• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.34 no.4
• /
• pp.273-292
• /
• 2017

This paper aims to develop an evaluation model for library mobile services in terms of service quality. First, a literature review of the service quality evaluation model and the mobile library service evaluation was conducted. Then, based on the analysis, the evaluation model consisting of 4 quality dimensions, 10 quality factors, 39 quality measurement items was developed. Delphi method was applied to verify the validity of the model. Finally, a final model consisting of 4 quality dimensions, 9 quality factors, and 37 quality measurement items was derived. The evaluation model proposed in this study can be used as a measure of library mobile service quality and can be used as a guideline for improvement of library mobile service.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2014.07a
• /
• pp.127-130
• /
• 2014

본 연구에서는 SNS 매체 평가를 위해 적용 가능한 품질의 측정요인들을 문헌고찰하고, 평가방법론으로 AHP 기법을 적용하여 SNS 매체를 평가할 수 있는 방안을 제시하고자 하였다. 선행연구에 의거하여 SNS 품질요인을 시스템품질, 정보품질, 인터페이스품질, 서비스품질 등으로 분류하였고, AHP 기법을 적용하여 품질요인별 중요도를 실증 분석하였다. 측정결과로서 서비스품질이 상대적으로 가장 주요한 요인으로 도출되었으며, 정보품질, 시스템품질, 인터페이스품질 등의 순으로 중요도가 높은 것으로 나타났다.

• Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference
• /
• 2019.01a
• /
• pp.177-178
• /
• 2019

본 연구에서는 SNS 품질요인에 대한 기존 연구에 대해 전문가 집단이 산출한 각 품질요인에 대한 중요도와 사용자 집단이 각 품질요인에 대해 중요하다고 생각하는 중요도의 차이를 알아보고자 하였다. 연구를 위하여 선행연구에서 사용된 SNS 품질요인을 시스템품질, 정보품질, 인터페이스품질, 서비스품질로 구분하여 AHP 기법을 적용하여 전문가 집단과 사용자 집단의 품질요인별 중요도를 실증 분석하였다. 분석결과 전문가 집단과 사용자 집단의 각 품질요인에 대한 중요도의 인식 차이가 나타나는 것으로 나타나 품질평가에 있어 전문가와 사용자의 의견을 종합하는 종합 평가가 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

• Journal of the Korea Society of Computer and Information
• /
• v.16 no.3
• /
• pp.237-249
• /
• 2011

Due to the economic development and the social structure and holiday structure change, we have more time for leisure and entertainment activities. For coping with this trend the waterpark has already become the one of major entertainment facilities for many countries. The purpose of this study is to construct Waterpark service quality evaluation factors and find out the importance and satisfaction degree of these factors. The result of this study are as follows; First, the safety field had considered as most important. Second, the importance of service quality evaluation fields and factors are different according to social characteristics. Third, the safety field is evaluated as the first satisfactory field and the cost/price field is evaluated as the lowest.

• Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems
• /
• v.21 no.4
• /
• pp.55-66
• /
• 2016

In this paper, 99 evaluation factors for website quality were derived from 79 research papers. Among them, 19 factors which are quoted in more than 7 research papers are summarized. The followings show such summarized factors: (1) Reliability (2) Ease of use (3) Design (4) Response time (5) Information Quality (6) Learnability (7) Accessibility (8) Effectiveness (9) Navigation (10) Sensibility (11) Accuracy (12) Contents (13) Aesthetic Impression (14) Completeness (15) Sympathy (16) Security (17) Delivery (18) Interaction (19) Responsibility.

• International Commerce and Information Review
• /
• v.13 no.4
• /
• pp.463-484
• /
• 2011

The survey was conducted by Chinese students who currently attend universities for the purpose of evaluating factors that determine the quality of educational services of universities in Korea. Three public universities and five private universities in Kyungsang province were surveyed for the purpose of this study with standardized questionnaires. The study raised questions on four different fronts: 1) Is there a difference in the importance of evaluation factors by Chinese student's on the quality of educational services between public universities and private ones? 2) Is there a difference in the degree of satisfaction felt by Chinese students who attend public universities or private ones? 3) Are there any significant differences in the importance of evaluation factors and satisfaction with the quality of educational services? 4) How different the relative influence of evaluation factors has on satisfaction with the quality of educational services for overall Korean university system? The results of this study showed that there was no statistical difference in signification in the importance of evaluation factors on the quality of educational services between public universities and private universities. Only the relationship factor in criteria four had an effect on satisfaction with quality of educational services between public and private universities. There were significant differences in the importance of evaluation factors and satisfaction with the quality of educational services. Chinese students determined that professor's lectureship as the most important factor, and is the ultimate deciding factor whether they attend a public or private university. It should be noted that studying and knowledge are primary concerns to them. Improvements in the quality of educational services in area of lectureship, physical education facilities, relationship, and administrative services are essential and crucially important for Korean universities in order to attract foreign students and to enhance their competitiveness in the global setting.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.50 no.2
• /
• pp.271-287
• /
• 2016

This study intends to review the quality factors of library service for the disabled using user-centered approach. For the empirical review of quality factors, Nine quality factors were drawn after analyzing the current library service quality factors and the standards of library service for the disabled. Using these factors, The survey for identifying importance of factors and the qualitative evaluation of service cases were performed in this study. As a result of this survey, the most critical but relatively weak quality factors were facility, collection and staff factors. And the qualitative evaluation results of service cases indicated that the reading culture program and the information service factors were critical.

• Proceedings of the Korean Institute of Navigation and Port Research Conference
• /
• 2012.06a
• /
• pp.57-58
• /
• 2012

위성항법중앙사무소는 다수의 DGNSS 기준국을 운영하고 있으며, 이 중 일부 기준국은 타 기준국에 비해 TEQC 품질평가 결과가 저조하다. 이에 이 연구는 TEQC 품질평가가 상대적으로 불량한 충주기준국을 대상으로 비교실험을 수행한다. 이전에 다른 관측장비를 이용하여 수행한 동시 관측에서는 TEQC 품질평가가 다른 기준국과 유사한 수준으로 나타나 지형이나 전파방해 등과 같은 주변 환경적인 요인은 아닌 것으로 확인하였다. 이번 충주비교실험은 기존 설치된 관측장비의 이상유무를 고려하여 크게 세 부분으로 나누어 진행한다. 안테나 이상판단은 기존 관측기기에 다른 기종의 안테나로 교체하여 확인하고, 수신기 이상 유무는 분배기를 이용하여 두 수신기에 동시 관측값을 기록하여 판단한다. 마지막으로 케이블의 경우, 상위 두 실험을 통해 수집된 관측자료의 품질평가를 통해 확인 가능하다. 이 연구를 통하여 TEQC 품질평가 저하요인을 확인하고 개선방안을 제시하여 양질의 DGNSS 정보를 제공할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

• Journal of the Korean Society for information Management
• /
• v.22 no.1 s.55
• /
• pp.267-285
• /
• 2005

As the Internet connections and services at U.S. public libraries have increased dramatically since 1990s, defining, assessing and measuring quality of these new electronic services have become a critical issue. This research was a study designed to identify key dimensions of Internet service quality at public libraries by providing a systematic framework for measuring and assessing the quality of Internet services. The study used modified SERVQUAL and SERVPERF instruments which have been widely used service quality measurement in business marketing areas and LibQUAL+ model which are widely adopted service quality measurement instrument in most of the academic libraries in U.S.

• Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science
• /
• v.41 no.4
• /
• pp.315-329
• /
• 2007

The objective of this study is to identify key dimensions of e-service quality and explore their relations to user satisfaction at Public libraries. This research used a modified e-service quality model and surveyed Internet service users for measuring and assessing Internet users' service satisfaction at 'A' public library in Seoul region. Using an exploratory factor analysis. the study identified three factors, named Service Affect, Information Access, and Tangibles as key dimensions for public library e-service quality. Also it was found that users' satisfaction was strongly positively correlated to their intention to refer others to the service.