• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2005.08a
• /
• pp.205-212
• /
• 2005

본 연구의 목적은 전문도서관인 공무원교육원 도서관의 공동수서정책을 위해 이용자의 요구를 인용문헌분석을 통해 파악하고자 하였다. 이을 위해 3개 공무원교육원의 주이용자인 장기교육생의 인용문헌을 자료의 유형분석, 자료의 최신성 분석, 인용문헌수 분석, 외국문헌 이용현황과 핵심자료를 파악하고자 하여 공무원교육원 도서관의 공동수서정책에 반영하고자 하였다. 그 결과 형태별로는 연구보고서의 인용율이 가장 높았으며, 평균인용건수를 분석한 결과, 교육수료보고서의 1인당 평균인용건수는 29.42권으로 조사되었다. 발행시기별로 분석한 결과, 출판 후2${\sim}$5년 내의 자료를 40.6%로 가장 많이 인용하는 것으로 조사되었으며, 언어별 분석 결과, 국내서로 기술된 문헌의 인용율은 90.1%로 조사되었다. 핵심자료를 파악한 결과 단행본의 최대 피인용문헌빈도(3회 이상)는 155권 이었으며, 학술지는 112종, 통계자료는 34권이었다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.237-258
• /
• 2013

As topics of researchers become diverse horizontally or vertically, academic libraries have difficulties to identify the dynamic change of researchers' needs for academic publications. This research aims to illustrate the topic areas of researchers in a department of university by analyzing bibliographies of their publications. First, researchers' publications were used to discover the topic areas where the researchers had published. Second, the cited publications in those papers were analysed to identify the expanded topic areas of these researchers. Finally, highly cited journals were analyzed by network analysis method. The major finding is that the importance of topic areas by the number of journals was not necessarily proportional to that by the number of papers. Researchers have a tendency to use many papers in a small number of journals in a certain topic area. Furthermore, the importance of topic areas discovered by researchers' publications was not the same as that discovered by researchers' citations.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2018.07a
• /
• pp.376-378
• /
• 2018

한국의 과학기술정보 유통 및 분석 전문기관인 한국과학기술정보연구원(KISTI)은 동북아시아 국가들간의 정보 협력과 국제 협력을 위하여 오랜기간 일본과 중국의 정보 유통 전문기관들인 JST와 ISTIC과 함께 CJK(Chinese, Japanese, Korean) 국제회의와 연구협력을 지속해오고 있다. 본 논문에서는 이들 국가간 인용정보를 매개로 하는 새로운 학술정보의 개발을 위한 기초 연구를 수행하여, KSCD 참고문헌에 출현하는 일본 및 중국의 고인용 학술지와 양국간 주제분야별 인용특성을 살펴보고 응용 서비스 사례를 제시하였다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.24 no.3
• /
• pp.179-200
• /
• 2007

This study identifies the interdisciplinary structures of 8 scientific disciplines in science and technology using the data from journal citations and web links, and compares the interdisciplinarity among these scientific disciplines. The interdisciplinarity refers to interdisciplinary connections among scientific fields and the degree of interdisciplinarity is measured by the number of associated fields and the rate of self-citation. A re-arranged classification scheme for science and technology was adopted to identify subject categories of journals and web pages. Web link analysis revealed a few additional interdisciplinary connections that were not identified by the journal citation analysis, thus demonstrating that it is useful means of investigating the interdisciplinarity of scientific fields. Besides, in most of the cases the interdisciplinarity of the engineering fields were found greater than that of the fields in natural sciences in both analyses.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.25 no.2
• /
• pp.317-325
• /
• 2014

Evaluating contents and quality of the journal along with the research ability of researcher is becoming an important issue recently. This research compared level of impact of the journals related to statistics in nation, 'Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society'-centric, using various KCI citation index. Moreover, this research surveyed network between the journals in the aspect of social network analysis, using co-citation frequency. From that, the following conclusions were drawn. First, percentage of self-citation was relatively high. Second, even though Statistics journal had higher impact index than the mathematics, physics and chemistry, frequency of citing statistics journal in other journals was not that high. Third, 'Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society' serves central role in network analysis, however it seems that more efforts are required.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 2015.08a
• /
• pp.77-82
• /
• 2015

본 연구는 의학 분야를 중심으로 A 대학교 의과대학 도서관의 Science Direct 전자학술지 이용통계와 Scopus 인용지수를 비교분석하였다. 이에 594종의 의학 분야 전자학술지를 추출하여, 그 이용통계와 Scopus 인용지수에 대해 빈도분석, 상관관계분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과 의학 분야 전자학술지의 이용이 소수의 학술지에 집중되어 있고, 그 이용통계와 인용지수 사이에 양의 상관관계가 성립함을 확인할 수 있었다.

• Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science
• /
• v.21 no.1
• /
• pp.211-221
• /
• 2010

The purpose of this study is to verify if there is any difference on researchers' language preference for citing documents in different subject fields. 8 scientific journals were selected one of each from 8 main categories, given by National Research Foundation of Korea. Five variables including the rate of citing domestic and foreign documents for each journals were choose, and the differences on language preference among researchers of different subject fields were checked by implementing ANOVA. As a result, there are some differences on language preference, in terms of the average number and percentage of foreign documents, among researchers, based on their subject background. It also found that 8 subject categories divided into 4 small clusters.

• Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society
• /
• v.26 no.4
• /
• pp.827-839
• /
• 2015

Extraction of communities from a journal citation database by the citation structure is a useful tool to see closely related groups of the journals. SCI of Thomson Reuters or SCOPUS of Elsevier have had tried to grasp community structure of the journals in their indices according to citation relationships, but such a trial has not been made yet with the Korean Citation Index, KCI. Therefore, in this study, we extracted communities of the journals of the natural science area in KCI, using various clustering algorithms for a social network based on citations among the journals and compared the groups obtained with the classfication of KCI. The infomap algorithm, one of the clustering methods applied in this article, showed the best grouping result in the sense that groups obtained by it are closer to the KCI classification than by other algorithms considered and reflect well the citation structure of the journals. The classification results obtained in this study might be taken consideration when reclassification of the KCI journals will be made in the future.

• Radiation Oncology Journal
• /
• v.24 no.4
• /
• pp.309-316
• /
• 2006

$\underline{Purpose}$: To analyze the recent citation trend and to find a way to improve impact factor (IF) of the Journal of Korean Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JKSTRO) by analysis of Korean Medical Citation Index (KoMCI) citation data of JKSTRO and comparison with that of mean citation data of all journals enlisted on KoMCI (KoMCI journals) during 2000-2005. $\underline{Materials\;and\;Methods}$: All citation data of entire journals enlisted on KoMCI and JKSTRO from 2000 to 2005 were obtained from KoMCI. The trend of total and annual number of published articles and reference citations, total citations and self-citations per paper, IF and impact factor excluding self-citations (ZIF) were described and compared on both KoMCI journals and JKSTRO. $\underline{Results}$: Annual number of published articles was decreased for 6 years on both KoMCI journals and JKSTRO (32% and 38% reduction rate). The number of Korean journal references per article is 1.6 papers on JKSTRO comparing to 2.0 papers on KoMCI journals. The percentage of Korean references/total references increased from 5.0% in 2000 to 7.7% in 2005 on JKSTRO and from 8.5% in 2000 to 10.1% on KoMCI journals. The number of total citations received/paper on JKSTRO (average 1.333) is smaller than that of KoMCI journals (average 1.694), there was an increased rate of 67% in 2005 comparing to 2000. The percentage of self-citations/total citations (average 72%) on JKSTRO is slightly higher than that of KoMCI journals (average 61%). IF of JKSTRO was gradually improved and 0.144, 0.125, 0.088, 0.107, 0.187, and 0.203 in 2000-2005 respectively. However, ZIF of JKSTRO is steadily decreased from 0.038 in 2000 to 0.013 in 2005 except 0.044 in 2004. $\underline{Conclusion}$: IF of JKSTRO was slightly improved but had some innate problem of smaller number of citations received. To make JKSTRO as a highly cited journal, the awareness of academic status of JKSTRO and active participation of every member of JKSTRO including encouraging self-citations of papers published recent 2 years and submission of English written papers, and active academic cooperation with related academic societies.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 1999.08a
• /
• pp.47-51
• /
• 1999

본 연구에서는 국내 의학분야중에서도 기생충학분야의 연구자중 논문 생산성이 높은 저자 30명을 선정하여, 그들이 국내외 학술지에 발표한 학술논문 총 1,810편이 SCI에 어느 정도 인용되는가를 측정하였다. 총 1,810편의 논문중 359편의 논문이 1회 이상 SCI 학술지 논문들에 의하여 인용되었다. 한국 기생충학 논문의 93.1%가 한국학술지에 발표되었는데 그 인용률은 18.7%이고, 외국학술지에 발로된 논문은 전채 논문의 6.9%인데 그 중의 48.7%가 인용되었다. 즉, 외국학술지에 발표된 논문의 인용률이 한국학술지에 발표된 논문의 인용률보다 2.5배정도 더 많이 인용된 것으로 나타났다.