• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2009.06a
• /
• pp.133-134
• /
• 2009

선박의 대형화와 함께 해운 항만 시장이 급속히 변화하는 가운데 각 항만들은 항만 경쟁력을 가지기 위해 물동량 예측과 더불어 하역료를 바탕으로 한 부두사용료 수준에 대해 검토를 시행하고 있는 실정이다. 또한 부산북항 재개발과 관련하여 일반부두 폐쇄 및 터미널의 이전이 계획되어지는 가운데, 터미널 임대료 및 물동량 배분에 관한 연구가 활발하게 이루어지고 있다. 따라서 본 논문은 컨테이너 터미널의 주변여건 변화에 따른 컨테이너화물 물동량을 추정 및 예측하고, 기존 사용료 및 부산북항의 특정 터미널을 대상으로 향후 2020년까지의 사용료를 검토하고자 한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2014.06a
• /
• pp.329-331
• /
• 2014

최근 국내외 여러 사건들로 인하여 VTS의 중요성이 대두되고 있는 바, 보다 더 안전한 해상 환경을 조성하기 위해서는 VTS 여러 부분의 개선과 발전이 필요하다. 여기서는 VTS의 발전을 위해서 필수적으로 요구되는 비용에 관한 부분을 해결하고자, VTS 사용료 제도에 관한 다른 비슷한 성격의 항만 요금과 외국의 VTS Fee 사례에 대하여 검토하고 비교해보고자 하였다. VTS 사용료로 인하여 여러 가지 기술적 개발을 이루어 원활하고 효율적인 VTS 관제가 이루어질 수 있도록 모색하고자 한다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.29 no.3
• /
• pp.191-198
• /
• 2024

Korea is an import and export-oriented economy that relies on shipping transportation, and sea ports play an important role in national economic growth. To secure and maintain the competitiveness of these ports, hardware and software investments are required, but policy support can also be expected to have an effect. This study identified the irrationality of the system by exploratory analysis of the port facility fee discount system for Ulsan Port, an energy hub port, and suggested improvement measures to resolve it.This study analyzed the volume of Ulsan Port and the reduction of port facility usage fees for about 10 years and identified irrational factors that despite a special port for liquid cargo, a considerable reduction for container cargo is concentrated, and even because it was a passing ship, 100% reduction for entrance and clearance fees were provided to them, which could cause serious moral hazard.. As a way to improve the port facility charge discount system at Ulsan Port, this study proposed strengthening support for eco-friendly activities to support containers, adjusting the reduction rate for passing ships, or improving the reduction and exemption application process.

• Journal of Navigation and Port Research
• /
• v.28 no.8
• /
• pp.709-714
• /
• 2004

This paper first tries to analyze total sea transport costs for the transshipment in Busan Port in comparison with direct transport to 4 Chinese Ports, Dalian, Tinajin, Qingdao and Shanghai, based on vessel operation scenarios. The results found that the transshipment in Busan port for the 4 Chinese ports are more expensive than the direct calling to the 4 ports, which implies that Busan port needs to make compensation as an incentive to the carriers providing transshipment service to it in order to keep their royalty. For the compensation, it suggested a method of calculating the Container Terminal Facilities Leasing Fee to levy additional revenue by port authority.

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.32 no.3
• /
• pp.21-33
• /
• 2016

This paper examines the effect of strategic trade policy on port ownership structures (nationalization or privatization) when two firms compete with each other in reciprocal markets. Furthermore, we analyze firms profits, port charges, ports profits and social welfare when ports are privatized or nationalized under tariff regime and under free trade regime respectively. Thus, we find that (i) under tariff regime, port nationalization is a dominant strategy regardless of transport costs. (ii) the effect of high port charges brings higher port profits than the effect of high trade volume. (iii) irrespective of trade regime, when transport cost is relatively low, port nationalization increases social welfare, while two government prefer free trade agreement to tariff regime when transport cost is sufficiently high regardless of port ownership structures.

• 해운
• /
• no.2 s.2
• /
• pp.2-12
• /
• 2004

• 해운
• /
• no.1 s.12
• /
• pp.47-47
• /
• 2005

• Journal of Korea Port Economic Association
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.23-35
• /
• 2008

The purpose of this paper is to suggest a rational cost allocation method that is efficient and fair. Cost allocation by taking cooperative game theory shows fair allocation considering marginal cost by ship type. Current berth occupancy charging method can not recover quay construction costs. Because it levies charges according to berthing time and tonnage of ships without considering the recovery of quay construction costs. And there are also cross subsidies among ships. This paper suggests the cost allocation method of cooperative game theory as a fair and efficient method.

• 복합운송
• /
• s.135
• /
• pp.20-22
• /
• 2002

무역항의 항만시설 사용 및 사용료 - 일본의 국제복합운송화물 취급실적

• 해운
• /
• no.4 s.3
• /
• pp.2-9
• /
• 2004