
• /
• pp.1296-1301
• /
• 2005

하천자연도 평가는 하천이용과 보전, 복원계획에 대한 적합성의 근거를 파악하고 이에 가치를 부여하기 위해 주로 평가가 이루어진다. 최근 많은 하천들이 자연형 공법을 적용하여 정비되고 있지만 하천 정비에 따른 실효성 검토가 제대로 이루어지지 않고 있다. 자연형 하천으로 정비된 하천의 실효성을 검토하는 하나의 방법으로 지속적인 모니터링을 통해 하천생태계의 구조와 기능을 파악하고 수집된 자료를 분석하여 공사전과 공사후 하천자연도를 평가할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 GIS를 이용하여 공사전과 공사후의 하천자연도 평가를 수행하였다. 평가항목은 종단면, 횡단면, 하상구조, 하천주변, 하천수질, 식생, 어류, 조류 등 8개 부문 29개 항목을 반영하였고 공사전과 후의 자연도 평가를 비교하기 위해 공사전 모니터링을 통해 얻은 자료를 바탕으로 부문별 평가항목 7개 부문에 17항목을 평가하였다. 평가의 척도는 정량적 지수로서 $1\~5$의 점수로 하였고 하천자연도의 표현은 5등급 체계로 구분하고 가중치는 부문별로 동일하게 하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 공사전 평가지수 3.3으로 하천자연도 III등급이었으나 공사후에는 평가지수 2.7로 II등급을 나타내었다.

• The Journal of Sustainable Design and Educational Environment Research
• /
• v.22 no.2
• /
• pp.1-16
• /
• 2023

This paper reports on three Delphi surveys based on draft evaluation items with the aim of deriving evaluation items prior to developing a BF certification index for school facilities in order to make the index safe and convenient. To this end, problems were formulated using content analysis and follow-up evaluation of existing BF certification indicators. Draft BF certification evaluation items for school facilities were proposed. The adequacy of each evaluation item was verified using a Delphi survey. Experts and working-level groups, such as university professors, architects, public officials, certification agencies, and organizations for disabled persons, provided feedback for all evaluation items for school facility BF, which was incorporated in the final evaluation items. As a result of the Delphi surveys, in addition to the existing 8 evaluation items, a total of 75 evaluation items were proposed as maintenance items, 12 as improvement review items, and 15 as new evaluation items.

• KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research
• /
• v.39 no.6
• /
• pp.913-921
• /
• 2019

The government introduced the comprehensive evaluation bidding system with the goal of pursuing the best value and the global standard in 2016. However, for the evaluation criteria on the construction evaluation reflected to the comprehensive evaluation bidding system, the problems of the objectivity insufficiency, the inclusion of multiple subjective evaluation items, and the irrationality of the weight for each evaluation item are continue to be presented. The central office group, the local government, the relevant industry, and the expert group share recognition, but the solution is not derived. Hence, the major evaluation items to be improved were derived with the characteristics analyzed to secure the objectivity of the construction evaluation. For the analysis method, the standard deviation and the Fleiss Kappa analysis method were used by utilizing the characteristics that the construction evaluation criteria consist of all 4-point measures (good, average, insufficient, and poor). According to the result, the 10 evaluation items of the total 25 construction evaluation items were derived as the evaluation items to be improved. It was found in the analysis on the major characteristics of the derived evaluation items that the qualitative evaluation criteria such as 'Very Suitable' and 'Suitable' were commonly included in the detailed evaluation guidelines. Hence, as far as the future construction evaluation standards are concerned, the qualitative evaluation standards are sublated, and the improvement should be made mainly for the quantitative evaluation criteria enabling the objectivity assurance.