• 사료
• /
• s.62
• /
• pp.79-85
• /
• 2013

"2012년(2차) 한 미 옥수수 품질 평가 프로젝트"는 2012년 7월부터 2013년 1월까지 미국곡물협회(USGC), 북미곡물수출협회(NAEGA), 한국사료협회(KFA)와 미농무부 연방곡물검사소(USDA FGIS)간에 공동으로 수행되었다. 프로젝트의 성공적인 수행을 위해 국내외 10개 이상의 기관이 협력하였다. 본고에서는 보고서의 주요내용과 업무수행 과정을 요약 정리하였다.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.17 no.5
• /
• pp.130-137
• /
• 2016

Owner's participation on a construction project can alter the success of a construction project. In general, success of a construction project is measured by project schedule and cost decrease without considering the role an owner has in a project. As a result, this research developed a framework for the project evaluation form and after extracting a total of 9 project critical success factors (CSF) and 27 sub-CSF. AHP method was utilized to evaluate the importance factor of each CSFs. Setting a goal for each CSFs at the beginning of a project and comparing the values at the completion of the project utilizing the project evaluation form will allow a systematic evaluation and management of a project. Solution Map was introduced and Solution Tool was suggested in order to utlize the evaluation results effectively. In the future studies, various project cases needs to be supplemented for further verification and a solution based on the evaluation result needs to be developed that can be applied to construction projects.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.9 no.4
• /
• pp.120-130
• /
• 2008

In construction industry, project performance should be evaluated in terms of project value objectives, i.e., cost, time, quality, safety, and environment. However, there have been few, if any, systematic approaches in assessing comprehensive performance level which encompasses the whole spectrum of project value objectives. It is non trivial to establish the standardized performance metric system due to the project individualities. This study provides a new approach in assessing the wide variety of project performance types by collecting the real industry project data. In addition, the proposed system has been validated through industry survey on project practitioners. It is concluded that the developed quantitative project performance measurement system would be effectively useful in indicating the level of current status of a particular project and furthermore, to provide a meaningful strategy for the future project in a more sustainable way.

• Journal of the KSME
• /
• v.51 no.5
• /
• pp.35-39
• /
• 2011

이 글에서는 신재생에너지 평가기구 RETScreen을 활용한 다양한 신재생에너지 프로젝트의 온실가스 저감량 및 평가 방안에 관한 정보를 제공하고 국제적으로 통용되고 있는 평가방법에 근거한 국내 신재생에너지에 대한 평가 방안을 제시한다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Information and Commucation Sciences Conference
• /
• 2013.05a
• /
• pp.889-891
• /
• 2013

A Study of Quality Evaluation Model for Automotive Software R&D Project.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2017.11a
• /
• pp.466-469
• /
• 2017

SI 프로젝트가 대형화되고 장기화 되면서 투입 인력과 구축 비용의 단위가 점점 커짐에 따라서 프로젝트의 복잡성과 위험요소가 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라 프로젝트 수행에 대한 종합적인 점검과 평가로 프로젝트에 대한 신뢰성과 안전성을 증진시키고, 각종 위험 및 역기능을 최소화 할 수 있는 프로젝트 관리에 대한 전문성이 요구되고 있다. PMO(Project Management Office)는 프로젝트의 수행을 일관성 있게 관리하고, 성공적인 완료를 위하여 지원, 감독, 통제 등의 제반 활동을 수행하는 조직이다. PMO의 도입은 사업관리 효율을 향상시키는 방법 중 하나로 인식되고 있는데, 특히 과거 프로젝트의 성공이나 실패에 대한 지식을 효과적으로 전달한다거나, 프로젝트 팀에게 프로젝트 수행과 관련된 지원 서비스를 제공한다는 점에서 효율적인 방법으로 인식 되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 성공적인 SI 프로젝트가 되기 위해서 프로젝트 내에서 PMO의 역할에 대해서 분석 및 연구하였다.

• Proceedings of the Korea Information Processing Society Conference
• /
• 2009.11a
• /
• pp.843-844
• /
• 2009

유비퀴터스 멀티 프로젝트 환경에서 프로젝트 팀은 프로젝트 결과를 얻기 위해 필요한 업무를 도출하여 실행한다. 이를 위해 실질적인 팀 관리 및 요구 사항 정제가 이뤄져야 성공적인 제품 출시로 연결될 수 있다. 프로젝트 관리에서 중요한 부분은 프로젝트 진행 사항에 대한 가시적인 조회와 평가가 중요하다. 그러기 위해서는 협업과 공동 책임 업무에 대한 지원이 필요하다. 이 논문에서 애자일 개발 방법론에 기반한 프로젝트 관리 및 협업 지원 방법 및 시스템을 제안한다.

• Information Systems Review
• /
• v.8 no.1
• /
• pp.265-285
• /
• 2006

The purpose of this research is to identify the major evaluation criteria of IT investment projects and establish the importance weights of criteria through AHP analysis. Seven evaluation criteria which have been drawn from prior studies and industry practices are direct costs, indirect costs, financial benefits, strategic value, risk, technical necessity, and political considerations. Data have been collected from 95 IT projects in 40 public organizations and private firms in Korea. After having applied the data reliability test, 79 projects have been selected. The results of AHP analysis show the importance weights and priorities of seven evaluation criteria as follows: financial benefits 25.2%, strategic value 22.36%, direct costs 14.34%, risk 12.10%, technical necessity 11.55%, political considerations 8.3%, and indirect costs 6.48%. And the weights of seven criteria shows considerable differences among three different IT project types such as transactional, informational, and infrastructural.

• Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
• /
• v.6 no.5 s.27
• /
• pp.110-118
• /
• 2005

This paper examines the method of evaluation for feasibility study factors on housing development projects which can assist project managers to asses potential sources of risk. The aim is to reduce uncertainty on the project objectives. The major initial goals for a feasibility analysis are to define a limited set of key related factors which apply to housing development project according to development and market environment, condition of project planning and economics. Thus, in order to construct types of factors related with the feasibility, the research executes Delphi Method subjected personnel in the task to explore housing development projects. Such exploration provide the information for Importance Index, Extra Weight and the Mean of Extra Weight that is used for constituting confines of factors related with a feasibility analysis.

• The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
• /
• v.18 no.4
• /
• pp.327-338
• /
• 2013

Effective and efficient selection of IT projects is crucial for company's competitiveness. The selection of IT projects usually involves consideration of budget constraints but existing IT project selection models often neglect budget constraints. This paper presents an IT project selection model which considers budget constraints. AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) and Knapsack problem model have been combined to develop the proposed model, AHP-K model, where AHP is used to estimate weights of selection criteria and, then, a knapsack problem model is utilized to optimize selection of IT project while meeting the budget constraints. In this paper, a case study is provided to validate the effectiveness of the proposed AHP-K model. It has been shown that the proposed AHP-K model is better than the AHP model in terms of total utility of projects and investment efficiency.