• Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education
• /
• v.15 no.2
• /
• pp.158-170
• /
• 2022

The purpose of this study is to understand the characteristics of Aristotle's view of nature that is, the static view of the universe, and find implications for education. Plato sought to interpret the natural world using a rational approach rather than an incomplete observation, in terms of from the perspective of geometry and mathematical regularity, as the best way to understand the world. On the other hand, Aristotle believed that we could understand the world by observing what we see. This world is a static worldview full of the purpose of the individual with a sense of purposive legitimacy. In addition, the natural motion of earthly objects and celestial bodies, which are natural movements towards the world of order, are the original actions. Aristotle thought that, given the opportunity, all natural things would carry out some movement, that is, their natural movement. Above all, the world that Plato and Aristotle built is a static universe. It is possible to fully grasp the world by approaching the objective nature that exists independently of human being with human reason and observation. After all, for Aristotle, like Plato, their belief that the natural world was subject to regular and orderly laws of nature, despite the complexity of what seemed to be an embarrassingly continual change, became the basis of Western thought. Since the universe, the metaphysical perspective of ancient Greece and modern philosophy, relies on the development of a dichotomy of understanding (cutting branches) into what has already been completed or planned, ideal and inevitable, so it is the basis of traditional teaching-learning that does not value learner's opinions.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.7 no.1
• /
• pp.101-117
• /
• 2004

베나세라프는, 프레게의 플라톤주의를 비판하기 위하여 서로 다른 집합 순서열들이 수 순서열로 간주될 수 있다는 수 미결정성 논제를 주장한다. 이에 대하여 신프레게주의자인 헤일은 수 미결정성 논제를 정면으로 부정하는 논증을 제시하였다. 본 논문에서 필자는 헤일의 논증에서 핵심적인 역할을 하는 형이상학적 원리가 수용되기 어려운 것임을 보이고자 한다.

• Journal of the Daesoon Academy of Sciences
• /
• v.45
• /
• pp.1-35
• /
• 2023

This study aims at determining the meaning of Life in The Canonical Scripture of the Daesoon Thought upon the ontological bases of occidental philosophies; especially upon those of Plato and Bergson. In western philosophy, the word ontology designates investigating the meanings of being, which is derived from the Greek 'onto (being)' and 'logia (logical discourse).' The various meanings of life have been sought from ancient times all over the world, for these are the critical and vital questions that pertain to the nature of human existence. Plato had asserted that life, in his word, soul, had three different kinds of aspects of meaning. Immortal, reciprocal, and divine. Plato scheme was such that the soul could die, but after death it could became reborn into another various forms of living creatures. The real inner life of humans, the soul, would live eternally. Henri-Louis Bergson, a famous French philosopher from the 20^th century, claimed that life had three different kinds of aspects. Self-identity, Élan vital (vital impetus) and liberty. Bergson insisted especially the real meaning of life had been characterized by "unité multiple et multiplicitéune," "unity as something multiple and multiplicity something singular." The meaning of life in Daesoon Thought could be said to have three different characteristics, solidarity, earthly immortality and grievance-resolution. Some similarities can be found between certain western ontological meanings of life and those of Daesoon Thought. Namely, the qualities of eternity, reciprocity, and divinity.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society for Information Management Conference
• /
• 1994.12a
• /
• pp.133-136
• /
• 1994

문헌분류는 지식분류에 입각하여야 한다는 분류의 제 1원리를 규명하기 위하여 지식의 발전과정을 인식론적 관점에서 규명하였으며. 이를 바탕으로 지식분류가 문헌분류에 어떤 영향력을 미쳤는가를 규명하였다. 주제개념은 주관적 관념론, 객관적 관념론, 실용주의, 유물론으로 구분하여 분석하였다. 분석된 결과에 따라 지식분류가 어떤 인식의 관점에서 전개되어 왔는지를 인도의 베다분류법을 비롯하여 플라톤과 아리스토텔레스의 지식분류에서부터 현재의 머시럼, 브리테니카 3의 분류법에 이르기까지 분석하였다. 또한 이를 토대로 지식분류와 문헌분류의 상보성을 규명하였다.

• 발명특허
• /
• v.5 no.11 s.57
• /
• pp.18-20
• /
• 1980

코페르니쿠스의 보수적요소를 거부하고 근본적으로 태양중심체계를 바꾸어 놓은 것은 케플러 (Gohannes Kepler, 1571-1630)였다. 그는 튀빙엔에서 신학을 공부했으나 천문학으로 관심을 돌렸다. 그에게 천문학을 가르친 매스틀린(Mastlin)은 지구중심우주체계를 강의했지만 사석에서는 코페르니쿠스가 맞는다고 했다. 그래서 케플러는 이미 학생시절에 열렬한 코페르니쿠스주의자가 되어 있었다. 케플러는 루터파 신교도로서 우주에서 삼위일체를 보았다. 즉 태양은 성교, 별들은 성자, 중간의 공간은 성신이었다. 그는 우주가 살아 있으며 행성들과 지구는 영혼을 가지고 있다고 믿었다. 이것은 아마도 당시에 크게 유행한 루터파 신비주의의 영향인 듯하다. 케플러는 철저한 피타고라스${\cdot}$플라톤주의자였다. 그는 우주가 수학적 조화를 이루고 있고, 신은 위대한 기하학자이며, 인간은 신의 이미지를 따서 만들어졌다고 보았다. 따라서 인간은 수학을 통해 우주를 이해할 수 있다는 생각이었다.

• Archives of design research
• /
• v.18 no.2 s.60
• /
• pp.101-110
• /
• 2005

Simulacre is one of the major topics in the Western philosophy since Plato. Since the 20th century, the Western philosophy is based on rationalism toward 'absolute truth' founded on Platonic Ideas. The concept of Simulacre is ignored and rejected until the modern days. However, Simulacre is gaining its attention at this time of image. and the time of Simulacre. The concept of postmodern Simulacre started from Walter Benjamin is developed by Gnther Anders, Jacques Derrida, Gilles Deleuze, and Jean Baudrillard. This study, based on the Jean Baudrillard's concept of Simulacre, examines today's Simulacre phenomena and analyzes the cinematic works of Oshii Mamoru who displays the concept of Simulacre in his films. Analyzing and evaluating his recent visual works based on Simulacre theory with such superficial methods as advanced special visual effects is a mistake that demeans Simulation? (Matrix). Today, Simulacre phenomena are scattered all over our life. The search of its substance and the analysis of his artworks will be a foundation that makes a new alternative suggestion.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• v.142
• /
• pp.165-192
• /
• 2017

The purpose of this thesis is to explain the difference between Heidegger's hermeneutical philosophy and Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics. The difference is to say that Heidegger's philosophy begins with Aristotle's theory of category and transcendental philosophy. On the other hand, the beginning of Gadamer's philosophical research is Plato's dialog, philosophy and Hegels dialectic. 2. Heidegger regards humanism as a variant of the modern ideal of human beings. On the contrary, Gadamer understands humanism as a place where romantism leads to the ideals of human education. 3. Heidegger says that the hermeneutical circle is still a logical and existential structure of the circle. On the contrary, Gadamer understands the circle as a circle between the whole and the part. This circle is the law of traditional hermeneutics derived from the tradition of rhetoric. 4. Heidegger says Plato's philosophy is the first beginning of the substance metaphysic, Hegel's philosophy the end of the subject metaphysic. On the contrary, Gadamer says the hermeneutical understanding and the hermeneutical interpretation is endless. 5. Heidegger's ontology is as Sein zum Tode a future oriented and eschatological. On the contrary, Gadamer's hermeneutic is as Sein zum Text always the way to a past, the infinite openness.

• Journal of Korean Philosophical Society
• /
• no.89
• /
• pp.37-67
• /
• 2010

The 21 Century is definded as an age of culture or image characterized by the fact, that modern society are being overwhelmed with virtual reality, that is full of visual images. The cultural concentration on the visual image and the excessive tendency to attend it become not only today but also ever as the leading style of culture. Nevertheless, it is particularly noteworthy that the visual image has become so one of the basic conditions of modern society, that one holds it as the society of the spectacle. So can the problem of seeing that resulted from the oculocentric culture, that is the problem of the fundamental relationship between the world and the eyes of human beings, be examined in the phenomenological sense. For this study, I believe that 『Phenomenologie de la Perception』 of Merleau-Ponty provides a important approach. The theme of this study is to refer, first, how man has dealt with the seeing in the history of philosophy, such as Plato, Kant, and Merleau-Ponty, who although not the anti-oculocentricism, but also makes serious reflection about an excess of visual images. Second, it is to explain what characteristics and problems are located in these considerations, and thirdly, it must be brought into the light, what is the essence of the seeing with regard to the beauty, the truth and the morality.

• Korean Journal of Logic
• /
• v.12 no.2
• /
• pp.1-29
• /
• 2009

According to Field, mathematical objects do not exist but they might have existed. In this paper I examine how persuasive this 'contingent' nominalism could be. For this I give a detailed analysis of the recent debate on the contingency of mathematical objects. I argue that the putative connection between contingency and explanation could still be sustained, but an independent argument is needed in order to support a general principle underlying the connection. I show that the attacks based on the anti-insularity principles already reflect their own positions on the modal status of the existence of mathematical objects.

• Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference
• /
• 2014.11a
• /
• pp.147-148
• /
• 2014

The analysis of the various settings for modal Composition used for characterization of the characters in an epic movie. We set the mode along the role of the profession, gender of the characters in the movie. The mode is used, from Gregorian chant. Analysis reveals the Dorian, Phrygian, Lydian, Mixolydian, Aeolian, Locrian, Ionian character of the seven total Mode how the character is portrayed in the characters for each Mode specificity. The analysis of the reasons for the musical approach and the nature of the characters cited for Mode a portion of Plato's [Republic].