• Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture
• /
• v.47 no.2
• /
• pp.1-12
• /
• 2019

The purpose of this study is to compare and analyze how many species of trees presented with scientific names are on the written test for engineer landscape architecture, as their usage has increased in the landscape industry in recent years. The following is the result of comparing and analyzing the species of trees which are frequently used in landscape, planting construction, and the scientific name questions presented in the previous 6 years by year on the written test for engineer landscape architecture. First, the results of analyzing the examination question frequency by year in the landscape planting subject showed a gradually declining trend from 2014 after peaking at 56.6% in 2013. Second, 163 species of trees using scientific names were presented in questions on the written test for engineer landscape architecture over the previous 6 years and these included Betula platyphylla, Sophora japonica, Cercis chinensis, Taxus cuspidata. The number of species of trees used in landscape construction during the same period was 169 including Pinus densiflora, Chionanthus retusus, Cornus officinalis, Syringa dilatata. The result of interviews with landscape planting construction officials showed that when choosing the species of trees, they emphasize ecological characteristics, such as the ratio of trees to shrubs, flowers and autumn leaf characteristics, and also consider the morphological characteristics, landscape characteristics, economic feasibility, and the supply and demand situation. Third, it was found that 70 (42.9%) out of 163 species of trees presented with scientific names on the examination were not used in landscape planting construction and 76 (44.9%) out of 169 species were not used as material for questions. As for the scientific name questions, deciduous trees and evergreen shrubs accounted for the more questions, Evergreen and deciduous tree and shrubs were most common in landscape planting construction as well.

• The Korean Journal of Zoology
• /
• v.30 no.1
• /
• pp.71-78
• /
• 1987

한국산 기름종개의 학명사용에 정확을 기하기 위하여 우리나라 낙동강의 15개수역에서 채집된 1,472마리의 기름종개 표본과 유럽산 기름종개 표본을 비교검토하였다. 종전에 국내에서 C.taenia로 간주하였던 낙동강산 표본은 체측과 배면 반문의 수와 모양, 입수염의 길이, 및 안하극말단의 위치등의 유럽산 C.taenia와는 달리 중국산 C. sinensis와 더 유사하였다. 따라서 우리나라 낙동강산 기름종개 표본은 Cobitis sinensis et Dabry, 1874의 학명을 사용하는 것이 타당하다고 판단된다.

• Korean journal of applied entomology
• /
• v.14 no.4 s.25
• /
• pp.227-231
• /
• 1975

The writer adopted the new correct scientific names of 46 Microlepidoptera previously incorrectly recorded in 'A List of Plant Diseases, Insect Pests and Weeds in Korea,' published by the Korean Society of Plant Protection in 1972 and 'Nomina Animaium Koreanorum Insects,' by the Zoological Society of Korea in 1968.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Soil Zoology Conference
• /
• 2005.09a
• /
• pp.7-12
• /
• 2005

동물학의 발전에 따라 동물의 학명을 쓰는데 혼란을 방지하고자 국제동물명명규약(이하 규약)의 제정을 시도한 것은 19세기가 끝날 무렵이었으며, 1905년에 유럽의 동물학자들은 국제동물명명규약인 를 출판했다. 이 규약은 미비한 점을 크게 개정하여 1961년에 를 출간했다. 이 규약을 약간 수정하여 제2판을 1964년에, 1985년에는 제2판을 대폭으로 개정하여 제3판을, 현재는 1999년 여름에 국제동물명명심의회(International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature)에서 출간한 제4판, 에 따라 동물의 학명을 다룬다.

• Animal Systematics, Evolution and Diversity
• /
• v.14 no.2
• /
• pp.117-120
• /
• 1998

Caligus latus Kim, 1995, the junior homonym of C. latus Byrnes, 1987, is replaced by the name C. parvilatus n. nov. Description of male of this species is provided for the first time.

• Environmental engineer
• /
• v.19 s.201
• /
• pp.24-35
• /
• 2003

• The Korea Beekeeping Bulletin
• /
• s.348
• /
• pp.50-51
• /
• 2009

• The Korea Beekeeping Bulletin
• /
• s.338
• /
• pp.58-59
• /
• 2008

• The Korea Beekeeping Bulletin
• /
• s.331
• /
• pp.31-32
• /
• 2008

• The Korea Beekeeping Bulletin
• /
• s.347
• /
• pp.47-47
• /
• 2009